Forwarded from Election Data Analyzer (M_EDA)
Feel like scanning your area for open ports to your voting machine MS SQL databases? No problem. Just download this app to your phone. Makes it real convenient to find that Port 1433. And the app is FREE!! https://apps.apple.com/us/app/fing-network-scanner/id430921107
App Store
Fing - Network Scanner App - App Store
Download Fing - Network Scanner by Fing Limited on the App Store. See screenshots, ratings and reviews, user tips, and more apps like Fing - Network Scanner.
Forwarded from Election Data Analyzer (M_EDA)
After you know the port, then you can download this other FREE app to your phone and start flipping vote totals. https://apps.apple.com/us/app/sql-server-mssql-by-sqlpro/id1176218536
App Store
SQL Server / MSSQL by SQLPro
SQLPro for MSSQL is a lightweight Microsoft SQL Server database client, allowing quick and simple access to MSSQL Servers, including those hosted via cloud services such as SQL Azure or Amazon RDS.
Features include:
+ Intellisense/SQL autocompletion.
+…
Features include:
+ Intellisense/SQL autocompletion.
+…
Forwarded from Election Data Analyzer (M_EDA)
Mr. Doug Gould concludes (p 103) the Mesa County forensic report with this warning: “With elections beginning on a large scale very soon, with the massive security vulnerabilities, the weakness presented by this uncertifiable Voting System, the abject failure of the Voting System testing laboratory with the expired accreditation and lack of proper oversight by authorities, remediation of these issues before pending election IS NOT POSSIBLE.” (my emphasis)
So, what are we to DO to fix it? Do we really need to AUDIT and CANVASS to make the point? If the goal is to VOTE differently, this analysis is conclusive enough. I have spent 100s of hours analyzing voter rolls and built and distributed a free tool to help others do the same (EDA). But, at this point, we need to focus on the machines. PERIOD.
So, what are we to DO to fix it? Do we really need to AUDIT and CANVASS to make the point? If the goal is to VOTE differently, this analysis is conclusive enough. I have spent 100s of hours analyzing voter rolls and built and distributed a free tool to help others do the same (EDA). But, at this point, we need to focus on the machines. PERIOD.
Forwarded from Election Data Analyzer (M_EDA)
I hope Mr. Gould does not mind me posting a snippet of the report (Appendix A) here for those of you who don't want to read the entire report. These are non-compliance items related to the Voluntary Voting System Guideline (VVSG). His conclusions in RED.
That Tina Peters would be thrown in jail with a $500k cash bond for doing her job is atrocious.
I gave money this morning when I heard Sheronna Bishop on Bannon’s war room pandemic provide the below website.
I gave money this morning when I heard Sheronna Bishop on Bannon’s war room pandemic provide the below website.
Forwarded from LadyDraza
Repetition for comprehension: Please do not use "anomaly" please do not use "fraud" - please begin using:
"Election Manipulation via Vote Acceleration"
Or - ballot stuffing at the end to make the less popular candidate win - and followed by the machines re-writing history - a la 1984 - so when you check the records - it was always that way.
"Election Manipulation via Vote Acceleration"
Or - ballot stuffing at the end to make the less popular candidate win - and followed by the machines re-writing history - a la 1984 - so when you check the records - it was always that way.
Forwarded from David Clements
Attend your next county commission meeting.
Organize and get others to attend.
Hundreds.
Use the time for public comment to voice your concerns over rigged cheat machines.
Demand a no confidence vote on your corrupt election machines.
Keep showing up, increase your numbers, and if necessary invite experts in the movement to help advocate.
Transition to all paper voting.
No machines.
Imagine casting a real vote in your next election.
Fix your county.
Fix your country.
Organize and get others to attend.
Hundreds.
Use the time for public comment to voice your concerns over rigged cheat machines.
Demand a no confidence vote on your corrupt election machines.
Keep showing up, increase your numbers, and if necessary invite experts in the movement to help advocate.
Transition to all paper voting.
No machines.
Imagine casting a real vote in your next election.
Fix your county.
Fix your country.
I agree, and I’ve made my voice heard.
I went to option 2 – news tips. The guy said he’d pass my word along. We’ll see.
I went to option 2 – news tips. The guy said he’d pass my word along. We’ll see.
Forwarded from Kandiss Taylor
WSB in Atlanta, GA is refusing Kandiss Taylor participation in a televised debate with Kemp and Perdue scheduled for April.
Please call them and let our voices be heard. She is a candidate for governor just like the 2 establishment politicians.
WSB Station # 404 897-7000
Please call them and let our voices be heard. She is a candidate for governor just like the 2 establishment politicians.
WSB Station # 404 897-7000
Forwarded from ElectionEvidence 🇺🇲🇺🇲🇺🇲
https://t.me/FrankSpeech/160
Key findings in the Mesa Report #3
1. Creation of multiple databases: The Mesa County voting system server should have had three databases in its election project for each election. But in Mesa County’s system, two additional
databases were found for two separate elections. The existence of those additional databases, and the movement of ballot records between them, breaking the chain of evidence needed for ballot and vote authentication is proof of voting system non-compliance with Federal Voting System Standards mandatory under Colorado law, and proof of manipulation. This is akin to having two sets of
accounting records in a business, to hide fraudulent and illegal financial transactions.
2. A pattern of multiple illegal databases in separate elections: Multiple databases were found in
both the 2020 election records, and in the 2021 election records. Slight variations in the method of
ballot and batch record copying between databases reinforces the conclusion that the manipulation was
deliberate.
3. Ballot and election records chain of evidence broken in multiple ways: Once ballot images and
records were moved, deleted, manipulated, and re-copied, the chain of evidence was broken. Digital
files required to verify ballot image authenticity simply did not exist in the new databases. It makes it
impossible to verify the authenticity of so many ballot records. Now election results cannot be
determined from the voting system records.
4. No accident: There are no listed, authorized features and procedures, or even the ability through a combination of features and procedures on the electronic voting systems to instruct or enable election
officials to manipulate ballot records and vote count databases in the manner discovered. This activity
was unauthorized, and could have been conducted in any number of ways, including combinations of unauthorized software, remote access and/or malware introduced through a removable device (USB
drive).
5. Illegal certification of Colorado electronic voting systems: Because the electronic voting system in
Mesa County, Colorado was not only vulnerable and exposed to manipulation, including the systematic destruction of election records, and proof of actual manipulation, the voting system could not possibly
have met the requirements of the Federal Voting System Standards mandated by Colorado statute.
@ElectionEvidence 🇺🇲🇺🇲🇺🇲
Key findings in the Mesa Report #3
1. Creation of multiple databases: The Mesa County voting system server should have had three databases in its election project for each election. But in Mesa County’s system, two additional
databases were found for two separate elections. The existence of those additional databases, and the movement of ballot records between them, breaking the chain of evidence needed for ballot and vote authentication is proof of voting system non-compliance with Federal Voting System Standards mandatory under Colorado law, and proof of manipulation. This is akin to having two sets of
accounting records in a business, to hide fraudulent and illegal financial transactions.
2. A pattern of multiple illegal databases in separate elections: Multiple databases were found in
both the 2020 election records, and in the 2021 election records. Slight variations in the method of
ballot and batch record copying between databases reinforces the conclusion that the manipulation was
deliberate.
3. Ballot and election records chain of evidence broken in multiple ways: Once ballot images and
records were moved, deleted, manipulated, and re-copied, the chain of evidence was broken. Digital
files required to verify ballot image authenticity simply did not exist in the new databases. It makes it
impossible to verify the authenticity of so many ballot records. Now election results cannot be
determined from the voting system records.
4. No accident: There are no listed, authorized features and procedures, or even the ability through a combination of features and procedures on the electronic voting systems to instruct or enable election
officials to manipulate ballot records and vote count databases in the manner discovered. This activity
was unauthorized, and could have been conducted in any number of ways, including combinations of unauthorized software, remote access and/or malware introduced through a removable device (USB
drive).
5. Illegal certification of Colorado electronic voting systems: Because the electronic voting system in
Mesa County, Colorado was not only vulnerable and exposed to manipulation, including the systematic destruction of election records, and proof of actual manipulation, the voting system could not possibly
have met the requirements of the Federal Voting System Standards mandated by Colorado statute.
@ElectionEvidence 🇺🇲🇺🇲🇺🇲
Telegram
FrankSpeech
Forwarded from Kandiss Taylor
Dollar Store David is littering up the rally with cheap signs. I believe in quality over quantity.
May 24th is the date of the primary in Georgia, if any of you are voting in Georgia.