Objectively, White’s position is somewhat better. As is well-known, the queen is a poor blockader. In addition, the white pieces are already on strong squares. The direct idea of transferring the knight from f6 to d6 either fails tactically, or is met by a basic refutation in the form of the move Bc2-a4 and the exchange of the knight on e8, with an obvious advantage to White.

Black goes for the sacrifice, to exchange some major pieces.

An important move. Black gives up a pawn, but exchanges all the rooks.

White has an extra protected passed pawn, but the position is a draw.

Unlike the queen, the knight is an excellent blockader! It fulfils its function of keeping the white king out excellently.

Draw agreed.

White has the advantage, thanks to his extra space. But how great is this advantage? Black’s plan is to strengthen the e5- pawn if necessary with ...f7-f6, bring his Ra8 to the centre (probably with the help of exchanges on the d-file) and include his light-squared bishop in the game via c8. If he succeeds in doing this, White will have few chances of a break on the kingside. By exploiting a tactical motif, White finds a way to change the position in his favour:

This is not about simplifying or conceding the open file. It is just that after this exchange, the black pieces lose coordination.

The pawn that now lands on d4 restricts Black’s bishop, and is excellently blockaded by the knight. Another important thing is that the white e-pawn gets the chance to advance, and he can start piece play on the light squares on the kingside.

This move gives up control of e6, which allows White to carry out an attack.
It made sense to provoke some opening of lines on the queenside with 25...a5, or get the sleeping bishop into play by 25...Bc8 – in both cases, White has a clear advantage, but there is a lot of fight left.