Charles Malet × Unbound Today
1.48K subscribers
987 photos
232 videos
9 files
1.24K links
Getting to the truth of the matter. Investigating in the name of choice, truth, inalienable rights and ownership of risk. Pull together, or we're done for. Chip in; comments welcome. unbound.today
Download Telegram
What are the odds?

The Launderers and Auditors granted back-to-back Royal Charters! You could make it up, but it would have taken a while.

To peruse for yourself:

👇

https://privycouncil.independent.gov.uk/royal-charters/list-of-charters-granted/
😁11
An unholy alliance, if ever there was.
🤮13🤔2💩1
Forwarded from Mrs Tiggywinkle
Bob Moran:

Imagine the most sophisticated PR machine in the world coming up with this:

"As you are aware, Your Royal Highness, there has been widespread speculation and all kinds of nasty conspiracy theories circulating about your absence. We haven't managed this very well thus far. In fact, we've made a complete pig's ear of it. But now we're going to fix everything. We've put our best people on this and here's what we're going to do:

Just you perched awkwardly on a bench. Minimal makeup. Uncharacteristically pale skin. Tired eyes. But inexplicably immaculate and perfectly symmetrical hair. You mustn't touch your hair in that natural, spontaneous way you always do. You know, that thing that makes people subconsciously know it's definitely you. NEVER touch your hair. Or flick it. Don't flick your hair back or do any of those natural, human movements that, incidentally, deep fake technology still struggles to pull off. Keep your hands in your lap. DO NOT lift them off your legs.

There will be no establishing shots. The last thing we want to do is film you walking through the garden, holding hands with William or picking daffodils with your children, like we would normally do. Not even you on your own, walking up to the bench and sitting down. Or getting up at the end. It's just going to be BOOM! HELLO HERE I AM ON A BENCH. ALONE. I'VE GOT CANCER, LIKE MOST OF YOU NOW - LOL - THANKS A LOT BYE.

Not even indoors surrounded by photographs of the family, as we also normally like to do these things. No. This will be unlike any other filmed message we've ever produced, in a deliberately confusing way. In fact, it's going to be done in a way that no filmmaker or videographer would ever, ever choose to shoot something like this.

We've written a script for you. It's mainly talking about how comforting it is to have William by your side. It's very important that you emphasise this because he will NOT be by your side as you say it. This will not make any sense at all, to anybody. Next to you will just be an egg-shaped void where your husband's head should be. It's the stupidest thing in the world to not have at least one shot of you with your husband. So we're not going to have one.

The take away from this needs to be that you're a frightened, sickly woman whose only friend in the world is a fucking bench and nobody understands how you got there.

Also, if you blink at an almost impossible, inhuman rate. We won't do another take. That's the one we'll use.

Obviously, the really smart way to do this would be to invite a BBC journalist to do a candid interview with you, somebody like Nick Robinson, who also suffered from cancer and also told everyone to get the injections that cause horrific cancers. Just like you! Anyway, he could talk to you, perhaps on a sofa, candidly but with respect and sensitivity, and you could reveal your situation to the world. We could even subtly place a copy of that day's paper on the coffee table in front of you as a wry, playful, 'fuck you' to all the conspiracy theorists. People would love that. It also shows you still have a sense of humour.

But we've decided not to do any of those things. We're going for this really weird, unsettling, off-brand, totally inexplicable bench monologue. Like a Mr Bean sketch, but with fewer laughs"

https://twitter.com/bobscartoons/status/1772185340326862891
👍2310👏8💯2🔥1😁1
"Convoys of tractors have been seen across London waving Union flags and holding signs reading 'no farmers, no food, no future'. Fortunately for their drivers, specialist agricultural vehicles are exempt from Sadiq Khan's £12.50 ULEZ charge."

What next? Subsidy will always mean slavery.

👇

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-13236903/tractor-convoy-descends-london-rush-hour-farmer-protest.html
👍22
On 25th March 2024, the Government announced “plans” for enhanced water fluoridation in the North East of England. A consultation is launched alongside these plans, the results of which will be ignored, for your safety.

Nonetheless, if the consultation is not responded to, there are no sticks with which to beat the Government, and only limited justification for taking action.

To get you in the mood, this is an excerpt from the press release:

“Fluoride is a naturally occurring mineral which protects teeth against decay. Natural levels of fluoride in water can be safely topped up to provide additional protection for teeth and reduce dental health inequalities, with decades of research showing it is effective and safe.”

For further detailed background, please see UK Column interview on this with Joy Warren “Fluoride—The Poisoned Chalice: In Plain Sight”

Consultation HERE

Press Release HERE
🤬22👍1
Forwarded from Katharine Gun
Julian Assange's hearing is 10am today, apparently the hearing will only be for 10 mins and it will be electronic not in court. No one will be present physically or remotely.

https://t.me/taylorhudak/1148
🤡4
Good job the Russians don’t have access to the internet.

“Type 26 and Type 31 frigates and Type 45 destroyers will be fitted with a trainable countermeasure launcher system under a £135 million contact with Systems, Engineering and Assessment Ltd (SEA), supporting more than 150 skilled roles across SEA and UK supply chain.”

Another nail in the coffin of OPSEC.

👇

https://des.mod.uk/royal-navy-ships-to-be-better-protected-from-hostile-drone-and-missile-threats-under-135-million-contract/
🤡32
LinkedIn has its moments!
😁16
Charles Malet × Unbound Today
Is anyone in a position to verify the claim of "recall"? 👇 https://lawenforcementtoday.com/us-army-prepared-to-implement-army-retiree-recall-program-but-why
With thanks to Ze New Vorld Wheelie, here is the front page of the attached recall notice for US Armed Forces, with the pdf link below.

It is Executive Order 13223, from 2001, with an additional clause.

For more on this, see t.me/rattletrap1776/7777.

👇

https://armypubs.army.mil/epubs/DR_pubs/DR_a/ARN40510-ALARACT_0172024-000-WEB-1.pdf
👍3🤔1
"If fomenting World War III is a metric of success (and in Washington, it is), then Nuland will be on her way to a high-paid professorship at an American university, if not a fellowship at a Beltway think tank. Nuland’s career is a testament to career officials failing upward in the elite class of D.C. bureaucrats."

Tristan Justice with a somewhat restrained conclusion to his piece on the demise of Victoria Nuland's career.

👇

https://thefederalist.com/2024/03/06/state-department-no-3-victoria-nuland-resigns-after-failing-upward-for-decades/
👏5👍1🤡1
Morgan Lerette gave me an extremely candid, amusing and thought-provoking interview for UK Column. He had been working for Blackwater in Baghdad two decades ago and he witnessed the chaotic and unseemly world of private military contractors (PMCs) at first-hand.

He has also written a book about his experiences, which rattles along at breakneck speed, sparing no details: Guns, Girls and Greed. I recommend it, sincerely. Full of action, but laced with many poignant and philosophical reflections on the nature and conduct of warfare, by any means.

I think Morgan’s interview has universal appeal, but I should especially like to direct military veterans and serving members of the Armed Forces towards it, so if anyone springs to mind, please send it on.

👇

Interview: https://www.ukcolumn.org/video/outsourcing-morality-blackwater-and-beyond-with-morgan-lerette

Book: https://www.simonandschuster.com/books/Guns-Girls-and-Greed/Morgan-Lerette/9798888450888
👏7👍32
Though written in January, the Home Office has only yesterday published its response to the most recent State of Policing response (2022 so not, in actual fact, very recent).

During the peak of the Braverman meddling, which looked very much like thinly-veiled Zionism, the words “operational independence” were used repeatedly.

In James Cleverly’s letter is a paragraph about granting powers to His Majesty’s Inspectorate of Constabulary (HMIC (Cleverly has inserted a typo here)) to “give directions” to a police force.

This is being dressed up as a measure by which HMIC may steer a failing force back on course. The reality is that this legitimises interference with operational independence, and it is not so hard to see the Home Secretary leaning on HMIC to achieve just this effect.

A dark development.

Correspondence
State of Policing 2022 report: government response

Published 28 March 2024

Power to give directions in relation to a police force

Granting HMCI the power to direct forces is a significant new power. Such a power would need a proper system of accountability to accompany it, as well as detailed consideration of how it would be exercised in relation to the wider system of policing governance. As you know, I already hold powers under section 40 of the Police Act 1996 to intervene where a force or local policing body is failing. That said, I agree you should be able to raise any concerns you have with me about force performance, and discussions at Police Performance Oversight Group should inform advice on whether I should use my powers of intervention in specific circumstances. We already have regular bi-lateral meetings scheduled, and I would welcome you continuing to use these to highlight any significant performance concerns you have.”

👇

https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/state-of-policing-2022-report-government-response/state-of-policing-2022-report-government-response
👍93
I have no way to verify the footage, but combustion upon stress via impact seems an odd way for steel to behave.

👇
Forwarded from Battleground (Jerm)
My latest podcast with Sam and Mark Bailey on their book The Final Pandemic.

Not for normies who believe in viral pandemics and contagious diseases.

https://jermwarfare.com/conversations/sam-and-mark-bailey-on-their-book-the-final-pandemic
👍12🔥1💯1
Jeremy Bowen's farewell piece for the BBC?

"The UN's most senior human rights official, Volker Türk, said in a BBC interview that Israel bore significant blame, and that there was a "plausible" case that Israel was using starvation as a weapon of war in Gaza.

Mr Türk, who is the UN high commissioner for human rights, said that if intent was proven, that would amount to a war crime."

👇

https://www.bbc.com/news/world-middle-east-68679482
8👍4
I took part in an Easter vigil last night. One of the lessons was from Genesis 22, which concerns Abraham preparing to sacrifice his own son, Isaac.

It is a text which makes for uneasy listening (or reading, of course). There will be many other interpretations, but this one seems to make some sense of it:

"The Bible has many difficult passages for modern readers, but few are more challenging than the moment when God asks Abraham to sacrifice his son Isaac in Genesis 22. This story causes us to ask a lot of troubling questions. What kind of God would ask for this? Is God commanding child sacrifice? Isn’t this request in conflict with everything else God seems to value?"

Regardless of your beliefs on any of this, I hope you are enjoying a peaceful, reflective and positive weekend.

👇

https://bibleproject.com/articles/why-did-god-ask-abraham-to-sacrifice-isaac/
11🤔2
Forwarded from GovDotUK Watch
Speech
Russia’s veto is about its breaching of sanctions in pursuit of weapons to use against Ukraine: UK statement at the UN Security Council

Statement by Ambassador Barbara Woodward at the UN Security Council meeting on nuclear non-non-proliferation and the Democratic People's Republic of Korea.

“This veto does not demonstrate concern for the North Korean people or the efficacy of sanctions. It is about Russia gaining the freedom to evade and breach sanctions in pursuit of weapons to be used against Ukraine. This Panel, through its work to expose sanctions non-compliance, was an inconvenience for Russia.”

https://www.gov.uk/government/speeches/russias-veto-is-about-its-breaching-of-sanctions-in-pursuit-of-weapons-to-use-against-ukraine-uk-statement-at-the-un-security-council
1👍1😁1