JACKSON WHIPPS SHOWALTER
(born Feb-05-1859, died Feb-05-1935, 76 years old) United States of America
Jackson Whipps Showalter held the title Chess Champion of the United States on several occasions from the 1890s to 1909.
He played matches against Max Judd in 1890 (+3 -7) and 1891-2 (+7 -4 =3), Emanuel Lasker in 1892 (+2 -6 =2), Samuel Lipschutz in 1892 (+1 -7 =7), Jacob C Halpern in 1893-4 (+5 -3 =1), two against Albert Hodges (+7 -6 =4) and (-5 +3 =1), and Adolf Albin (+10 -7=8) in 1894. Following Hodges' retirement, he definitely established a claim to the title by defeating Lipschutz in 1895 (+7 -4 =3).
He defended this title by defeating Emil Kemeny (+7 -4 =4) and John Finan Barry (+7 -2 =4) in successive matches (1896), before losing twice to Harry Nelson Pillsbury in both the Pillsbury - Showalter (1897) (+8-10=3) and Pillsbury - Showalter (1898) (+2-7=3) matches.
Following Pillsbury's death in 1906, he was again considered US Champion until being defeated by Frank James Marshall (+2 -7 =3) in 1909.
He was a regular participant in major international events from 1893 to 1904, scoring wins over World Champions Wilhelm Steinitz and Emanuel Lasker among other notables.
Wikipedia article: Jackson Showalter
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jackson_Showalter
(born Feb-05-1859, died Feb-05-1935, 76 years old) United States of America
Jackson Whipps Showalter held the title Chess Champion of the United States on several occasions from the 1890s to 1909.
He played matches against Max Judd in 1890 (+3 -7) and 1891-2 (+7 -4 =3), Emanuel Lasker in 1892 (+2 -6 =2), Samuel Lipschutz in 1892 (+1 -7 =7), Jacob C Halpern in 1893-4 (+5 -3 =1), two against Albert Hodges (+7 -6 =4) and (-5 +3 =1), and Adolf Albin (+10 -7=8) in 1894. Following Hodges' retirement, he definitely established a claim to the title by defeating Lipschutz in 1895 (+7 -4 =3).
He defended this title by defeating Emil Kemeny (+7 -4 =4) and John Finan Barry (+7 -2 =4) in successive matches (1896), before losing twice to Harry Nelson Pillsbury in both the Pillsbury - Showalter (1897) (+8-10=3) and Pillsbury - Showalter (1898) (+2-7=3) matches.
Following Pillsbury's death in 1906, he was again considered US Champion until being defeated by Frank James Marshall (+2 -7 =3) in 1909.
He was a regular participant in major international events from 1893 to 1904, scoring wins over World Champions Wilhelm Steinitz and Emanuel Lasker among other notables.
Wikipedia article: Jackson Showalter
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jackson_Showalter
Wikipedia
Jackson Showalter
Jackson Whipps Showalter (February 5, 1859 in Minerva, Kentucky – February 5, 1935 in Lexington, Kentucky) was a five-time U.S. Chess Champion: 1890, 1892, 1892–1894, 1895-1896 and 1906–1909.
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Amos Burn vs Jackson Whipps Showalter
3rd Anglo-American Cable Match (1898), London ENG / New York USA, rd 1, Mar-18
Queen's Gambit Declined: Orthodox Defense. Botvinnik Variation (D60) ·
0-1
3rd Anglo-American Cable Match (1898), London ENG / New York USA, rd 1, Mar-18
Queen's Gambit Declined: Orthodox Defense. Botvinnik Variation (D60) ·
0-1
Nezhmetdinov (left) congratulates Tal for winning the 24th USSR Championship in Moscow, 1957.
@UnityChess
@UnityChess
Vasily Smyslov facing Bobby Fischer at the Yugoslav International Chess Tournament, Belgrade, 1959. Fischer won the match.
@UnityChess
@UnityChess
Robert Byrne, Pal Benko, William Addison, Samuel Reshevsky at the US Chess Championships, New York 1969.
@UnityChess
@UnityChess
The 1938 Vienna championship began less than 2 months after the Anschluss and was promoted as a National Socialist event. Hans Müller (r.) won ahead of Ernst Grünfeld (l.)
@UnityChess
@UnityChess
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
A fine William Hartston quote on chess: "A game to subdue the turbulent spirit, or to worry a tranquil mind." https://bit.ly/2Ib6yuw
@UnityChess
@UnityChess
50.Bd4?
This mistake helps Shankland to release his bishop.
The correct move is 50.Rb7!! +- with the idea of trapping The Black's bishop by Kb5-Kc6-Bd4-Kd7.
50...Bc7 51.Kb5 Rc1 52.Rb7 b3 53.Ka6 Rc4 54.R×b3 R×a4 55.Kb5 Rb4+ 56.R×b4 a×b4 57.K×b4 Kf7 58.Kc5 Bg3 59.Kd5 ½-½
This mistake helps Shankland to release his bishop.
The correct move is 50.Rb7!! +- with the idea of trapping The Black's bishop by Kb5-Kc6-Bd4-Kd7.
50...Bc7 51.Kb5 Rc1 52.Rb7 b3 53.Ka6 Rc4 54.R×b3 R×a4 55.Kb5 Rb4+ 56.R×b4 a×b4 57.K×b4 Kf7 58.Kc5 Bg3 59.Kd5 ½-½
22...Qb7?
Bacallao takes a risky plan. It would have been better to play 22...Bd8 23.Nc4 Rb8.
23.Nc4 B×f3 24.g×f3 R×f3 25.Q×c5 Qe4 26.N×a5 Rf4 27.h3! Qf5 28.Rb4 Qg5+ 29.Kh2 Rf3 30.Rc3 R×c3 31.Q×c3 R×a5 32.b6 1-0
Bacallao takes a risky plan. It would have been better to play 22...Bd8 23.Nc4 Rb8.
23.Nc4 B×f3 24.g×f3 R×f3 25.Q×c5 Qe4 26.N×a5 Rf4 27.h3! Qf5 28.Rb4 Qg5+ 29.Kh2 Rf3 30.Rc3 R×c3 31.Q×c3 R×a5 32.b6 1-0
36. Rc7?
White misses his last drawing chance. 36.Rh7! c3 37.h5 c2 38. Rc7 Nxa4 39. Kd3 c1=Q 40. Rxc1 Nc5+ 41.
Kc4 Nxe6 42. Rd1
36... c3 37. g4 fxg3 38. fxg3 Nxa4 39. Kd1 Nc5 40. Rc6 Ke7 41. g4 Nxe6 0-1
White misses his last drawing chance. 36.Rh7! c3 37.h5 c2 38. Rc7 Nxa4 39. Kd3 c1=Q 40. Rxc1 Nc5+ 41.
Kc4 Nxe6 42. Rd1
36... c3 37. g4 fxg3 38. fxg3 Nxa4 39. Kd1 Nc5 40. Rc6 Ke7 41. g4 Nxe6 0-1
34...Rac8!
A surprising move by eight-time Spanish champion.
35.Rc4 R×c4 36.b×c4 Nc5 37.Be4 f3 38.Rf1 N×e4 39.d×e4 Q×a4 -+
A surprising move by eight-time Spanish champion.
35.Rc4 R×c4 36.b×c4 Nc5 37.Be4 f3 38.Rf1 N×e4 39.d×e4 Q×a4 -+
In this position, White has little control over the queenside – an area in which he normally places his hopes in the Queen's Gambit Declined. A transfer of his forces to the queenside seriously compromises the kingside, where g2-g4 has created certain commitments. For this reason, White will have to play on the kingside, and as Black has a dark-squared bishop it will most likely be on the light squares. All of this basic logic points us in the direction of the threat in the position. White will play 18 h4! and it will give him the advantage. Black should prevent this, after which he will have time to slowly improve his position.
17...b6?
(17...Bh4! would have given Black a better game, when it is not easy to see how White can improve his position, whereas Black has a lot of moves coming.)
18.h4! c5 19.dxc5 bxc5 20.Qxc5 Qxc5 21.Rxc5.
17...b6?
(17...Bh4! would have given Black a better game, when it is not easy to see how White can improve his position, whereas Black has a lot of moves coming.)
18.h4! c5 19.dxc5 bxc5 20.Qxc5 Qxc5 21.Rxc5.