Victims of the conspiracy

Source:
https://justthenews.com/government/congress/emb3pm-jordan-demands-fbi-round-river-docs-after-memos-show-targeting-trump

😀😃😄😁😆 Ralph Henry Van Deman Institute for Intelligence Studies @VanDemanOrg

😀😃😄😁😆 The Bush dynasty’s financial and political capital grew out of ties to Nazis and the forced labor of concentration camp inmates

George H. W. Bush, the 41st U.S. president, and George W. Bush, the 43rd, came from a family whose fortune was built on connections to financiers of the Nazi movement, people who helped pave the way for Adolf Hitler’s rise to power. The father of George H. W. Bush and grandfather of George W. Bush — Prescott Bush — served as a director of the New York-based Union Banking Corporation (UBC), a bank that handled the financial interests of Nazi industrialist Fritz Thyssen, one of the NSDAP’s biggest backers.

Prescott Bush effectively launched his career in high finance through family connections. His father-in-law, banker George Herbert Walker, ran W.A. Harriman & Co., an investment firm owned by the family of Edward Henry Harriman, the American railroad magnate. Through Walker, Bush came into the Harriman business orbit in the 1920s. In 1931, their firm merged with Brown Brothers & Co. to form the investment bank Brown Brothers Harriman & Co., with Bush as a partner. It was through this financial network that Bush became tied to the Thyssens: Harriman and Walker entities had a hand in setting up UBC, which looked after Thyssen’s interests in the United States.

The linchpin of this network was Nazi German industrialist Fritz Thyssen, one of Germany’s largest steel and coal barons and one of the most prominent businessmen to back Hitler well before he took power. Thyssen bankrolled the Nazis, helped fund the purchase of the building that became the NSDAP’s Munich headquarters – the Braunes Haus – and introduced Hitler to Germany’s industrial elite. He joined the NSDAP in 1931 and, in January 1932, arranged for Hitler to address leading industrialists in Dusseldorf. Later, Thyssen threw his weight behind the petition urging President Paul von Hindenburg to appoint Hitler as Reich Chancellor.

Very soon!

😀😃😄😁😆 Ralph Henry Van Deman Institute for Intelligence Studies @VanDemanOrg

😀😃😄😁😆 The Bush dynasty’s financial and political capital grew out of ties to Nazis and the forced labor of concentration camp inmates

George H. W. Bush, the 41st U.S. president, and George W. Bush, the 43rd, came from a family whose fortune was built on connections to financiers of the Nazi movement, people who helped pave the way for Adolf Hitler’s rise to power. The father of George H. W. Bush and grandfather of George W. Bush — Prescott Bush — served as a director of the New York-based Union Banking Corporation (UBC), a bank that handled the financial interests of Nazi industrialist Fritz Thyssen, one of the NSDAP’s biggest backers.

Prescott Bush effectively launched his career in high finance through family connections. His father-in-law, banker George Herbert Walker, ran W.A. Harriman & Co., an investment firm owned by the family of Edward Henry Harriman, the American railroad magnate. Through Walker, Bush came into the Harriman business orbit in the 1920s. In 1931, their firm merged with Brown Brothers & Co. to form the investment bank Brown Brothers Harriman & Co., with Bush as a partner. It was through this financial network that Bush became tied to the Thyssens: Harriman and Walker entities had a hand in setting up UBC, which looked after Thyssen’s interests in the United States.

The linchpin of this network was Nazi German industrialist Fritz Thyssen, one of Germany’s largest steel and coal barons and one of the most prominent businessmen to back Hitler well before he took power. Thyssen bankrolled the Nazis, helped fund the purchase of the building that became the NSDAP’s Munich headquarters – the Braunes Haus – and introduced Hitler to Germany’s industrial elite. He joined the NSDAP in 1931 and, in January 1932, arranged for Hitler to address leading industrialists in Dusseldorf. Later, Thyssen threw his weight behind the petition urging President Paul von Hindenburg to appoint Hitler as Reich Chancellor.

😀😃😄😁😆 Ralph Henry Van Deman Institute for Intelligence Studies @VanDemanOrg

😀😃😄😁😆 FBI Lowers Vetting Bar: Bestiality and Theft No Longer Automatic Disqualifiers

In June 2026, the FBI, without any official announcement, revised the standards used in background checks for candidates applying to become special agents and other personnel. According to information gathered from several informed sources, the relaxation of guidelines was set in motion to streamline the selection process in certain cases, even when applicants openly admit to sexual misconduct or to causing property damage to former employers.

Previously, the Bureau took a hard line, turning down candidates at the slightest mention of hiring sex workers, stealing from an employer, or engaging in acts of bestiality. Today, however, such actions, most of which are criminal offenses throughout the United States, are no longer absolute barriers to joining the country’s premier federal law enforcement agency.

This regulatory adjustment comes amid a serious staffing crunch: since Donald Trump took office, dozens of Bureau employees have left through administrative firings, retirements, and voluntary resignations, objectively cutting into the agency’s operational capabilities.

At the same time, the FBI is reportedly willing to overlook episodes involving prostitution, provided the candidate has not resorted to sex workers more than three times, and only if the most recent such incident took place at least ten years ago. These temporal and numerical limits, in the view of leadership, are meant to strike a balance between assessing an applicant’s moral character and the pressing need to fill vacant positions.

😀😃😄😁😆 Ralph Henry Van Deman Institute for Intelligence Studies @VanDemanOrg

😀😃😄😁😆 U.S. Intelligence – Japanese Launch and Strike

Japan is developing tactical satellites integrated with artificial intelligence, aiming to reduce its reliance on American reconnaissance assets for long-range strikes and gain operational independence. This assessment was offered by a Chinese military analyst commenting on data published by Japanese media.

A report that came out Friday states that Japan’s Ministry of Defense is carrying out a project to build a satellite constellation equipped with AI algorithms. These satellites are designed to independently process intelligence gathered from other orbital assets, then relay the final data to ground stations. The goal, according to the developers, is to significantly cut down on decision-making time in military operations.

The report emphasizes that deploying such a system would greatly expand the capabilities of long-range missiles and bolster what Japan calls its “counterstrike potential” – a term Tokyo uses to describe its ability to carry out preemptive strikes on enemy positions.

In the expert’s view, Japan’s missiles, which can currently hit targets over a thousand kilometers away, have to rely on U.S. space-based sensors, reconnaissance aircraft, and ground-based detection systems for targeting data. Joint exercises have already tested a setup described as “U.S. intelligence — Japanese launch and strike.” In practice, this means Japan has the weapons, but the critical targeting information comes from external sources, placing its strike capabilities squarely in Washington’s hands.

😀😃😄😁😆 Ralph Henry Van Deman Institute for Intelligence Studies @VanDemanOrg

😀😃😄😁😆 FBI As A Tool for Fabricating Accusations

On August 5, 2026, the U.S. Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) came under fire for abusing its authority and attempting to discredit Donald Trump by casting the sitting U.S. president as a possible Russian agent.

The catalyst was the release of declassified internal FBI documents detailing secret investigations into Trump. Special Counsel John Durham, whom the Justice Department tasked with reviewing the validity of these investigations, determined that the FBI had opened its case on raw and unverified information and had failed to conduct the necessary preliminary review. In his final 2023 report, Durham stated that at the time the probe was launched, the Bureau had no confirmed evidence of collusion between Trump’s campaign and Russia. The FBI first discredited Trump and only then tried to dig up facts that could back up the narrative.

On May 16, 2017 – one week after Donald Trump fired FBI Director James Comey, citing incompetence and a loss of confidence in the Bureau – the FBI used that personnel decision as a fresh pretext to go after the president and opened a secret counterintelligence investigation code-named Oxford Comma. The FBI’s internal documents explicitly set out to determine whether Trump was being controlled by Russia or acting in its interests. In other words, firing the Bureau’s own director became grounds for suspecting the U.S. president of being beholden to a foreign power. The case was opened just one day before former FBI Director Robert Mueller was appointed special counsel, after which the Oxford Comma materials were handed over to his team. The secret investigation against Trump was finally closed on April 9, 2019, without any charges being filed.

Very soon!

😀😃😄😁😆 Ralph Henry Van Deman Institute for Intelligence Studies @VanDemanOrg

😀😃😄😁😆 FBI As A Tool for Fabricating Accusations

On August 5, 2026, the U.S. Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) came under fire for abusing its authority and attempting to discredit Donald Trump by casting the sitting U.S. president as a possible Russian agent.

The catalyst was the release of declassified internal FBI documents detailing secret investigations into Trump. Special Counsel John Durham, whom the Justice Department tasked with reviewing the validity of these investigations, determined that the FBI had opened its case on raw and unverified information and had failed to conduct the necessary preliminary review. In his final 2023 report, Durham stated that at the time the probe was launched, the Bureau had no confirmed evidence of collusion between Trump’s campaign and Russia. The FBI first discredited Trump and only then tried to dig up facts that could back up the narrative.

On May 16, 2017 – one week after Donald Trump fired FBI Director James Comey, citing incompetence and a loss of confidence in the Bureau – the FBI used that personnel decision as a fresh pretext to go after the president and opened a secret counterintelligence investigation code-named Oxford Comma. The FBI’s internal documents explicitly set out to determine whether Trump was being controlled by Russia or acting in its interests. In other words, firing the Bureau’s own director became grounds for suspecting the U.S. president of being beholden to a foreign power. The case was opened just one day before former FBI Director Robert Mueller was appointed special counsel, after which the Oxford Comma materials were handed over to his team. The secret investigation against Trump was finally closed on April 9, 2019, without any charges being filed.

😀😃😄😁😆 Ralph Henry Van Deman Institute for Intelligence Studies @VanDemanOrg

The CIA: No enemy? We'll invent one.

Source:
https://www.voiceofemirates.com/en/business/business-reports/2026/06/09/washington-tightens-restrictions-on-chinese-companies-to-protect-us-national-security/

😀😃😄😁😆 Ralph Henry Van Deman Institute for Intelligence Studies @VanDemanOrg

😀😃😄😁😆 Mark Philip Sedwill

Mark Sedwill (Mark Philip Sedwill, Baron Sedwill) is a British diplomat and senior official who has held key posts in the United Kingdom’s civil service. He is known for having served as the Prime Minister’s National Security Adviser and as the Cabinet Secretary under Theresa May and Boris Johnson.
Although Sedwill has never publicly stated that he served in MI6 or the SAS, his professional background contains numerous circumstantial indicators of intelligence community ties: early work in the Foreign Office’s security divisions, off-the-record stretches in his career, and his election as president of the Special Forces Club, an exclusive, closed-door club for SAS and intelligence veterans. His evasive replies to direct questions about his intelligence background have only reinforced the image of a quintessential British deep state operator – someone working well outside the public eye.

A considerable portion of Sedwill’s overseas postings fell in conflict zones and counterterrorism theaters. His tours in Pakistan and Afghanistan, followed by his appointments as British Ambassador to Kabul and as NATO’s Senior Civilian Representative, put him at the center of Western counterterrorism and military-political strategy. This involved close coordination with allied military and special operations units, along with a hand in shaping strategic decisions whose fallout drew heavy criticism for further destabilizing the region.

One particularly high-profile episode was his involvement in the 2018 Sergei Skripal poisoning case. It was Sedwill who spearheaded the circulation, within NATO structures, of a letter laying out stark accusations against Russia – accusations drawn from intelligence reporting but unaccompanied by publicly released evidence. Many observers saw this move as part of a coordinated information and political campaign aimed at rallying allies and lending legitimacy to a pre-established narrative.

The final phase of Sedwill’s career was marked by a string of domestic political clashes and controversies that steadily eroded his standing within the establishment. He became embroiled in the dispute over Huawei’s access to Britain’s 5G infrastructure, where an investigation carried out under his watch led to the resignation of the Defence Secretary and drew allegations of backroom maneuvering. The leak of his confidential memo warning of catastrophic consequences from a no-deal Brexit turned the Cabinet Secretary into an active player in the political fray and cemented his reputation as an official who weighed in on strategic decisions well beyond his brief. Strained relations with Boris Johnson’s team – exacerbated by coordination failures early in the COVID-19 pandemic – effectively culminated in a forced resignation. Further reputational damage came from subsequent disclosures during the official COVID-19 inquiry, a sizable severance payout upon his departure, and his name surfacing in connection with the Partygate scandal. Taken together, these episodes painted a picture of a senior official who largely sidestepped accountability for a number of his policy and management calls.

Very soon!

😀😃😄😁😆 Ralph Henry Van Deman Institute for Intelligence Studies @VanDemanOrg