A note on Andrew Bridgen, following the swirling comment in relation to the posts of ‘tweets’ from his wife.

Everyone has their own definition of what it is to be controlled opposition and what the potential consequences of such a situation are. As far as I am concerned, the argument Bridgen has chosen is not the one I would have pressed. He is vaccine harmed. Given his position in the first instance, which was that he was mostly in support of Government restrictions, the jabs themselves and—even—mandates for healthcare workers, it looks as though he has only changed direction because of the effect on him, personally.

It also looks very much like he is, in principle, supporting the Government’s position that ‘vaccines’ should be imposed on people and that the only reason that he does not is that these ones are not ‘safe and effective’. Only retrospectively—as well as on wider issues—has he suggested that the freedom to make choices on such matters rests with the individual. As far as I am concerned, this is the ONLY point which matters, as it may not be subverted by circumstance. Looking back, this is precisely the reason why the ‘vaccine passport’ was available to those that had not been jabbed but had, in effect, signed up to the scheme by taking part in a clinical ‘trial’ or by getting a medical exemption. The underlying message is that ‘we would have got the jab if….’

However, the specific issue upon which he is campaigning is the harm and excess death created by these pharmaceutical products. Since he is the only MP in a chamber of 650 to speak out about this, to dismiss him outright looks a lot like cutting off one’s nose to spite one’s face. It is a message which needs to shouted from the rooftops and I think it is a mistake to imagine that it detracts from the core message surrounding liberty, choice and risk. Remember, these are Members of Parliament we are talking about; a collection of the most narcissistic, self-interested and small-minded individuals in the country. How much are they likely to care for their constituents’ views on their individual freedoms?

Andrew Bridgen will forever be tainted by his support for the unsupportable and for his failure to speak out about the wider point. He is also rendered extremely vulnerable by a number of bad smells which follow him around. But, if he stops banging the drum on excess deaths and vaccine harms, complete silence will fall upon Westminster and I really cannot see who benefits in such an eventuality.

The bizarre and undignfied spat with his wife on Twitter may well signal the beginning of the end for Bridgen. Or, it may not. Either way, may I recommend spending a little less time concentrating on whether you think Bridgen a good bloke or a prize ratbag and a little more time concentrating on how you can amplify the message that there is a very specific reason for the excess death toll? The more people that understand that message, the more people will question the direction they were being pushed in in the first place.

He'll need quite some movement off the seam to get out of this one.

👇

Ex-Pakistani PM Imran Khan sentenced to ten years in prison https://www.rt.com/news/591517-imran-khan-pakistan-jail/

With an oblique reference to Bridgen, this shows why it's important to follow the message and not the man.

It is, though, funny to see Walsh and many of his compatriots consider their country's greatest achievement as being the idea of sending three rather underwhelmed men to a place where not much happens.

He must be quite chuffed to own the branding of the next pandemic for no cost whatsoever.

This one’s managed a capital ‘U’.

Very on brand, they’ve really captured the Malet tone 😝

Admirable honesty!

👇

I got an elephant!

In an environment segment on this afternoon’s UK Column News, I made reference to DEFRA’s pledge to 30by30 which, rather than being something a builder would use, is a pledge to commit 30% of the UK’s landmass to ‘nature recovery’ by 2030.

Quick as a whip, Debi Evans has pointed out that this has come from the then Prince Charles’s Terra Carta aims. Once all the food has run out, at least this sort of knowledge might get you over the line in a pub quiz. A virtual pub quiz, of course.

👇

https://www.sustainable-markets.org/TerraCarta_Charter_Jan11th2021.pdf

Today's UK Column covers very important topics including the commencement of the Online Safety Act, the recent drone strike in Syria, (sources suggest it was NOT in Jordan), and the ICJ ruling about Israel.

At 41.54 our post about tax withholding is mentioned. We would like to thank UK Column for featuring this. Tax withholding is one of the oldest methods of peaceful non compliance against war that there is. And if enough of us do it, it can make a real difference to the lives of innocent people.

Please watch the whole episode if you have time, as it is packed with lots of useful and crucial info and updates.

https://t.me/ukcolumn/857

The most recent 'tweet' from some of the grown-ups in receipt of a £9bn UK defence funding package.

Tax Resistance

Following Mike Robinson's segment on Tax Resistance on yesterday's UK Column News (at 07:15 in extract below this post, though I recommend listening to Vanessa first), I said I would compile resources on this subject, in order you can learn more about its history and practical execution. In essence, this involves withholding tax that would otherwise go to the Government, for the very specific reason that the money raised through taxes is being used by Government for unlawful purposes.

Mike's segment relates to the action being described on the excellent Lawyers of Light channel. Without wanting to trigger an e-valanche, may I request further resources on this subject? Please only send material that you regard very highly and that is completely cogent. No need to send on any of the Lawyers of Light posts, which I have sight of already.

Once I have amassed the material, I will put it together in what, I hope, will be a useful and shareable format.

Thank you.

Charles

Tax Resistance from 07:15, though listen to entire segment for context.

👇🏼