For your reference, all 50 states use Albert Sensors (see info below). They sit behind the election system network firewalls and send real-time updates. At the November 2021 meeting with the NC Speaker et al, the presence of Albert Sensors in NC was highlighted, and a theory regarding a risk for "authorized" access to our election systems by hackers was posed. (Note: this is not related to any PCAPs). Legislators were informed about what Albert Sensors are, how they work, and the risk that the SolarWinds breach could have created to the 2020 election. A Compliance Study was proposed as a solution to investigate so that existing laws could be modified, as needed, and new legislation created. (Note: A Compliance Study is a top-to-bottom review of the NC election system, including ballots, electronics, procedures, processes, and documentation - all in comparison to existing local, state, and federal laws and required chain of custody documentation). To date, no action to pursue this solution has been taken.

My question of the day: Do the Albert Sensors that CISA applied to the voting systems have remote communication connectivity that opens up normally air-gapped voting system networks?

No logs kept on the sensors? Excatly how are the reports sent?

"Alerts

No logs or data reside on the sensor. All data collected is compressed, encrypted, and sent to the CIS SOC every few minutes for analysis. As alerts are analyzed and verified as actionable, event notifications are sent to your organization in accordance with pre-established escalation procedures."

https://www.cisecurity.org/services/albert-network-monitoring/

Kay Cammack seems about as good as anyone can get in the US house. Sounds as though she didn’t even buckle after the “attacks.”

She has another important message about what the demo-craps are trying to do. They’re trying to disguise that HB1 fiasco as some type of NASA bill, in addition to destroying the filibuster.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w85C9NIFoFc

I was about to make my own music video, but then I stumbled upon this one ☺️

This will be interesting.

WI hearing

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=Sx7zhjCbN20

More incoming from WI

Just got done testifying (remotely) in Wisconsin. My favorite finding I presented today:

"The fact remains that the Milwaukee County vote dump which occurred at 5:51 AM
EST was the largest single update of votes in the state (211,196 combined votes for
Trump and Biden) as well as the single most “Biden heavy” update in the state
(80.2% Biden) for updates of more than 2,000 total votes. (If that restriction is not
made, only one small county update exceeded 80.2%). Only Dane County’s
updates of 78.5%, 76.3%, and 74.7% (which totaled 338,946 votes) came close to
this mark. As another way of expressing, this single update contained 83% of all
Biden votes from the county while comprising just 52% of the total county votes
for the whole election."

See my little artwork on page ten.

The squiggly red lines and the VERY LARGE text on page 10 are my annotations. The rest of this is from Mr. O’Donnell, aka https://t.me/ALoneRaccoon

The important point here is that a slightly greater number of voters that Biden’s supposed victory margin cast their ballots on or after Nov. 4. The election was Nov. 3.

Below is his original.

Here is the report that I delivered today. To see what I am responding to, please go to: https://elections.wi.gov/faq Most of the items are in the "2020 election FAQs".

Yes – there must be legal consequences to all involved in the theft of the 2020 election.

We must fight in what lawful ways we can to prove the truth of what happened.

And when we do, we will only move forward by addressing what happened. Merely “looking forward” without holding the bad actors accountable is a tacit admission of what happened and positive reinforcement for it to happen again.

We will not allow the Republicrat Uniparty gaslight us. Republicans and Democrats in office at both the state and federal level should answer for their actions on the 2020 election – actions I deem tantamount to treason.

From what I’ve heard from credible sources about NC Speaker Tim Moore, I can see him doing the same thing.

The difference, though, is that NC does not have even ONE legislator with the courage and capability of Wisconsin state representative Ramthun.

I thought I'd share my reply to Mylan M with everyone, because I believe it is a message that applies to everyone. Thank you, Mylan M!

For me, the answer to your "who is out" question is pretty easy. I would say that just about everyone of the NC incumbent lawmakers should be out. For me, the threshold issue of whether I will vote to re-elect an incumbant Republican lawmaker in the primary is that legislators' commitment to the truth about the 2020 election.

I would recommend you reach out to your representatives to guage their commitment to investigating 2020. If they have are unwilling to investigate 2020, then your representatives are no longer worthy of your trust. I speculate that it won't take you long to get an answer to that question. I don't know who you are or where you live in NC, but the odds are you will not even get a response from your representatives.

Here are a few facts:
- FIVE of the 170 state lawmakers in NC sent official delegates to the Cyber Symposium
- of the SEVER or EIGHT with whom I've directly corresponded, two have taken the time to respond. One of those two snubbed me. The other did the bare minimum to cover his six.
- Republican leadership in the NCGA has been indifferent to the tremendous amount of quality work assembled by people I know and trust. Speaker Moore waited until the last possible day of the 2021 legislative session before listening to them, even when we had the attention of private donors.

I would say that the default assumption is that your incumbent republican representatives have done nothing, unless they take the time to tell you otherwise. If they do, then it's up to you to determine whether their efforts were significant.