Aim: The committee aims to manage the immediate geopolitical shockwave following the Nazi-Soviet Non-Aggression Pact of August 23, 1939. Delegates representing the great powers and affected smaller nations must determine how to respond to the redrawing of Eastern European spheres of influence, prevent the imminent invasion of Poland, and decide whether collective security or unilateral action offers Europe its best chance of survival.

Context: On August 23, 1939, Nazi Germany and the Soviet Union shook the world by signing a public non-aggression pact — and a secret protocol dividing Eastern Europe between them. Poland, Romania, the Baltic states, and Finland were carved into German and Soviet spheres without their knowledge. Britain and France, who had been negotiating a tripartite alliance with Moscow, were blindsided. The pact freed Hitler to invade Poland without fear of a two-front war, and left the West scrambling for a response. Smaller nations across Eastern Europe faced an existential choice: align with Berlin, seek protection from London and Paris, or accept their fate. Within days, Germany would launch its blitzkrieg into Poland, igniting the Second World War. The question before delegates is whether diplomacy, collective security, or force can still avert catastrophe — before the clock runs out.

Aim: The committee aims to forge a binding international framework governing the development, deployment, and use of Lethal Autonomous Weapons Systems. Delegates must define the legal and ethical boundaries of human oversight in AI-driven warfare, determine what types of autonomous targeting should be banned outright, and resolve how existing international humanitarian law applies to weapons that can select and engage targets without direct human intervention.

Context: Lethal Autonomous Weapons Systems — machines capable of identifying and engaging targets using AI without a human in the decision loop — have moved from science fiction to the battlefield. Israel's HARPY drone, Russia's Lancet-3 loitering munition, and AI-guided drones deployed in the Ukraine conflict represent a rapidly accelerating arms race. In 2021, a UN Panel of Experts documented what may have been the first autonomous lethal engagement in Libya involving the Kargu-2 drone. The UN Secretary-General and the International Committee of the Red Cross have jointly called for a binding treaty on LAWS by the end of 2026 — but negotiations remain stalled. The core tension is ethical and legal: an algorithm can process the laws of war, but it cannot weigh moral responsibility. Without a clear framework, technology is outpacing regulation, creating a dangerous gray zone where accountability for civilian deaths and war crimes becomes impossible to assign.

Aim: The committee aims to manage the global political, security, and scientific implications of the simultaneous appearance of twenty unidentified extraterrestrial monoliths across twenty nations. Delegates must determine the nature and intent of the signal emitted by the structures, prevent international instability, and decide whether humanity should pursue a unified or fragmented response to the unknown phenomenon.

Context: At 03:17 UTC, twenty identical monoliths appear simultaneously in twenty countries without any detectable launch, atmospheric entry, or known origin. Each structure emits an unknown signal that defies conventional scientific explanation. As governments race to interpret the phenomenon, conflicting theories emerge: a message, a warning, a test, or something beyond human understanding. With military forces mobilizing, public panic growing, and trust between nations deteriorating, the international community faces an unprecedented challenge. The crisis raises a defining question for humanity: when confronted with the unknown, will the world act as one civilization—or as twenty competing nations?

Aim: The committee aims to conduct a comprehensive post-tournament review of the 2026 FIFA World Cup, evaluating the successes and failures of hosting the largest football tournament in history across three nations and 16 cities. Delegates must assess the human health risks posed by extreme heat to players and fans, audit the tournament's carbon footprint and sustainability claims, examine the ticketing and equity controversies that preceded the event, and agree on governance reforms to guide future mega-tournament bids.

Context: The 2026 FIFA World Cup, the first-ever tri-nation tournament hosted by the USA, Canada, and Mexico, expanded to 48 teams and 16 host cities spanning thousands of kilometres and multiple time zones. The ambition was historic; so were the challenges. The tournament kicked off on June 11, 2026, during one of North America's hottest summers on record, with scientists from Imperial College London warning that roughly one in four scheduled matches were set in cities where heat levels could begin to physically stress the body's cooling system. Southern cities like Dallas, Houston, Miami, and Atlanta faced temperatures with a heat index exceeding extreme thresholds, prompting questions about whether FIFA's mandatory three-minute hydration breaks were adequate. Simultaneously, environmental groups warned that air travel alone could generate over 7.7 million tonnes of CO2, a 160 to 325 percent increase over prior tournaments, exposing the gap between FIFA's sustainability pledges and structural reality. On the commercial side, the attorneys general of New York and New Jersey subpoenaed FIFA in May 2026 over alleged ticketing fraud at the tournament's final venue. Delegates must confront whether the "North American Experiment" delivered on its promise and what reforms must follow.

Maqsad: Komitet sun'iy intellekt tomonidan yuzaga keladigan ommaviy ishsizlik tahdidiga qarshi muvofiqlashtrilgan global iqtisodiy siyosatlarni ishlab chiqishni maqsad qiladi — ayniqsa Global Janubdagi zaif ishchilarni himoya qilishga alohida e'tibor qaratadi. Delegatlar avtomatlashtirishning mahsuldorlik daromadlarini qayta taqsimlash mexanizmlarini taklif qilishlari, qayta o'qitish va ijtimoiy himoya tizimlarini loyihalashlari hamda umumiy bazaviy daromad, robot solig'i yoki xalqaro mehnat o'tish fondlari kabi vositalar yuz millionlab ishchilarning ko'chib ketishini haqiqiy ravishda yumshatib bera oladimi yoki yo'qmi, degan masalani muhokama qilishlari kerak.

Kontekst: Sun'iy intellekt va avtomatlashtirishning rivojlangan iqtisodiyotlardagi ish o'rinlarining 60 foizini, rivojlanayotgan bozorlardagining esa 40 foizini siqib chiqarishi yoki tubdan o'zgartirishi prognoz qilinmoqda. Goldman Sachsning hisob-kitoblariga ko'ra, butun dunyoda 300 million to'liq stavkali ish o'rni xavf ostida qolmoqda. Bu tahdid bir xil taqsimlanmagan: arzon mehnatga asoslangan sanoatlarga tayanuvchi rivojlanayotgan davlatlar mutanosib ravishda katta zarba ko'radi, ammo ular boy davlatlarga xos moliyaviy va ijtimoiy himoya vositalaridan mahrum. EKOSOS 2024-yilda barqaror rivojlanish uchun sun'iy intellektdan foydalanish bo'yicha maxsus sessiya o'tkazdi, biroq mehnat ko'chishini boshqarish uchun global boshqaruv tizimi hali ham tarqoq holda qolmoqda. Iqtisodchilar global iqtisodiy tengsizlikni yanada chuqurlashtirmaslik uchun misli ko'rilmagan xalqaro hamkorlik va yangi qayta taqsimlash mexanizmlari zarurligini ogohlantirmoqda. Delegatlar oldidagi asosiy muammo avtomatlashtirishning iqtisodiyotni o'zgartirishi-o'zgartirmasligida emas — bu muqarrar — balki dunyo uning yutuqlarini taqsimlash va yo'qotishlarini o'zlashtirish uchun zarur institutlarni yangi doimiy "ishsizlar sinfi" paydo bo'lishidan oldin qurib bera oladimi yoki yo'qligida.

Цель: Комитет ставит целью разрешить фундаментальное противоречие между государственным суверенитетом и международной ядерной безопасностью — определив, следует ли наделить МАГАТЭ расширенными полномочиями для проведения внеплановых инспекций ядерных объектов. Делегаты должны взвесить императив нераспространения в сопоставлении с суверенными правами государств, рассмотреть обвинения в политизации деятельности агентства, а также разработать режим инспекций, одновременно заслуживающий доверия и справедливый в отношении всех государств-членов — как ядерных, так и неядерных.

Контекст: МАГАТЭ является мировым ядерным регулятором, которому в рамках Договора о нераспространении ядерного оружия поручено проверять, что гражданские ядерные программы не переориентируются на военные цели. Инспекционные полномочия агентства — включая право на проведение внезапных проверок в соответствии с Дополнительным протоколом — неоднократно оказывались недостаточными в случаях, когда государства отказывались от сотрудничества. В июне 2025 года Иран объявил о приостановке взаимодействия с МАГАТЭ и демонтаже камер видеонаблюдения в центрифужных залах — после того как Совет управляющих принял резолюцию о несоблюдении страной своих обязательств. Северная Корея выдворила инспекторов МАГАТЭ ещё в 2009 году и с тех пор беспрепятственно расширяет свою программу обогащения урана.