The Patriarchy Paradox has been up on YouTube for a little over three years. It was produced and narrated by Will Knowland, who was teaching at a secondary school, Eton College, at the time.

After showing it to some pupils at the school, there was a complaint from another member of staff, which resulted in the headmaster instructing Knowland to take the video off YouTube.

Knowland refused and was sacked. It's only a little over half an hour long. Eton was founded in 1440 and survives to this day, but this material was considered too dangerous for the inmates.

What do you think?

👇🏼

https://youtu.be/wTHgMxQEoPI

In September, Jeremy Nell (whom you may know better as Jerm) interviewed Sean Parker about being falsely accused of rape. I would encourage to you listen to the conversation as it points towards the enormous vulnerability of suspects in 'he said, she said' allegations. This has a much broader application than just rape and sexual offences, and police and CPS alike are susceptible to being blinded by circumstance.

During their conversation, Sean spoke about the Criminal Cases Review Commission (CCRC), which is supposed to be an independent body dealing with miscarriages of justice after the appeal process has completed. The CCRC is, in fact, funded by the Ministry of Justice, which has most certainly been able to affect change on the CCRC's ability to do its job by control of the purse strings. Take a look at their 'facts and figures' section.

In January of this year, the Justice Gap produced an excellent critique of the relationship between the CCRC and Government. The authors wrote:

'We have criticised the devastating cuts to its budget. The CCRC suffered the greatest funding cut of any part of the criminal justice system – its budget was just £6m last year compared to £9.24m in 2004 – and its workload has more than doubled since 2010. Its referral rate has declined sharply, reaching a nadir of just a dozen cases in 2016 and 13 in 2017. The reasons for this are unclear and are likely to be multi-faceted but it has left the CCRC exposed to criticism.'

Iain Davis on the transition to panto season.

👇🏼

So, at the so-called COVID inquiry did Dominic Cummings talk much about the "Gates' type people" and the Bill Gates sort of "network?" There is no mention of it, from what I've read. This is extremely odd because in 2021 he said this:

"In March I started getting calls from various people saying these new mRNA vaccines could well smash the conventional wisdom.. People like Bill Gates and that kind of network were saying.. Essentially what happened is.. there is a network of people, Bill Gates type people, who were saying completely rethink the paradigm of how you do this.. What Bill Gates and people like that were saying to me and others in number 10 was you need to think of this much more like the classic programs of the past.. the Manhattan Project in WWII, the Apollo program.. But what Bill Gates and people were saying.. was, the actual expected return on this is so high that even if does turn out to be all wasted billions it's still a good gamble.. and that is what we did."

Apparently, according to alleged news outlets such as the UK Guardian, among the major revelations to emerge from his COVID-19 Inquiry testimony is that he didn't treat some of his female staff very well, suggesting he may be a misogynist.

So, given that the prime minister senior advisor told a Commons Select Committee in 2021 that much of the government's policy response to the alleged pandemic was led by a bunch of unelected philanthropic foundations and billionaires, how has that been reflected in the so-called inquiry to date? Do you think it will even be discussed?

Of course, it is not really an inquiry at all. It's a clean up and whitewash operation designed provide a rationale for the damage caused by the COVID policy "response." That damage, such as increased mortality and economic disaster for SME's while global corporations have never made more, was a nailed on certainty from the start. It is hard to imagine how it wasn't, in fact, the planned outcome.

The laughable "inquiry" will ultimate produce some "lessons" to be learned from the identified "policy failures."

These alleged "failures" will lead to recommendations for more lockdowns, harder and sooner the next time. They will highlight the need for more government authority and control, for tighter partnership working with private corporations, more "pandemic response" and biosecurity measures, more centralised power and more involvement for global governance bodies like the WHO.

Anyone who has been paying any attention at all should understand this. It is not a difficult prediction to make.

Some years ago, John Keay wrote a magnificent book about the Great Trigonometrical Survey of India.

It is packed with tales of the extraordinary lengths those involved went to in order to complete their assigned tasks.

The man in charge of the survey when the big hill was measured was George Everest, which is why it bears his name. A direct descendant of his was my doctor at Sandhurst, just before she joined an expedition back to the Himalayas (a medic with integrity, she seemed to be at the time).

The book is called The Great Arc, and I can assure you it is a lot more interesting than anything Jordan Peterson has to say about curved shapes.

👇

https://harpercollins.co.uk/products/the-great-arc-the-dramatic-tale-of-how-india-was-mapped-and-everest-was-named-john-keay

Richard Dawkins's Christmas Card design for this year.

Mark Knopfler's view, just over 40 years ago:

'Now, warning lights are flashing down at Quality Control
Somebody threw a spanner, and they threw him in the hole
There's rumours in the loading bay and anger in the town
Somebody blew the whistle and the walls came down
There's a meeting in the boardroom
They're trying to trace the smell
There's a leaking in the washroom, there's a sneak in personnel
Somewhere in the corridors, someone was heard to sneeze
Goodness me, could this be industrial disease?

The caretaker was crucified for sleeping at his post
They're refusing to be pacified, it's him they blame the most
The watchdog's got rabies, the foreman's got the fleas
Everyone's concerned about industrial disease
There's panic on the switchboard, tongues in knots
Some come out in sympathy, some come out in spots
Some blame the management, some the employees
And everybody knows it's the industrial disease

Yeah, now the work force is disgusted, downs tools, walks
Innocence is injured, experience just talks
Everyone seeks damages and everyone agrees
That these are "classic symptoms of a monetary squeeze"
On ITV and BBC they talk about the curse
Philosophy is useless, theology is worse
History boils over, there's an economics freeze
Sociologists invent words that mean "industrial disease"

Doctor Parkinson declared "I'm not surprised to see you here
You've got smoker's cough from smoking
Brewer's droop from drinking beer
I don't know how you came to get the Betty Davis' knees
But, worst of all young man you've got industrial disease"
He wrote me a prescription he said "You are depressed
I'm glad you came to see me to get this off your chest
Come back and see me later, next patient please
Send in another victim of industrial disease, ha-ha
Ha, splendid!"

And I go down to Speaker's Corner I'm-a thunderstruck
They got free speech, tourists, police in trucks
Two men say they're Jesus, one of them must be wrong
There's a protest singer, he's singing a protest song, he says
"They want to have a war to keep their factories
They want to have a war to keep us on our knees
They want to have a war to stop us buying Japanese
They want to have a war to stop Industrial Disease

They're pointing out the enemy to keep you deaf and blind
They want to sap your energy, incarcerate your mind
Give you Rule Britannia, gassy beer, page three
Two weeks in España and Sunday striptease"
Meanwhile the first Jesus says "I'd cure it soon
Abolish Monday mornings and Friday afternoons"
The other one's out on hunger strike, he's dying by degrees
How come Jesus gets industrial disease?

Oh no... I'm sick!'

🎸

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CiT0mUDCRMU

There has been a lot of interest in the transfer of wealth during the past few years, land ownership in particular. More than 3 million acres of land in the UK is owned by the Forestry Commission and the Ministry of Defence, which amounts to around 5% of the total.

The Forestry Commission was brought into being by the Forestry Act 1919, which made the case for regenerating woodland after so much of it disappeared during the war, via a host of means, including compulsory purchase. As you would expect, there was opposition to the idea, mostly from the Scots.

James Hogge, the Liberal MP, said in the House of Commons 'We have found, and I think the proof can easily be produced, that in Scotland our scheme of small holdings is largely impossible from the point of view of economic success unless these small holdings are associated with subsidiary industries, and the attempt has continually been made in Scotland, particularly in our Highland and Island districts, to associate the system of small holdings with a system of afforestation, so that a man placed upon a small holding may continue to work to the extent that farming operations are possible and still have a subsidiary occupation, that occupation being his connection with afforestation.'

Today, the Forest Research department of the Forestry Commission holds a great array of documents of pure speculation into the relationship between 'climate change' and forestry.

Press release
£89 million of funding to develop cutting edge new electric vehicle technology

'£89 million of funding has been awarded to 20 cutting edge net zero tech projects, reinforcing the UK as a world leader in zero emissions vehicle technology.'


https://www.gov.uk/government/news/89-million-of-funding-to-develop-cutting-edge-new-electric-vehicle-technology

Though eternally unwilling to rebroadcast state propaganda, this does not appear to be much covered outside the BBC.

It is reported that the public 'mood is favourable' on the matter of messing about with human embryos up to 28 days of age. This follows a consultation with 70 people. Not a typo. 70.

The funding was provided by the government's UK Research and Innovation, which is described as 'independent'.

The Church of England’s investment body will be licking their lips.

👇

https://www.bbc.com/news/health-67204553

I had the chance to talk to Jeremy Nell on TNT radio yesterday, during his excellent Jerm Warfare show. We spoke about the extraordinary and immoral contradiction that is the Church of England's 'Ethical Investment Policy'.

I had written an article about this for UK Column some months ago and it describes the way in which the Church may invest in pornography, the manufacture of lethal weapons and the cloning of human embryos. This is not hypothetical; 6 of the top 20 equity holdings relate directly to genomics.

If you do make it through the interview, I would recommend reading the article as well because the CofE's chicanery really does need to be seen to be believed.

Since the dramatic escalation of conflict and tensions within and without the Middle East, the absence of reason, humanity and any form of coherent leadership has been staggering.

The conduct of the Home Secretary very well articulates the complete loss of the objectivity of the organs of the state and she has made a number of highly questionable forays into the operational decision-making processes of the Chief Constables of the nation's police forces.

This is my latest article for UK Column, on this subject and the apparently insatiable desire for conflict.

Mike Yeadon, a member of this channel, has very recently started his own solo Telegram channel and, apart from drawing your attention to its existence, I would encourage you to join it.

Below this message, I will post the short video he has made to explain the situation. And, in order to get a better idea of the sorts of things you would find hanging in his cupboards, you will have to watch it.

https://t.me/DrMikeYeadonsolochannel

Message to all the subscribers of this formerly shared channel from Dr Mike Yeadon.

His new solo channel is
@DrMikeYeadonsolochannel

Make sure to subscribe to his new channel!

Robin

JP Sears hits the target again, so to speak.

Thank you, Elaine, for posting in the chat:

👇

https://youtu.be/Y01vFlVnLbo

The expansion of the boundless intolerance of liberal progressives continues in Stroud, Gloucestershire (birthplace of the lawnmower and Wimbledon tennis balls).

'Community Solidarity Stroud District' (CSSD) does what it can to shut down free speech, open debate and anything with a counter-narrative whiff about it.

Having singled out Sandi Adams and James Delingpole as personae non gratae on previous occasions, one wonders what is being cooked up in advance of their return tomorrow! Flyer below.

Amusingly, CSSD seems to have it in for a particular venue, which seems hard luck on the place, but The Beacon gets it in the neck. Someone must have forgotten that Stroud's favourite sons (of all genders)—Extinction Rebellion—met there in the past.

Given the fearsome nature of CSSD's campaign, I will be girding myself appropriately before turning up to this tomorrow.

If you happen to be going along, please make yourself known. I look a bit like the picture for this channel.

👇🏼

https://www.eventbrite.co.uk/e/net-zero-the-final-frontier-tickets-731488671307

If you are keen to take control of your own supply of meat, or you already have control of it, learning how to butcher is not imperative, but it is very useful and very satisfying. Also, once you know what you are doing, it is not as difficult as you might imagine.

The School of Traditional Skills (in USA) is running a free online session on butchery on Wednesday 15 Nov. I think you might have to be signed up to their database to be eligible, but to do so is also free.

On the subject of keeping and killing livestock, whilst the Government in the UK do not want you to do it, it is perfectly lawful to control the entire life cycle on one site (no need for abattoir etc).

👇🏼

https://schooloftraditionalskills.com/classes/pasture-to-plate-home-butchery-with-brandon-sheard/

As far as policy and legislation goes in the UK, this is the document which defines what you may, or may not, do with regard to the slaughter of your own livestock.

This guidance tells you that it is designed to preserve the welfare of the animal, so take note that you must stun before you kill. Unless, of course, that interferes with a religious rite, in which case the welfare of the animal—in the eyes of the guidance—takes a back seat.

'This guidance is for livestock owners and landowners who kill rabbits and hares on their land.

You do not need a licence to kill animals to eat at home, as long as:

you own the animal and you kill it on your property
you’re killing it for you or your immediate family, who live on your property, to eat
You could be prosecuted if you do not follow the rules in this guide.

Slaughter without stunning in accordance with religious rites can only take place in an approved slaughterhouse.'

👇🏼

https://www.gov.uk/guidance/slaughter-poultry-livestock-and-rabbits-for-home-consumption

And, for a light-hearted look at the relationship between eating and hectoring, here is JP again:

👇🏼

https://youtu.be/z0O_VYcsIk8

Widespread disappointment across the mainstream media that those gathering in London in the name of peace did not spontaneously decide to start a massacre.

However, in all the pointless and wilfully misleading discussion around a potential 'ban' of the demonstration, lots of police powers were overlooked.

The one exercised today was Section 60 of the Criminal Justice and Public Order Act 1994, which grants police the power to search anyone within a given area, without suspicion. This may be authorised by an inspector or above, based upon the reasonable belief that serious violence may occur, or has occurred, and that use of such power will mitigate further violence.

👇🏼

https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1994/33/section/60