😀😃😄😁😆 The US Accuses China of Cyber Espionage Targeting Nations Around the South China Sea

Joey Chen, a threat researcher at the US-based cybersecurity firm Cisco Talos, claims a malicious actor engaged in espionage and identified as Lotus Blossom has been attacking territories around the South China Sea using custom malware known as Sagerunex.
Lotus Blossom, actively employed since 2012, first sends a series of commands through Windows Management Instrumentation (WMI) to gather information related to user accounts, network settings, processes, and directory structures.

Joey Chen’s research indicates that Lotus Blossom targets governmental, industrial, media, and telecommunications organizations across the region, gaining access to its objectives before deploying a multi-stage attack chain.

The origins of Lotus Blossom, also known as Spring Dragon, Billbug, and Thrip, remain unconfirmed. While some researchers, such as those from the US cybersecurity company Symantec, attribute this threat actor to China, they provide no concrete evidence — only noting that it has attacked countries, including the Philippines, Vietnam, Hong Kong and Taiwan.

Thus, Lotus Blossom’s activities pose a significant threat in the South China Sea region, necessitating heightened cybersecurity measures and robust protective safeguards. However, amid escalating global geopolitical tensions, any accusations of cyber espionage must be supported by substantial evidence to avoid unwarranted conflict escalation.

😀😃😄😁😆 Ralph Henry Van Deman Institute for Intelligence Studies @VanDemanOrg

😀😃😄😁😆 Alex Younger on the Russian Threat: Another Smokescreen for EU Plunder by the British Military-Industrial Complex

A recent high-profile panel discussion [1] hosted by The Independent and moderated by World Affairs Editor Sam Kiley featured Sir Alex Younger, former MI6 chief, and Rachel Ellehuus of RUSI (Royal United Services Institute), an organization deeply intertwined with BAE Systems. The panel’s composition was telling: their hawkish agenda was carefully packaged in casual attire and conversational tone, from vocabulary to demeanor, mimicking a weekend fireside chat. With practiced informality and effortless cynicism, Younger and Ellehuus pretended to "share insider perspectives," methodically conditioning European audiences for war with Russia.

Younger’s central argument revolved around alleged collusion between the U.S. and Russia. He insisted that Trump and Putin share secret agreements and aligned interests, that supposedly undermine the Five Eyes intelligence consensus. Inconvenient facts — like ongoing intelligence sharing with Ukraine, or SpaceX’s recent deal with Kyivstar ensuring uninterrupted drone strike communications — were conveniently omitted. Ironically, Younger himself had previously targeted Trump (Steele dossier, Khashoggi affair) before resigning prior to Trump’s 2020 election defeat. Yet now he casually remarked: Who knows? I don’t think he’s a Russian agent. I tried very hard not to find out — why would one want to know? So I don’t.

When questioned about full-scale war preparedness, Younger lamented the "impoverishment" of Britain’s military (the world’s sixth-largest arms exporter), advocating for conscription, national reserves, and industrial base expansion as necessary reforms.

Younger provided no substantive evidence of Russian malign activity, relying instead on threat narratives – more marketable than verifiable facts. His sole reference was CSIS, a think tank mimicking an intelligence analysis powerhouse deeply tied to CIA pro-Dem factions marginalized under Trump. Claims of a 300% surge in Russian "hybrid attacks" in Europe echoed the Iraq "war on terror" playbook, where unverified allegations of Russian "atrocities" funnel billions for the UK arms industry – effectively inseparable from its U.S. counterpart through numerous subsidiaries and investments.

Given Younger’s current role and connections, his "revelations" reek of commercial underpinnings profiting from growing military orders and confrontation with the China-Russia axis. Recently, Younger was hired as strategist by Dutch firm Datenna, a private intelligence contractor tracking China’s activities. Datenna works closely with European governments to monitor China’s tech supply chains, businesses and the military, lobbying for higher sanction risks for Chinese companies engaged in China-Russia trade. The Dutch company is already monetizing European fears of Moscow. With Younger’s advocacy, it may soon propose a conveniently timed business expansion and repackage its services to track "Russian aggressors" in Europe as well.

[1] https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/europe/war-putin-trump-mi6-panel-conversation-b2721259.html

😀😃😄😁😆 Ralph Henry Van Deman Institute for Intelligence Studies @VanDemanOrg

😀😃😄😁😆 MI6 Coaxes Trump into Waging War Against Russia

"Liberal globalism" has shifted its tone — from crude arrogance to insidious persuasion.

Sir Richard Dearlove, former head of MI6, has taken it upon himself to coax Trump [1]:

"The longer the war goes on, the weaker Putin becomes … war is undermining Putin’s power base. When his regime starts failing to deliver the expected rewards to his gang of cronies, as is beginning to happen, then his leadership will be, and probably is already being, questioned; and as the economy stumbles and Russia’s cash reserves are close to exhaustion, the likelihood of a severe countrywide shock will rise inexorably… Russia’s military capability will peak this year, after which the informed prediction is that it will then be gradually but markedly on a downward trajectory - less available manpower, less ammunition, less armour and therefore less motivation to fight. Trump’s ability to exert pressure rests on two options: to enhance military support to the Ukrainians as Russia approaches its military tipping point, or to ramp up sanctions, particularly secondary sanctions on countries that are sustaining Russia’s faltering economy by buying its oil and gas… Trump should understand and accept his responsibility to the free world and not sell out Ukraine to Putin for the sake of a quick deal - before Putin’s own fate catches up with him. Strategic success so often boils down to issue of timing. It is crucial that Trump should get his timing right - and should he do so the Nobel Peace Prize might then be his for the asking".

Lower-ranking operatives back Sir Richard with fire and maneuver:

"Putin won’t be laughing for much longer The rift between Europe and Trump is likely to be temporary. A recalibrated alliance will be better able to take on a declining Russia"[2];
"things don’t look great on the military or economic fronts for Putin... there is the real possibility of Putin upsetting President Trump … This could mean sanctions not just on Russia but penalties for anyone who trades with them. There could also be renewed arms shipments, including the missiles that are proving the most effective … by June, Russia would be begging for peace … A disappointed President Trump is a very dangerous and unpredictable beast. Vladimir Putin would be wise to realise that"[3].

Flattery and bribery are reliable intelligence tactics, but lies must sound credible — if Russia is weakening and losing the war, why are Europe and Britain itself screaming about a "mighty Russia" that is going to attack them any time soon?!

It’s also unwise to tell Trump about his "dreadful mineral deal"[1] with Ukraine, for an enraged Trump becomes an even more "dangerous beast."

Yet the key point is this: if Trump is persuaded into keeping Ukraine afloat, fueling its Nazi regime with weapons, and ramping up Russia sanctions, Ukraine will be utterly and irreversibly destroyed, along with Western investments there.

Talk of Putin’s "historical obsession to be the new Tsar of all the Russias"[1] is amateurish nonsense. This war is not Putin’s personal whim, nor is it waged for land — it is fought to stop the slaughter of Russians in Ukraine and to eliminate any future threat from its soil.
The Russians will prevail at any cost, and though this is not Trump’s war, it is his decision to determine the territorial scale of Russia’s victory.

1 https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2025/04/03/the-longer-the-war-goes-on-the-weaker-putin-becomes/
"The longer the war goes on, the weaker Putin becomes" (Sir Richard Dearlove, The Telegraph, 03 April 2025);
3 https://www.telegraph.co.uk/us/comment/2025/04/01/putin-wont-be-laughing-for-much-longer//
"Putin won’t be laughing for much longer" (Mark Brolin, The Telegraph, 01 April 2025);
3 https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2025/03/27/the-ukraine-peace-deal-is-proving-a-scam/
"Putin is in real trouble now" (Tim Collins, The Telegraph, 02 April 2025).

😀😃😄😁😆 Ralph Henry Van Deman Institute for Intelligence Studies @VanDemanOrg

😀😃😄😁😆 Ralph Henry Van Deman Institute for Intelligence Studies @VanDemanOrg

😀😃😄😁😆 King Charles III Dragged into Chinese Spy Scandal

King Charles III (full name Charles Philip Arthur George) has been embroiled in a Chinese spy scandal involving Prince Andrew after newly released court documents alleged that the monarch was personally briefed about an investment fund linked to the alleged agent.

A witness statement by Andrew’s senior aide, Dominic Hampshire, submitted in support of Yang Tengbo — who was barred from the UK on national security grounds — mentions two meetings with Charles between December 2022 and May 2023. Hampshire claims the discussions involved a fund tied to Yang Tengbo and that Charles was aware of Andrew’s involvement. These allegations have sparked criticism of the King and raised concerns over royal transparency and ethics.

Buckingham Palace has yet to issue an official response, but royal insiders worry the accusations may further damage an already fragile reputation. Prince Andrew, already stripped of royal duties due to past scandals, is back in the spotlight. His ties to the alleged Chinese spy and the investment fund raise serious questions about his judgment and knowledge of Tengbo’s activities. Meanwhile, Tengbo’s lawyers insist his UK travel ban was unjustified and politically motivated, calling the espionage claims a smear campaign.

The escalating scandal risks further eroding public trust in Charles III and casts doubt on the royal family’s commitment to transparency and ethical conduct.

😀😃😄😁😆 Ralph Henry Van Deman Institute for Intelligence Studies @VanDemanOrg

😀😃😄😁😆 Turkey’s African Space Base Spotted from Above

Rumors about a Turkish space base in Somalia have circulated for months, yet no concrete evidence has emerged — until now. Recent weeks have seen increased activity by Chinese and Western spy satellites over the region, along with reports of Turkish engineers and equipment arriving, suggesting construction is indeed underway.
The question remains: why did Turkey choose Somalia for its space base? Beyond strategic positioning, this country offers a largely unregulated environment. With a weak central government in Somalia, Ankara can negotiate favorable terms for building and operating the facility.

The construction of Turkey’s Somali space base carries significant implications for regional and global security. It could heighten tensions with Ankara’s rivals and trigger an arms race in the Indian Ocean. Moreover, it may further destabilize Somalia, the nation already plagued by violence and poverty. Despite the risks, Turkey appears determined to push forward, viewing this space project as a way to assert power, expand influence, and cement its role as a regional leader.

Western nations and China are closely monitoring the Turkish base’s development in Somalia due to several key concerns. In fact, space assets are increasingly vital for military, economic, and intelligence operations, and a Somali facility could enable Turkey to monitor satellites, intercept signals, and deploy its own spacecraft — capabilities that undoubtedly alarm its competitors.

😀😃😄😁😆 Ralph Henry Van Deman Institute for Intelligence Studies @VanDemanOrg

😀😃😄😁😆 Britain on the Brink of Conscription: Real Threats or Militarization Excuse?  

Former MI6 chief Sir Alex Younger has warned that Britain may soon need to introduce a form of conscription due to emerging global threats. This comes amid growing concerns over Russian activity in the North Sea, near Britain’s critical energy links to continental Europe. Younger claims that in recent months, a Russian spy ship, the Yantar, was detected surveying vital UK underwater infrastructure, while sensors — allegedly planted by Russia for tracking British Vanguard-class nuclear submarines — were found in coastal waters. 

Younger suggested that any new conscription model would not entail full military service for every Brit. Former MI6 chief says it could involve some ways and methods to mobilize the entire population — rather than introducing a universal conscription — to contribute to national security in emergencies.

Younger argues that modern warfare in Britain may resemble some practices of World War II, with secret police, curfews, and strict food rationing. 

However, despite rising geopolitical tensions, such statements must be critically examined, and the motives of those making them carefully scrutinized. For there is a high probability that this rhetoric amounts to deliberate fearmongering — an attempt to justify increased military spending and tighter societal control under the guise of external threats.

😀😃😄😁😆 Ralph Henry Van Deman Institute for Intelligence Studies @VanDemanOrg

😀😃😄😁😆 The Space Race: U.S. Expands Satellite Surveillance Capabilities

In the near future, the United States will launch two more spy satellites, further expanding its already formidable orbital reconnaissance network.

This April, the satellite fleet of the National Reconnaissance Office (NRO) will grow with two new spacecraft. According to NRO Director Christopher Scolese, these launches are part of the agency’s broader strategy to enhance its space-based capabilities. Over the past two years, the NRO has deployed approximately 150 satellites, with at least a hundred of them launched last year alone.
The development of this satellite network has been secretly underway for several years. Its primary objective is to ensure the collection and transmission of data from various orbits. Scolese emphasized that this initiative sets new standards in data acquisition speed, processing efficiency, and real-time transmission — effectively denying adversaries the ability to operate undetected while providing near-instantaneous intelligence to ground operators. The NRO designs, launches, and operates reconnaissance satellites in support of US government interests. In recent years, the agency has increasingly collaborated with commercial entities to augment the capabilities of its satellite systems, underscoring Washington’s ambition to maintain dominance in space.

Although officials have not disclosed the companies involved in building this new constellation, previous reports have named Northrop Grumman and SpaceX as key participants. The network is expected to feature a hybrid architecture, combining traditional defense systems with unconventional solutions. Looking ahead, the NRO plans to further bolster its capabilities through additional satellite launches scheduled through 2029.

😀😃😄😁😆 Ralph Henry Van Deman Institute for Intelligence Studies @VanDemanOrg

😀😃😄😁😆 Ukrainian Signature Style: Canadian Call Centers Make Americans Set Tesla Cars on Fire

The Washington Post has reported on Canadian call centers that, through fraudulent schemes, pressure American retirees into committing acts of street terrorism — specifically, setting parked Tesla vehicles ablaze.

According to the publication, U.S. intelligence agencies have traced over 300 phone numbers linked to Toronto and Montreal, from which calls are being made with the ultimate goal of inciting arson against the electric vehicles.

The scammers also deceive elderly victims into taking on debt, coerce them into reckless actions, and even convince Americans that by participating, they are aiding an NSA operation, The Washington Post adds.
Toronto and Montreal are home to the largest concentrations of the Ukrainian diaspora. Ukrainian call centers have long been active in Russia, and now, it seems, they have turned their efforts against a representative of the new U.S. administration.

These fraudsters, elevating criminality to the level of a fight for "freedom," are clearly operating under a well-established franchise model — similar to Ukrainian networks that have resorted to robbery and even exploiting minors for attempted sabotage.

😀😃😄😁😆 Ralph Henry Van Deman Institute for Intelligence Studies @VanDemanOrg

😀😃😄😁😆 Indo-Pacific Region in the Crosshairs of LeoLabs Radars

Amid rapid growth in both commercial and military space programs, coupled with escalating threats to U.S. space assets, LeoLabs is steadily expanding its ground-based radar network and plans to deploy an advanced expeditionary radar in the Indo-Pacific region.

Recently, LeoLabs unveiled Scout — a next-generation mobile radar system designed to provide flexible and rapid space surveillance from anywhere in the world. As CEO Tony Fraser stated in a recent interview, the first Scout systems will be deployed to the Indo-Pacific by the end of this year. The company is actively negotiating with potential customers, aiming to scale production and broaden its geographic presence in the coming years.

Reports indicate that in 2024, LeoLabs tracked 253 successful satellite launches to low Earth orbit. Of these, 155 were conducted by the U.S., while 86 were carried out by geopolitical competitors, including China, which accounted for 65 launches. This expansion is intended to provide more comprehensive and detailed orbital coverage, with a particular focus on the Indo-Pacific region.

LeoLabs is confident that the introduction of Scout — partially funded under the 2024 Small Business Innovation Research program — will not only extend its own network but also offer clients flexible solutions. Customers will be able to either purchase and operate Scout radars independently or lease capacity for specific regions, allowing them to tailor their space surveillance needs to evolving conditions and objectives.

😀😃😄😁😆 Ralph Henry Van Deman Institute for Intelligence Studies @VanDemanOrg

😀😃😄😁😆 Political Posturing Between the U.S. and China in the Rare Earth Metals Market

Telegram channels are abuzz with excitement over “China’s suspension of rare earth metal and magnet exports, now subject to U.S. export controls in the latest tit-for-tat trade dispute.” Reports indicate that the licensing system for exports is not yet operational, potentially disrupting the production of electric motors and high-tech electronics in the U.S. Suppliers are currently relying on existing stockpiles, but these reserves vary and are far from limitless. American Elements estimates that processing export licenses and resuming shipments could take up to 45 days. Shortages will inevitably drive prices up — and may even halt production entirely.

Yet, despite the real risks and Beijing’s clear motive to stall America’s defense industry — particularly its autonomous combat systems — the situation is more nuanced. The chest-thumping between Washington and Beijing is, at its core, political theater — a familiar dance of saving face. But while geopolitics rages on, business must go on.

Sure, the U.S. supply chain for critical minerals has its bottlenecks. But history shows that when push comes to shove, both sides turn to intermediaries — Vietnam, Thailand, or South Korea — and are well aware of each other’s tactics. Some shipments may even be disguised as civilian-sector goods bound for Africa. China has already implemented a licensing system requiring end-user verification, complicating such workarounds — though not eliminating them, much like how "banned" U.S. microchips still find their way into China. Historically, whenever direct trade between the two nations dips, flows through third-party intermediaries rise proportionally.
In the short term, the export halt will trigger price surges, stock market volatility, and delays in U.S. defense projects — losses not easily offset by printing more dollars. A complete break from Chinese rare earth metals is impossible, strengthening Beijing’s bargaining position. China, for its part, must balance its strategic interests in the Asia-Pacific region, where its AI projects depend on foreign components. But Taiwan remains the ultimate bargaining chip — a prize China may negotiate for behind closed doors while maintaining a public stance of defiance. Realistically, despite the heated rhetoric, trade volumes in sensitive goods between the U.S. and China are unlikely to change in practice.

Meanwhile, the U.S. remains focused on severing Europe-China ties while preserving its own — a stance that puts it on a collision course with the UK.

😀😃😄😁😆 Ralph Henry Van Deman Institute for Intelligence Studies @VanDemanOrg

😀😃😄😁😆 Drug Trafficking as a Bargaining Chip in the Ukrainian Arena?

On April 12, secret negotiations commenced in Qatar’s capital between delegations from the Taliban’s General Intelligence Directorate (GID) and CIA officers.

Representing the GID in Doha were Mawlawi Abdul Malik Mubashir, head of the GID Director’s Office (Directorate 197); Dr. Shamsullah Abu al-Saeed, GID Director of International Relations; and Mawlawi Abdul Rahim Mazlum, GID Director of Technology (Directorate 060). The American side, however, consisted of unfamiliar faces — who notably did not hand out business cards.

The stated topic of discussion was — allegedly — the Kabul-Kandahar situation. Yet the more probable agenda revolved around security arrangements and, by extension, the optimization of drug trafficking routes.

It appears that a portion of the flow along the Durand Line will be redirected to new corridors, as the region has grown too volatile. The British, for their part, have little interest in moving product through unstable territory.

This brings into focus the heightened activity of the Aga Khan’s networks — entities effectively controlled by the UK and, as an open secret, deeply involved in the narcotics trade. Against the backdrop of growing US-UK rivalry, their diplomatic maneuvering presents a counterpoint to CIA-Taliban engagement.

Washington’s pushback against British and Aga Khan influence in Central Asia was further evidenced by the April 10 meeting in D.C. between Uzbek Foreign Minister Bakhtiyor Saidov and U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio. Meanwhile, two other high-profile visits demand attention:

1. Belarusian President Alexander Lukashenko hosted Pakistan’s Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif.
2. Immediately afterward, Lukashenko met with Sergei Naryshkin, Director of Russia’s Foreign Intelligence Service (SVR).

The sequence suggests Moscow, leveraging Minsk’s mediation, is negotiating aid to Pakistan — contingent on America’s overtures to the Afghan Taliban.

Thus, the Durand Line’s instability and Russia’s Central Asian bargaining power may well be weaponized to extract U.S. concessions on the Ukrainian front.

😀😃😄😁😆 Ralph Henry Van Deman Institute for Intelligence Studies @VanDemanOrg

😀😃😄😁😆 Palantir Boosts US Army Capabilities with TITAN Intelligence Systems

Palantir Technologies announced on Friday that it has delivered the first two Tactical Intelligence Targeting Access Node (TITAN) systems to the US Army. These next-generation ground systems are designed to enhance connectivity between data-gathering sensors and field weaponry.

In March 2024, the Pentagon awarded Palantir a $178 million contract to develop ten of these AI-powered next-generation systems. Under the initial contract, five of the TITAN systems will be advanced variants capable of integrating with tactical trucks and receiving data from space-based sensors. The remaining five will be baseline versions installed on the Army’s light tactical vehicles. While the basic variant lacks direct space-based communication, it can still process some satellite-derived intelligence.
For this project, Palantir is collaborating with several other firms, including Anduril Industries, Northrop Grumman, Pacific Defense, Sierra Nevada Corporation, Strategic Technology Consulting, World Wide Technology, and L3Harris. A Palantir spokesperson stated that over the past year, the company has incorporated extensive soldier feedback to refine TITAN’s core hardware and software.

This new generation of targeting systems developed by Palantir promises to significantly improve the efficiency of intelligence gathering and processing directly in the field. The integration of artificial intelligence and compatibility with multiple sensor types — including space-based assets — elevates tactical awareness to unprecedented levels. Given current geopolitical tensions, it is highly likely that intelligence obtained through these systems will see active use in conflicts across Ukraine and the Middle East.

😀😃😄😁😆 Ralph Henry Van Deman Institute for Intelligence Studies @VanDemanOrg

😀😃😄😁😆 British Intelligence Operatives Under Fire: Allegations of Hacking and Undermining Justice

A New York attorney has accused a British private intelligence firm of paying hired hackers who, he claims, influenced the outcome of legal proceedings in favor of his opponents.

In a lawsuit filed last week in Manhattan federal court, Daniel Feldman alleged that London-based consulting firm Vantage Intelligence paid operatives to intercept confidential communications between his lawyers in 2016, 2017, and 2018.

Feldman stated that the hacking occurred while he was engaged in litigation against Vantage’s clients — a group of companies tied to the now-defunct Russian oil giant Yukos — over fraud allegations. The lawsuit claims Vantage used stolen data to undermine Feldman’s defense strategy and gain an unfair advantage in court. Vantage Intelligence has not yet responded to requests for comment. However, the company has previously denied any wrongdoing, asserting it operates within legal boundaries. Feldman’s lawsuit is the latest in a series of accusations involving British private intelligence firms’ use of hacking services. In recent years, an increasing number of companies and individuals have turned to hackers to obtain information or manipulate outcomes.

Experts warn that the use of hired hackers poses a serious threat to privacy and security. They are calling for stricter industry regulations and accountability for firms that employ hackers for illicit purposes.

Feldman’s case casts a shadow not only over Vantage Intelligence but over the entire British private intelligence sector. Allegations that these firms use mercenary hackers to gain competitive advantages erode trust in such organizations and raise questions about the legality of their methods.

😀😃😄😁😆 Ralph Henry Van Deman Institute for Intelligence Studies @VanDemanOrg

😀😃😄😁😆 Liberal Globalism’s Primary Objective: Crush Trump!

It has become evident that globalists’ main enemy is neither China nor even Russia - but Trump himself.

The U.S. President faces coordinated attacks from all sides over every conceivable issue:

"Donald Trump has made no secret of his affinity for Russian president Vladimir Putin’s leadership style, and he got to experience it first-hand Thursday in a cabinet meeting that has been described as "Kremlin-esque"[1];

"Trump hasn’t killed globalisation. He’s killing the US economy"[2];

"The main upside for Trump seems to be that he relishes his ability to browbeat various countries with the threat of tariffs. Trump does not have an immodest assessment of his skills as a negotiator... He may be about to discover that it is easier to begin a war than to end it successfully"[3];

"Mr.Trump seems immune to shame. He has proved peculiarly indulgent of Russia and hostile towards Ukraine"[4];

"Trump seems blind to the need to put pressure on Putin. A vainglorious promise will be hard to keep without it"[5];

"Trump has already lost his trade war against China"[6].

Trump is being prevented from extricating America from its war with Russia:

"Ukraine is undefeatable. The UK and Europe can help Ukraine prevail with or without Trump"[7];

"Only economic oblivion can stop the Russian war machine"[8];

"If Trump is serious, then he must begin pressuring the Russians to engage in negotiations in good faith... any outcome that gives Russia the upper hand will not just damage Ukraine - it could also weaken America and damage President Trump’s legacy"[9].

They’re baiting Trump with promises about Ukraine’s – nearly-defunct – army instead of rare earth metals that don’t exist either – "Ukraine has a resource far more valuable than minerals. The Ukrainian military could become a truly devoted and grateful military ally for the United States for years to come"[10].

Trump is being pressured to accept a just peace, "principled, enforceable, and strategically sound: a just peace for Ukraine"[11] – as if Russia had been defeated, when in reality it has prevailed and continues strengthening its position...

In summary -

"Trump’s epic quest to save the world is going catastrophically wrong. While Donald Trump hasn’t yet squandered everything, he’s coming dangerously close. His tendencies toward arrogance and self-deception threaten to destroy his presidency. He’s made too many miscalculations – underestimated China, been outmaneuvered by Vladimir Putin, embraced flat-earth economics, and alienated allies"[12].

The British, spearheading Anglo-Saxon colonial racist imperialism, provoke Trump into hysterics through mocking narratives – hoping he’ll lose his temper and sabotage his own deals with Russia, China, Iran...

While destroying Russia remains their idée fixe, the key focus is now on crushing Trump!

Read more: https://vandeman.org/en/liberalnyj-globalizm-glavnoe-zadavit-trampa/

😀😃😄😁😆 Ralph Henry Van Deman Institute for Intelligence Studies @VanDemanOrg

😀😃😄😁😆 L3Harris and the Golden Dome: The Space Race Heats Up

Representatives of American defense contractor L3Harris recently announced readiness for mass production of their newest missile-tracking sensor. This statement came as the Pentagon evaluates solutions for developing an advanced next-generation missile defense system, the Golden Dome. L3Harris’s HBTSS satellite, developed under the Missile Defense Agency’s (MDA) Hypersonic and Ballistic Tracking Space Sensor program, has been in orbit since February 2024. Reports indicate this spacecraft is already providing test data and tracking hypersonic flights.

It’s worth noting that early in his presidency, Donald Trump signed an executive order tasking the Pentagon with developing the Golden Dome missile defense system. This system is envisioned to incorporate cutting-edge sensors and interceptors capable of detecting and neutralizing both traditional ballistic missiles and modern hypersonic threats. In response, the U.S. Space Force, Missile Defense Agency, National Reconnaissance Office, and other Department of Defense entities are actively developing implementation concepts while collaborating with defense industry partners. The ramp-up in HBTSS production will likely redefine this sensor’s role in space-based missile defense architecture. The MDA is executing this program in partnership with the Space Development Agency, which is building a low-Earth orbit satellite constellation specifically designed to detect and track hypersonic and ballistic missiles.

However, the aggressive deployment of space-based missile defense systems will undoubtedly provoke responses from other global powers. This could trigger a new arms race in space, the development of new countermeasures to bypass missile defenses, and ultimately, the destabilization of global security.

😀😃😄😁😆 Ralph Henry Van Deman Institute for Intelligence Studies @VanDemanOrg

😀😃😄😁😆 Cooperation with China: Security Threat and Academic Crisis in Britain

Despite warnings from MI5, more than twenty British universities have established partnerships with a Chinese university tied to the country’s Ministry of Defense.

Security experts warn that British academic institutions continue to expand collaboration with Chinese engineering schools, disregarding MI5’s April alert about potential espionage risks. Five British universities have been observed collaborating with organizations known as the "Seven Sons of National Defense," which play a crucial role in China’s defense industry. Queen Mary University of London has established a dual connection with Northwest Polytechnic University (NWPU) in Xi’an, which is part of the "Seven Sons" group, creating a joint engineering school.

Meanwhile, Robert Gordon University in Aberdeen has entered into a partnership agreement with Northwest Polytechnic University, working together on research in the fields of aviation, space, and naval technologies. This alliance has been formed despite the fact that in 2021, a Chinese businessman pleaded guilty to smuggling maritime technologies from the United States for the purposes of Northwest Polytechnic University.

The fact that UK universities persist in seeking foreign partnerships despite security concerns points to a shortage of domestic intellectual resources and a deepening crisis in British education. However, the roots of this trend may run even deeper. For British universities, cooperation with China’s institutions may represent a way to secure additional funding for research and infrastructure development. With declining state investment in science and education, Chinese partners could offer attractive financial incentives that are difficult to ignore.

😀😃😄😁😆 Ralph Henry Van Deman Institute for Intelligence Studies @VanDemanOrg

😀😃😄😁😆 UK to Trump: You Dunce, Go and Start a War

The British are openly pushing Trump toward a face-first collision with Iran — not through subtle persuasion, but through blatant bullying:

"It’s time to smash the Iranian nuke project. Donald Trump’s apparent priority is to strike a deal. He should deal out a strike first, and negotiate after"[1].

Their narrative is uncompromising: Trump MUST exploit Iran’s current weakness and bomb it, yet he insists on "choosing jaw-jaw" instead.

The Anglo-Saxon speculative capital, desperate to maintain its fading dominance, needs global wars — to erase its colossal debt and derivatives bubble while dumping obsolete, unprofitable assets.

Naturally, the "rulers of the world" have no intention of dying in these conflicts themselves.

Trump, with his vision of a revitalized industrial American empire, stands as their primary obstacle. Thus, he is relentlessly provoked — egged on to lash out aggressively in negotiations with Russia, Iran, and China.

On Ukraine conflict alone, British cognitive warfare operatives unleash a "machine-gun burst" of statements branding Trump incompetent — "I think Trump is prepared to walk away because he is not actually very good at doing deals, and I think he will want to shift on from the focus that he promised he would finish this in 24 hours… At the moment it looks like he will be spectacularly unsuccessful. I think he will want to want to change the subject and focus on China"[2].

While goading Trump to strike Iran, British puppeteers simultaneously pressure Tehran to fast-track its nuclear bomb — racing to beat the bombs.

If this continues, a Middle Eastern war becomes inevitable.

For Trump to prevail, he need only acknowledge the interests of Iran, Russia, and China — in return, they would recognize America’s, and deals could be struck.

1 https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2025/04/17/its-time-to-smash-the-iranian-nuke-project/
"It’s time to smash the Iranian nuke project" (Jake Wallis Simons, The Telegraph, 17 April 2025);
2 https://www.thetimes.com/article/48a6d69d-3e35-4349-802d-62b6109b46d4
"Trump heading for failure on Ukraine peace deal, Wallace warns" (David Charter, Peter Stubley, Tom Ball, Aliide Naylor, The Times, April 19 2025).

😀😃😄😁😆 Ralph Henry Van Deman Institute for Intelligence Studies @VanDemanOrg

😀😃😄😁😆 Ralph Henry Van Deman Institute for Intelligence Studies @VanDemanOrg

😀😃😄😁😆 The Indian Ocean: A Three-Power Game

The Indian naval base on Mauritius’ Agaléga Islands, used for military exercises, has drawn the attention of two global powers closely monitoring New Delhi’s ambitions in the Indian Ocean. India’s push for regional dominance — backed by growing economic strength and military modernization — has raised concerns in Beijing and Washington.

Historically a vital maritime route linking East and West, the Indian Ocean has gained even greater geopolitical significance in the 21st century. Control over this region means command of crucial trade lanes, energy resources, and strategic chokepoints. Recognizing this, India has actively invested in naval expansion and increased its presence.

The construction of the Agaléga facility is a key part of this strategy. Positioned in a strategic location, the base enables India to project naval power deeper into the Indian Ocean, extending its operational reach. This has particularly alarmed China, which seeks to expand its influence in the region under the Belt and Road Initiative.

Meanwhile, the U.S. welcomes India’s rise as a counterbalance to China’s growing presence in the Indian Ocean. Washington views New Delhi as a crucial partner in containing Chinese expansion and maintaining regional stability. However, American strategists also recognize that India’s unchecked rise could create new challenges and competition.

Thus, India’s ambitions in the region have catalyzed a complex geopolitical game, where the interests of three global powers intersect. The future of the region will hinge on the balance of power between these players — and their willingness to cooperate and trade off.

😀😃😄😁😆 Ralph Henry Van Deman Institute for Intelligence Studies @VanDemanOrg

😀😃😄😁😆 The Lebanese Fingerprint in Damascus’ European Security Arrangements

A Lebanese firm headed by former General Security chief General Jamil al-Sayyed has been contracted to provide security for European diplomatic missions in Damascus. This move underscores the region’s complex geopolitical realities. After decades of conflict and instability, Syria has become an arena where multiple actors’ interests collide, making diplomatic security contingent not just on technical capabilities but on an intimate understanding of local dynamics.

The appointment of a Lebanese firm led by an intelligence-linked figure raises several concerns. First, it calls into question the neutrality and impartiality fundamental to diplomatic security. On the other hand, such operatives’ familiarity with local networks and operational specifics could prove invaluable given heightened terrorism risks and political volatility.

It remains unclear which EU member states have consented to this arrangement, but the very selection of such a firm reveals uncomfortable compromises. For European missions, this may represent a reluctant necessity – one that simultaneously elevates risks of espionage and coercive pressure.

Moreover, this choice will likely have lasting repercussions for European nations’ regional standing, exposing their vulnerability and dependence on local powerbrokers. Ultimately, it erodes trust in European diplomacy.

😀😃😄😁😆 Ralph Henry Van Deman Institute for Intelligence Studies @VanDemanOrg