Calling for a No-No vote, conservative group Family Solidarity said: “One particularly concerning possibility is the legal recognition of polygamous relationships under the guise of ‘family’.”

The group noted former attorney general Michael McDowell’s concerns over the lack of clear legal definition of the terminology “durable relationships”.

“This could lead to unforeseen and profound changes in family law, affecting areas such as inheritance, welfare rights, and more,” the group claimed.

On the generic concept of care, the group warns this move to “gender-neutral language, while seemingly progressive, actually erases the specific recognition of mothers and their unparalleled role in nurturing and maintaining the familial structure”.

https://www.independent.ie/irish-news/the-role-of-mothers-should-continue-to-be-cherished-catholic-bishops-urge-no-no-votes-in-care-and-family-referendums/a864218635.html

IRELAND

BISHOPS CALL FOR NO VOTE IN PRO POLYGAMY AND ANTI MOTHER REFERENDUMS

Bishops have released a statement on the upcoming Referendums, one of which could equate 'durable relationships' such as polygamy and extra marital affairs with marriage and another which seeks to remove the words 'Mother' and 'woman' from the constitution and which will remove limits on power of government to force mothers into employment.

They have said:

"While ‘Marriage’ entails a public and legal commitment, the term ‘durable relationship’ is shrouded in legal uncertainty and is open to wide interpretation. It does not make sense that such an ambiguous reality would be considered ‘antecedent and superior to all positive law’ and acquire the same ‘inalienable and imprescriptible’ rights as those ascribed to the ‘family founded on marriage’. Various commentators have suggested that the term ‘durable relationship’ risks leading to unforeseen and unintended consequences"

And:

"The State has to date failed to financially acknowledge the role of women in the home; once again there is no indication that there will be provision for the adequate financial remuneration of carers.  The proposed term ‘strive to support’ appears to weaken the State’s constitutional responsibility to materially and legislatively support such care.  Indeed, the proposed new Article 42B does not actually confer any enforceable rights for carers or for those being cared for"

https://www.catholicbishops.ie/2024/02/25/irish-catholic-bishops-conference-statement-on-the-family-and-care-referendums/

@CATHOLICARENA

A greenpill:

3 years ago British Jew Paul Mason was on RTÉ saying only 1% of Irish people oppose immigration.

Now look.

https://www.businesspost.ie/news/red-c-poll-two-thirds-of-public-think-ireland-has-taken-in-too-many-refugees

Large protest at the Manor Hotel in Celbridge tonight where locals got word that a foreign child had been gang raped by 3 roma gippos.
Protesters turned up earlier this evening to voice their concerns.
Imagine putting young children of any race colour or creed in with a bunch of known scammers and rapists.
That is Ireland in 2024

These Spiritual words just came to me simple but powerful, Why eat from a seedless tree when it does not bare Fruit!?!