I think what struck me the most was when you said that the people around you in the police did not get at all what your letter was saying. In medicine many doctors are similarly blinkered. It is also why Edward Dowd (https://gettr.com/user/edwarddowd) has pitched his book (https://www.amazon.co.uk/Cause-Epidemic-Sudden-Deaths-2021/dp/B0C6VMSHD7/ref=sr_1_1?crid=FDQIQ8PYL86Q&keywords=cause+unknown%22+the+epidemic+of+sudden+deaths+in+2021+%26+2022&qid=1687701519&sprefix=the+epidemic+of+sudden+death%2Caps%2C1299&sr=8-1) at the marginal mind (30% get it already, 40% are marginal, 30% will never get it). My question to you is this: given what you say that those around you simply didn't get what you had written (when it's so obvious to the rest of us), does it make sense to try to 'convert' them or would it not be better simply to get communities to build parallel systems: i.e. those of us who can chip in to fund a policeman's position who would work for the community's priorities, not the UN's/WEF's Agenda 30 destruction. With numbers we have each others' backs (and our policeman's) and we simply turn our back on the corrupt supranational organisation/CCP-infiltrated and subverted system. Does that mean fiefdoms? Perhaps. But I think that might be preferable to what we are facing by doing nothing.

Charles what do you think about the Australian police officers who have been suspended for almost 2 years now for refusing to disclose jab status?
It has been almost a year since the court cases and still no judgment. Those who didn’t join a class action early on (at a cost of £3000) haven’t received any pay at all. Those who did join are still ostracised from the workplace because of covidian commissioners.

The last part was so interesting because the experience you had of people agreeing (a bit) with the logic of the scam then reverting immediately afterward.
I worked years ago for Wellcome as a scientist in vaccine adverse reactions, I left as they were not really investigating the many neurological problems in infants after pertussis vaccination.I felt it was very wrong Vallance worked in London at the time but I never knew him.My colleagues were not evil people.
Then came the swine flu scam and then covid scam.During the covid scam I worked as a pharmacist locum in a big supermarket and knew it was a huge lie.I never wore the mask or used the toxic hand gel.
The thing is even my brother called me an anti vaxxer!He knew what my job had been yet was so deeply in the trance he could only repeat TV slogans.
I tried to talk to customers and they ( mostly) had the reaction that you described.Some did listen.
I saw people being neglected, young and old and saw midazolam prescribed a lot.
A few people did come round, mostly colleagues.I hope I could save some.Who knows?One delivery driver came to my house recently and thanked me.So it’s just a few but the mind control is deep.I believe that Thomas Mayer is correct when he talked about dark energy forces somehow in these shots and that’s the AI connection

If that truly isn’t a parody account, the Cabinet Office needs to have another think.
It’s absolutely nothing to do with government how people fare in hot or cold weather, as a result of choices they make.
It’s particularly true when, despite the decades of lying about climate change, the temperatures above or below which the government considers it legitimate to interfere in the lives of the citizenry are well within the historic boundaries for the country.
This is not different in kind from official responses to infectious diseases (pointedly mentioning that, despite propaganda, there was no real pandemic, only one of deliberately bad testing). The general rationale for intervention is that otherwise, people could infect others and thereby injure or kill them.
I’m afraid this is incorrect. Those without symptoms themselves have never before & do not now represent a health risk to others.

In short, asymptomatic transmission was a flat lie.

*It’s even worse. Symptomatic transmission doesn’t occur, either.*

I’m not kidding. One of the commonly understood foundational principles of so-called infectious diseases is that it’s trivially easy to infect another person. The reality is that no one has ever successfully set up a transmission event of a symptomatic respiratory so-called viral infection. Not once, despite tremendous efforts. In short, our understanding of colds and flu is WRONG. They’re not caused by viruses & the sickness is not transmissible.

This kicks thd stool out from under all the WHO BS. Not only do you not need vaccines, but they don’t work at all. The field of “viroliegy” is indeed a lie.

Feel free to continue to believe the lies, if you don’t care that it’s on these fraudulent grounds that you will be stripped of God-given liberties to get on with your peaceful, law-abiding life. To have that life made legally conditional upon having rolled up your sleeve for an injection, more likely an open-ended series of injections of gene-based products which are designed to injure, to maim and to kill.

Reject digital ID (even if it’s not called a “Vaccine Passport”). If you accede, this conditionality will be exploited to strip you of your rights and liberty & probably your life.

I can stand up all these allegations. Please consider them.

Best wishes
Mike

Dr Mike Yeadon

All, it’s absolutely vital that you REJECT any retailer that either makes it impossible to shop without a digital ID of some kind or chooses not to accept cash (whether or not you use cash).

If you fall into the trap of access to goods (including food) and services becoming contingent upon possession of a digital ID and the choice to use cash is deleted, it will be the end of human freedoms and shortly after that, the end of your life.

There is extraordinarily no question whatsoever that we face a supranational action to take over & totally control the lives of citizens of formerly democratic countries, to subject us all to digital totalitarian control and make our lives conditional upon accepting a series of mRNA “vaccines”, which are designed to injure, maim and kill.

This is a truly diabolical, murderous agenda, decades in the planning, by evil people.

Best wishes
Mike

Dr Mike Yeadon

Once, this sat on my grandfather's desk. Now, it is in my 'office'. The only place I have seen this version was on a billboard overlooking a dramatic stretch of Lake Tanganyika, in Burundi.

Until we act like these beasts do in the last two frames, we are easy meat. I think it constructive to dispel any notion of victimhood and to develop a mindset of being in control; which we are. The direct 'challenge' is a much underestimated weapon.

Rejection of interference on principle, not technicality, is the firmest ground, I believe. Detail does matter; the maelstrom created by the 'COVID' internship gave way to too much of the struggle in the top three frames. Whether there was an illness and what sort of illness it may have been was neither here nor there—nor should it ever be.

Not government, nor any other party, has the right to interfere in our lives. Choice, and the risk that comes with it, rests with the individual. Without exception.

As a matter of interest, have you seen this particular poster before?

The pic only rings bells, but it sure puts me in mind of the 'long spoons, hell or heaven' story!
Great interview with James, thank you so much.

Net Zero, taken on the front foot.

👇

https://twitter.com/StarkNakedBrief/status/1673578661562204160?t=0ph4znVqULrbP0bek7V5cA&s=19

I believe this chap is absolutely right. However, I don't think he goes far enough. It is not just that the conduct—in a public place and in the presence of children—is lewd and inappropriate. Normalising this sort of behaviour for children, and branding it with colourful flags, makes them much more susceptible to the possibility of abuse.

In suggesting to children that this sort of behaviour is 'fun' and something to do with 'love', these people are removing the natural barriers of wariness and inhibition. For the malevolent and perverted, the bar has been lowered considerably.

I have written to Simon Roberts, the Chief Executive of Sainsbury's, to ensure that he is aware of the responsibility that his organisation, and he personally, must bear with regard to putting children at risk. Selling tat to children that is, in effect, marketing gender mutilation and sexual intercourse, is not alright. If it were, they would be flogging similar rubbish pertaining to heterosexuality.

Pride Month is an horrific misnomer.

https://twitter.com/clarksonlawson_/status/1673389749220810764?s=20

Context for the above post.

👇🏼

Sainsbury's, today. They have been asked to explain why this is aimed at children.

Cock-eyed reasoning from the Bank of England. We don't walk as much as we used to, but even the transhumanists aren't calling for us to do away with legs (yet).

This is disingenuous, at best.

👇🏼

https://www.bankofengland.co.uk/the-digital-pound

So, it's not like cash then. The Bank of England is not in a position to tell me how many pound notes I may stuff in my pocket at any one time.

This particular wall of the digital prison deserves to be kicked down simply on the dreariness of such a day.

The Oath of Allegiance came up a few times during the Delingpod interview (both for police and Armed Forces). These oaths are sworn to the monarch, and in the Coronation Oath, the monarch swears to 'govern.....according to their respective laws and customs'.

With these in mind, this passage from the first book of Samuel, chapter 8, sets out the relationship extremely clearly.

👇🏼

'10 Samuel told all the words of the Lord to the people who were asking him for a king. 11 He said, “This is what the king who will reign over you will claim as his rights: He will take your sons and make them serve with his chariots and horses, and they will run in front of his chariots. 12 Some he will assign to be commanders of thousands and commanders of fifties, and others to plow his ground and reap his harvest, and still others to make weapons of war and equipment for his chariots. 13 He will take your daughters to be perfumers and cooks and bakers. 14 He will take the best of your fields and vineyards and olive groves and give them to his attendants. 15 He will take a tenth of your grain and of your vintage and give it to his officials and attendants. 16 Your male and female servants and the best of your cattle and donkeys he will take for his own use. 17 He will take a tenth of your flocks, and you yourselves will become his slaves. 18 When that day comes, you will cry out for relief from the king you have chosen, but the Lord will not answer you in that day.”

19 But the people refused to listen to Samuel. “No!” they said. “We want a king over us. 20 Then we will be like all the other nations, with a king to lead us and to go out before us and fight our battles.”

21 When Samuel heard all that the people said, he repeated it before the Lord. 22 The Lord answered, “Listen to them and give them a king.”'

Charles, hope you don't mind me sharing this small clip, which reinforces what you were saying:

This arrest of Abi Roberts illustrates, very well, so many of the issues that police seem absolutely unable to overcome. I will put out a short audio clip about this tomorrow.

The text below the video is not mine. Charles

👇🏼

First video

Swearing is illegal" 😂😂😂

No its not. A s5 is using threatening [or abusive] words or behaviour, or disorderly behaviour, within the hearing/sight of a person likely to be caused harassment, alarm or distress thereby

A crime the Govt is guilty of with their abusive psychological messaging they pushed on the UK population.