I have only recently managed to listen to David Rogers Webb talking to James Delingpole, mostly about the discoveries which have populated his book, The Great Taking.

I have not read the book–and I hope the answers lie therein–but I would like to find the particular points of law which substantiate his claims. If you do know of the legal or financial instruments which refer to his descriptions, may I ask that you post them in the comments, please? This applies to whichever part of the world you may be in, or know about.

The book has prompted a rash of videos about this, and related issues, so please post any of those you consider especially good, too.

Thank you very much.

If you have no idea what this post is about, I would encourage you to listen to the interview as it's fascinating. It may well turn out that we own less than we thought, and I really can't see anyone being happy about it.

Goodness, imagine what the world would be like if people cared this much about the wanton destruction of trees that hadn't starred in Hollywood blockbusters.

'Before entering the greenhouses, we must walk through disinfectant to stop diseases contaminating the site. The blue plastic covers put on our shoes will be incinerated when we leave.'

👇

https://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-68497720

Gaslighting. From The Critic, 2021.

Advertising censorship on the back of a magazine, August 2021.

The Week asking a question which was very much open to interpretation.

The strangest of times, that's for sure.

Further proof that all trials were compromised. How could they be as much as 10% out?

August 2021; a reminder of the corporate madness which gripped those in the COVID Cult.

This is an internal communiqué to the personnel of Gloucestershire Constabulary.

On a boring, but important, technical note, none of the items listed as 'PPE' were ever actually classified as such. However, the reason for listing them like this is to be able to use employment law to enforce the use of them.

The entire charade, from start until now, has been manifestly dishonest.

Quietly, and largely unseen, Charles III has created a web of charities, public-private partnerships, faith groups and big finance that puts nature first and people second. He’s only interested in global value creation, and that means big money and nothing else.

www.ukcolumn.org/video/no-smoke-without-fire-7-the-green-king-part-2

In this episode of No Smoke Without Fire, Debi correctly points out that KCIII is the first to jump on the Build Back Better (BBB) bandwagon (2019 being the shaping phase) in the COVID era.

Bearing in mind the eternal opportunity springing from disaster, by anyone's hand, it is worth remembering Bill Clinton pumping up the BBB rhetoric in 2006, in relation to the earlier tsunami.

'In December 2006, on the second anniversary of the 2004 Indian Ocean Tsunami, the United Nations Secretary-General's Special Envoy for Tsunami Recovery, former US President William (“Bill”) Clinton, issued a report titled “Key Propositions for Building Back Better”'

👇🏼

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590061719300031

A couple of weeks ago, and following the gathering of Welsh farmers and supporters in Cardiff on 28th March 2024, I spoke to Gareth Wyn Jones. The purpose of speaking to him was to ascertain the specific concerns of the farmers, the way those concerns would shape the campaign and what levers the campaigners have with which to exert any influence.

Without clearly defined goals and a comprehensive strategy which outlines how they may be achieved and how it is recognised that they have been achieved, it is hard to see how such a campaign will succeed.

What do you think?

👇🏼

https://www.ukcolumn.org/video/seeing-the-wood-for-the-trees-farming-and-habitat-in-wales-with-gareth-wyn-jones

I fear these sorts of remarks are wasted on 'X'.

While your attention is being misdirected towards ‘them’, the real subversion is happening.

Diversity 👇

Full house now confirmed. Remember if you suggest white people are being replaced in anyway shape or form and put up stickers to that effect you could face jail. Something seriously wrong here.

Like a number of others on this channel, I was lucky enough to take a seat at Bob Moran's Art-pocalypse last night. It was an absolute corker.

He had memorised a 10,000 word script, including over a hundred slides, live drawing and live music (Bob himself playing the occasional guitar). Other than being extremely impressive and engaging, it was a very moving journey over some of the more uncomfortable track of the past few years.

As seems to be the case at similar events, the atmosphere was most convivial and new conversations were easily opened. A most memorable evening and one that I would very much encourage you to aim for, if he is able to put on another.

Yet, this is the problem. Dingwalls, at Camden Lock, hosted last night's event. There is a vanishing number of venues capable of holding their nerve and actually permitting such an event to go ahead.

If you know of a decent sized venue that you think would be likely to accept Bob and his supporters, please post in the comments.

👇🏼

bobmoran.co.uk

In UK Column News Extra, on Wednesday 13th March 2024, Mike Robinson spoke about geoengineering. Predictably, the forum was awash with comments afterwards. There have been a few brief references to that discussion in the comments on this channel. A few things have become clear, in reading the comments and interactions.

There are one or two issues out there which provoke significant intransigence; this is one of them. The point of this post is not to try to change anyone's mind. Rather, it is to encourage a pause for thought before assuming that someone else's beliefs are a direct challenge to yours.

The specifics of the issue are a quagmire of respectable proportions, so I do not want to become bogged down in them. However, like lots of other people on this channel, I have seen plenty of videos on "chemtrails". I have read a lot about geoengineering, solar radiation management, and the rest of it.

I have also seen a great many completely pointless, wobbly camera videos of aircraft in flight.

Depending upon the atmospheric conditions, there is no doubt that where there are aircraft, there are clouds. This is observable. I say depending upon the atmospheric conditions because it is also easy to observe a clear sky with aircraft moving across it.

On the occasions that flights result in cloud, we are witnessing the pollution of the atmosphere, the consequences of which are reduced sunlight, harm to health and harm to the environment, for a start. Whatever you believe are the reasons for this occurring, there are very few sticks with which to hit the perpetrators. Air quality regulations are the most obvious one. Without evidence, there is no challenge to be made. If there were, it would have been made.

Some countries have declared, openly, that weather modification, or a variant thereof, has taken place or is taking place. The UK, which is where the majority of this channel reside, is not one of them. There are many institutions and organisations openly working on geoengineering, but none that can be proven to be conducting it at the moment.

The reason I refer to the videos as completely pointless is that they prove nothing. They will never be able to prove anything. To say so does not mean that I do not consider what is going on in the sky to be catastrophic. I think that the effect that aviation has on us and the environment is extremely detrimental. The only coordinated action, involving thousands of participants, which can be proven and—therefore—tackled, is the day-to-day activity of the entire aviation industry.

In summary, this is not to dismiss what are referred to as "chemtrails". As mentioned above, I see the same sky as everyone else, but I do not refer to the exhaust as chemtrails because of the absence of evidence. I would prefer to deal with what I can prove and challenge those that put forward grotesque theories with the intent to manipulate the climate.

UK Column News exclusive:

Quite by chance, the sentences that were muted by Parliament TV during Bell's committee hearing—some of them with the screen also blacked out—were sensitive remarks (highlighted here) about how well Britain's medicines regulator is doing.

ukcolumn.org/video/uk-column-news-15th-march-2024

"Niger regrets the intention of the American delegation to deny the sovereign Nigerien people the right to choose their partners and types of partnerships capable of truly helping them fight against terrorism,”

👇

African state scraps military ties with US https://www.rt.com/africa/594362-niger-scraps-us-military-agreement/