Homework for Day 7
Food travels thousands of miles from producers to consumers.
Some people think that it would be better for the environment and economy if people only ate the local food produced by farmers.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Food travels thousands of miles from producers to consumers.
Some people think that it would be better for the environment and economy if people only ate the local food produced by farmers.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Money should be spent on creating new public buildings such as museums or town halls rather than renovating the existing ones.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
There is a view that governments should spend their budget on creating new public buildings like town halls or museums in preference to repairing the existing ones. I partly agree with this statement as I recognize some benefits of refurbishing the old buildings.
Admittedly, there are several upsides to building new buildings as opposed to repairing the old ones. First, newly-built buildings can incorporate cutting-edge technological advancements. It is no secret that these buildings can be designed with energy-efficient systems, smart infrastructure, and modern materials that contribute to long-term cost savings and environmental sustainability. As well as this, government can optimize their space and design structures to specify to their current and future needs by constructing new buildings. Now that this is a fresh start, government can manage workspaces, advanced security and staff size. In contrast, older builds may have limitations in terms of layout and design, making it challenging for modern operational requirements.
Nevertheless, I would that the positive outcomes of renovating existing facilities are worth mentioning. To begin with, reconstruct the old buildings instead of creating new ones can be cost-efficient. For instance, some public buildings such as museums or stadiums can be damaged partially, thereby fixing only certain areas is enough as opposed to construct new ones. Therefore, a large amount of money can be saved. Aside from that, several museums or educational institutions can be historical and have cultural heritage, thereby they can not be replaced by new ones. By repairing these places when it is damaged, government can keep the value of these constructions. In this way, it would be unwise to build new ones.
In conclusion, though it would be better to allocate money for creating new and modern public buildings, the advantages of renovating them should not be overlooked.
304 words
Band 7.5
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
There is a view that governments should spend their budget on creating new public buildings like town halls or museums in preference to repairing the existing ones. I partly agree with this statement as I recognize some benefits of refurbishing the old buildings.
Admittedly, there are several upsides to building new buildings as opposed to repairing the old ones. First, newly-built buildings can incorporate cutting-edge technological advancements. It is no secret that these buildings can be designed with energy-efficient systems, smart infrastructure, and modern materials that contribute to long-term cost savings and environmental sustainability. As well as this, government can optimize their space and design structures to specify to their current and future needs by constructing new buildings. Now that this is a fresh start, government can manage workspaces, advanced security and staff size. In contrast, older builds may have limitations in terms of layout and design, making it challenging for modern operational requirements.
Nevertheless, I would that the positive outcomes of renovating existing facilities are worth mentioning. To begin with, reconstruct the old buildings instead of creating new ones can be cost-efficient. For instance, some public buildings such as museums or stadiums can be damaged partially, thereby fixing only certain areas is enough as opposed to construct new ones. Therefore, a large amount of money can be saved. Aside from that, several museums or educational institutions can be historical and have cultural heritage, thereby they can not be replaced by new ones. By repairing these places when it is damaged, government can keep the value of these constructions. In this way, it would be unwise to build new ones.
In conclusion, though it would be better to allocate money for creating new and modern public buildings, the advantages of renovating them should not be overlooked.
304 words
Band 7.5
By your Ticher
🔥2😁1
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
#Task_2 #lesson #day_7.5
Perfect Task 2 course by Adam
✅ 1 ta Live-Written essay yozdik.
✅ Ajoyib Grammatika, Lug
Rate the lesson with your reactions⚡️
Perfect Task 2 course by Adam
✅ 1 ta Live-Written essay yozdik.
✅ Ajoyib Grammatika, Lug
at va usullarni organdik.Rate the lesson with your reactions⚡️
By your Ticher🙂
⚡1
Food travels thousands of miles from producers to consumers.
Some people think that it would be better for the environment and economy if people only ate the local food produced by farmers.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Before coming to consumers from producers, food travels from remote destinations. There is a view that it would be beneficial not only for the economy but also environment if individuals solely consumed the local food produced by farmers. I partly agree with this statement as I recognize the benefits of foreign food products.
Admittedly, there are several upsides to eating domestic food. First, the most promising positive aspects of local food is its cost-efficiency and quantity. It is no secret that locally produced food can inexpensive, since there will not any tax for the product. Moreover, some local vegetables such as potato or onion are widely available for the population, thereby its cost is not be high-priced. As well as this, some food produced by farmers is somehow eco-friendly and do not travel thousand of miles. In this way, there is no need any transportation which produces carbon emissions for bringing them.
Nevertheless, I would argue that the positive outcomes of imported food are worth mentioning. To begin with, some products such as coffee or citrus fruits are not available in local country. Therefore, it would better for government to import such products instead of producing them in domestic areas. Aside from that the quality of most foreign products are very high in preference to local ones. For instance, large number of individuals prefer widely-recognized products such as McDonald's or KFC, thereby many local community will not purchase domestic counterparts. Hence, it is economically advisable to import products from abroad.
In conclusion, though there are numerous advantages of eating local food for both the environment and economy, the positive sides of importing food from other countries should not be overlooked.
332 words
Band 7
Some people think that it would be better for the environment and economy if people only ate the local food produced by farmers.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Before coming to consumers from producers, food travels from remote destinations. There is a view that it would be beneficial not only for the economy but also environment if individuals solely consumed the local food produced by farmers. I partly agree with this statement as I recognize the benefits of foreign food products.
Admittedly, there are several upsides to eating domestic food. First, the most promising positive aspects of local food is its cost-efficiency and quantity. It is no secret that locally produced food can inexpensive, since there will not any tax for the product. Moreover, some local vegetables such as potato or onion are widely available for the population, thereby its cost is not be high-priced. As well as this, some food produced by farmers is somehow eco-friendly and do not travel thousand of miles. In this way, there is no need any transportation which produces carbon emissions for bringing them.
Nevertheless, I would argue that the positive outcomes of imported food are worth mentioning. To begin with, some products such as coffee or citrus fruits are not available in local country. Therefore, it would better for government to import such products instead of producing them in domestic areas. Aside from that the quality of most foreign products are very high in preference to local ones. For instance, large number of individuals prefer widely-recognized products such as McDonald's or KFC, thereby many local community will not purchase domestic counterparts. Hence, it is economically advisable to import products from abroad.
In conclusion, though there are numerous advantages of eating local food for both the environment and economy, the positive sides of importing food from other countries should not be overlooked.
332 words
Band 7
By your Ticher
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
In many countries, most shops and products become identical. Some people think it is a positive development, while others believe it is a negative development.
Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
It is undeniable that many products and shops are becoming similar around the world. There is a view that this trend is positive, while I believe that it has many negative implications.
Admittedly, there are several upsides to the similarity of shops and products in many countries.
First, it helps to develop the marketing brand.
It is no secret that some brands such as Coca-Cola or Pepsi have already gained popularity since these products are being sold in nearly every nation.
As well as this, some infrastructure of shops are being preferred by most countries.
In this way, several shop styles ( pop-up and local artisan markets) are the most preferable choice when building new shops.
Nevertheless, I would argue that the negative sides of the identicality of productions and stores are worth mentioning.
To begin with, it affects the competition between brand products in many ways.
For instance, if there is only one type of brand like Pepsi which is sold widely, there will not be any attention to the other kinds of beverages.
Aside from that, similar shops can be annoying or boring for customers.
Now that the styles of shops are identical in many countries, individuals try to find other kinds of shops, contributing to the decrease in customer numbers in markets.
In conclusion, though the similarity of products as well as shops around the world is not without its downsides, the advantages of this trend should not be overlooked.
250 words
Band 7.5
Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
It is undeniable that many products and shops are becoming similar around the world. There is a view that this trend is positive, while I believe that it has many negative implications.
Admittedly, there are several upsides to the similarity of shops and products in many countries.
First, it helps to develop the marketing brand.
It is no secret that some brands such as Coca-Cola or Pepsi have already gained popularity since these products are being sold in nearly every nation.
As well as this, some infrastructure of shops are being preferred by most countries.
In this way, several shop styles ( pop-up and local artisan markets) are the most preferable choice when building new shops.
Nevertheless, I would argue that the negative sides of the identicality of productions and stores are worth mentioning.
To begin with, it affects the competition between brand products in many ways.
For instance, if there is only one type of brand like Pepsi which is sold widely, there will not be any attention to the other kinds of beverages.
Aside from that, similar shops can be annoying or boring for customers.
Now that the styles of shops are identical in many countries, individuals try to find other kinds of shops, contributing to the decrease in customer numbers in markets.
In conclusion, though the similarity of products as well as shops around the world is not without its downsides, the advantages of this trend should not be overlooked.
250 words
Band 7.5
By your Ticher
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Homework 8
Some people think money is the best gift to give it to youngsters, while others disagree.
Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Some people think money is the best gift to give it to youngsters, while others disagree.
Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Shu kungacha otilgan
Discussion ( Introduction)
Agree Disagree ( Introduction)
Advantage&Disadvantage (Introduction)
Problem&Solution (Introduction)
Cause&Effect (Introduction)
Double questions (Introduction)
Technology (Vocab and Ideas)
Environment (Vocab and Ideas)
8 ways to make Complex sentence
Agree&Disagree ( Body 1 and Body 2)
(Bonus dars)
(Bonus dars 2)
Discussion essay ( Body 1 and Body 2)
Darslar hali davom etadi...
TASK 2 darslari ro'yxati!!!Discussion ( Introduction)
Agree Disagree ( Introduction)
Advantage&Disadvantage (Introduction)
Problem&Solution (Introduction)
Cause&Effect (Introduction)
Double questions (Introduction)
Technology (Vocab and Ideas)
Environment (Vocab and Ideas)
8 ways to make Complex sentence
Agree&Disagree ( Body 1 and Body 2)
(Bonus dars)
(Bonus dars 2)
Discussion essay ( Body 1 and Body 2)
Darslar hali davom etadi...