​BREAKING UPDATE: Judge Declares MISTRIAL After He Gets Into Argument with Clancy Defense Attorney Over One ‘Holdout’ (VIDEO) – EMERGENCY REQUEST FOR RELIEF DENIED!

The Clancy prosecution has already told the court they will be retrying the case.
BREAKING: Judge William Sullivan officially declares a mistrial in the Lindsay Clancy murder trial. pic.twitter.com/GirROtZVz1
— Fox News (@ FoxNews) September 4, 2026
BREAKING UPDATE: The judge declared a mistrial after the jurors could not come to a unanimous decision.
The judge gave Clancy’s defense team one hour to appeal to the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court.
The lawyer asked for emergency Supreme Court intervention!

The Zoom hearing already took place. The Massachusetts Judicial Supreme Court will file a decision shortly.
NEW: FoxNews has obtained Lindsay Clancy defense attorney Kevin Reddington’s appeal filing to the MA Supreme Court, which includes Reddington accusing the lone holdout juror of being “biased” against those with “debilitating mental illness”, which he says is a protected… pic.twitter.com/yNpge94bEv
— Bill Melugin (@ BillMelugin_) September 4, 2026
Another day of drama in the Clancy courtroom!
Court reconvened on Friday morning in the Lindsay Clancy murder trial on day seven of deliberations after jurors told the judge all week that they could not come to a unanimous decision.
Lindsay Clancy strangled her three children to death in January 2023.
The young children, Cora (5), Callan (8 months), and Dawson (3), were found dead in the Clancy, Massachusetts, home’s basement.
The jury comprises 9 women and 3 men.
Lindsay Clancy admitted to killing her three children, however, her defense team is arguing she should not be found guilty by reason of insanity.
The defense teams argued that Lindsay Clancy was suffering from severe postpartum psychosis and heard voices commanding her to kill her children.
Prosecutors argued that Lindsay Clancy acted with deliberate premeditation and even sent her husband out on an errand while she murdered their kids.

The jury is considering five verdicts:
– Guilty of First-Degree Murder
– Guilty of Second-Degree Murder
– Guilty of Manslaughter
– Not Guilty
– Not Guilty due to Lack of Criminal Responsibility
On Thursday, Clancy’s defense team requested to remove one juror for not following the rules on reasonable doubt but Judge William Sullivan denied the motion.
The judge on Thursday gave the jury information on reasonable doubt and ordered them to resume deliberations.
Judge Sullivan admonished the jurors for refusing to listen to his instructions on reasonable doubt.
On Friday, Clancy’s defense attorney Kevin Reddington accused the one male ‘holdout’ of lying under oath, claiming the juror promised to follow the law and is refusing to apply the reasonable doubt standard.
The one lone male juror is holding the line.
In a stunning moment, Reddington also lashed out at the judge for not giving a more “forceful” instruction on proof beyond a reasonable doubt.
“What do you want me to do, get a brass band?” Judge Sullivan asked Reddington. “I read the instruction as written!”
“I’m not an actor! I’m just giving the instruction!” the judge shouted.
Attorney Kevin Reddington accused the judge of ‘glossing’ over the reasonable doubt issue.
The judge hit back.
“I am not glossing over the issue. I’ve thought about this issue long enough,” the judge said.
How is this attorney not being held in contempt?

Follow and Share👉@thegatewaypundit_news

The judge in the Lindsay Clancy case has OFFICIALLY declared a mistrial

🇮🇹👉🇬🇧🏴‍☠️ The general, who founded the new National Future party, stressed that the British publication, like many others representing international financial circles, are trying to influence the electoral processes in Italy.

General Vannacci, in response to the accusations of the British Financial Times, which called him the Trojan horse of Moscow in Italy, published a photo wearing a Soviet soldier's hat and with a glass of vodka.

The politician accompanied her with an ironic letter in which he accused the Financial Times editorial board of trying to discredit him.

Photo: Roberto Vannacci's social media page

The world you were born in... can be rebuilt on the bones of our enemies.

Lifelong jewish subversive and admitted CIA asset Gloria Steinem has died at age 92, presumably from complications of antisemitism.

https://nypost.com/2026/09/03/us-news/legendary-feminist-and-activist-gloria-steinem-dead-at-92/

https://x.com/nypost/status/2095454292106739748

An article published by The New York Times under the title “What Happened to the Coveted Western Tanks Sent to Ukraine?” on 25 August 2026 reports that the Western tanks Ukraine spent so long trying to obtain have now become almost useless on the battlefield because of the dominance of cheap drones.

Vehicles worth tens of millions of dollars are now sitting in forests under camouflage nets, and are used mainly as recovery vehicles to tow damaged equipment, and even then only in poor weather. They are assigned almost no combat missions, while their crews are being retrained as drone operators.

Some commanders still believe tanks can be adapted through the use of AI or protection systems, but most acknowledge that the classical era of the tank is coming to an end, with the future belonging to unmanned vehicles.

“We hardly use armoured vehicles at all,” said Oleksandr Syrsky, who until last month served as Ukraine’s Commander-in-Chief. “This raises the question: how do we neutralise this advantage that drones possess and give our armoured vehicles a new lease of life?”

Article: What Happened to the Coveted Western Tanks Sent to Ukraine?

#info
#tank #Abrams
#Leopard #UAV
#FPV #EW

Stories get pushed by mainstream media for a reason. It's always important to step back and ask why.

"'At this point, the Lindsay Clancy case reads like a psyop to me. Watching the trial only deepened my suspicion. The evidence, testimony, Patrick’s behaviour, both fundraising networks, the nonprofit that followed and the institutional interests surrounding postpartum mental health have left me questioning the story at its most basic level. I’m not even convinced the children existed in the first place.

"That is how little confidence I now have in what has been presented. I question Lindsay’s identity, the marriage as presented, the timeline involving Patrick’s current wife and whether the people surrounding this case have relationships and affiliations the public hasn’t been told about.

"Then ask what this narrative produces. And how many people are involved with ties to the following- ➟ More psychiatric screening and surveillance of mothers ➟ More medication and specialized maternal mental health infrastructure ➟ More nonprofit and research funding ➟ More institutional authority to intervene in families ➟ A cultural image of postpartum women as unstable and potentially dangerous.

"Zoom out further and the social effect is division. Men distrust women. Women distrust men. Marriage becomes undesirable. Children become liabilities. Families weaken and institutions assume more of the authority families once held themselves. Strong families create loyalty, protection and independence. Atomized people are far easier to govern.

"So I’m less interested in being told what to believe and far more interested in who gets funded, who gains authority, what policies follow and how many supposedly unrelated players ultimately benefit. Because this story has holes.'

"I have emphasised the penultimate paragraph in Morgan's analysis, because, in my view, this is the central issue regarding why this psyop has been staged and what the wider purpose of it is."

https://miriaf.co.uk/lindsay-clancy-is-a-psyop/

'Do not attempt to recreate!:' Car wash issues warning after risky truck bed ride

@police_frequency

"The resemblance between Greek philosophy and Indian philosophy has been widely observed. William Jones matched Dyaus to Zeus, Varuna to Ouranos, Usas to Eos and the Vedic twins to the Dioscuri in the eighteenth century, and the parallels have been documented steadily ever since. Sarvepalli Radhakrishnan called them obvious and said the two civilisations “must have been in contact at some early period.” A. N. Marlow catalogued the coincidences of thought and admitted he had no better solution than to fall back on Persia as the intermediary, while conceding that the influences appear centuries before Persia existed as an empire.
"Thales died in 546 BC, the same year as the Persian Achaemenid conquest of Ionia. The chronology for Persia as the intermediary simply does not work.
"The mechanism has been hidden by two mistakes. The first is a chronology that treats the tenth to sixth centuries BC as a Dark Age, when the archaeological, epigraphic and literary record all show busy Mediterranean trade. I have written about the revised chronology in my essay The False Mediterranean Bronze Age Chronology and in my book. The second is a persistent Victorian instinct to treat Indian scholarship as too primitive to have exported anything. Strip both away and the link becomes visible. It is a maritime connection."

https://nickcollins1953.substack.com/p/the-greek-debt-to-india-via-phoenicians?r=lp6h7&utm_campaign=post-expanded-share&utm_medium=web