๐ #about_Galliamova
๐ข Alisa Galliamova
๐ข Russian chess International Master
๐ฐ Alisa Mikhailovna Galliamova is a Russian chess player, who holds the FIDE titles of International Master and Woman Grandmaster.
๐ Full name: Alisa Mikhailovna Galliamova
๐ Country: Soviet Union Ukraine Russia
๐ Born: 18 January 1972 (age 46)
Kazan, Russian SFSR, Soviet Union
๐ Title: International Master
Woman Grandmaster
๐ FIDE rating: 2422 (June 2018)
๐ Peak rating: 2554 (January 2001)
๐ฐ Galliamova is twice runner-up at the Women's World Chess Championship, in 1999 and 2006, and three-time Russian women's champion (1997, 2009, 2010). She was known as "Alisa Galliamova-Ivanchuk" from 1993 to 2001.
๐ฐ Galliamova played for the gold medal-winning Russian team at the 2010 Women's Chess Olympiad and for the gold medal-winning Ukrainian team in the 1992 Women's European Team Chess Championship.
๐ฐ Galliamova won the World Under-16 Girls' Championship in 1987 and 1988. In 1988 she also won the World Junior Girls Championship.
In December 1997, she won the Candidates Tournament for the Women's World Chess Championship held in Groningen, Netherlands. She was scheduled to play a match with Xie Jun, who finished second, in August, 1998 and the winner of that match was supposed to play a match in November 1998 with Zsuzsa Polgar for the Women's World Chess. Championship.
โฆ๏ธ A memorable game by Galliamova ๐
๐ธ Alisa Mikhailovna Galliamova vs Evgenija Ovod
๐ธ Russian Women's Superfinals (2012), Moscow RUS, rd 5, Aug-07
๐ธ Catalan Opening: General (E00)
โฆ๏ธ Review and download PGN file๐
@unitychess
๐ข Alisa Galliamova
๐ข Russian chess International Master
๐ฐ Alisa Mikhailovna Galliamova is a Russian chess player, who holds the FIDE titles of International Master and Woman Grandmaster.
๐ Full name: Alisa Mikhailovna Galliamova
๐ Country: Soviet Union Ukraine Russia
๐ Born: 18 January 1972 (age 46)
Kazan, Russian SFSR, Soviet Union
๐ Title: International Master
Woman Grandmaster
๐ FIDE rating: 2422 (June 2018)
๐ Peak rating: 2554 (January 2001)
๐ฐ Galliamova is twice runner-up at the Women's World Chess Championship, in 1999 and 2006, and three-time Russian women's champion (1997, 2009, 2010). She was known as "Alisa Galliamova-Ivanchuk" from 1993 to 2001.
๐ฐ Galliamova played for the gold medal-winning Russian team at the 2010 Women's Chess Olympiad and for the gold medal-winning Ukrainian team in the 1992 Women's European Team Chess Championship.
๐ฐ Galliamova won the World Under-16 Girls' Championship in 1987 and 1988. In 1988 she also won the World Junior Girls Championship.
In December 1997, she won the Candidates Tournament for the Women's World Chess Championship held in Groningen, Netherlands. She was scheduled to play a match with Xie Jun, who finished second, in August, 1998 and the winner of that match was supposed to play a match in November 1998 with Zsuzsa Polgar for the Women's World Chess. Championship.
โฆ๏ธ A memorable game by Galliamova ๐
๐ธ Alisa Mikhailovna Galliamova vs Evgenija Ovod
๐ธ Russian Women's Superfinals (2012), Moscow RUS, rd 5, Aug-07
๐ธ Catalan Opening: General (E00)
โฆ๏ธ Review and download PGN file๐
@unitychess
19.Qc4?
19.Nรb7!
A combination along the long diagonal due to the coordination of the white pieces.
19...Qรb7 20.Nc5 Bรc5 21.Bรd5 +/-
19...Rd8 20.Rfe1 =
19.Nรb7!
A combination along the long diagonal due to the coordination of the white pieces.
19...Qรb7 20.Nc5 Bรc5 21.Bรd5 +/-
19...Rd8 20.Rfe1 =
37.f3?
A careless move that allows Nakamura to generate serious counterplay.
37.Ne6!
A)37...Nรe4 38.c5 +-
B)37....Qรe4 38.Ng5+ +-
37...Nรe4! 38.fรe4 Qb6+ 39.c5 Qรc7 40.Qf5+ Kh8 41.Kh2 Qc6 =
A careless move that allows Nakamura to generate serious counterplay.
37.Ne6!
A)37...Nรe4 38.c5 +-
B)37....Qรe4 38.Ng5+ +-
37...Nรe4! 38.fรe4 Qb6+ 39.c5 Qรc7 40.Qf5+ Kh8 41.Kh2 Qc6 =
34.Kรe2??
A blunder. White should have tried to keep the queens on the board with 34.b3! Nb2 35.Kรe2 Qh6 36.Qe5=
34...Qh6 35.Qรh6 Kรh6 36.b3 Nd6 37.Kd3 Kg5 -+
A blunder. White should have tried to keep the queens on the board with 34.b3! Nb2 35.Kรe2 Qh6 36.Qe5=
34...Qh6 35.Qรh6 Kรh6 36.b3 Nd6 37.Kd3 Kg5 -+
40...Nd4?
Anand only had to play 40...e3! and Vachier would have had to throw in the towel.
40...e3+
A) 41.Ke2 Nc1+ 42.Rdรc1 dรc1=Q 43.Rรc1 Rd2+ 44.Kรe3 Rรa2 -+
B) 41.Kf1 Re6 -+
41.Rc8+ Kh7 42.Re8
White has some drawing chances.
Anand only had to play 40...e3! and Vachier would have had to throw in the towel.
40...e3+
A) 41.Ke2 Nc1+ 42.Rdรc1 dรc1=Q 43.Rรc1 Rd2+ 44.Kรe3 Rรa2 -+
B) 41.Kf1 Re6 -+
41.Rc8+ Kh7 42.Re8
White has some drawing chances.
25...Rb6!
White is given a frightful choice: either he must concede control of the b-file or else exchange on b6, when Black is given a lever with which to prise open the white center pawn structure.
26.Rxb6 axb6 27.Qb3
The exchange of queens doesn't help much, but if Harrwitz had just waited he could be assailed with ...Ra8 and ...b6-b5, when the a3-pawn would be a target for the black queen.
27...Qxb3 28.Nxb3 b5 29.cxb5 Bxb5-/+
White is given a frightful choice: either he must concede control of the b-file or else exchange on b6, when Black is given a lever with which to prise open the white center pawn structure.
26.Rxb6 axb6 27.Qb3
The exchange of queens doesn't help much, but if Harrwitz had just waited he could be assailed with ...Ra8 and ...b6-b5, when the a3-pawn would be a target for the black queen.
27...Qxb3 28.Nxb3 b5 29.cxb5 Bxb5-/+
15...Qa5!
This activity is all very well, but has the d6-pawn been abandoned to its fate?
No, because 16.Rxd6 is met by a 'global' combination that harasses the white pieces on the queenside, center, and kingside: 16...Ne5! 17.b3 (to defend c4) 17...axb3 18.axb3 Bxh3! 19.Bxh3 Nf3+ 20.Kf1 Nxe1 21.Kxe1 Nxe4 22.Rd3 Nxc3! 23.Nxc3 Qa1+ 24.Nd1 Ra2 with a huge initiative to Black.
16.Bf1
A poor square for the bishop. Actually, having gone this far, Reshevsky should probably have tried 16.Rxd6 anyway but, after 16...Ne5 , returned the pawn with 17.Rdd1! Nxc4 18.Bd4!, as played by Smyslov. White can't rejoice at having exchanged his c-pawn for the d6-pawn, but at least he gets rid of Black's strong dark-squared bishop.
16...Ne5 17.Nd4
The fact that the knight returns to d4 shows that the plan to attack d6 has ended in fiasco.
17...a3
Here it paralyses Reshevsky's queenside, making b4 an excellent outpost for a black knight, and casts a blight over his endgame chances.
18.f4 Ned7 19.b3 Na6!
The black knights take the b4- and c5-squares.
This activity is all very well, but has the d6-pawn been abandoned to its fate?
No, because 16.Rxd6 is met by a 'global' combination that harasses the white pieces on the queenside, center, and kingside: 16...Ne5! 17.b3 (to defend c4) 17...axb3 18.axb3 Bxh3! 19.Bxh3 Nf3+ 20.Kf1 Nxe1 21.Kxe1 Nxe4 22.Rd3 Nxc3! 23.Nxc3 Qa1+ 24.Nd1 Ra2 with a huge initiative to Black.
16.Bf1
A poor square for the bishop. Actually, having gone this far, Reshevsky should probably have tried 16.Rxd6 anyway but, after 16...Ne5 , returned the pawn with 17.Rdd1! Nxc4 18.Bd4!, as played by Smyslov. White can't rejoice at having exchanged his c-pawn for the d6-pawn, but at least he gets rid of Black's strong dark-squared bishop.
16...Ne5 17.Nd4
The fact that the knight returns to d4 shows that the plan to attack d6 has ended in fiasco.
17...a3
Here it paralyses Reshevsky's queenside, making b4 an excellent outpost for a black knight, and casts a blight over his endgame chances.
18.f4 Ned7 19.b3 Na6!
The black knights take the b4- and c5-squares.
Unity Chess Multiple Choice 531
public poll
C: Kh1 โ 10
๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ 83%
@MohamadAsp, Jonas, Gavin, Ramesh, Jahanbakhsh, Vincent, @Sophia_Peng, @RichardPeng, @AryanLeekha, @haoyuw
A: Re2 โ 1
๐ 8%
@MerissaWongso
B: Qe7 โ 1
๐ 8%
Michael
๐ฅ 12 people voted so far.
public poll
C: Kh1 โ 10
๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ 83%
@MohamadAsp, Jonas, Gavin, Ramesh, Jahanbakhsh, Vincent, @Sophia_Peng, @RichardPeng, @AryanLeekha, @haoyuw
A: Re2 โ 1
๐ 8%
@MerissaWongso
B: Qe7 โ 1
๐ 8%
Michael
๐ฅ 12 people voted so far.