Forwarded from David Clements
Attend your next county commission meeting.
Organize and get others to attend.
Hundreds.
Use the time for public comment to voice your concerns over rigged cheat machines.
Demand a no confidence vote on your corrupt election machines.
Keep showing up, increase your numbers, and if necessary invite experts in the movement to help advocate.
Transition to all paper voting.
No machines.
Imagine casting a real vote in your next election.
Fix your county.
Fix your country.
Organize and get others to attend.
Hundreds.
Use the time for public comment to voice your concerns over rigged cheat machines.
Demand a no confidence vote on your corrupt election machines.
Keep showing up, increase your numbers, and if necessary invite experts in the movement to help advocate.
Transition to all paper voting.
No machines.
Imagine casting a real vote in your next election.
Fix your county.
Fix your country.
I agree, and I’ve made my voice heard.
I went to option 2 – news tips. The guy said he’d pass my word along. We’ll see.
I went to option 2 – news tips. The guy said he’d pass my word along. We’ll see.
Forwarded from Kandiss Taylor
WSB in Atlanta, GA is refusing Kandiss Taylor participation in a televised debate with Kemp and Perdue scheduled for April.
Please call them and let our voices be heard. She is a candidate for governor just like the 2 establishment politicians.
WSB Station # 404 897-7000
Please call them and let our voices be heard. She is a candidate for governor just like the 2 establishment politicians.
WSB Station # 404 897-7000
Forwarded from ElectionEvidence 🇺🇲🇺🇲🇺🇲
https://t.me/FrankSpeech/160
Key findings in the Mesa Report #3
1. Creation of multiple databases: The Mesa County voting system server should have had three databases in its election project for each election. But in Mesa County’s system, two additional
databases were found for two separate elections. The existence of those additional databases, and the movement of ballot records between them, breaking the chain of evidence needed for ballot and vote authentication is proof of voting system non-compliance with Federal Voting System Standards mandatory under Colorado law, and proof of manipulation. This is akin to having two sets of
accounting records in a business, to hide fraudulent and illegal financial transactions.
2. A pattern of multiple illegal databases in separate elections: Multiple databases were found in
both the 2020 election records, and in the 2021 election records. Slight variations in the method of
ballot and batch record copying between databases reinforces the conclusion that the manipulation was
deliberate.
3. Ballot and election records chain of evidence broken in multiple ways: Once ballot images and
records were moved, deleted, manipulated, and re-copied, the chain of evidence was broken. Digital
files required to verify ballot image authenticity simply did not exist in the new databases. It makes it
impossible to verify the authenticity of so many ballot records. Now election results cannot be
determined from the voting system records.
4. No accident: There are no listed, authorized features and procedures, or even the ability through a combination of features and procedures on the electronic voting systems to instruct or enable election
officials to manipulate ballot records and vote count databases in the manner discovered. This activity
was unauthorized, and could have been conducted in any number of ways, including combinations of unauthorized software, remote access and/or malware introduced through a removable device (USB
drive).
5. Illegal certification of Colorado electronic voting systems: Because the electronic voting system in
Mesa County, Colorado was not only vulnerable and exposed to manipulation, including the systematic destruction of election records, and proof of actual manipulation, the voting system could not possibly
have met the requirements of the Federal Voting System Standards mandated by Colorado statute.
@ElectionEvidence 🇺🇲🇺🇲🇺🇲
Key findings in the Mesa Report #3
1. Creation of multiple databases: The Mesa County voting system server should have had three databases in its election project for each election. But in Mesa County’s system, two additional
databases were found for two separate elections. The existence of those additional databases, and the movement of ballot records between them, breaking the chain of evidence needed for ballot and vote authentication is proof of voting system non-compliance with Federal Voting System Standards mandatory under Colorado law, and proof of manipulation. This is akin to having two sets of
accounting records in a business, to hide fraudulent and illegal financial transactions.
2. A pattern of multiple illegal databases in separate elections: Multiple databases were found in
both the 2020 election records, and in the 2021 election records. Slight variations in the method of
ballot and batch record copying between databases reinforces the conclusion that the manipulation was
deliberate.
3. Ballot and election records chain of evidence broken in multiple ways: Once ballot images and
records were moved, deleted, manipulated, and re-copied, the chain of evidence was broken. Digital
files required to verify ballot image authenticity simply did not exist in the new databases. It makes it
impossible to verify the authenticity of so many ballot records. Now election results cannot be
determined from the voting system records.
4. No accident: There are no listed, authorized features and procedures, or even the ability through a combination of features and procedures on the electronic voting systems to instruct or enable election
officials to manipulate ballot records and vote count databases in the manner discovered. This activity
was unauthorized, and could have been conducted in any number of ways, including combinations of unauthorized software, remote access and/or malware introduced through a removable device (USB
drive).
5. Illegal certification of Colorado electronic voting systems: Because the electronic voting system in
Mesa County, Colorado was not only vulnerable and exposed to manipulation, including the systematic destruction of election records, and proof of actual manipulation, the voting system could not possibly
have met the requirements of the Federal Voting System Standards mandated by Colorado statute.
@ElectionEvidence 🇺🇲🇺🇲🇺🇲
Telegram
FrankSpeech
Forwarded from Kandiss Taylor
Dollar Store David is littering up the rally with cheap signs. I believe in quality over quantity.
May 24th is the date of the primary in Georgia, if any of you are voting in Georgia.
I note you’ve said you’ll “get rid of those cursed Dominion machines” when you’re Governor. That would be great, David.
‘Wow! Would you believe it?! I’m not even there yet, but there are already THOUSANDS…and THOUSANDS…of people…and so many THOUSANDS more behind the fake news media! THE FAKE NEWS! Their red lights just went off! They are the fake news!’
How close will this be to his opening comments? This kind of rough and tumble rhetoric of our fighter president is a string-music symphony to the at least 74 million of us who’ve been disenfranchised by the election that was stolen from him.
We are many at this venue. And while Trump is no doubt the main event, we are here because WeThePeople were defrauded.
How close will this be to his opening comments? This kind of rough and tumble rhetoric of our fighter president is a string-music symphony to the at least 74 million of us who’ve been disenfranchised by the election that was stolen from him.
We are many at this venue. And while Trump is no doubt the main event, we are here because WeThePeople were defrauded.
So far all the oily Georgia politicos are chirping the election integrity rhetoric.
My gut is that John Gordon, the candidate for Georgia AG, might actually mean it. I had the opportunity to sit beside him at a recent election integrity event in Atlanta.
Then again, in his otherwise impressive speech he delivered at that one event from several weeks ago, he gave credit to Ray Smith, then the lawyer for Lin Wood, for the suit that Lin filed against Brad Raffensperger back in November of 2020. From what I’ve seen, Ray Smith does not deserve credit. For one thing, Ray Smith’s argument for standing, as opposed to the one put forth in the Curling v. Raffensperger case just two years prior, was – at least in my not-yet-lawyer opinion –trash. Also, is the Georgia Bar going after Ray Smith with the same maniacally relentless vitriol with which they’ve gone after Lin? Why or why not?
To be fair, Ray was the counsel of record in the Wood v. Raffensperger case. But who had the initiative to bring that case? My guess – just a hunch, really – is that it’s probably his then client.
And yet the State Bar mentioned that case in the latter part of its massive complaint against Lin, which Lin made public on Telegram early in 2021. Lin was not even the attorney in that case – Lin was the plaintiff. While Lin probably got the ball rolling on Wood v. Raffensperger, if there was anything at all wrong with it, the responsibility was on the attorney, and not the client. Yet, the State Bar, at least as of early last spring, wanted to hold Ray Smith’s client accountable for (apparently) his lawyerly misconduct. Did they go after the actual lawyer? If they did, I’ve seriously missed it – please enlighten me.
So…Ray Smith gets credit in stolen election grievance grifting RINO circles trying to rally the troops in the midterm, but how much blame does Smith get for trying to ‘overturn the pristine and 100% legitimate’ election in Georgia? Haven’t heard much about Smith, but we’ve definitely seen Lin’s name run through the mud over it.
So with that, I’m not sure if I can trust John Gordon, but he’s far from the worst. Do I like him more than current Georgia AG Chris Carr? Yes. For now, my instinct gives Gordon an overall thumbs up, but I’ve noted my reservations.
Just sayin.
My gut is that John Gordon, the candidate for Georgia AG, might actually mean it. I had the opportunity to sit beside him at a recent election integrity event in Atlanta.
Then again, in his otherwise impressive speech he delivered at that one event from several weeks ago, he gave credit to Ray Smith, then the lawyer for Lin Wood, for the suit that Lin filed against Brad Raffensperger back in November of 2020. From what I’ve seen, Ray Smith does not deserve credit. For one thing, Ray Smith’s argument for standing, as opposed to the one put forth in the Curling v. Raffensperger case just two years prior, was – at least in my not-yet-lawyer opinion –trash. Also, is the Georgia Bar going after Ray Smith with the same maniacally relentless vitriol with which they’ve gone after Lin? Why or why not?
To be fair, Ray was the counsel of record in the Wood v. Raffensperger case. But who had the initiative to bring that case? My guess – just a hunch, really – is that it’s probably his then client.
And yet the State Bar mentioned that case in the latter part of its massive complaint against Lin, which Lin made public on Telegram early in 2021. Lin was not even the attorney in that case – Lin was the plaintiff. While Lin probably got the ball rolling on Wood v. Raffensperger, if there was anything at all wrong with it, the responsibility was on the attorney, and not the client. Yet, the State Bar, at least as of early last spring, wanted to hold Ray Smith’s client accountable for (apparently) his lawyerly misconduct. Did they go after the actual lawyer? If they did, I’ve seriously missed it – please enlighten me.
So…Ray Smith gets credit in stolen election grievance grifting RINO circles trying to rally the troops in the midterm, but how much blame does Smith get for trying to ‘overturn the pristine and 100% legitimate’ election in Georgia? Haven’t heard much about Smith, but we’ve definitely seen Lin’s name run through the mud over it.
So with that, I’m not sure if I can trust John Gordon, but he’s far from the worst. Do I like him more than current Georgia AG Chris Carr? Yes. For now, my instinct gives Gordon an overall thumbs up, but I’ve noted my reservations.
Just sayin.
XmFactor
Voice message
Before I started recording this, David Perdue loudly proclaimed that the 2020 election had been stolen.
Where was this resolve in late Nov. and Dec. of 2020? Why wasn’t he PUBLICLY calling for a special session? (Assuming he actually did so privately, per a politico article I just read).
David Perdue, I think, is a Johnny come lately election integrity warrior. My guess, as others I know have pointed out, is that he made a deal.
Where was this resolve in late Nov. and Dec. of 2020? Why wasn’t he PUBLICLY calling for a special session? (Assuming he actually did so privately, per a politico article I just read).
David Perdue, I think, is a Johnny come lately election integrity warrior. My guess, as others I know have pointed out, is that he made a deal.