Highlights from earlier, in case you missed it.

👇👇👇

VoterGA Provides Conclusive Evidence Showing Fulton County 2020 Election Results Were Electronically Manipulated — 524K Votes in Question

ATLANTA, March 7, 2022 – VoterGA announced at a press conference today a 15-point analysis that documents clear, irrefutable evidence of how the November 2020 Fulton County election results were electronically manipulated. The analysis was based on a year-long study of ballot images conducted by an expert-laden volunteer research team. The ballot image research was made possible last year when the Georgia legislature passed SB202, which made ballot images public records. The ballot images were collected statewide by a VoterGA Open Records Request team.

The 15-point analysis that can be verified through public ballot images at GAballots.com or other sites found the following problems in Fulton County:

1. 17,724 final certified Fulton County absentee votes have no ballot images, representing 13,303 extra Biden votes and 4,279 extra Trump votes — net 9,024 mail-in votes — that cannot be substantiated

2. All 374,128 in-person Fulton County ballot images from the original election count are missing and cannot be authenticated

3. 132,284 of the 148,318 mail-in ballot images are missing their authentication files and cannot be verified as legitimate votes

4. Only 16,034 mail-in ballot images had authentication files and those files (which should be generated automatically at the time of scanning) were added days after scanning

5. 4,000+ tabulator images have impossible duplicate time stamps

6. 104,994 image files in 1,096 batches have impossible duplicate time stamps

7. Images in 288 batches have backfilled time stamps out of scanning chronological order

8. All ballot batches were improperly forced to adjudication to facilitate tampering

9. 10 ballots were impossibly
adjudicated in one minute by one user

10. 941 [image] files were backdated prior to adjudication

11. Same 12 tabulators closed 148 early voting polls masking identity of scanning tabulator

12. One tabulator serial# impossibly closed two polls in same overlapping times

13. One tabulator was never closed and may have added many illegitimate votes

14. 85 closing tapes for 12,024 Election Day ballots are unsigned or missing

15. All but two tabulator closing tapes for early voting are unsigned, representing 315,000 ballots; Georgia law requires closing tapes to be signed by a poll manager and 2 witnesses

VoterGA emphasized that while one or two of these may be procedural issues, the electronic tampering found so far is not limited to Fulton. Co-founder Garland Favorito said: “In fairness to Fulton County, they did preserve enough of their ballot images to make some of our research possible. Other counties, like Cobb, destroyed most or all of their original November 2020 images despite federal and state law. This tampering and destruction is proof positive why Georgians cannot trust the 2020 election results. We desperately need an independent multi-county audit immediately to secure our elections before 2022 primaries.”

Source 🔎 VoterGA Press Release
Watch 📺 VoterGA Press Conference

Learn more 🔎🧵 GA Thread

@LibertyOverwatchChannel
—

Stuff like this ’65 Project’ doesn’t scare me. It just makes me mad.

https://www.axios.com/trump-election-lawyers-disbar-5c2b9252-d15d-495f-a759-2446d9fa62e8.html

So in Texas…there’s at least some accountability? That’s nice.

Here is a quote directly from the Mesa forensic report #2: "The presence of prior election databases on the EMS Server also offers an extensive and convenient repository for copy and paste modification of election data, not only for the 2020 election but for any prior listed election as well."

If you are familiar with the work of Garland Favarito at https://voterga.org/ his team has found EXACTLY that which is evidence of cutting and pasting in the CVR in Fulton County GA. This is called “Simultaneous Discovery”.

Imagine you have two records in your machine database of “1 - Trump 56,894 votes” and “2 - Biden 31,536 votes”. Then imagine you right click on those records and change “1” to “2” and “2” to “1”. You have just flipped the election in the machine database. No warnings, no passwords, nothing to stop you. Actually, you don’t need to imagine it because it can be done with the terrible way these machine databases have been designed. Read the report. There are even screen shots for the doubters. Was that actually done in the Election? Nobody knows....and that is exactly the point. The fact that it is POSSIBLE makes the machines uncertifiable.

What a joke. Telnet was used to access the machine server. "The commonly-known default SQL Service, TCP Port 1433 is specifically ALLOWED by this firewall rule." This is so bad in my opinion, it HAD to be done on purpose. Imagine leaving home with the key in the lock to your front door left in the lock. And these are certified based on RLAs?

Wow…creepy

Feel like scanning your area for open ports to your voting machine MS SQL databases? No problem. Just download this app to your phone. Makes it real convenient to find that Port 1433. And the app is FREE!! https://apps.apple.com/us/app/fing-network-scanner/id430921107

After you know the port, then you can download this other FREE app to your phone and start flipping vote totals. https://apps.apple.com/us/app/sql-server-mssql-by-sqlpro/id1176218536

Bingo!!! Now we’re talkin

👇👇👇

Mr. Doug Gould concludes (p 103) the Mesa County forensic report with this warning: “With elections beginning on a large scale very soon, with the massive security vulnerabilities, the weakness presented by this uncertifiable Voting System, the abject failure of the Voting System testing laboratory with the expired accreditation and lack of proper oversight by authorities, remediation of these issues before pending election IS NOT POSSIBLE.” (my emphasis)

So, what are we to DO to fix it? Do we really need to AUDIT and CANVASS to make the point? If the goal is to VOTE differently, this analysis is conclusive enough. I have spent 100s of hours analyzing voter rolls and built and distributed a free tool to help others do the same (EDA). But, at this point, we need to focus on the machines. PERIOD.

I hope Mr. Gould does not mind me posting a snippet of the report (Appendix A) here for those of you who don't want to read the entire report. These are non-compliance items related to the Voluntary Voting System Guideline (VVSG). His conclusions in RED.

That Tina Peters would be thrown in jail with a $500k cash bond for doing her job is atrocious.

I gave money this morning when I heard Sheronna Bishop on Bannon’s war room pandemic provide the below website.

Good suggestion, @ladydraza

Repetition for comprehension: Please do not use "anomaly" please do not use "fraud" - please begin using:

"Election Manipulation via Vote Acceleration"

Or - ballot stuffing at the end to make the less popular candidate win - and followed by the machines re-writing history - a la 1984 - so when you check the records - it was always that way.

Worth a shot…

👇👇👇

Attend your next county commission meeting.

Organize and get others to attend.

Hundreds.

Use the time for public comment to voice your concerns over rigged cheat machines.

Demand a no confidence vote on your corrupt election machines.

Keep showing up, increase your numbers, and if necessary invite experts in the movement to help advocate.

Transition to all paper voting.

No machines.

Imagine casting a real vote in your next election.

Fix your county.

Fix your country.