One of the biggest creeps in the history of Bitcoin.

(Also pictured: Craig Wright)

🎵 “Here’s a story…”

someone has to propose the addition of a rule to the protocol to break consensus with 110

like “if bit is flipped for 110, then invalid”
that’s what “coherence” of an opposing chain would mean

which is why people say URSF or stfu

“There’s no spam problem on Bitcoin”

The spam problem on Bitcoin:

My propaganda:
1. Bitcoin is money
2. Run a node

The most unscrupulous people in Bitcoin have been telling you for the last year that your node is irrelevant.

The most unscrupulous people in Bitcoin have been telling you for the last year that your node is irrelevant.

I hate that BIP-110 opponents call it a hostile attack. NO. It's a defensive temp solution to a problem that we SEE that they DON'T. They don't see it because they are benefiting from the problem. Their ROI is fiat money or they want to see BTC self destruct.

Why are they fighting tooth and nail to stop BIP-110? It’s a very practical solution. It doesn’t harm the network and doesn’t freeze coins. What exactly is so dangerous about BIP-110? If you’re on the fence, think critically, and ask yourself "who are the…

It's odd that you weren't willing to speak out when Core uncapped datacarriersize and refused to fix the inscriptions exploit, and now you're saying that the network's immune system reaction is the actual problem