4 Swedish Doctors: Lockdowns are the biggest public health failure in world history
OPINION. The government decided to send SEK 150 billion in grants to the EU's corona fund. A breathtaking sum to countries that through lockdowns deliberately destroy their economies. Now we never want to hear again that there is a lack of money for Swedish elderly care.
One year into the pandemic, the risk groups still lacks the focused protection that can save lives and enable the removal of counterproductive restrictions. Half of all those who died with covid-19 have lived in municipal nursing homes, a quarter had home care. The median age of death is 85 years.
The Swedish doctor's call has collected 7,500 signatures against harmful restrictions and for strengthened protection of the old and fragile.
Debate article by Doctors: Nils Littorin, Sebastian Rushworth, Sven Román and Hans Zingmark. In Swedish so translate please https://newsvoice.se/2021/04/lakare-lockdowns-folkhalsofiasko/
OPINION. The government decided to send SEK 150 billion in grants to the EU's corona fund. A breathtaking sum to countries that through lockdowns deliberately destroy their economies. Now we never want to hear again that there is a lack of money for Swedish elderly care.
One year into the pandemic, the risk groups still lacks the focused protection that can save lives and enable the removal of counterproductive restrictions. Half of all those who died with covid-19 have lived in municipal nursing homes, a quarter had home care. The median age of death is 85 years.
The Swedish doctor's call has collected 7,500 signatures against harmful restrictions and for strengthened protection of the old and fragile.
Debate article by Doctors: Nils Littorin, Sebastian Rushworth, Sven Román and Hans Zingmark. In Swedish so translate please https://newsvoice.se/2021/04/lakare-lockdowns-folkhalsofiasko/
NewsVoice
Läkare i Sverige: Lockdowns är världshistoriens största folkhälsofiasko - NewsVoice
OPINION. Regeringen beslöt att skicka 150 miljarder kronor i bidrag till EU:s coronafond. En hisnande summa till länder som genom lockdowns medvetet förstör sina ekonomier. Nu vill vi aldrig mer höra att det saknas pengar till svensk äldreomsorg. Det skriver…
Forwarded from RT News
A pint-sized view of the future? UK considers digital face scans to allow access to pubs
Britain is funding a project to build a smart system that will scan faces to check vaccination status, and grant entry to public places such as pubs and stadiums.
Despite previously promising there would be no vaccine passport, it now seems a “two-tier society” will be created based on vaccination.
The new tech will process patrons within seconds, but does it open up a worrying precedent by leaving those unwilling to submit their faces out in the cold?
Subscribe to RT t.me/rtintl
Britain is funding a project to build a smart system that will scan faces to check vaccination status, and grant entry to public places such as pubs and stadiums.
Despite previously promising there would be no vaccine passport, it now seems a “two-tier society” will be created based on vaccination.
The new tech will process patrons within seconds, but does it open up a worrying precedent by leaving those unwilling to submit their faces out in the cold?
Subscribe to RT t.me/rtintl
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Naomi Wolf on “vaccine passports”
Forwarded from Dr. Tenpenny
https://nypost.com/2021/04/03/cornell-university-mandates-covid-19-vaccines-for-students/ Exceptions will be made for those with religious and medical exemptions, the statement says.
New York Post
Cornell University mandates COVID-19 vaccines for students and staff
Students and staff have no shot of returning to Cornell this fall if they don’t get the COVID-19 vaccine, the school said in a statement. “With the recent announcements of expanded
Forwarded from KongenErNøgen
♦️ 🏛 🇦🇹 - Austrian court overturns judgment: PCR test not suitable for diagnosis
Translation - In the name of the republic” a sensational judgment was issued on March 24 which slapped the Kurz government's panic policy. The court states in several places that a PCR test is not suitable for determining infectivity. This probably factually correct judgment indirectly rejects the entire corona policy in Austria, which is based on this test.
The Vienna Administrative Court has granted a complaint by the FPÖ against the prohibition of its meeting registered for January 31 in Vienna. “The prohibition was wrongly done,” it says on behalf of the republic. In the grounds for the judgment, the court stated on the basis of scientific studies that the grounds for the prohibition put forward by the Vienna State Police Department are completely unfounded. The court agrees with the statements in the complaint "on all points" and even goes far beyond the arguments put forward by the FPÖ itself. In particular, the criteria and definitions used to determine the number of corona sufferers are being massively questioned.
"PCR test not suitable for diagnostics"
It is expressly pointed out that, even according to the World Health Organization (WHO), “a PCR test is not suitable for diagnosis and therefore does not in itself say anything about the disease or infection of a person”. However, the Minister of Health uses a completely different, much broader case definition for Covid-19 diseases, which cannot be used to justify the prohibition of a meeting, because: Should the Corona Commission have based the case definition of the Minister of Health and not that of the WHO; so any determination of the numbers for "sick / infected" is wrong.
The court came to the conclusion that the “information” from the Vienna City Health Service, on which the prohibition by the Vienna State Police Department was based, “ did not contain any valid and evidence-based statements or findings on the epidemic ”
The court literally: Based on the definitions of the Minister of Health, "Case definition Covid-19" from December 23, 2020, a "confirmed case" 1) is any person with evidence of SARS-CoV-2-specific nucleic acid (PCR test, note), regardless of clinical manifestation or 2) any person with evidence of SARS-CoV-specific antigen that meets the clinical criteria or 3) any person with evidence of SARS-CoV-specific antigen that meets the epidemiological criteria. Thus none of the three "confirmed cases" defined by the Minister of Health meet the requirements of the WHO concept of "sick / infected". The WHO refuses to rely solely on the PCR test (confirmed case 1) (...)
Article translation from - https://www.info-direkt.eu/2021/03/31/oesterreichisches-gericht-kippt-urteil-pcr-test-nicht-zur-diagnostik-geeignet/
➡️ - Court judgement (in German) - Here the original judgment on the side of the vote of the day: Administrative Court Vienna - https://wp.tagesstimme.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/Verwaltungsgericht_FPOe-Versammlung.pdf
Translation - In the name of the republic” a sensational judgment was issued on March 24 which slapped the Kurz government's panic policy. The court states in several places that a PCR test is not suitable for determining infectivity. This probably factually correct judgment indirectly rejects the entire corona policy in Austria, which is based on this test.
The Vienna Administrative Court has granted a complaint by the FPÖ against the prohibition of its meeting registered for January 31 in Vienna. “The prohibition was wrongly done,” it says on behalf of the republic. In the grounds for the judgment, the court stated on the basis of scientific studies that the grounds for the prohibition put forward by the Vienna State Police Department are completely unfounded. The court agrees with the statements in the complaint "on all points" and even goes far beyond the arguments put forward by the FPÖ itself. In particular, the criteria and definitions used to determine the number of corona sufferers are being massively questioned.
"PCR test not suitable for diagnostics"
It is expressly pointed out that, even according to the World Health Organization (WHO), “a PCR test is not suitable for diagnosis and therefore does not in itself say anything about the disease or infection of a person”. However, the Minister of Health uses a completely different, much broader case definition for Covid-19 diseases, which cannot be used to justify the prohibition of a meeting, because: Should the Corona Commission have based the case definition of the Minister of Health and not that of the WHO; so any determination of the numbers for "sick / infected" is wrong.
The court came to the conclusion that the “information” from the Vienna City Health Service, on which the prohibition by the Vienna State Police Department was based, “ did not contain any valid and evidence-based statements or findings on the epidemic ”
The court literally: Based on the definitions of the Minister of Health, "Case definition Covid-19" from December 23, 2020, a "confirmed case" 1) is any person with evidence of SARS-CoV-2-specific nucleic acid (PCR test, note), regardless of clinical manifestation or 2) any person with evidence of SARS-CoV-specific antigen that meets the clinical criteria or 3) any person with evidence of SARS-CoV-specific antigen that meets the epidemiological criteria. Thus none of the three "confirmed cases" defined by the Minister of Health meet the requirements of the WHO concept of "sick / infected". The WHO refuses to rely solely on the PCR test (confirmed case 1) (...)
Article translation from - https://www.info-direkt.eu/2021/03/31/oesterreichisches-gericht-kippt-urteil-pcr-test-nicht-zur-diagnostik-geeignet/
➡️ - Court judgement (in German) - Here the original judgment on the side of the vote of the day: Administrative Court Vienna - https://wp.tagesstimme.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/Verwaltungsgericht_FPOe-Versammlung.pdf
Forwarded from GreenMedInfo