Forwarded from Lin Wood (L. Lin Wood)
Elon Musk
Tesla
SpaceX
The Boring Company
WATCH OUT!!!
Lin ❤️🙏🇺🇸
https://www.businessinsider.com/neuralink-elon-musk-microchips-brains-ai-2021-2?op=1#neuralink-is-developing-two-bits-of-equipment-the-first-is-a-chip-that-would-be-implanted-in-a-persons-skull-with-electrodes-fanning-out-into-their-brain-2
Tesla
SpaceX
The Boring Company
WATCH OUT!!!
Lin ❤️🙏🇺🇸
https://www.businessinsider.com/neuralink-elon-musk-microchips-brains-ai-2021-2?op=1#neuralink-is-developing-two-bits-of-equipment-the-first-is-a-chip-that-would-be-implanted-in-a-persons-skull-with-electrodes-fanning-out-into-their-brain-2
Business Insider
Neuralink's first human patient has been revealed. Here's how we got here.
Neuralink's tech could help study and treat neurological disorders. Musk also claims it could one day meld human consciousness with AI.
🤮18👍1😢1
Forwarded from Just Us
Will you help us convince the NC State Board of Elections to REQUIRE signature verification on all absentee ballots?
Public Comment Period Opens on Request Related to Signature Verification for Absentee Voting
Raleigh, N.C. — The State Board of Elections has opened a written public comment period for a request by the North Carolina Republican Party for the State Board to authorize county boards of elections to scrutinize voter signatures on absentee ballot request forms and absentee ballot return envelopes, to determine whether to count those ballots in North Carolina elections.
North Carolina law currently requires an absentee voter to confirm their identity by having two witnesses or a notary attest that the voter completed their ballot. This request seeks an additional layer of verification for absentee voters.
Read the Republican Party’s request for a declaratory ruling, which was made on May 14, 2022.
The public comment period will be open from Friday, June 10 through Tuesday, July 5. Members of the public may comment in the following ways:
• Online: Public Comment Portal
• Email: rulemaking.sboe@ncsbe.gov
• Mail: Attn: Legal Division, 6400 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27603-1362
State Board staff will compile the comments and post them online before the State Board meets to consider a ruling on the request, likely in mid-July.
Specifically, in addition to confirming that the voter’s ballot was properly witnessed, the request seeks to also allow county boards of elections to compare the signature on an absentee document with the voter’s signature on their voter registration documents, which are kept on file with the county boards. The request also asks that the county boards be able to “exhaust all available resources to confirm that the signature provided on an absentee container-return envelope is that of the purported voter.”
The State Board’s current guidance to county boards of elections is not to use signature verification in the consideration of absentee returns. Under state law, each absentee by-mail voter must have two witnesses or a notary attest that the voter completed their ballot in the witnesses’ presence. Verification of the voter’s identity is completed through this witness requirement. State law does not explicitly address the comparison of voter signatures.
The request for a declaratory ruling is a process authorized under a provision of the North Carolina Administrative Procedures Act, N.C.G.S. § 150B-4. That statute allows individuals to request a ruling to resolve a conflict regarding an interpretation of state law or a rule adopted by the agency.
###
Please email the State Board of Elections with your comments regarding their policy which is highlighted below.
THE DEADLINE IS TUESDAY, JULY 5, 2022.
NC law currently requires an absentee voter to confirm their identity by having two witnesses or a notary attest that the voter completed their ballot. The State Board of Election (SBE) policy states "the voter’s signature should not be compared with the voter’s signature on file because this is not required by North Carolina law.” This applies to absentee ballot request forms and absentee ballot return envelopes.
This policy was instituted in August 2020. Prior to that time it was common practice for county boards of elections to compare signatures on absentee ballot return envelopes to the voter’s signature on their registration file.
The NC GOP petitioned the State Board of Elections to revisit this issue and now is in the comment period.
***************************************************************************************
Here is an example of what you might want to email in:
SUBJECT: Public Comment on Signature Verification for Absentee Voting
Signature verification for absentee voting must be required because for Absentee Vot
I strongly recommend that
Public Comment Period Opens on Request Related to Signature Verification for Absentee Voting
Raleigh, N.C. — The State Board of Elections has opened a written public comment period for a request by the North Carolina Republican Party for the State Board to authorize county boards of elections to scrutinize voter signatures on absentee ballot request forms and absentee ballot return envelopes, to determine whether to count those ballots in North Carolina elections.
North Carolina law currently requires an absentee voter to confirm their identity by having two witnesses or a notary attest that the voter completed their ballot. This request seeks an additional layer of verification for absentee voters.
Read the Republican Party’s request for a declaratory ruling, which was made on May 14, 2022.
The public comment period will be open from Friday, June 10 through Tuesday, July 5. Members of the public may comment in the following ways:
• Online: Public Comment Portal
• Email: rulemaking.sboe@ncsbe.gov
• Mail: Attn: Legal Division, 6400 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27603-1362
State Board staff will compile the comments and post them online before the State Board meets to consider a ruling on the request, likely in mid-July.
Specifically, in addition to confirming that the voter’s ballot was properly witnessed, the request seeks to also allow county boards of elections to compare the signature on an absentee document with the voter’s signature on their voter registration documents, which are kept on file with the county boards. The request also asks that the county boards be able to “exhaust all available resources to confirm that the signature provided on an absentee container-return envelope is that of the purported voter.”
The State Board’s current guidance to county boards of elections is not to use signature verification in the consideration of absentee returns. Under state law, each absentee by-mail voter must have two witnesses or a notary attest that the voter completed their ballot in the witnesses’ presence. Verification of the voter’s identity is completed through this witness requirement. State law does not explicitly address the comparison of voter signatures.
The request for a declaratory ruling is a process authorized under a provision of the North Carolina Administrative Procedures Act, N.C.G.S. § 150B-4. That statute allows individuals to request a ruling to resolve a conflict regarding an interpretation of state law or a rule adopted by the agency.
###
Please email the State Board of Elections with your comments regarding their policy which is highlighted below.
THE DEADLINE IS TUESDAY, JULY 5, 2022.
NC law currently requires an absentee voter to confirm their identity by having two witnesses or a notary attest that the voter completed their ballot. The State Board of Election (SBE) policy states "the voter’s signature should not be compared with the voter’s signature on file because this is not required by North Carolina law.” This applies to absentee ballot request forms and absentee ballot return envelopes.
This policy was instituted in August 2020. Prior to that time it was common practice for county boards of elections to compare signatures on absentee ballot return envelopes to the voter’s signature on their registration file.
The NC GOP petitioned the State Board of Elections to revisit this issue and now is in the comment period.
***************************************************************************************
Here is an example of what you might want to email in:
SUBJECT: Public Comment on Signature Verification for Absentee Voting
Signature verification for absentee voting must be required because for Absentee Vot
I strongly recommend that
👍5
Forwarded from The Pattern Seer (Pattern Seer)
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
NC SPEAKER TIM MOORE
Thursday, June 23, 2022
Contact: Demi Dowdy
U.S. Supreme Court Rules 8-1 to Allow the NC General Assembly to Intervene in Voter ID Case
Raleigh, NC— Today the United States Supreme Court ruled 8-1 that the North Carolina General Assembly can intervene in the federal voter ID case.
House Speaker Tim Moore said, "North Carolinians overwhelmingly support voter ID, and they deserve nothing less than the strongest representation from those who would uphold the will of the voters and our constitution, not a tepid defense by an attorney general who has a record of opposing voter ID. As stated in today’s decision, “More than once a North Carolina attorney general has opposed laws enacted by the General Assembly and declined to defend them fully in federal litigation.”
He continued, "The U.S. Supreme Court has rightfully agreed with us that, without the participation of the General Assembly in defending voter ID, “important state interests would not be represented.” Also, “... while serving as a state senator the attorney general voted against an earlier voter-ID law and filed a declaration in support of a legal challenge against it.” I am proud of our General Counsel and legal team for their diligent work on behalf of the voters. Rest assured, I will continue to fight to defend the will of the people for voter ID to become law as decided by the voters."
###
NC SPEAKER TIM MOORE
Thursday, June 23, 2022
Contact: Demi Dowdy
U.S. Supreme Court Rules 8-1 to Allow the NC General Assembly to Intervene in Voter ID Case
Raleigh, NC— Today the United States Supreme Court ruled 8-1 that the North Carolina General Assembly can intervene in the federal voter ID case.
House Speaker Tim Moore said, "North Carolinians overwhelmingly support voter ID, and they deserve nothing less than the strongest representation from those who would uphold the will of the voters and our constitution, not a tepid defense by an attorney general who has a record of opposing voter ID. As stated in today’s decision, “More than once a North Carolina attorney general has opposed laws enacted by the General Assembly and declined to defend them fully in federal litigation.”
He continued, "The U.S. Supreme Court has rightfully agreed with us that, without the participation of the General Assembly in defending voter ID, “important state interests would not be represented.” Also, “... while serving as a state senator the attorney general voted against an earlier voter-ID law and filed a declaration in support of a legal challenge against it.” I am proud of our General Counsel and legal team for their diligent work on behalf of the voters. Rest assured, I will continue to fight to defend the will of the people for voter ID to become law as decided by the voters."
###
👏32👍6
The Origin and Operation of the US Administrative State
https://link.theepochtimes.com/mkt_app/the-origin-and-operation-of-the-us-administrative-state_4532879.html
https://link.theepochtimes.com/mkt_app/the-origin-and-operation-of-the-us-administrative-state_4532879.html
The Epoch Times
The Origin and Operation of the US Administrative State
Commentary On July 2, 1881, only four months into the first term of President James A. Garfield, an ...
👍12
This looks like a step in the right direction, but a still huge step short if nothing is done about the machines.
👍18
Forwarded from Froz Toz
Missouri Governor Parsons Signs House Bill (HB) 1878 - Requires Voter ID - Eliminates Drop Boxes
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2022/06/missouri-governor-parsons-signs-bill-hb-1878/
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2022/06/missouri-governor-parsons-signs-bill-hb-1878/
The Gateway Pundit
Missouri Governor Parsons Signs House Bill (HB) 1878 - Requires Voter ID - Eliminates Drop Boxes | The Gateway Pundit | by Joe…
Governor Parsons from Missouri today signed an election bill in an effort to make elections more secure. Today, during a signing ceremony at the State Capitol, Governor Mike Parson signed five pieces of legislation into law, including House Bill…
👍44🔥6
https://youtu.be/YaxGNQE5ZLA
I’m sure most of us have heard this story about the origins of our national anthem, but it bears repeating.
This background on our national anthem is the story of how WeThePeople, with God’s help, preserved our nation in the most dire and daunting of circumstances.
Fort McHenry was a fort with mostly women and children. The “entire British war fleet” trained its fire on just the flagpole, since the lowering of the flag would have meant surrender. Yet when the fog of battle cleared, “Patriots’ bodies” had kept the flag flying.
This song defines who we are as a people. This story behind it exemplifies our greatness as a people and as a nation.
Happy Fourth!
I’m sure most of us have heard this story about the origins of our national anthem, but it bears repeating.
This background on our national anthem is the story of how WeThePeople, with God’s help, preserved our nation in the most dire and daunting of circumstances.
Fort McHenry was a fort with mostly women and children. The “entire British war fleet” trained its fire on just the flagpole, since the lowering of the flag would have meant surrender. Yet when the fog of battle cleared, “Patriots’ bodies” had kept the flag flying.
This song defines who we are as a people. This story behind it exemplifies our greatness as a people and as a nation.
Happy Fourth!
YouTube
Star Spangled Banner As You've Never Heard It
A story of how our national anthem came to be.
I was asked by someone to put a video together for this audio and upload it, so here it is. I was never expecting it to get so many views.
Yes, I'm aware some info isn't exactly right. Please stop sending…
I was asked by someone to put a video together for this audio and upload it, so here it is. I was never expecting it to get so many views.
Yes, I'm aware some info isn't exactly right. Please stop sending…
👍26❤3
Forwarded from Lin Wood (L. Lin Wood)
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
❤23
Anyone have a reasonable explanation for why my comments before June 15th have all been wiped out? I’ve confirmed through multiple devices and have had other people check on theirs as well.
I notice that on other Telegram channels such as EFN, that’s not the case.
Asking for a friend. Thank you, and have a blessed day.
I notice that on other Telegram channels such as EFN, that’s not the case.
Asking for a friend. Thank you, and have a blessed day.