Somewhat ironically, the decommissioned American aircraft carrier, USS Hornet, was badly damaged in a typhoon in 1945.
She is now the platform from which the University of Washington is conducting its Marine Cloud Brightening Program; with the specific intent of modifying the weather.
👇
Taking the wrong course, 1945: https://www.history.navy.mil/content/history/museums/nnam/education/articles/history-up-close/hornet-hits-a-typhoon.html
Taking the wrong course, 2024: https://atmos.uw.edu/faculty-and-research/marine-cloud-brightening-program/
She is now the platform from which the University of Washington is conducting its Marine Cloud Brightening Program; with the specific intent of modifying the weather.
👇
Taking the wrong course, 1945: https://www.history.navy.mil/content/history/museums/nnam/education/articles/history-up-close/hornet-hits-a-typhoon.html
Taking the wrong course, 2024: https://atmos.uw.edu/faculty-and-research/marine-cloud-brightening-program/
👍4
From 2011, when some people were a little more circumspect about this now tinderbox issue:
"For example, a June 1918 article from the trade publication Earnshaw's Infants' Department said, “The generally accepted rule is pink for the boys, and blue for the girls. The reason is that pink, being a more decided and stronger color, is more suitable for the boy, while blue, which is more delicate and dainty, is prettier for the girl.” Other sources said blue was flattering for blonds, pink for brunettes; or blue was for blue-eyed babies, pink for brown-eyed babies, according to Paoletti."
👇
https://www.smithsonianmag.com/arts-culture/when-did-girls-start-wearing-pink-1370097/
"For example, a June 1918 article from the trade publication Earnshaw's Infants' Department said, “The generally accepted rule is pink for the boys, and blue for the girls. The reason is that pink, being a more decided and stronger color, is more suitable for the boy, while blue, which is more delicate and dainty, is prettier for the girl.” Other sources said blue was flattering for blonds, pink for brunettes; or blue was for blue-eyed babies, pink for brown-eyed babies, according to Paoletti."
👇
https://www.smithsonianmag.com/arts-culture/when-did-girls-start-wearing-pink-1370097/
Smithsonian Magazine
When Did Girls Start Wearing Pink?
Every generation brings a new definition of masculinity and femininity that manifests itself in children’s dress
👍4🤔2
Excerpt from Debi Evans's UK Column blog this week, relating to the announcement about testing for cancer.
👇
👇
Forwarded from Debi
From my blog this week www.ukcolumn.org
Since my last blog, The Princess of Wales has revealed she is receiving preventative chemotherapy after abdominal surgery. Speculation of any links with the Covid-19 ‘vaccine’ have of course been snuffed out and debunked quickly.
With three royal ‘trusted messengers’ (King Charles, The Princess of Wales and The Duchess of York) now in receipt of a diagnosis and treatment for cancer, it appears their citizens, the commoners, are worried about whether they may have cancer too. There is, however, a difference between them and us. We who don’t have ‘blue blood’ or live in mansions don’t get access to rapid, state of the art cancer treatment (not that many of us would want it), and we don’t get the world’s top oncologists at our disposal 24/7 365 either (thank goodness).
Those who ‘matter’, the nobility and elite, also don’t need to worry about the cost of living, keeping warm, and eating a healthy diet. Remember the World Economic Forum’s promise? ‘YOU will own nothing…’ They didn’t say we will own nothing, did they?
As I said, many are frightened by the news from our royal family. According to mainstream media, people are rushing to the MacMillan, Cancer Research UK, and NHS websites for more information on how to get themselves tested for cancer, even when they have no symptoms.
But — and there is a big but — those who are being told that they have cancer have nowhere to go. The NHS is overwhelmed, and with a waiting list of approximately 7 million, where do all these newly diagnosed cancer patients go? The answer is they don’t go anywhere; they languish on a waiting list for weeks or even months. Isn’t it strange that the NHS don’t have enough staff to treat the sick, yet always find enough staff to carry out tests for cancer? Whatever next? Everyone will be offered an mRNA cancer vaccine? In my opinion, neither option sounds great, so any cancer test that comes through my door goes in the bin.
Keep an eye out for a new lung cancer vaccine, and perhaps a new prostate cancer vaccine. For those of you who suffer from repeated urinary tract infections, there’s a vaccine on its way for you too. Since when did a ‘vaccine’ become a therapeutic? Who funded the cancer detection company Grail? The answer probably won’t surprise you.
Since my last blog, The Princess of Wales has revealed she is receiving preventative chemotherapy after abdominal surgery. Speculation of any links with the Covid-19 ‘vaccine’ have of course been snuffed out and debunked quickly.
With three royal ‘trusted messengers’ (King Charles, The Princess of Wales and The Duchess of York) now in receipt of a diagnosis and treatment for cancer, it appears their citizens, the commoners, are worried about whether they may have cancer too. There is, however, a difference between them and us. We who don’t have ‘blue blood’ or live in mansions don’t get access to rapid, state of the art cancer treatment (not that many of us would want it), and we don’t get the world’s top oncologists at our disposal 24/7 365 either (thank goodness).
Those who ‘matter’, the nobility and elite, also don’t need to worry about the cost of living, keeping warm, and eating a healthy diet. Remember the World Economic Forum’s promise? ‘YOU will own nothing…’ They didn’t say we will own nothing, did they?
As I said, many are frightened by the news from our royal family. According to mainstream media, people are rushing to the MacMillan, Cancer Research UK, and NHS websites for more information on how to get themselves tested for cancer, even when they have no symptoms.
But — and there is a big but — those who are being told that they have cancer have nowhere to go. The NHS is overwhelmed, and with a waiting list of approximately 7 million, where do all these newly diagnosed cancer patients go? The answer is they don’t go anywhere; they languish on a waiting list for weeks or even months. Isn’t it strange that the NHS don’t have enough staff to treat the sick, yet always find enough staff to carry out tests for cancer? Whatever next? Everyone will be offered an mRNA cancer vaccine? In my opinion, neither option sounds great, so any cancer test that comes through my door goes in the bin.
Keep an eye out for a new lung cancer vaccine, and perhaps a new prostate cancer vaccine. For those of you who suffer from repeated urinary tract infections, there’s a vaccine on its way for you too. Since when did a ‘vaccine’ become a therapeutic? Who funded the cancer detection company Grail? The answer probably won’t surprise you.
BBC News
Kate, Princess of Wales: I am having cancer treatment
Kate releases video message saying she is having preventative chemotherapy after cancer was found in tests.
👍16❤2
Forwarded from UK Column
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
UK Column News - 12th April 2024
Mike Robinson, Debi Evans, Ben Rubin and guests Cheryl Grainger and Norman Fenton with today's UK Column News.
00:23 Integrity Initiative Propaganda Pivots From Russia To China
11:40 Ben Rubin Reports On ACHES Event—Society: Controlled or Free?
20:08 Yellow Card Genetic Biobank
27:59 Updates And Announcements
29:58 Former Health Minister Lord Bethell Notes How Sick The UK Is Now—What Happened In 2021?
34:33 The Data Protection Act Is Not About Protecting Our Data
40:35 Artificial Indoctrination: AI News From Channel 1, Personalised And Fed To You
46:39 MHRA Still Won’t Release The Data On mRNA Injected Pregnant Women
If you would like to support our independent journalism, please join the community: https://community.ukcolumn.org/
Sources: www.ukcolumn.org/video/uk-column-news-12th-april-2024
Mike Robinson, Debi Evans, Ben Rubin and guests Cheryl Grainger and Norman Fenton with today's UK Column News.
00:23 Integrity Initiative Propaganda Pivots From Russia To China
11:40 Ben Rubin Reports On ACHES Event—Society: Controlled or Free?
20:08 Yellow Card Genetic Biobank
27:59 Updates And Announcements
29:58 Former Health Minister Lord Bethell Notes How Sick The UK Is Now—What Happened In 2021?
34:33 The Data Protection Act Is Not About Protecting Our Data
40:35 Artificial Indoctrination: AI News From Channel 1, Personalised And Fed To You
46:39 MHRA Still Won’t Release The Data On mRNA Injected Pregnant Women
If you would like to support our independent journalism, please join the community: https://community.ukcolumn.org/
Sources: www.ukcolumn.org/video/uk-column-news-12th-april-2024
👍17
Note: the "right deaths".
Press release
Causes of death to be scrutinised in revamp of death certificates
To strengthen safeguards, medical examiners will look at the cause of death in all cases that haven’t been referred to the coroner.
"The changes demonstrate the government’s commitment to providing greater transparency after a death and will ensure the right deaths are referred to coroners for further investigation."
👇
https://www.gov.uk/government/news/causes-of-death-to-be-scrutinised-in-revamp-of-death-certificates
Press release
Causes of death to be scrutinised in revamp of death certificates
To strengthen safeguards, medical examiners will look at the cause of death in all cases that haven’t been referred to the coroner.
"The changes demonstrate the government’s commitment to providing greater transparency after a death and will ensure the right deaths are referred to coroners for further investigation."
👇
https://www.gov.uk/government/news/causes-of-death-to-be-scrutinised-in-revamp-of-death-certificates
GOV.UK
Causes of death to be scrutinised in revamp of death certificates
To strengthen safeguards, medical examiners will look at the cause of death in all cases that haven’t been referred to the coroner.
🤔9🤬6
Forwarded from Eastern Approaches—Alex Thomson
Subscriber's comment on this interview:
"Let me get this straight. Peaceful protests should not take place outside of MPs' houses in the UK but Nato countries need the necessary intelligence so that they can threaten 'enemy' commanders with the killing of their families."
ukcolumn.org/video/winging-it-why-is-the-uk-training-ukrainian-pilots
"Let me get this straight. Peaceful protests should not take place outside of MPs' houses in the UK but Nato countries need the necessary intelligence so that they can threaten 'enemy' commanders with the killing of their families."
ukcolumn.org/video/winging-it-why-is-the-uk-training-ukrainian-pilots
UKColumn
Winging it: Why is the UK training Ukrainian pilots?
F-16 fast jets have no chance against Russian air defence systems, Tim Davies tells Charles Malet.
👍11❤5
How much will this change over the next few months, as the Government adds to the list of countries it will no longer trade with?
What are the benefits for British businesses and taxpayers in these sorts of nose/spite/face exercises?
👇
https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/65f976329316f5001d64c288/iran-trade-and-investment-factsheet-2024-03-21.pdf
What are the benefits for British businesses and taxpayers in these sorts of nose/spite/face exercises?
👇
https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/65f976329316f5001d64c288/iran-trade-and-investment-factsheet-2024-03-21.pdf
👍5❤1🤔1
Under the 'question everything' heading, how much have you really thought about what you eat, where it comes from and why you eat it?
To my mind, the agricultural revolution is to blame for an enormous number of the issues we face today, and what Anthony Chaffee has to say would seem to be an extension of the problem.
This lecture is only 30 mins long, but I think it's a cracker. Let me know what you think.
👇
https://youtu.be/j1cqNDDG4aA?si=ON1r7_dGDdqpLAR9
To my mind, the agricultural revolution is to blame for an enormous number of the issues we face today, and what Anthony Chaffee has to say would seem to be an extension of the problem.
This lecture is only 30 mins long, but I think it's a cracker. Let me know what you think.
👇
https://youtu.be/j1cqNDDG4aA?si=ON1r7_dGDdqpLAR9
YouTube
Dr. Anthony Chaffee - 'Plants are trying to kill you!'
Dr Anthony Chaffee is an American medical doctor specialising in Neurosurgery who over a span of 20 years has researched the optimal nutritional habits for athletic performance and health. It is his assertion that most of the so-called chronic diseases that…
👍16❤2
Caitlin Johnstone on a few of the swirling hypocrisies. Concise and well presented:
"The “rules-based international order” that the US-centralized power structure purports to uphold just means an order in which the US makes up the rules and nations had better obey them. It means rules for thee but not for me."
👇
https://www.caitlinjohnst.one/p/rules-based-order-means-rules-for
"The “rules-based international order” that the US-centralized power structure purports to uphold just means an order in which the US makes up the rules and nations had better obey them. It means rules for thee but not for me."
👇
https://www.caitlinjohnst.one/p/rules-based-order-means-rules-for
www.caitlinjohnst.one
"Rules-Based Order" Means Rules For Thee But Not For We
Notes From The Edge Of The Narrative Matrix
💯13👍3❤1
I can't see that I'll be barging anyone out of the way for a space on her couch.
Given her profession, the failure to consider any other causes of malaise seems alarming. Or, given her profession, the failure to consider any other causes of malaise is exactly what I would expect.
Jumping off the path you pick in life is very hard and, even now, very unusual.
Given her profession, the failure to consider any other causes of malaise seems alarming. Or, given her profession, the failure to consider any other causes of malaise is exactly what I would expect.
Jumping off the path you pick in life is very hard and, even now, very unusual.
💯15😱2
The purpose of subsidy in farming is to manipulate those producing food and to exert control over the use of land.
In the UK, we are seeing this play out as DEFRA pushes the agendas of the UN and the Terra Carta. The result is a landscape destroyed by policy without sense or nuance, and a food chain reliant on toxic chemicals.
The effect of subsidy is shown in these slides. How many people buying food direct from the producer, or growing their own, are tipping any of it in the bin?
The normalisation of waste, especially of food, must stop.
In the UK, we are seeing this play out as DEFRA pushes the agendas of the UN and the Terra Carta. The result is a landscape destroyed by policy without sense or nuance, and a food chain reliant on toxic chemicals.
The effect of subsidy is shown in these slides. How many people buying food direct from the producer, or growing their own, are tipping any of it in the bin?
The normalisation of waste, especially of food, must stop.
👍26👏4💯2❤1
Forwarded from Political Foe
I have spent about half my working life in the food manufacturing and distribution trade. It strikes me that there are much better ways to address food waste than disciplining serfs to put waste in the right bin!
First problem is "big", as in big retailer, big manufacturer, and probably big farmer. Big inevitably means more focus on spreadsheets, and less on the product, and even less on customer service (which nowadays really only matters if it shows up on the spreadsheet). Probably related to the "Curse of the KPI". Ben should write a book on that!
Second problem is the idea that the customer requires "consistency", which very rapidly turns into an internal requirement for "identical". If a baked product didn't rise enough, or hasn't the specified crust colour, very rapidly it goes into the skip. Given modern mass production processes, that can be a lot of product before the blemish is rectified. There used to be an outlet for such products through market stalls. But many market outlets have ceased trading of late.
Thirdly we come to the shelf life problem. People have of late been trained that they should throw away any item beyond its specified "best before" or "eat by" date. Once upon a time people had an understanding of how foods went off, and which deterioration was poisonous, and which could instead be safely covered up with a goodly portion of custard or gravy (depending on the course). Instead we have fear and "the precautionary principle" taken to extremes.
As the "elites" seem to have put hunger on the agenda, we plebs must rapidly adjust our food supply, purchase and consumption habits, unless we wish to starve in the near future.
First problem is "big", as in big retailer, big manufacturer, and probably big farmer. Big inevitably means more focus on spreadsheets, and less on the product, and even less on customer service (which nowadays really only matters if it shows up on the spreadsheet). Probably related to the "Curse of the KPI". Ben should write a book on that!
Second problem is the idea that the customer requires "consistency", which very rapidly turns into an internal requirement for "identical". If a baked product didn't rise enough, or hasn't the specified crust colour, very rapidly it goes into the skip. Given modern mass production processes, that can be a lot of product before the blemish is rectified. There used to be an outlet for such products through market stalls. But many market outlets have ceased trading of late.
Thirdly we come to the shelf life problem. People have of late been trained that they should throw away any item beyond its specified "best before" or "eat by" date. Once upon a time people had an understanding of how foods went off, and which deterioration was poisonous, and which could instead be safely covered up with a goodly portion of custard or gravy (depending on the course). Instead we have fear and "the precautionary principle" taken to extremes.
As the "elites" seem to have put hunger on the agenda, we plebs must rapidly adjust our food supply, purchase and consumption habits, unless we wish to starve in the near future.
👍23👏2🏆1