“It cannot be admitted that speeches or interviews, even if they contain questions about the regularity of the voting system or harsh accusations against members of other branches of government, could constitute an attempt to abolish the Democratic Rule of Law.

I was often criticized because I used to say that the electronic voting machine was just like a toaster. Plug it in, it works. Unplug it, it doesn’t. That was my understanding.”

“On the contrary, there is evidence that, as soon as the destruction began, one of the defendants took measures to prevent the Supreme Court building from being invaded by vandals. An accused person cannot be held responsible for damage caused by a third party, especially if there is no evidence of any direct link or order.”

“The imputation of the crime of criminal organization requires more than the gathering of several agents to commit offenses, the plurality of agents. The existence of a criminal plan does not in itself constitute the crime of criminal organization.”

According to Fux, “even if the agents discuss for several months whether or not to commit a particular offense, the case falls within the scope of moral and social reproach. But it does not allow for the intervention of criminal law,” he noted. “If the agents ultimately decide to carry out those planned acts and offenses, they will be held accountable according to their respective authorship and participation.”