GPT-Image-2
Three new models appeared in the arena and then disappeared: maskingtape, packingtape, gaffertape.
Most likely, this is a new version of OpenAIβs image generator.
The models are extremely strong in world knowledge (just look at the anatomy) and also incredibly good at rendering very fine text (YouTube screenshots and code were generated).
It looks like a breakthrough for illustrative graphics.
Importantly, under the hood itβs not the old 4o, but one of the new models. I wonder which one it is?
Three new models appeared in the arena and then disappeared: maskingtape, packingtape, gaffertape.
Most likely, this is a new version of OpenAIβs image generator.
The models are extremely strong in world knowledge (just look at the anatomy) and also incredibly good at rendering very fine text (YouTube screenshots and code were generated).
It looks like a breakthrough for illustrative graphics.
Importantly, under the hood itβs not the old 4o, but one of the new models. I wonder which one it is?
π1.11Kπ₯1.1Kβ€1.08Kπ1.06K
We are COOKED! gpt-image-1.5 vs gpt-image-2 it's so over!
OpenAI shipped again!
πππ
Try all best models in VORTEX AI platform
https://vortex.channel/create.php
OpenAI shipped again!
πππ
Try all best models in VORTEX AI platform
https://vortex.channel/create.php
π459π₯136π130β€113
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Sync-3 is positioning itself as having the best lip sync on the market.
First, the good: you can upload your own voices and audio files, and the system will process them and sync the lips. The key point is that the model is language-agnostic β it doesnβt care what language the input audio is in.
Now, the downsides: Itβs insanely expensive. If you use it via Fal, it costs about $8 per minute: https://fal.ai/models/fal-ai/sync-lipsync/v3
If you use it through their own website, the pricing model is pretty unclear: thereβs a subscription PLUS usage-based charges, but in the end it comes out to roughly the same as Fal: https://sync.so/sync-3
On Twitter, they admit their target segment is B2B and enterprise, and that an ad agency will gladly pay $8 per minute for localization without blinking. But in that case, their βHobbyβ plan looks odd β itβs way too expensive for casual experimentation at home.
First, the good: you can upload your own voices and audio files, and the system will process them and sync the lips. The key point is that the model is language-agnostic β it doesnβt care what language the input audio is in.
Now, the downsides: Itβs insanely expensive. If you use it via Fal, it costs about $8 per minute: https://fal.ai/models/fal-ai/sync-lipsync/v3
If you use it through their own website, the pricing model is pretty unclear: thereβs a subscription PLUS usage-based charges, but in the end it comes out to roughly the same as Fal: https://sync.so/sync-3
On Twitter, they admit their target segment is B2B and enterprise, and that an ad agency will gladly pay $8 per minute for localization without blinking. But in that case, their βHobbyβ plan looks odd β itβs way too expensive for casual experimentation at home.
π122π117β€114π₯113