๐•‹๐•™๐•– ๐”ธ๐•–๐•ฅ๐•™๐•–๐•ฃ๐•ค๐•ฅ๐•ฃ๐•–๐•’๐•ž
412 subscribers
16.9K photos
5.77K videos
84 files
23.1K links
The highest voltage takes on science, current events, and more!
Download Telegram
Forwarded from Eva Karene Bartlett (Yeva)
"Moscow repels massive drone attack

Right now, drones are being shot down in large numbers as they approach the capital. Reports indicate groups of 8, 10, or even 17 drones being intercepted. According to Sergei Sobyanin, more than 90 drones have already been shot down, and the attack is ongoing. There is damage in residential areas of the Moscow region, including a strike on an apartment building. It appears that Zelenskyy has begun implementing his terrorist plan against international civil aviation traffic in Russia.

Yesterday, Kyiv also took action on the administrative front. Ukrainian aviation authorities issued a NOTAM (Notice to Airmen) regarding Russian airspace. Rosaviatsiya (Russia's Federal Air Transport Agency) responded, stating that the documents from the Ukrainian side have no legal force, and that air traffic is operating according to schedule.

The sequence of events is clear. First, a warning to insurance companies, then an attempt to close the airspace through official procedures, followed by a wave of drones targeting airport zones. This is a terrorist operation against civil aviation, to put it bluntly.

What is actually happening with the airports.

Throughout the night, restrictions were implemented in a staggered manner, but most were short-lived. Gelendzhik and Sochi stopped operations at 01:24 and reopened at 05:05 โ€“ less than four hours. Vnukovo and Sheremetyevo introduced restrictions around 11:00 PM, then switched to a coordinated operation mode. Zhukovsky, Yaroslavl, Nizhny Novgorod, Penza, and Saratov followed a similar pattern: they were closed, held for a period, and then reopened.

As of this moment, Sheremetyevo and Domodedovo are accepting and sending flights under a coordinated operation mode โ€“ this is a special mode, not a complete shutdown. Zhukovsky has been under restrictions since 00:41. Yaroslavl โ€“ since 06:32. Nizhny Novgorod is operating under a coordinated operation mode. Penza and Saratov have been under restrictions since this morning. Sochi was briefly reopened, but was closed again at 09:54. Gelendzhik has resumed normal operations after the overnight interruption.

The airspace is not completely closed, although it is partially operating under a coordinated operation mode. But so far, nothing extraordinary has happened."
https://t.me/sashakots/64198
Forwarded from /r/Mapporn
This map of the Golan Heights encapsulates the core of the dispute and why neither side will ever give it up
https://redd.it/1vfg3wt
@r_mapporn
Forwarded from DoomPosting
Eight people sealed themselves in a glass dome to prove humanity could feed itself on plants, and spent two years starving in front of the world's press.

Biosphere 2 cost a hundred and fifty million dollars. Three acres of Arizona desert under sealed glass, eight crew, door shut on 26 September 1991, nothing in or out for two years. The farm inside was worked intensively and by any agronomic measure it was superb, out-producing the most efficient smallholder farming on earth by a wide margin.

It produced 83 per cent of what they needed.

Which left Roy Walford, the crew doctor, in a sealed box with seven hungry colleagues and his own life's work. Walford was a UCLA pathologist who had spent thirty years arguing that severe calorie restriction extends lifespan. He had doubled it in mice. And here was reality handing him his own hypothesis with the door welded shut.

So he called it a health programme.

The menu became vegetables, half a glass of goat's milk a day, and meat or fish about once a week. The men lost close to a fifth of their body weight, the women about a tenth. And the markers Walford cared about behaved impeccably: blood pressure, glucose, cholesterol and triglycerides all down at least twenty per cent, into ranges any doctor would frame. He published it in PNAS in 1992.

The bloodwork was magnificent. The people were falling apart.

Jane Poynter wrote the book afterwards. Fatigue, depression, mental fog, and a preoccupation with food that ate the entire interior life of the crew. They stole from each other. They split into two factions that stopped speaking. The ecological research the building had been constructed for was largely abandoned by people who no longer had the headroom for anything past the next meal. The ants and cockroaches, by contrast, were thriving.

The air was leaving too. Oxygen started at 20.9 per cent and kept dropping and nobody knew where it was going. Columbia eventually worked it out: the concrete was quietly eating it. So oxygen had to be pumped in from outside, which is an interesting result for a sealed world.

Walford's verdict on the mutiny is the whole thing in one sentence. He said afterwards that any other physician aboard would have panicked and declared they were starving, but that he knew they were on a programme of health enhancement.

He knew. Seven other people, visibly wasting, were simply mistaken.

He came out in 1993, developed ALS, blamed the conditions inside, and died in 2004 aged 79 after years on 1,600 calories a day in pursuit of a longer life. The mice got double. He did not make it to average for an American professor.

Every argument you have heard this decade was already in that building. Grow it locally. Take the animals out. Eat less. Watch the numbers improve.

Eight of the most motivated humans alive, handed three acres of the best-managed farmland on the planet and no meat, could not feed themselves.

The press reported the fighting as a personality clash.

๐Ÿ„ณ๐Ÿ„พ๐Ÿ„พ๐Ÿ„ผ๐Ÿ„ฟ๐Ÿค–๐Ÿ…‚๐Ÿ…ƒ๐Ÿ„ธ๐Ÿ„ฝ๐Ÿ„ถ
๐Ÿ‘6๐Ÿ”ฅ3๐Ÿค”3
Forwarded from The Gateway Pundit Media
โ€‹BREAKING UPDATE: Judge Declares MISTRIAL After He Gets Into Argument with Clancy Defense Attorney Over One โ€˜Holdoutโ€™ (VIDEO) โ€“ EMERGENCY REQUEST FOR RELIEF DENIED!

The Clancy prosecution has already told the court they will be retrying the case.
BREAKING: Judge William Sullivan officially declares a mistrial in the Lindsay Clancy murder trial. pic.twitter.com/GirROtZVz1
โ€” Fox News (@ FoxNews) September 4, 2026
BREAKING UPDATE: The judge declared a mistrial after the jurors could not come to a unanimous decision.
The judge gave Clancyโ€™s defense team one hour to appeal to the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court.
The lawyer asked for emergency Supreme Court intervention!

The Zoom hearing already took place. The Massachusetts Judicial Supreme Court will file a decision shortly.
NEW: FoxNews has obtained Lindsay Clancy defense attorney Kevin Reddingtonโ€™s appeal filing to the MA Supreme Court, which includes Reddington accusing the lone holdout juror of being โ€œbiasedโ€ against those with โ€œdebilitating mental illnessโ€, which he says is a protectedโ€ฆ pic.twitter.com/yNpge94bEv
โ€” Bill Melugin (@ BillMelugin_) September 4, 2026
Another day of drama in the Clancy courtroom!
Court reconvened on Friday morning in the Lindsay Clancy murder trial on day seven of deliberations after jurors told the judge all week that they could not come to a unanimous decision.
Lindsay Clancy strangled her three children to death in January 2023.
The young children, Cora (5), Callan (8 months), and Dawson (3), were found dead in the Clancy, Massachusetts, homeโ€™s basement.
The jury comprises 9 women and 3 men.
Lindsay Clancy admitted to killing her three children, however, her defense team is arguing she should not be found guilty by reason of insanity.
The defense teams argued that Lindsay Clancy was suffering from severe postpartum psychosis and heard voices commanding her to kill her children.
Prosecutors argued that Lindsay Clancy acted with deliberate premeditation and even sent her husband out on an errand while she murdered their kids.

The jury is considering five verdicts:
โ€“ Guilty of First-Degree Murder
โ€“ Guilty of Second-Degree Murder
โ€“ Guilty of Manslaughter
โ€“ Not Guilty
โ€“ Not Guilty due to Lack of Criminal Responsibility
On Thursday, Clancyโ€™s defense team requested to remove one juror for not following the rules on reasonable doubt but Judge William Sullivan denied the motion.
The judge on Thursday gave the jury information on reasonable doubt and ordered them to resume deliberations.
Judge Sullivan admonished the jurors for refusing to listen to his instructions on reasonable doubt.
On Friday, Clancyโ€™s defense attorney Kevin Reddington accused the one male โ€˜holdoutโ€™ of lying under oath, claiming the juror promised to follow the law and is refusing to apply the reasonable doubt standard.
The one lone male juror is holding the line.
In a stunning moment, Reddington also lashed out at the judge for not giving a more โ€œforcefulโ€ instruction on proof beyond a reasonable doubt.
โ€œWhat do you want me to do, get a brass band?โ€ Judge Sullivan asked Reddington. โ€œI read the instruction as written!โ€
โ€œIโ€™m not an actor! Iโ€™m just giving the instruction!โ€ the judge shouted.
Attorney Kevin Reddington accused the judge of โ€˜glossingโ€™ over the reasonable doubt issue.
The judge hit back.
โ€œI am not glossing over the issue. Iโ€™ve thought about this issue long enough,โ€ the judge said.
How is this attorney not being held in contempt?

Follow and Share๐Ÿ‘‰@thegatewaypundit_news
โค2๐Ÿ”ฅ1
Forwarded from Z and V
๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡น๐Ÿ‘‰๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ง๐Ÿดโ€โ˜ ๏ธ The general, who founded the new National Future party, stressed that the British publication, like many others representing international financial circles, are trying to influence the electoral processes in Italy.

General Vannacci, in response to the accusations of the British Financial Times, which called him the Trojan horse of Moscow in Italy, published a photo wearing a Soviet soldier's hat and with a glass of vodka.

The politician accompanied her with an ironic letter in which he accused the Financial Times editorial board of trying to discredit him.

Photo: Roberto Vannacci's social media page
The world you were born in... can be rebuilt on the bones of our enemies.
๐Ÿ”ฅ5
Forwarded from Today I Learned
TIL During World War I, an estimated 40,000 to 80,000 soldiers died as a result of avalanches during the mountain campaign in the Alps at the Austrian-Italian front, many of which were caused by artillery fire.
https://ift.tt/i8zbrAm
Forwarded from The Right People Z
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
An article published by The New York Times under the title โ€œWhat Happened to the Coveted Western Tanks Sent to Ukraine?โ€ on 25 August 2026 reports that the Western tanks Ukraine spent so long trying to obtain have now become almost useless on the battlefield because of the dominance of cheap drones.

Vehicles worth tens of millions of dollars are now sitting in forests under camouflage nets, and are used mainly as recovery vehicles to tow damaged equipment, and even then only in poor weather. They are assigned almost no combat missions, while their crews are being retrained as drone operators.

Some commanders still believe tanks can be adapted through the use of AI or protection systems, but most acknowledge that the classical era of the tank is coming to an end, with the future belonging to unmanned vehicles.

โ€œWe hardly use armoured vehicles at all,โ€ said Oleksandr Syrsky, who until last month served as Ukraineโ€™s Commander-in-Chief. โ€œThis raises the question: how do we neutralise this advantage that drones possess and give our armoured vehicles a new lease of life?โ€

Article: What Happened to the Coveted Western Tanks Sent to Ukraine?

#info
#tank #Abrams
#Leopard #UAV
#FPV #EW
๐Ÿ”ฅ1
Stories get pushed by mainstream media for a reason. It's always important to step back and ask why.
"'At this point, the Lindsay Clancy case reads like a psyop to me. Watching the trial only deepened my suspicion. The evidence, testimony, Patrickโ€™s behaviour, both fundraising networks, the nonprofit that followed and the institutional interests surrounding postpartum mental health have left me questioning the story at its most basic level. Iโ€™m not even convinced the children existed in the first place.

"That is how little confidence I now have in what has been presented. I question Lindsayโ€™s identity, the marriage as presented, the timeline involving Patrickโ€™s current wife and whether the people surrounding this case have relationships and affiliations the public hasnโ€™t been told about.

"Then ask what this narrative produces. And how many people are involved with ties to the following- โžŸ More psychiatric screening and surveillance of mothers โžŸ More medication and specialized maternal mental health infrastructure โžŸ More nonprofit and research funding โžŸ More institutional authority to intervene in families โžŸ A cultural image of postpartum women as unstable and potentially dangerous.

"Zoom out further and the social effect is division. Men distrust women. Women distrust men. Marriage becomes undesirable. Children become liabilities. Families weaken and institutions assume more of the authority families once held themselves. Strong families create loyalty, protection and independence. Atomized people are far easier to govern.

"So Iโ€™m less interested in being told what to believe and far more interested in who gets funded, who gains authority, what policies follow and how many supposedly unrelated players ultimately benefit. Because this story has holes.'

"I have emphasised the penultimate paragraph in Morgan's analysis, because, in my view, this is the central issue regarding why this psyop has been staged and what the wider purpose of it is."

https://miriaf.co.uk/lindsay-clancy-is-a-psyop/
๐Ÿ”ฅ5