I can't see there's any need to read the 'story', but this looks like it'll be my favourite byline of the day.

Well done to all at the Daily Mail.

This is an excellent and detailed canter (15 mins) through the systems that enable an apparently small number of people to control the vast majority of the increasingly isolated and demoralised remainder of the world's population. Dr Shiva Ayyadurai sees things as they are, of that there is no question.

Though the last few minutes of the video deal with his presidential campaign, they include the most important thing he says, in my opinion. 'The future is offline'. Coming from a man who is reputed to have invented email (thanks a bunch, mate), this is significant.

I hope, like me, you believe that the hammer he draws does exist and that we are it.

If you have trouble persuading anyone else to watch it, perhaps you could lure them by talking up his incredible use of a whiteboard.

👇🏼

https://vashiva.tv/v/1696

She is absolutely right about this and I will aim to send on the full interview once Jerm releases it.

The language used in the presence of children informs, exactly, the way they go on to use it. Recently, I overheard a five year-old telling another child that he had 'scored thrice' whilst playing football.

👇🏼

Incredibly interesting podcast about how children's books have been deliberately dumbed down over the last century, so that they become more compliant and immoral.

Full podcast coming soon.

'Bangor University has designed nuclear fuel cells, the size of poppy seeds, to produce the energy needed to sustain life there.'

'There' is the moon, according to the BBC. As with all state propaganda, there is never enough room to explain any of this properly, so no firm conclusions can be drawn.

However, at least a few questions fall out of this story. In the midst of trashing this realm, how do earthlings summon the gall to assume we can hop onto the moon and start doing the same there? I mean trashing via toxins, not fake science about carbon dioxide.

If these nuclear sesame seeds do exist, they must have been tested on earth, which means they must work on earth. In which case, why on earth are they not replacing all the monstrous, useless and money-sapping 'renewable' energy contraptions here?

If the answer to this question relates to 'safety', then I refer back to the first question.

Separately, or not so separately, efforts to mine for Helium-3 have kept a low profile during the excitement surrounding the Lego Landing.

BBC Report

👇

https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-wales-66687056

Hunt for Helium-3

👇

https://www.esa.int/Enabling_Support/Preparing_for_the_Future/Space_for_Earth/Energy/Helium-3_mining_on_the_lunar_surface

Hunt for Helium-3 in perspective

👇

https://www.resilience.org/stories/2021-11-14/another-extraordinary-delusion-mining-helium-from-the-moon/

A great piece on Substack by Miriam Finch, about the relationship between knackered concrete, nasal flu vaccination and mind-control.

👇🏼

https://miri.substack.com/p/collapsing-schools-means-one-thing

There are at least 56,000 people in the United Kingdom who believe that 'trans health care treatments' should, without question, be available to minors. They put their names on a petition to that effect. It will come as little surprise that the petition was run during the first internment of 2020.

The Government's mealy-mouthed response is worth reading, and it makes reference to the Gillick competence: 'Patients under the age of 16 are not automatically presumed to be legally competent to make decisions about their healthcare. The courts have stated under the Gillick competence, that under 16-year olds will be competent to give valid consent to a particular intervention if they have “sufficient understand and intelligence to enable him or her to understand fully what is proposed”'.

With transgender indoctrination starting at nursery age, all minors will present as 'competent' if this is not stopped.

Exactly the same point of case law was wheeled out to ensure minors could roll their sleeves up for a novel drug, without parental consent.

👇🏼

https://petition.parliament.uk/petitions/318025

A breakdown of The Energy Bill by the Daily Sceptic, and what a monstrous energy bill it may create.

Have you ever taken a serious look at an off-grid alternative, I wonder? Are there examples of small communities investing in micro power stations (large generators, solar arrays) that you know of?

👇🏼

https://dailysceptic.org/2023/09/07/energy-bill-authorises-reasonable-force-to-install-smart-meters-that-allow-authorities-to-turn-customers-energy-on-and-off/

This is exactly what happened with Gillick competency and the new pharmaceuticals; something I refer to in a forthcoming UK Column article.

👇🏼

With reference to the point that the Gillick Competency was used to justify children giving consent to vaccines. I heard that at a local school there were children sobbing in the queue for the vaccine, begging the teachers to not make them have it. Teachers were supervising the queue and told them they had to have it because their parents had consented. I heard this from a teacher who worked at the school who was known within the school to be anti vax.

So Gillick competency has been used as a one way ticket, the children are stuffed either way.

In hindsight, one has to wonder why the Victoria Gillick case was so high profile at the time. Why would it be so important for that case to set the president for Drs and children to go behind parents backs? I wonder how Ms Gillick now feels about children’s competency to give consent for various things. Isn’t the whole concept of that young girl taking her wish to get contraception behind her parents back, all the way to the end of the legal process a strange one?

On the Problem/Reaction/Solution front, you may have heard reports about Bill Gates cutting down trees to 'capture carbon', or some such.

In effect, he is, or he will be forced to. Despite the evidence that forest fires have declined in incidence in recent decades, the media has created the illusion that the opposite is true, due—of course—to anthropogenic climate change.

To reduce the risk of these fires, forested areas are thinned out, leaving dead trees which are said to give off all this awful carbon dioxide. Therefore, burying the trees in the ground is the brainwave of Kodama Systems. As far as I am aware, they have not provided figures comparing the amount of carbon dioxide used to bury a tree (in a very short space of time) versus the amount of carbon dioxide given off by a dead tree (over a very long period).

Still, this has been enough for Bill Gates's Breakthrough Energy fund to dish out nearly $7m to get Kodama up and digging.

Of course, for Kodama to develop and sustain their operations, they will need a lot of dead trees and, inevitably, this will mean cutting more and more trees down—to reduce carbon dioxide. Truly, this is their plan. See for yourself:

Kodama Systems

Breakthrough Energy

MIT Technology Review explaining how clever all of this is.

For those in need of an antidote to health and safety/snowflakeism and the pathetic failure to deal with risk, this should do the trick.

👇🏼

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tMrB_3wq2ak

She brought the case because she wanted assurances that her daughters or anyone under 16 would not be given contraception or abortion advice without parents knowledge. She wanted to protect her daughters. She lost the case. The fact it is called Gillick competence must be like salt in the wound for her.

Only 11%?

👇

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-66716501

'The worst affected route was Queensway, where the daily traffic count jumped from 706 prior to March 2022 to 1,795 in September last year. Council officers said that there was “little evidence” that the LTN had helped people get around on foot and that, despite an initial increase, there had been a “disappointing” downturn in cycling in the area to levels lower than the pre-trial period. It was also found that the project had “little to no impact on alleviating the impact of school traffic”.'

👇

https://www.chroniclelive.co.uk/news/north-east-news/fenham-low-traffic-neighbourhood-scrapped-27637197

The list of things that the NHS is very bad at would take far too long to compile. However, I might venture to add reading the room to the tally.

To my astonishment, the GP surgery at which I am registered sent me (yet another) text message yesterday. The message asked whether I would like to 'become a volunteer Practice Health Champion'. Other than a loose reference to making a difference to 'people's lives' (not clear whether for better or worse), no description was offered. No, thank you.

Like most surgeries, this one piled up the furniture inside the door the moment the wind changed direction in 2020 and the publicly-funded employees hid behind it. What I will champion, though, are determined efforts for individuals to manage their own health and their own lives and for the NHS—if it is to remain in existence at all—to be reduced a a trauma only service.

This link (which is not from the surgery in question) gives a little insight into the surgery's suggestion. How long before these volunteers are jabbing experimental toxins into their fellow men?

👇🏼

https://www.planetreesgrouppractice.nhs.uk/practice-information/what-are-practice-health-champions/