30...Rxe1! [In order to use his own queenside pawn majority, Caruana correctly decides to exchange a pair of rooks.]
[30...b6 31.Red1 Preventing ...c5. 31...Ne7 (31...c5 32.Bxc5Β±) 32.Be3 c5 33.Rd6Β±; 30...Re6 31.Rxe6 Kxe6 32.g4=]
31.Rxe1 c5 32.Be3 b5 33.Kf3 c4 34.Bd2 b4 35.Rc1 f5 36.g4? [ΒΉ36.Ke2]
36...fxg4+ 37.Kxg4 c3 38.bxc3 bxc3 39.Be1 Rc4+ 40.Kf3 Rxh4β+
0β1
[30...b6 31.Red1 Preventing ...c5. 31...Ne7 (31...c5 32.Bxc5Β±) 32.Be3 c5 33.Rd6Β±; 30...Re6 31.Rxe6 Kxe6 32.g4=]
31.Rxe1 c5 32.Be3 b5 33.Kf3 c4 34.Bd2 b4 35.Rc1 f5 36.g4? [ΒΉ36.Ke2]
36...fxg4+ 37.Kxg4 c3 38.bxc3 bxc3 39.Be1 Rc4+ 40.Kf3 Rxh4β+
0β1
1...Nc2+!! [1...Kg5? 2.Kc3 Nc6 3.Kxb3 Ne5 4.Bc2β‘+β; 1...b2? 2.a4! (2.Kc3?? Nb5+ 3.Kxb2 Nxa3 4.Kxa3=) 2...Ne6 3.Bb1Β±]
2.Kxb3 Nxa3 3.Kxa3 Kg5 4.Kb4 Kf6 5.Kc5 Ke7 6.Bc4 Kf8 7.Kd6 Ke8=
Β½βΒ½
2.Kxb3 Nxa3 3.Kxa3 Kg5 4.Kb4 Kf6 5.Kc5 Ke7 6.Bc4 Kf8 7.Kd6 Ke8=
Β½βΒ½
Unity Chess Strategy Multiple Choice 156
public poll
B) Na5 β 12
πππππππ 75%
@mahyarebrahimi1983, ΨΉΨ¨Ψ§Ψ³, @Somebody_Sophia, @RichardPeng, Sahil, Srikar, Atharva, Michael, Hansika, Daniel, Abhi, Matthew
A) d4 β 3
ππ 19%
Masoud, Max, Saghana
C) Kb7 β 1
π 6%
@Sujas2
π₯ 16 people voted so far.
public poll
B) Na5 β 12
πππππππ 75%
@mahyarebrahimi1983, ΨΉΨ¨Ψ§Ψ³, @Somebody_Sophia, @RichardPeng, Sahil, Srikar, Atharva, Michael, Hansika, Daniel, Abhi, Matthew
A) d4 β 3
ππ 19%
Masoud, Max, Saghana
C) Kb7 β 1
π 6%
@Sujas2
π₯ 16 people voted so far.
Unity Chess Endgame Multiple Choice 156
public poll
A) Ne2 β 16
πππππππ 76%
@M_L_110213, ΨΉΨ¨Ψ§Ψ³, Masoud, Ψ²ΩΨ±Ω, Babak, @FrozenBlade, @Sujas2, Saghana, @RichardPeng, Sahil, Srikar, Atharva, Michael, Hansika, Abhi, Matthew
C) Nd5 β 4
ππ 19%
Max, @miladnajafiyan, @Somebody_Sophia, Daniel
B) h5 β 1
β«οΈ 5%
@mahyarebrahimi1983
π₯ 21 people voted so far.
public poll
A) Ne2 β 16
πππππππ 76%
@M_L_110213, ΨΉΨ¨Ψ§Ψ³, Masoud, Ψ²ΩΨ±Ω, Babak, @FrozenBlade, @Sujas2, Saghana, @RichardPeng, Sahil, Srikar, Atharva, Michael, Hansika, Abhi, Matthew
C) Nd5 β 4
ππ 19%
Max, @miladnajafiyan, @Somebody_Sophia, Daniel
B) h5 β 1
β«οΈ 5%
@mahyarebrahimi1983
π₯ 21 people voted so far.
The participants in the tournament at Pasadena, California, August 1932. Seated - Alekhine. Standing, from the left: 4th - Fine, 6th - Reshevsky, 7th - H. Steiner, 8th - Kashdan, 10th - Dake.
@UnityChess
@UnityChess
On August 14, 1932, Alexander Alekhine arrived on the eve of the Chess Congress Masters Tournament (part of the Los Angeles Congress) at the Maryland Hotel in Pasadena, following the 10th Modern Olympic Games at Los Angeles. Alekhine won the event (and $250) with a score of 8.5-2.5 (+7=3-1). Isaac Kashdan took 2nd with a score of 7.5-3.5. Next were Arthur Dake, Sammy Reshevsky, and Herman Steiner with 6.5. Next came Harry Borochow, California State champion, with the score of 5.5-5.5. He was followed by Fred Reinfeld, Jacob Bernstein, Reuben Fine, and Samuel Factor, all with 5-6. Jose Araiza came next with a score of 3.5-7.5. Last place went to Adolph Fink, San Francisco's strongest player, with a score of 3-8. It was agreed that the California player having the highest score in this event would be declared champion of California. Thus, Harry Borochow became California champion for the third straight year. This international tournament was promoted by Cecil B. DeMille. The tournament organizers also wanted to invite Capablanca, but Alekhine demanded an extra $2,000 appearance fee if Capablanca participated in the event. The money could not be raised (the whole budget for the tournament was $1,500), and Capablanca was not invited. Lavieve Mae Hines (1896-1997) won the Pasadena Congress Women's Chess tournament, which was held concurrently with the Pasadena 1932 International Chess Tournament.
http://www.chessgames.com/perl/chesscollection?cid=1023818
http://www.chessgames.com/perl/chesscollection?cid=1023818
Chessgames
1932 Pasadena
The internet's oldest and best chess database and community.
βLoss generally occurs when a player overrates his advantage or for other reasons seeks to derive from a minute advantage a great return such as a forced win.β
πΈ Emanuel Lasker (1926) βLasker's Manual of Chess"
@UnityChess
πΈ Emanuel Lasker (1926) βLasker's Manual of Chess"
@UnityChess
Here Fischer and Larsen are preparing for they're legendary candidates semi final match and yes also this match ended 6-0 in Fischer's favor.
As usual Fischer won many games in the end-game as he was in better form and did not crack from pressure after the 5th hour of play.
@UnityChess
As usual Fischer won many games in the end-game as he was in better form and did not crack from pressure after the 5th hour of play.
@UnityChess
This letter signals the starting point of the Oxford v Cambridge match ("Cambridge Chronicle and University Journal," February 25, 1871). After 136 matches held between 1873 and 2019, Cambridge leads with + 59 - 56 = 22.
@UnityChess
@UnityChess
It was a promising start in the #SpringChessClassic - Group A, as the first round ended with 4 decisive games and only one draw.