Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
1β€βπ₯78β€15π9π7π6β‘5π₯°5π₯4π4π3π3
Discuss Both Views [ Band: 8.0+ ]
In recent years, the public has been divided on the issue of making certain vaccinations compulsory for children, in both developed and developing countries. Although some believe the right to refuse vaccination should be respected, in my view, making such vaccinations a legal obligation appears more reasonable overall.
There are certain reasons why parents should have the right to refuse to vaccinate their kids. First, many vaccines are prohibitively expensive, which discourages parents from disadvantaged backgrounds from vaccinating their children. In fact, if low-income households were legally required to immunize their kids with those vaccines, many may choose to either delay or refuse vaccinations altogether, since the costs constitute a financial burden for them. In addition, many people are concerned about the side effects of various types of vaccines. For example, it is not advisable that kids with certain medical conditions be vaccinated, as that may cause severe allergic reactions or even permanent damage to them.
Nevertheless, the benefits of vaccination clearly overshadow any potential drawbacks. First, mass vaccination campaigns for children mean there would be fewer or no cases of some illnesses in the future, thus saving enormous amounts of time and effort to treat them. In fact, thanks to immunization programs backed by governments, the incidence of various contagious diseases has been greatly reduced, and in certain cases such as small pox, totally eliminated. Besides, if vaccination regulations come into play, many kids, especially those in rural areas, will be able to survive widespread epidemics that affect plenty of communities. As a result, parents should be encouraged to get their kids immunized, thereby significantly improving their future health prospects.
In conclusion, although some parents may be reluctant to vaccinate their children because of concerns about costs or side effects, introducing laws with regard to vaccination should be encouraged, as it means reduced incidence of certain contagious diseases and is more cost-effective in the long term.
[317 words]
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
1β€βπ₯55π27β€16π₯7π₯°4π4β‘3π2π2π2π€2
Parents throughout the world place spend time reading with their offspring to prepare them for school where their literacy skills are further developed; however, recent research suggests that focusing on reading at an early age can be detrimental, and participating in fun activities would be far more beneficial. I am a strong advocate of this approach, and the benefits of it will be covered in this essay.
A fundamental reason for this is that there is no biological age for reading, and pushing infants to acquire this skill before they are ready could have repercussions. For example, in the UK, many boys are reluctant readers, possibly because of being forced to read, and this turned them off reading. By focusing on other activities and developing other skills such as creativity and imagination, when they are ready to read, they usually acquire this skill rapidly.
In addition, the importance of encouraging creativity and developing a child's imagination must be acknowledged. Through play, youngsters develop social and cognitive skills, for example, they are more likely to learn vocabulary through context rather than learning it from a book.
Furthermore, play allows youngsters to mature emotionally, and gain self-confidence. There is no scientific research which suggests reading at a young age is essential for a child's development, moreover, evidence suggests the reverse is true. In Finland, early years' education focuses on playing.
Reading is only encouraged if a child shows an interest in developing this skill. This self-directed approach certainly does not result in Finnish school leavers falling behind their foreign counterparts. In fact, Finland was ranked the sixth-best in the world in terms of reading.
Despite being a supporter of this non-reading approach, I strongly recommend incorporating bedtime stories into a child's daily routine. However, reading as a regular daytime activity should be swapped for something which allows the child to develop other skills.
[311 words]
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
1β€53β€βπ₯13π8π₯7π5π3π₯°2π2π³2π2β‘1
Agree/Disagree [ Band: 8.5+ ]
Recycling waste materials should help tackle the mountains of domestic rubbish produced each year and our depleting natural resources. However, recycling programmes need the full cooperation of residents if they are to be effective. The question here is whether this can only be achieved by imposing restrictions.
Undoubtedly, far too many recyclable materials are thrown away with general waste and, as a result, damage the environment. To address this problem, we need to first consider the reasons behind peopleβs reluctance to recycle. One possible issue may be the process itself, which usually requires us to clean and sort waste into different categories based on their material. This is both time-consuming and confusing if we do not know whether certain types of glass, plastic or paper are recyclable. We naturally avoid tasks that take up too much time, so it is not surprising that so many people simply throw all their rubbish away in the same bin.
If the main problems are a confusing process and lack of time, then creating a law to govern this seems rather severe. It also seems unlikely to succeed, given that laws and fines generally lead to resentment rather than cooperation. Furthermore, as recycling must occur within the home, it is difficult to imagine how such a law could realistically be enforced. A better solution would be to find ways to simplify the recycling process and educate people about the benefits of recycling, both for the environment and for society as a whole.
To conclude, I believe that the most effective way to increase recycling is to make the task simpler and raise awareness of the impact that excessive amounts of waste are having on our planet. In my view, laws and fines should only be used as a last resort and when all other approaches have failed.
[308 words]
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
1β€55π17π₯8β€βπ₯7π5π³4π2π€2π2β‘1π1
Ielts_academic_vocabulary.pdf
2.4 MB
β speaking va writing uchun advanced
vocabulary
β 3000 dan ziyot eng kerakli lugβatlar
dan tashkil topgan
qoβying π
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
1π³125π₯9β€7π4π₯°3β€βπ₯2β‘2π2π2π1π1
Agree or Disagree [Band: 9.0]
There is an ongoing debate about whether governments should prioritise investment in public transportation rather than allocating substantial resources to the construction of new roads. Although expanding road networks can be beneficial in certain circumstances, I strongly agree that public transport should receive greater financial support because it can reduce congestion, improve accessibility and contribute to more sustainable urban development.
The most compelling reason for prioritising public transportation is its potential to alleviate traffic congestion. As urban populations continue to grow, relying predominantly on private cars inevitably places enormous pressure on existing road networks. By contrast, an efficient system of buses, trains and underground railways can transport large numbers of passengers while occupying considerably less road space. If public transport is frequent, affordable and reliable, commuters are more likely to leave their cars at home, thereby reducing the number of vehicles on overcrowded roads. Consequently, investment in public transport can address the underlying causes of congestion rather than simply creating additional space for traffic.
Another important advantage is that a well-developed public transport network can promote greater social and environmental sustainability. Not everyone can afford to own and maintain a private vehicle, particularly students, elderly people and those on lower incomes. Affordable public transport therefore provides these groups with better access to education, employment and essential services. Furthermore, encouraging people to use shared forms of transportation can reduce fuel consumption and emissions, helping cities tackle air pollution and their wider environmental challenges.
Nevertheless, this does not mean that governments should stop building roads altogether. New roads may be necessary in rapidly developing areas where existing infrastructure is inadequate, and they can improve connections between regions. However, continuously expanding road capacity is unlikely to be a long-term solution if the number of private vehicles continues to rise.
In conclusion, I strongly agree that governments should give greater priority to public transportation than to constructing new roads. While road development remains necessary in some circumstances, a reliable and accessible public transport system offers a more effective long-term response to congestion, inequality and environmental problems.
qoβying π
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
1π³158β€33π₯10π€©6β‘5π3π2π2π1π€1π1
β The Impact of the Internet on Human Lifeβ Advantages & Disadvantages of Fast Foodβ Extreme Sports Should Be Bannedβ The Problem of Homelessnessβ Artificial Intelligenceβ Water Shortageβ Advantages & Disadvanβ¦ of Remote Workβ Youth Crime / Juvenile Delinquencyβ Globalisationβ Hobbiesβ Air Pollution vs Traffic Congestionβ Work-Life Balanceβ Volunteeringβ The Influence of Social Media on Teenagersβ Online Education vs Traditional Educationβ Climate Change & Individual Responsibilityβ The Importance of Mental Health Awareβ¦β Should University Education Be Free?
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
1β€76π₯°38π₯19π19π10π9π8π«‘8π7πΏ7π€5
Master IELTS Writing Band 9.0 Essays.pdf
2.1 MB
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
2π³165β€35π₯6β4π4π4π₯°3πΎ3π€2β‘1π«‘1
Useful for Writing. Words to use instead of βveryβ π¬
Ochishga ochdiz endi post ga reaksiya bosing πβ€οΈποΈπ₯°
π Join: @Writing_9_samples
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
1π₯187β€64π23π₯°17π15π14π12π10π«‘10π9π€9
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
1π―109β€31β€βπ₯14π₯10π€©6π€6π5π5π4π₯°3π2
Cause & Solution [Band: 9.0]
In many countries, an increasing number of young people are becoming less involved in physical activities than previous generations. This trend can largely be attributed to the growing appeal of digital entertainment and increasingly sedentary lifestyles. However, it can be reversed if schools, governments and families work together to make regular exercise more accessible and appealing to young people.
One major reason for this decline is the amount of time teenagers spend using digital devices. Social media, online games and streaming platforms provide convenient forms of entertainment that can easily occupy several hours of a young person's day. As a result, physical activity is often replaced by activities that require little or no movement. Another contributing factor is the pressure associated with modern education. Many students spend long periods completing homework or preparing for examinations, leaving them with limited time and energy for sport. In addition, some communities lack affordable and well-maintained sports facilities, making regular participation difficult for young people from less affluent families.
Several measures could be introduced to address this problem. Schools should make physical education more engaging by offering a wider variety of activities rather than concentrating solely on traditional competitive sports. For instance, students could choose from swimming, cycling, martial arts, athletics or team games according to their interests. Governments could also invest in public sports facilities and provide free or inexpensive programmes for teenagers. Finally, parents can encourage active lifestyles by limiting excessive recreational screen time and participating in physical activities with their children. These measures would make exercise a more enjoyable and accessible part of young people's daily lives.
In conclusion, the decline in youth participation in sport is primarily caused by the attraction of digital entertainment, academic pressures and limited access to suitable facilities. By making physical education more varied, improving public infrastructure and encouraging healthier routines at home, societies can motivate more young people to become physically active.
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
2β€106π₯92π15β‘11π11π―10π9π8π8π₯°7π³7
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
1π₯133β€35π―12π8β5β‘5π4β€βπ₯3π₯°3π3π€3
Discussion Essay [ Band 9.0 ]
The question of when children should begin learning a foreign language has generated considerable debate. While some people argue that primary school is the most appropriate stage, others believe that students should wait until secondary education. Although both perspectives have merit, I believe that introducing a foreign language at primary school is more beneficial because younger children tend to acquire pronunciation and basic communication skills more naturally.
Those who favour beginning at secondary school often point to the greater academic maturity of older students. Teenagers are generally better able to understand grammatical rules, analyse complex linguistic structures and study independently. As a result, they may progress rapidly once formal language instruction begins. Furthermore, secondary-school students often have a clearer understanding of why they are learning a foreign language, particularly if it is relevant to their future education or career. This awareness can encourage them to approach lessons more seriously and maintain consistent study habits.
On the other hand, there are strong arguments for introducing foreign languages during primary education. Young children are typically more receptive to unfamiliar sounds and can develop pronunciation and listening skills without becoming overly concerned about making mistakes. Language learning at this age can also be incorporated into games, songs and interactive activities, making the process enjoyable rather than academically demanding. More importantly, starting early gives learners several additional years to practise the language, allowing them to develop greater fluency by the time they reach adulthood.
In my view, the advantages of early language education outweigh the benefits of postponing it until secondary school. However, the effectiveness of such programmes depends heavily on teaching methods. If primary-school pupils are subjected to excessive grammar exercises or examination pressure, their natural enthusiasm may disappear. Instead, lessons should focus initially on communication, vocabulary and exposure to authentic spoken language, with more complex grammatical instruction introduced gradually as students mature.
In conclusion, although secondary-school students may have greater cognitive maturity and a stronger academic motivation, beginning foreign-language education at primary school provides a longer learning period and allows children to develop more natural linguistic abilities. Therefore, I believe that foreign languages should be introduced at an early stage, provided that teaching is engaging and age-appropriate.
[Band: 9.0]
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
2β€246π₯41β€βπ₯30π22β12π³12π11π’10π―10πΏ10π9
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
1β€111β€βπ₯25π13π―11π₯°6β‘5π₯5π’5π4π4π3