Forwarded from Lawyers For Justice Ireland Official
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Protestors outside Dublin Airport today against the State's mass immigration and open border policy.
Forwarded from :rory-brian:
Constitutional Review in Ireland
The Irish Constitution (Bunreacht na hÉireann) divides state power into three parts,[3] with each part assigned to a particular organ of the state – executive power to the government,[4] legislative power to the parliament (the Oireachtas),[5] and judicial power to the courts.[6] Yet since the enactment of the Constitution in 1937, the separation of powers has been in practice not tripartite, but bipartite.[7] The reason for this is that the government is dominant over the legislature, by reason of the political party ‘whip’ system. Typically, when a general election occurs, either one party wins an outright majority of seats in the parliament or it builds a coalition which has such a majority. Then, members of the government parties are in practice obliged to vote with the party, lest their membership be terminated. In this way, the government can pass legislation through the parliament virtually without constraint (save, of course, for political constraints on what they might do), and so the executive and legislative branches are in practice fused as one.[8]
Under the Constitution, the Courts are empowered to directly review the exercise of executive power,[9] and administrative power through the procedure of judicial review.[10] Furthermore, and perhaps most significantly, Irish courts have the power to review the constitutionality of legislation. Article 34 of the Constitution provides that justice shall be administered in courts established by law. In Ireland, there is no specialist constitutional court, but instead the Superior Courts – the High Court, the Court of Appeal, and the Supreme Court – are empowered to decide on constitutional matters. Their power to review legislation arises first as a result of Article 15.4 which states that the parliament shall not enact any law that is repugnant to the Constitution, and that any such law would be, but to the extent of its repugnancy, invalid. By Article 34.4, the task of determining the validity or otherwise of laws with respect to the Constitution is assigned to the Superior Courts.
The Irish Constitution (Bunreacht na hÉireann) divides state power into three parts,[3] with each part assigned to a particular organ of the state – executive power to the government,[4] legislative power to the parliament (the Oireachtas),[5] and judicial power to the courts.[6] Yet since the enactment of the Constitution in 1937, the separation of powers has been in practice not tripartite, but bipartite.[7] The reason for this is that the government is dominant over the legislature, by reason of the political party ‘whip’ system. Typically, when a general election occurs, either one party wins an outright majority of seats in the parliament or it builds a coalition which has such a majority. Then, members of the government parties are in practice obliged to vote with the party, lest their membership be terminated. In this way, the government can pass legislation through the parliament virtually without constraint (save, of course, for political constraints on what they might do), and so the executive and legislative branches are in practice fused as one.[8]
Under the Constitution, the Courts are empowered to directly review the exercise of executive power,[9] and administrative power through the procedure of judicial review.[10] Furthermore, and perhaps most significantly, Irish courts have the power to review the constitutionality of legislation. Article 34 of the Constitution provides that justice shall be administered in courts established by law. In Ireland, there is no specialist constitutional court, but instead the Superior Courts – the High Court, the Court of Appeal, and the Supreme Court – are empowered to decide on constitutional matters. Their power to review legislation arises first as a result of Article 15.4 which states that the parliament shall not enact any law that is repugnant to the Constitution, and that any such law would be, but to the extent of its repugnancy, invalid. By Article 34.4, the task of determining the validity or otherwise of laws with respect to the Constitution is assigned to the Superior Courts.
Trinity College Law Review (TCLR) | Trinity College Dublin
The Common Law, the Constitution, and Judicial Self-Identity: Constitutional Rights Adjudication in Ireland | Trinity College Law…
This article forms the first part of the King's Student Law Review and Trinity College Law Review's Joint Edition in Constitutional Law Series Introduction 'One of the strengths and – paradoxically, at the same time - the weaknesses of the Constitution…
Forwarded from 𝗢𝗳𝗳-𝗚𝗿𝗶𝗱 𝗜𝗿𝗲𝗹𝗮𝗻𝗱 ☘️ (Gabhán)
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Forwarded from Pox Populi
Alleged evidence of NGOs planning an invasion of Africans into Ireland under the pretext of saving persecuted gays.
Forwarded from Late Stage Ireland
🚨 A mother traveling on a train from Heuston Station to Tullamore with her five children says a foreign man started talking them and asked her son to sit next to him.
The mother intervened and warned her son not to move, but then the man began taking pictures of her children. When confronted, he disappeared to another part of the train.
As the mother prepared to disembark with her children at Tullamore, a foreign woman got in her way and started asking about the kids, touching one of her sons. When the mother asked the woman to move, she grabbed her son's arm in what the mother believed was an abduction attempt. The mother told her to let go and tried to alert security but there was none.
The woman then walked off, talking to someone on an earpiece, which the mother believes may have been the man she had previously confronted.
This incident bears similarities to one that occurred in Thurles last December, where a foreign woman allegedly attempted to abduct a child from a bus stop.
🔗 facebook.com
The mother intervened and warned her son not to move, but then the man began taking pictures of her children. When confronted, he disappeared to another part of the train.
As the mother prepared to disembark with her children at Tullamore, a foreign woman got in her way and started asking about the kids, touching one of her sons. When the mother asked the woman to move, she grabbed her son's arm in what the mother believed was an abduction attempt. The mother told her to let go and tried to alert security but there was none.
The woman then walked off, talking to someone on an earpiece, which the mother believes may have been the man she had previously confronted.
This incident bears similarities to one that occurred in Thurles last December, where a foreign woman allegedly attempted to abduct a child from a bus stop.
🔗 facebook.com
Forwarded from Gearóid Murphy
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
State-funded male migrant appears to make death threat gesture to #Mullingar women protesters, as if he wants to cut their throats.
🤬1
Forwarded from Free Speech Ireland
The leaflet distributed in Greystones today
Forwarded from 💥We ARE the Spark (Candie Scott)
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Forwarded from R1 D1
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
A Ukrainian soldier breaks down and calls out Zelensky and his politicians who have sold out Ukrainian people to the globalists.