Forwarded from PeterSweden
BOMBSHELL NEWS🚨🚨🚨
New data shows that among young people, there could be 10 times higher risk of getting myocarditis after mRNA vaccination compared with covid.
They LIED to you!
Read the huge news in my latest Substack article here:
https://petersweden.substack.com/p/myocarditis-mrna
New data shows that among young people, there could be 10 times higher risk of getting myocarditis after mRNA vaccination compared with covid.
They LIED to you!
Read the huge news in my latest Substack article here:
https://petersweden.substack.com/p/myocarditis-mrna
The Freedom Corner with PeterSweden
BOMBSHELL – Myocarditis after mRNA vaccines.
The truth about these shots are getting out.
👍11😢6⚡2
Forwarded from Dolores Cahill (Dolores)
Dolores Cahill Law versus legal: 'Trial by Jury' (Part 5):
Here is a second excellent interview of William Keytes with Richard Vobes on the Law & the process of 'Trail by Jury' 💞
Natural Law has principles, such as Innocent until Proven Guilty,
Do No Harm &
Fraud unravels ALL.
Act in Honour: Do No Harm:
Right to Life, Travel, Speech, Privacy & Private Property:
The 'Trial by Jury' is an ancient process.
It involves the Jurors & Jury using their Conscience, determining Right & Wrong, & assessing a number of elements:
Is the accusation a 'Crime', e.g did it involve Harm to another living Man or Woman:
Based on the 'Hearing' & the Evidence, is the accusation, True or False.
The important role of the Jury is to assess the 'accusation' made against the living Man or Woman & also assess the 'document' it is based on, whether 'legislation', 'act' etc, if this is a Lawful accusation or document.
If not, Juries have the duty to deem the 'accused' INNOCENT & also 'NULLIFY' the accusation document, whether 'legislation', 'act' etc for causing Harm to ONE Man or Woman as a Precedence to defend their Inalienable Rights & Freedoms in Law.
The Man or Woman deemed Innocent, can then assess whether the 'Accuser' 'Knew or should have Known', the accusation or 'legislation' was false & Unlawful.
The 'Trial by Jury' comes from ancient times to defend Men & Women's Freedoms, Innocence & Honour, as a Bulwark against the making of FALSE written documents, 'legislation', accusations.
This is called Malfeasance & is the Criminal offence of trying to make false 'legislation' when 'police', 'justices', 'politicians' etc 'knew or should have known', for example when 'legislation' infringes on Inherent & Inalienable Rights & Freedoms, such as to Life, Travel, Speech, Privacy, Private Property.
The access to 'Trial by Jury' is ancient, & was known & practiced throughout the world.
As William Keytes discusses, it was a cherished foundation of England in the many centuries BEFORE written documents, before any 'Constitution', before the 1215 Magna Carta, etc
From ancient times, a Maxim of Law is:
'Innocent until proven Guilty by a Jury of Peers'.
In Law, for a Criminal offence, there will be allegations of a Crime, which must involve Harm done by a Man or Woman, who is alive, to another Man or Woman.
The individual Jurors & Jury together decide if allegations are True or False.
The individual Jurors & Jury together decide on Innocence or Guilt based on the Evidence & weighing what they hear & each making the important decision in good conscience.
The responsibility of being a Juror & participating in a 'Trail by Jury' is one of the responsibilities of Men & Women in Law & in their community.
Making false allegations of Criminal Offences causes Harm, by attempting to damage the Honour, & the Reputation of other Men & Women, or to attempt to Infringe on their Inherent Rights & Freedoms.
The individual Jurors and the Jury also assess if the accusation of a 'Crime' is Lawful.
They assess the Accusation.
They assess the 'written documents', such as 'legislation', 'statutes', 'acts' etc
'Knew or should have known', if the Jury deem the 'written documents'/'legislation' contradict the 'Right to Travel' etc, they Jury can 'Nullify' the 'legislation'. This is a 'Precedence' in Law.
If the Jury deems the 'accusation' was NOT 'criminal'.
The Jury can 'Nullify' 'legislation', so no other man or woman is FALSELY accused.
The Jury can deem the 'legislation' UNLAWFUL and NULLIFY it.
Then the Jury can assess the 'Accuser' for example, a Lawful Police Constable 'Knew or should have Known' their accusation was
Lawful & True
or
Unlawful & False.
The accuser who 'Knew or should have Known' the accusation this Man or Woman made was NOT a Lawful Crime, can be assessed by 'Trial by Jury' for the crime(s) of Malfeasance, Fraud and or Deception etc
'Trial by Jury' is how people for centuries protect themselves from Corruption, abuse of positions of 'police', 'justices' etc.
Join & share 💞
@DoloresCahill
https://youtu.be/4JPMY-PZhdI
Here is a second excellent interview of William Keytes with Richard Vobes on the Law & the process of 'Trail by Jury' 💞
Natural Law has principles, such as Innocent until Proven Guilty,
Do No Harm &
Fraud unravels ALL.
Act in Honour: Do No Harm:
Right to Life, Travel, Speech, Privacy & Private Property:
The 'Trial by Jury' is an ancient process.
It involves the Jurors & Jury using their Conscience, determining Right & Wrong, & assessing a number of elements:
Is the accusation a 'Crime', e.g did it involve Harm to another living Man or Woman:
Based on the 'Hearing' & the Evidence, is the accusation, True or False.
The important role of the Jury is to assess the 'accusation' made against the living Man or Woman & also assess the 'document' it is based on, whether 'legislation', 'act' etc, if this is a Lawful accusation or document.
If not, Juries have the duty to deem the 'accused' INNOCENT & also 'NULLIFY' the accusation document, whether 'legislation', 'act' etc for causing Harm to ONE Man or Woman as a Precedence to defend their Inalienable Rights & Freedoms in Law.
The Man or Woman deemed Innocent, can then assess whether the 'Accuser' 'Knew or should have Known', the accusation or 'legislation' was false & Unlawful.
The 'Trial by Jury' comes from ancient times to defend Men & Women's Freedoms, Innocence & Honour, as a Bulwark against the making of FALSE written documents, 'legislation', accusations.
This is called Malfeasance & is the Criminal offence of trying to make false 'legislation' when 'police', 'justices', 'politicians' etc 'knew or should have known', for example when 'legislation' infringes on Inherent & Inalienable Rights & Freedoms, such as to Life, Travel, Speech, Privacy, Private Property.
The access to 'Trial by Jury' is ancient, & was known & practiced throughout the world.
As William Keytes discusses, it was a cherished foundation of England in the many centuries BEFORE written documents, before any 'Constitution', before the 1215 Magna Carta, etc
From ancient times, a Maxim of Law is:
'Innocent until proven Guilty by a Jury of Peers'.
In Law, for a Criminal offence, there will be allegations of a Crime, which must involve Harm done by a Man or Woman, who is alive, to another Man or Woman.
The individual Jurors & Jury together decide if allegations are True or False.
The individual Jurors & Jury together decide on Innocence or Guilt based on the Evidence & weighing what they hear & each making the important decision in good conscience.
The responsibility of being a Juror & participating in a 'Trail by Jury' is one of the responsibilities of Men & Women in Law & in their community.
Making false allegations of Criminal Offences causes Harm, by attempting to damage the Honour, & the Reputation of other Men & Women, or to attempt to Infringe on their Inherent Rights & Freedoms.
The individual Jurors and the Jury also assess if the accusation of a 'Crime' is Lawful.
They assess the Accusation.
They assess the 'written documents', such as 'legislation', 'statutes', 'acts' etc
'Knew or should have known', if the Jury deem the 'written documents'/'legislation' contradict the 'Right to Travel' etc, they Jury can 'Nullify' the 'legislation'. This is a 'Precedence' in Law.
If the Jury deems the 'accusation' was NOT 'criminal'.
The Jury can 'Nullify' 'legislation', so no other man or woman is FALSELY accused.
The Jury can deem the 'legislation' UNLAWFUL and NULLIFY it.
Then the Jury can assess the 'Accuser' for example, a Lawful Police Constable 'Knew or should have Known' their accusation was
Lawful & True
or
Unlawful & False.
The accuser who 'Knew or should have Known' the accusation this Man or Woman made was NOT a Lawful Crime, can be assessed by 'Trial by Jury' for the crime(s) of Malfeasance, Fraud and or Deception etc
'Trial by Jury' is how people for centuries protect themselves from Corruption, abuse of positions of 'police', 'justices' etc.
Join & share 💞
@DoloresCahill
https://youtu.be/4JPMY-PZhdI
YouTube
The power is in our hands
William Keyte returns to add more clarity to the debate over the common law constitution.
Important links:
Common Law Constitution https://www.commonlawconstitution.org
Democracy Defined: https://www.democracydefined.org/
----------------------------…
Important links:
Common Law Constitution https://www.commonlawconstitution.org
Democracy Defined: https://www.democracydefined.org/
----------------------------…
👍9
Forwarded from Dolores Cahill (Dolores)
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Children's Health Defence & Oracle Films video Highlighting Vaccine Adverse Events with a Message to the mainstream media, governments and health professionals:
🚫 Stop dismissing the injured & bereaved.
🚫 Stop gaslighting them.
🚫 Stop harming them.
✅ Start acknowledging them.
✅ Start listening.
✅ Start helping.
Join & share 💞
@DoloresCahill
🚫 Stop dismissing the injured & bereaved.
🚫 Stop gaslighting them.
🚫 Stop harming them.
✅ Start acknowledging them.
✅ Start listening.
✅ Start helping.
Join & share 💞
@DoloresCahill
👍7👌4❤2😢1
Forwarded from Dolores Cahill (Dolores)
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Law versus legal: 'Trial by Jury' (Part 6)
'The Medical body which is supposed to protect the population from doctors Is now killing the population'.
Dr Roger Hodkinson.
'Trial by Jury' is Lawful today & is how Communities for Millennia have developed a Lawful, Fair & Locally Implemented Process to prevent Men & Women causing Harm to others in their Communities.
Maxims of Law/Principles of Law:
No one is above the Law:
Act in Honour:
Do No Harm:
Knew or Should have Known:
Innocent until proven Guilty:
Ignorance of the Law is no Excuse:
Liability for ALL Actions & Omissions:
Fraud unravels ALL:
Hippocratic Oath:
First Do No Harm:
Cannot administer a Poison:
Simply put:
Every Man & Woman have a Inherent & Inalienable Right to Life.
Put another way:
People cannot 'Get away with Murder'.
Communities know Justice & Law will have to be restored locally & Lawfully to prevent People in Cherished Positions causing Harm to our vulnerable loved ones by their Actions & Omissions.
Join & share 💞
@DoloresCahill
'The Medical body which is supposed to protect the population from doctors Is now killing the population'.
Dr Roger Hodkinson.
'Trial by Jury' is Lawful today & is how Communities for Millennia have developed a Lawful, Fair & Locally Implemented Process to prevent Men & Women causing Harm to others in their Communities.
Maxims of Law/Principles of Law:
No one is above the Law:
Act in Honour:
Do No Harm:
Knew or Should have Known:
Innocent until proven Guilty:
Ignorance of the Law is no Excuse:
Liability for ALL Actions & Omissions:
Fraud unravels ALL:
Hippocratic Oath:
First Do No Harm:
Cannot administer a Poison:
Simply put:
Every Man & Woman have a Inherent & Inalienable Right to Life.
Put another way:
People cannot 'Get away with Murder'.
Communities know Justice & Law will have to be restored locally & Lawfully to prevent People in Cherished Positions causing Harm to our vulnerable loved ones by their Actions & Omissions.
Join & share 💞
@DoloresCahill
👍16❤🔥3👏2
Forwarded from Dolores Cahill (Dolores)
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Professor of Oncology Aengus Dalgleish of St. George's Medical School, London, calls for urgent stop to Covid-19 boosters immediately:
As an Oncologist, I Am Seeing People With Stable Cancer for up to 20 years, feeling very tired and Rapidly Relapse with Cancer after a Covid-19 injection/booster (with leukemia, lymphoma, melanoma etc).
Join &. share 💞
@DoloresCahill
As an Oncologist, I Am Seeing People With Stable Cancer for up to 20 years, feeling very tired and Rapidly Relapse with Cancer after a Covid-19 injection/booster (with leukemia, lymphoma, melanoma etc).
Join &. share 💞
@DoloresCahill
👍24👀2
Forwarded from LauraAboli (Laura Aboli)
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Founder of Pink Floyd, Roger Waters, says Russia's Special Operation in Ukraine was NOT UNPROVOKED, during his address to UN Security Council.
Waters put the Security Council on blast, saying their goal in Ukraine is to secure profits for war industry, maintain global power, and a bigger share of 'the world cake'.
https://t.me/LauraAbolichannel
Waters put the Security Council on blast, saying their goal in Ukraine is to secure profits for war industry, maintain global power, and a bigger share of 'the world cake'.
https://t.me/LauraAbolichannel
❤39👍13
Please help us to force the BBC to take down its misleading interview with Bourla of Pfizer about his vaccines and children. If all 19,214 of us complain it will make a huge noise! Please also share widely. You don’t have to be in the UK
👍6
Forwarded from Freda Birrell
Action for today - complain to the BBC!
Dear Supporters,
Since our last update we have been responding to press interest in the outcome of our regulatory complaint against Pfizer — more on that below — spotlighting Government and NHS efforts to continue to push the Covid vaccine to children and teenagers, and continuing the battle to break through MSM’s apparent oath of silence on these issues.
UsForThem vs Pfizer
After news of our complaint against Pfizer broke in The Telegraph in November, we promised we would tell you more about it once the regulator published its case report and we were free to do so. The Prescription Medicines Code of Practice Authority (PMCPA), the UK regulator which heard our complaint, published its report on 3 February, and it can now be read in full online.
Many of you will already have seen our Broken Custodians Substack, but suffice it to say that the highlight of this year-long process is that on the points that mattered most to us, we won!
In particular, after a lengthy appeal by Pfizer against initial findings given last summer, the PMCPA’s Appeal Board upheld three key elements of our complaint, finding that Pfizer’s Chairman and CEO, Dr Albert Bourla, had made comments in a BBC interview about vaccinating 5 to 11-year-olds which not only promoted the use of covid-19 vaccines for children but were also “misleading” and “incapable of substantiation”.
For our more detailed insights into the case please visit our Broken Custodian Substack.
The story has been picked up by news reports around the world, with interest in particular from the US, and you can see Molly interviewed last week by the USA’s Dr Drew here. We have also seen some good coverage in the UK from reporters at Epoch Times and The Conservative European.
MSM, though tends to stay quiet on any story that risks critiquing the official narrative that the vaccine rollout has been an unadulterated success, so UK MSM coverage has been sparse. The BBC has not only retained the offending interview with Dr Bourla on its website but has also given no coverage of the regulator’s findings — and plainly undermining its commitment to countering misinformation and disinformation by doing so.
That’s why we’ve included below a CTA to call on the BBC to remove Dr Bourla’s advertisement from their online platform and archive and to report on the PMCPA Appeal Board’s findings.
As our Substack article explains, this case, and the apparent regulatory impunity that companies such as Pfizer appear to enjoy, evidence that the system of oversight for UK Pharma is hopelessly outdated and that the regulatory authorities are risibly ill-equipped to keep powerful, hugely well-resourced corporate groups in check.
As we move into 2023, you can expect to hear more from us on this topic, which has become so relevant to children's health.
In the meantime, we wish you all a happy half-term break. We will be sending out a couple of more lighthearted Substacks over the holiday, written by supporters.
BBC / Pfizer CTA
Please can you complain to the BBC. In order to help you with this, we have drafted a template below which takes you through the process and gives a suggestion for what you could write. You can also find this on our website with text that will be easier to copy and paste.
Complaining to the BBC must be done on their website:
https://www.bbc.co.uk/contact/complaints/make-a-complaint
There are quite a few steps that you need to follow.
What is your complaint about? Choose General BBC
Are you contacting us about a previous complaint? Choose no
Select the best category to describe your complaint Choose Factual Error
What is the subject of your complaint? Enter “Pfizer interview ruled misleading by regulator”
Please enter your complaint [suggested text below]
On 2 December 2021, the BBC published on its website, its popular news app and in the BBC News at One programme, a video interview and an accompanying article under the headline ‘Pfizer boss: Annual Covid jabs for years to come’. It is still available on your website.
Dear Supporters,
Since our last update we have been responding to press interest in the outcome of our regulatory complaint against Pfizer — more on that below — spotlighting Government and NHS efforts to continue to push the Covid vaccine to children and teenagers, and continuing the battle to break through MSM’s apparent oath of silence on these issues.
UsForThem vs Pfizer
After news of our complaint against Pfizer broke in The Telegraph in November, we promised we would tell you more about it once the regulator published its case report and we were free to do so. The Prescription Medicines Code of Practice Authority (PMCPA), the UK regulator which heard our complaint, published its report on 3 February, and it can now be read in full online.
Many of you will already have seen our Broken Custodians Substack, but suffice it to say that the highlight of this year-long process is that on the points that mattered most to us, we won!
In particular, after a lengthy appeal by Pfizer against initial findings given last summer, the PMCPA’s Appeal Board upheld three key elements of our complaint, finding that Pfizer’s Chairman and CEO, Dr Albert Bourla, had made comments in a BBC interview about vaccinating 5 to 11-year-olds which not only promoted the use of covid-19 vaccines for children but were also “misleading” and “incapable of substantiation”.
For our more detailed insights into the case please visit our Broken Custodian Substack.
The story has been picked up by news reports around the world, with interest in particular from the US, and you can see Molly interviewed last week by the USA’s Dr Drew here. We have also seen some good coverage in the UK from reporters at Epoch Times and The Conservative European.
MSM, though tends to stay quiet on any story that risks critiquing the official narrative that the vaccine rollout has been an unadulterated success, so UK MSM coverage has been sparse. The BBC has not only retained the offending interview with Dr Bourla on its website but has also given no coverage of the regulator’s findings — and plainly undermining its commitment to countering misinformation and disinformation by doing so.
That’s why we’ve included below a CTA to call on the BBC to remove Dr Bourla’s advertisement from their online platform and archive and to report on the PMCPA Appeal Board’s findings.
As our Substack article explains, this case, and the apparent regulatory impunity that companies such as Pfizer appear to enjoy, evidence that the system of oversight for UK Pharma is hopelessly outdated and that the regulatory authorities are risibly ill-equipped to keep powerful, hugely well-resourced corporate groups in check.
As we move into 2023, you can expect to hear more from us on this topic, which has become so relevant to children's health.
In the meantime, we wish you all a happy half-term break. We will be sending out a couple of more lighthearted Substacks over the holiday, written by supporters.
BBC / Pfizer CTA
Please can you complain to the BBC. In order to help you with this, we have drafted a template below which takes you through the process and gives a suggestion for what you could write. You can also find this on our website with text that will be easier to copy and paste.
Complaining to the BBC must be done on their website:
https://www.bbc.co.uk/contact/complaints/make-a-complaint
There are quite a few steps that you need to follow.
What is your complaint about? Choose General BBC
Are you contacting us about a previous complaint? Choose no
Select the best category to describe your complaint Choose Factual Error
What is the subject of your complaint? Enter “Pfizer interview ruled misleading by regulator”
Please enter your complaint [suggested text below]
On 2 December 2021, the BBC published on its website, its popular news app and in the BBC News at One programme, a video interview and an accompanying article under the headline ‘Pfizer boss: Annual Covid jabs for years to come’. It is still available on your website.
👍19
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🌍🕊🇩🇪🕊🇦🇹 For peace: #muc1802
Gathering on February 18th, 2023 at 1 PM (CET) on Königsplatz square in Munich
Germany (and the entire world) needs you!
On February 18th, the eyes of the world will be directed to Munich, when all those who desire escalation in #Ukraine will be discussing the next steps during the #SecurityConference.
Let's use this occasion to send a strong, peaceful signal as a counter-weight: the people of Europe want #peace, #safety and #prosperity and ask for #negotiations and #diplomacy instead of #arms and #war.
🐣🎵 Please help us spread the message on Twitter!
#muc1802 #MachtFrieden #wewillallbethere #wwd #worldwidedemonstration
Warm greetings,
Alexander Ehrlich
@ehrlichalexander
@europeansunited
Gathering on February 18th, 2023 at 1 PM (CET) on Königsplatz square in Munich
Germany (and the entire world) needs you!
On February 18th, the eyes of the world will be directed to Munich, when all those who desire escalation in #Ukraine will be discussing the next steps during the #SecurityConference.
Let's use this occasion to send a strong, peaceful signal as a counter-weight: the people of Europe want #peace, #safety and #prosperity and ask for #negotiations and #diplomacy instead of #arms and #war.
🐣🎵 Please help us spread the message on Twitter!
#muc1802 #MachtFrieden #wewillallbethere #wwd #worldwidedemonstration
Warm greetings,
Alexander Ehrlich
@ehrlichalexander
@europeansunited
👏6👍5
Forwarded from PeterSweden
GREAT NEWS
Sweden has thrown away 8.5 million doses of covid vaccines because nobody wants it anymore.
People don't want to be the test subjects.
https://petersweden.substack.com/p/throwing-away-doses
Sweden has thrown away 8.5 million doses of covid vaccines because nobody wants it anymore.
People don't want to be the test subjects.
https://petersweden.substack.com/p/throwing-away-doses
www.petersweden.org
Sweden THROWS AWAY 8.5 million doses of covid vaccines
People don’t want this anymore.
👍60❤15😁5❤🔥2🔥2😢1
Forwarded from Dolores Cahill (Dolores)
Meeting
Live now
Please click this URL to join. https://who-e.zoom.us/w/92843641401?tk=YC3sQ1JOFLWuhTxwuAMp_hbJqGYxOKL-186l9dHOByw.DQMAAAAVnemKORZnNEMwSk9oeVNsdXI0ZER0T21JTGpnAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA&uuid=WN_A7j8atsCQoW7mfNsCiXENg
Passcode: m@rburg23
All about the vaccines for Marburg
Live now
Please click this URL to join. https://who-e.zoom.us/w/92843641401?tk=YC3sQ1JOFLWuhTxwuAMp_hbJqGYxOKL-186l9dHOByw.DQMAAAAVnemKORZnNEMwSk9oeVNsdXI0ZER0T21JTGpnAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA&uuid=WN_A7j8atsCQoW7mfNsCiXENg
Passcode: m@rburg23
All about the vaccines for Marburg
Zoom Video
Join our Cloud HD Video Meeting
Zoom is the leader in modern enterprise video communications, with an easy, reliable cloud platform for video and audio conferencing, chat, and webinars across mobile, desktop, and room systems. Zoom Rooms is the original software-based conference room solution…
Forwarded from Dolores Cahill (Dolores)
Dolores Cahill: Law versus legal: Marburg (Part 1)
The public WHO zoom on 14th February 2023 is over, discussing 'Marburg' in Equatorial Guinea announced yesterday 13th February 2023.
Please share & join 💞
@DoloresCahill
https://www.afro.who.int/countries/equatorial-guinea/news/equatorial-guinea-confirms-first-ever-marburg-virus-disease-outbreak
The public WHO zoom on 14th February 2023 is over, discussing 'Marburg' in Equatorial Guinea announced yesterday 13th February 2023.
Please share & join 💞
@DoloresCahill
https://www.afro.who.int/countries/equatorial-guinea/news/equatorial-guinea-confirms-first-ever-marburg-virus-disease-outbreak
WHO | Regional Office for Africa
Equatorial Guinea confirms first-ever Marburg virus disease outbreak | WHO | Regional Office for Africa
Equatorial Guinea today confirmed its first-ever outbreak of Marburg virus disease. Preliminary tests carried out following the deaths of at least nine people in the country’s eastern Kie Ntem Province turned out positive on one of the samples for the viral…
👀3👍2
Forwarded from Dolores Cahill (Dolores)
WHO Public Zoom 14th February 2023 on 'Marburg' in Equatorial Guinea announced 13th February 2023: Slide 1 of 5:
Please share 💞
@DoloresCahill
Please share 💞
@DoloresCahill
👍3😁1
Forwarded from Dolores Cahill (Dolores)
WHO Public Zoom 14th February 2023 on 'Marburg' in Equatorial Guinea announced 13th February 2023: Slide 2 of 5:
Please join & share
@DoloresCahill on Telegram 💞
Please join & share
@DoloresCahill on Telegram 💞
👍5
Forwarded from Dolores Cahill (Dolores)
WHO Public Zoom 14th February 2023 on 'Marburg' in Equatorial Guinea announced 13th February 2023: Slide 3 of 5:
Please share 💞
@DoloresCahill on Telegram
Please share 💞
@DoloresCahill on Telegram
Forwarded from Dolores Cahill (Dolores)
WHO Public Zoom 14th February 2023 on 'Marburg' in Equatorial Guinea announced 13th February 2023: Slide 4 of 5:
Please share 💞
@DoloresCahill on Telegram
Please share 💞
@DoloresCahill on Telegram
👍1
Forwarded from Dolores Cahill (Dolores)
WHO Public Zoom 14th February 2023 on 'Marburg' in Equatorial Guinea announced 13th February 2023: Slide 5 of 5:
Please share 💞
@DoloresCahill on Telegram
Please share 💞
@DoloresCahill on Telegram
👍3