Yan | swan.com / @skwp:
TL;DR: Bitcoin’s supply = safe. Mining = safe. Your coins in a never-reused address = safe behind a hashed (obscured) address. The real risk is exposed public keys, and BIP-360 gives us a clear migration path. The threat isn’t here yet, but it’s not a bad idea to prepare early.
TL;DR: Bitcoin’s supply = safe. Mining = safe. Your coins in a never-reused address = safe behind a hashed (obscured) address. The real risk is exposed public keys, and BIP-360 gives us a clear migration path. The threat isn’t here yet, but it’s not a bad idea to prepare early.
stacker news ~bitcoin:
Dathon Ohm releases BIP 110 release candidate 2
Dathon Ohm releases BIP 110 release candidate 2
GitHub
Release UASF BIP-110 v0.1 Release Candidate 2 · dathonohm/bitcoin
Same as RC1, with a few minor fixes:
CI is now fully passing
The spurious warning about Taproot being an unknown deployment has been fixed
The node now properly requests preferred peers when query...
CI is now fully passing
The spurious warning about Taproot being an unknown deployment has been fixed
The node now properly requests preferred peers when query...
stacker news ~bitcoin:
The asymmetric advantage of a BIP-110 fork
The asymmetric advantage of a BIP-110 fork
Stacker News
The asymmetric advantage of a BIP-110 fork \ stacker news
Something I've been struggling with for a while is that supporters of BIP-110 have been making statements like this: source source source There seems to be a belief among BIP-110 supporters that even a minority of hashrate (45%?) could pull of a successful…
stacker news ~bitcoin:
Who else is excited about BIP 110?
Who else is excited about BIP 110?
Stacker News
Who else is excited about BIP 110? \ stacker news
I got into Bitcoin relatively late. I wasn’t in Bitcoin around for the 2015–2017 era, I completely missed the blocksize wars, segwit drama, and all the historical battles people like to reference today. So for me, this BIP-110 situation is the first time…