𝗪𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝘀𝗲𝗻𝘀𝗶𝗯𝗹𝗲 𝗽𝗲𝗼𝗽𝗹𝗲 𝘁𝗵𝗶𝗻𝗸 𝗮𝗯𝗼𝘂𝘁 𝗕𝗢𝗥𝗜𝗦. 🤣🤣🤣

He's a dickhead!

𝗢𝗽𝗲𝗿𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻 𝗖𝗼𝘃𝗶𝗱𝟭𝟵 𝗶𝘀 𝗷𝘂𝘀𝘁 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗲𝘅𝗰𝘂𝘀𝗲 𝘁𝗼 𝗜𝗺𝗽𝗹𝗲𝗺𝗲𝗻𝘁 "𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗡𝗲𝘄 𝗪𝗼𝗿𝗹𝗱 𝗢𝗿𝗱𝗲𝗿"

- The Great Reset.

- The 4th Industrial Revolution.

- Immunisation Agenda 2030.

- Reset The Table.

- UNs Sustainable Development Goals.

- Agenda 21/30.

The 'New Normal', Agenda 21, Agenda 30, sure they are only conspiracy theories and this definitely wasn't planned.

#Anonymous

#SharingTheKnowledge

🔗𝗙𝗼𝗹𝗹𝗼𝘄, 𝗦𝘂𝗯𝘀𝗰𝗿𝗶𝗯𝗲👇👇 𝗦𝗵𝗮𝗿𝗲 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝘂𝗻𝗶𝘁𝗲:
@Truth_Awakening_Channel
𝙒𝙝𝙚𝙧𝙚 𝙥𝙚𝙤𝙥𝙡𝙚 𝙘𝙤𝙢𝙚 𝙩𝙤𝙜𝙚𝙩𝙝𝙚𝙧 𝙩𝙤 𝙙𝙚𝙗𝙖𝙩𝙚 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙧𝙚𝙖𝙡 𝙩𝙧𝙪𝙩𝙝.🤝🥰✌💏

🔻 Is this Doctored? 🤣
🔗 Derek Utley
#Fun

✔Credit: @TheTrumpist
via Twitter

🔗𝗠𝗨𝗦𝗧 𝗕𝗘 𝗪𝗔𝗧𝗖𝗛𝗘𝗗: 𝗗𝗿 𝗕𝗼𝗱𝗼 𝗦𝗰𝗵𝗶𝗳𝗳𝗺𝗮𝗻𝗻: “𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗽𝗮𝗻𝗱𝗲𝗺𝗶𝗰, 𝘁𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝘄𝗮𝘀𝗻’𝘁 𝗼𝗻𝗲”🔗
#BodoShiffman

Full context below.

🔗𝗠𝗨𝗦𝗧 𝗕𝗘 𝗪𝗔𝗧𝗖𝗛𝗘𝗗: 𝗗𝗿 𝗕𝗼𝗱𝗼 𝗦𝗰𝗵𝗶𝗳𝗳𝗺𝗮𝗻𝗻: “𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗽𝗮𝗻𝗱𝗲𝗺𝗶𝗰, 𝘁𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝘄𝗮𝘀𝗻’𝘁 𝗼𝗻𝗲”🔗

This is my first video in English, if You want me to make more videos like this, give me a like and follow my channel. Thanks for Your support.

Another Failure Of The COVID Diagnostic Test
In previous articles, I’ve detailed several key reasons why the PCR test is worthless and deceptive https://cutt.ly/zfn2Kjd.

Here I discuss yet another reason: the uniformity of the test has never been properly validated. Different labs come up with different results.

Let’s start here — the reference is the NY Times, January 22, 2007, “Faith in Quick Tests Leads to Epidemic That Wasn’t.”

“Dr. Brooke Herndon, an internist at Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, could not stop coughing…By late April, other health care workers at the hospital were coughing…”

“For months, nearly everyone involved thought the medical center had had a huge whooping cough outbreak, with extensive ramifications. Nearly 1,000 health care workers at the hospital in Lebanon, N.H., were given a preliminary test and furloughed from work until their results were in; 142 people, including Dr. Herndon, were told they appeared to have the disease; and thousands were given antibiotics and a vaccine for protection. Hospital beds were taken out of commission, including some in intensive care.”

“Then, about eight months later, health care workers were dumbfounded to receive an e-mail message from the hospital administration informing them that the whole thing was a false alarm.”

“Now, as they look back on the episode, epidemiologists and infectious disease specialists say the problem was that they placed too much faith in a quick and highly sensitive molecular test [PCR] that led them astray.”

“There is no national data on pseudo-epidemics caused by an overreliance on such molecular tests, said Dr. Trish M. Perl, an epidemiologist at Johns Hopkins and past president of the Society of Health Care Epidemiologists of America. But, she said, pseudo-epidemics happen all the time. The Dartmouth case may have been one the largest, but it was by no means an exception, she said.”

“Many of the new molecular [PCR] tests are quick but technically demanding, and each laboratory may do them in its own way. These tests, called ‘home brews,’ are not commercially available, and there are no good estimates of their error rates. But their very sensitivity makes false positives likely, and when hundreds or thousands of people are tested, as occurred at Dartmouth, false positives can make it seem like there is an epidemic.”

“’You’re in a little bit of no man’s land,’ with the new molecular [PCR] tests, said Dr. Mark Perkins, an infectious disease specialist and chief scientific officer at the Foundation for Innovative New Diagnostics, a nonprofit foundation supported by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. ‘All bets are off on exact performance’.”

“With pertussis, she [Dr. Kretsinger, CDC] said, ‘there are probably 100 different P.C.R. protocols and methods being used throughout the country,’ and it is unclear how often any of them are accurate. ‘We have had a number of outbreaks where we believe that despite the presence of P.C.R.-positive results, the disease was not pertussis,’ Dr. Kretsinger added.”

“Dr. Cathy A. Petti, an infectious disease specialist at the University of Utah, said the story had one clear lesson.”

“’The big message is that every lab is vulnerable to having false positives,’ Dr. Petti said. ‘No single test result is absolute and that is even more important with a test result based on P.C.R’.”

—Sobering, to say the least. Of course, some people will claim that since the date of the Times’ article (2007), vast improvements have been made in the PCR test.

Really? The truth is, something much worse is lurking in the weeds. It has been lurking ever since the PCR was approved for use in diagnostics:

No large study validating the uniformity of PCR results, from lab to lab, has ever been done.

You would think at least a dozen very large studies had checked for uniform results, before unleashing the PCR on the public; but no, this was not the case. It is still not the case.

Here is what should have been done decades ago:

Take a thousand volunteers. Remove tissue samples from each person. Send those samples to 30 different labs. Have the labs run PCR and announce their findings for each volunteer.

“We found the following virus in sample 1…” Something simple like that.

Now compare the findings, in each of the 1000 cases, from all 30 labs. Are the findings the same? Are the outcomes uniform all the way across the board?

My money would be against it. Strongly against.

But this is not the end of the process. SEVERAL of these large-scale studies should be done. In EACH study, there are 1000 volunteers and 30 labs.

Why? Because, as you can readily see, the whole story about a current pandemic is riding on those tests. The story, the containment measures, the lockdowns, the economic devastation, the human destruction—it’s all built on the presumption that the PCR is a valid test.

It’s unthinkable that these validation studies of the PCR weren’t done decades ago. But they weren’t. And there is only one reason why: to avoid the truth. The results of the PCR aren’t uniform. They vary from lab to lab.

One lab says positive for virus B. Another lab says negative for virus B. Both labs are looking at the same sample.

No? Couldn’t be? Then prove it with the several large-scale studies I’m proposing.

I’ll give you a rough fictional analogy for the current testing situation:

In an old-growth forest of immense trees, a government agency tests white spots found on some trunks. The verdict? A highly destructive and novel fungus, for which there is no remedy. Without immediate and drastic action, the fungus will spread to the whole forest and destroy all the trees.

So a government contract is signed with a logging company, and workers move in and start cutting down many trees.

Meanwhile, another lab tests those white spots and reports they’re harmless bird droppings. Yet another lab claims they’re a mild traditional fungus of no great concern.

The reports of these two labs are suppressed and censored. The labs are put on a quiet blacklist, and their business dries up.

The tree cutting continues.

An analyst at the US Forestry Service sends a memo to his boss. It details the fact that the test which found deadly fungus is unreliable. Different labs doing the test come up with different and conflicting results.

Worse yet, that test was never properly validated as a uniform process before being approved for use.

In other words, no one did a large study in which multiple labs used the test to determine the composition of spots found on trees. No one made sure that all labs came to the same conclusions using the test.

The Forestry analyst writes: “The test has inherent flaws. Different labs examining the same sample will always come up with different results. This has disastrous consequences in the real world. You can see that now; we are cutting down half a forest to prevent the spread of a fungus which has been noticed for centuries, and never caused serious harm…”

The analyst is fired from his job and firmly reminded that he signed a non-disclosure agreement, and he better keep his mouth shut.

The tree-cutting goes on. A developer buys up the cleared land at a very low price…

In essence, the pipeline of information from actually reliable sources, to the government, and then to the public, is narrowed, and guarded against unwelcome intrusions of TRUTH.

In the case of the PCR test, that’s what is happening.

By Jon Rappoport, Guest writer / Reference: NYtimes.com

https://cutt.ly/qhyjPrA

#SharingTheKnowledge

🔗𝗙𝗼𝗹𝗹𝗼𝘄, 𝗦𝘂𝗯𝘀𝗰𝗿𝗶𝗯𝗲👇👇 𝗦𝗵𝗮𝗿𝗲 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝘂𝗻𝗶𝘁𝗲:
@Truth_Awakening_Channel
𝙒𝙝𝙚𝙧𝙚 𝙥𝙚𝙤𝙥𝙡𝙚 𝙘𝙤𝙢𝙚 𝙩𝙤𝙜𝙚𝙩𝙝𝙚𝙧 𝙩𝙤 𝙙𝙚𝙗𝙖𝙩𝙚 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙧𝙚𝙖𝙡 𝙩𝙧𝙪𝙩𝙝.🤝🥰✌💏

𝗕𝗜𝗟𝗟 𝗚𝗔𝗧𝗘𝗦 𝗗𝗘𝗟𝗘𝗧𝗘𝗗 𝗗𝗢𝗖𝗨𝗠𝗘𝗡𝗧𝗔𝗥𝗬 "𝗪𝗛𝗬 𝗛𝗘 𝗦𝗪𝗜𝗧𝗖𝗛𝗘𝗗 𝗙𝗥𝗢𝗠 𝗠𝗜𝗖𝗥𝗢𝗦𝗢𝗙𝗧 𝗧𝗢 𝗩𝗔𝗖𝗖𝗜𝗡𝗘𝗦"

Bill Gates stepped down from his position on Microsoft’s board in 2020 to focus on his philanthropic work. He had already left his full-time role with the company in 2008, to focus on his endeavours with the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.

𝗣𝗹𝗮𝗻𝗲𝘁 𝗟𝗼𝗰𝗸𝗱𝗼𝘄𝗻 – 𝗖𝗮𝘁𝗵𝗲𝗿𝗶𝗻𝗲 𝗔𝘂𝘀𝘁𝗶𝗻 𝗙𝗶𝘁𝘁𝘀
𝗝𝗮𝗻𝘂𝗮𝗿𝘆 𝟮, 𝟮𝟬𝟮𝟭 𝗯𝘆 𝗦𝗵𝗮𝗿𝗶𝗯𝗶𝘁𝘀𝗶𝘀.
#PlanetLockdown

This sit down interview with Catherine covers the spectrum of the current situation we find ourselves in. It was conducted as a part of the full length documentary.
We are releasing the full interview for the betterment of public understanding of the situation.
Catherine’s analysis can be found at: https://home.solari.com
The full film, when released, will be available at https://www.PlanetLockdownFilm.com
Sign up to receive notification of the release of the feature length documentary film and full interviews by clicking here: https://cutt.ly/6jgMNkQ

𝗪𝗢𝗥𝗟𝗗 𝗗𝗢𝗖𝗧𝗢𝗥𝗦 𝗔𝗟𝗟𝗜𝗔𝗡𝗖𝗘

𝗔𝗻 𝗶𝗻𝗱𝗲𝗽𝗲𝗻𝗱𝗲𝗻𝘁 𝗻𝗼𝗻-𝗽𝗿𝗼𝗳𝗶𝘁 𝗮𝗹𝗹𝗶𝗮𝗻𝗰𝗲 𝗼𝗳 𝗱𝗼𝗰𝘁𝗼𝗿𝘀, 𝗻𝘂𝗿𝘀𝗲𝘀, 𝗵𝗲𝗮𝗹𝘁𝗵𝗰𝗮𝗿𝗲 𝗽𝗿𝗼𝗳𝗲𝘀𝘀𝗶𝗼𝗻𝗮𝗹𝘀 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝘀𝘁𝗮𝗳𝗳 𝗮𝗿𝗼𝘂𝗻𝗱 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝘄𝗼𝗿𝗹𝗱 𝘄𝗵𝗼 𝗵𝗮𝘃𝗲 𝘂𝗻𝗶𝘁𝗲𝗱 𝗶𝗻 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝘄𝗮𝗸𝗲 𝗼𝗳 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗖𝗼𝘃𝗶𝗱-𝟭𝟵 𝗿𝗲𝘀𝗽𝗼𝗻𝘀𝗲 𝗰𝗵𝗮𝗽𝘁𝗲𝗿 𝘁𝗼 𝘀𝗵𝗮𝗿𝗲 𝗲𝘅𝗽𝗲𝗿𝗶𝗲𝗻𝗰𝗲𝘀 𝘄𝗶𝘁𝗵 𝗮 𝘃𝗶𝗲𝘄 𝘁𝗼 𝗲𝗻𝗱𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗮𝗹𝗹 𝗹𝗼𝗰𝗸𝗱𝗼𝘄𝗻𝘀 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝗿𝗲𝗹𝗮𝘁𝗲𝗱 𝗱𝗮𝗺𝗮𝗴𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗺𝗲𝗮𝘀𝘂𝗿𝗲𝘀 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝘁𝗼 𝗿𝗲-𝗲𝘀𝘁𝗮𝗯𝗹𝗶𝘀𝗵 𝘂𝗻𝗶𝘃𝗲𝗿𝘀𝗮𝗹 𝗵𝗲𝗮𝗹𝘁𝗵 𝗱𝗲𝘁𝗲𝗿𝗺𝗶𝗻𝗮𝗻𝗰𝗲 𝗼𝗳 𝗽𝘀𝘆𝗰𝗵𝗼𝗹𝗼𝗴𝗶𝗰𝗮𝗹 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝗽𝗵𝘆𝘀𝗶𝗰𝗮𝗹 𝘄𝗲𝗹𝗹𝗯𝗲𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗳𝗼𝗿 𝗮𝗹𝗹 𝗵𝘂𝗺𝗮𝗻𝗶𝘁𝘆.

Please help humanity by signing their open letter.
#WorldDoctorsAlliance

Read more, go-to

https://cutt.ly/ajBksCB

𝗞𝗮𝘁𝗲: 𝗲𝗺𝗽𝗼𝘄𝗲𝗿𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝘆𝗼𝘂 𝘄𝗶𝘁𝗵 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗸𝗻𝗼𝘄𝗹𝗲𝗱𝗴𝗲 𝘁𝗼 𝘁𝗮𝗸𝗲 𝗰𝗼𝗻𝘁𝗿𝗼𝗹 𝗼𝗳 𝘆𝗼𝘂𝗿 𝗯𝗼𝗱𝘆.

𝗞𝗮𝘁𝗲 𝗵𝗮𝘀 𝗯𝗲𝗲𝗻 𝗹ay𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗹𝗼𝘄 𝘀𝗶𝗻𝗰𝗲 𝗵𝗲𝗿 𝗮𝗿𝗿𝗲𝘀𝘁. 𝗛𝗲𝗿𝗲, 𝘀𝗵𝗲 𝗺𝗮𝗸𝗲𝘀 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝘀𝗶𝘁𝘂𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻 𝗳𝗼𝗿 𝗵𝗲𝗮𝗹𝘁𝗵 𝘄𝗼𝗿𝗸𝗲𝗿𝘀 𝗰𝗼𝗻𝗰𝗲𝗿𝗻𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝘃𝗮𝗰𝗰𝗶𝗻𝗲 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝘁𝗵𝗲𝗶𝗿 𝗿𝗶𝗴𝗵𝘁𝘀, 𝗰𝗹𝗲𝗮𝗿.

#KateShimarani

𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗻𝗲𝘄 𝗟𝗼𝗰𝗸𝗱𝗼𝘄𝗻 𝗥𝗲𝗴𝘂𝗹𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻𝘀 𝗮𝗿𝗲 𝘁𝗼 𝗹𝗮𝘀𝘁 𝘂𝗻𝘁𝗶𝗹 𝟯𝟭 𝗠𝗮𝗿𝗰𝗵 𝟮𝟬𝟮𝟭...

𝗙𝗜𝗙𝗧𝗬-SIX (𝟱6) 𝘄𝗲𝗲𝗸𝘀 𝗮𝗳𝘁𝗲𝗿 "𝗧𝗵𝗿𝗲𝗲 𝗪𝗲𝗲𝗸𝘀 𝘁𝗼 𝗙𝗹𝗮𝘁𝘁𝗲𝗻 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗖𝘂𝗿𝘃𝗲"!
𝗚𝗼𝘃𝗲𝗿𝗻𝗺𝗲𝗻𝘁 𝗶𝘀 𝗡𝗢𝗧 𝗰𝗼𝗻𝘁𝗿𝗼𝗹𝗹𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝘃𝗶𝗿𝘂𝘀, 𝘁𝗵𝗲𝘆 𝗮𝗿𝗲 𝗰𝗼𝗻𝘁𝗿𝗼𝗹𝗹𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗬𝗢𝗨!

FOR THOSE OF YOU WHO ARE STILL IN YOUR SLUMBER OR FEEL SECURE BECAUSE FURLOUGH IS SAVING YOU... WAIT UNTIL THAT FEELING SERIOUSLY SUBIDES.... YOU NEED TO GET A GRIP NOW...

YOU HAVE BEEN SUBDUED AND ACCEPTED THE GOVERNMENT LINES/LIES...it is all part of their plan. There will be 6 lockdowns in total and that doesn't include the regional ones.

𝗝𝘂𝘀𝘁 𝗺𝗲𝘀𝘀𝗮𝗴𝗲𝗱 𝗦𝗶𝗿 𝗚𝗼𝗱𝗳𝗿𝗲𝘆 𝗕𝗹𝗼𝗼𝗺..
𝗧𝗵𝗶𝘀 𝗶𝘀 𝗺𝘆 𝗺𝗲𝘀𝘀𝗮𝗴𝗲 𝘁𝗼 𝗵𝗶𝗺:

Sorry to bombard you Godfrey.

I have been researching this since March of this year; however, this has been in the planning for a very long time.

Originally, the idea came about after WW2 and then was shelved. The EEC(EU) was part of this plan; however, you only have to put 2+2 together to understand why the "cabal" did not want us to leave.

Back in 1992, 193 countries came together and signed the document for the NEW WORLD ORDER.

That soon became Agenda 21/30 and now Klaus Schwab (Humanist and Eugenist) who founded the WEF in 1971, he coined the term "The Great Reset" and the 4th Industrial Revelution.

Him and Bill Gates have made plans to depopulate the planet and their sadistic plan is this deadly v a c c ine, which is not, it is a bio weapon.

Over in the USA 40k Adverse reactions have been reported and many thousands have died.

All the above was planned back in 2010: you can find this information in the Rockefeller "Lockstep" I have a copy of this report.

Then it was updated 2015, (at a, GAVI event. Bill Gates Founded Gavi 2009).

Then in 2018/2019, Bill Gates attended a Ted Talk about population control and about pandemics.

2018 - Covid 19 is patented.
2019, Gates also attends Event 201. I think that this was around Oct 2019, then the Pamdemic in Wuhan happens.

Event 201
https://cutt.ly/XjgqZ6o

Great reset
https://cutt.ly/3jgq9z8Event 201

Lockstep
https://cutt.ly/4jgq8N6

My email address removed.

Also, the Nightingale hospitals were dismantled back in July. I saved the video and article about it.

𝗛𝘂𝗺𝗮𝗻𝘀 𝗼𝗳 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗚𝗥𝗘𝗔𝗧 𝗥𝗘𝗦𝗘𝗧: 𝗪𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗳𝘂𝘁𝘂𝗿𝗲 𝗠𝗜𝗚𝗛𝗧 𝗹𝗼𝗼𝗸 𝗹𝗶𝗸𝗲 𝗶𝗻 𝟮𝟬𝟮𝟭 – 𝗶𝗳 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗰𝗼𝗻𝘁𝗿𝗼𝗹𝗹𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗲𝗹𝗶𝘁𝗲𝘀 𝗵𝗮𝘃𝗲 𝘁𝗵𝗲𝗶𝗿 𝘄𝗮𝘆.

By Graham Dockery, RT

With vaccine rollouts underway, humanity looks set to win the fight against the coronavirus. But some elites planning a post-coronavirus ‘Great Reset’ don’t want to go back to normal. Here’s what they have planned instead.
As lockdowns and mask mandates became a part of daily life over the last year, politicians the world over asked their citizenry to accept “The New Normal.” The phrase became ubiquitous, but as vaccines inched closer to deployment, that phrase was replaced with a new one, “The Great Reset,” used to describe the monumental changes to human society needed in a post-coronavirus world.

Unveiled in May by Britain’s Prince Charles and the World Economic Forum’s Klaus Schwab, the ‘Great Reset’ is an ambitious plan to create a more equal, cashless, integrated and sustainable global society. World leaders have seemingly signed up to the plan, with its catchphrase, “Build Back Better” featured prominently in incoming US President Joe Biden’s campaign messaging.

Overdue liberalization, or technocratic New World Order? Opinion on the plan is divided between those who think it’s the shot in the arm the world needs, and those who think it will make Cyberpunk 2077 look like a utopian dreamworld. Whatever your opinion, here’s a look at the ‘New Normal’ that awaits in 2021 and beyond.

𝗩𝗮𝗰𝗰𝗶𝗻𝗲 𝗽𝗮𝘀𝘀𝗽𝗼𝗿𝘁𝘀 𝗳𝗼𝗿 𝗲𝘃𝗲𝗿𝘆𝗼𝗻𝗲.
Even the World Economic Forum (WEF) has acknowledged that issuing citizens with immunity passports, or certificates of vaccination, could prove “controversial.” That hasn't stopped governments toying with the idea though. Britain is “exploring” the idea of creating a digital “freedom passport” database that would only grant access to public places to people who can prove a negative Covid test, while Ireland and Israel have discussed banning the unvaccinated from certain spaces. France may ban the unvaccinated from public transport.

Such moves have been fiercely criticized by civil liberties advocates, but those pushing them don’t care. “Prepare for a form of health passport now,” former British Prime Minister Tony Blair wrote last week. “I know all the objections, but it will happen. It’s the only way the world will function and for lockdowns to no longer be the sole course of action.”

Governments may not be able to force citizens to take a rushed and side-effect-riddled jab at gunpoint, but they won’t have to. The air travel industry has already said it will require proof of vaccination to fly this coming year, leaving wannabe travelers with a simple choice: take the jab or stay at home. Budget airline Ryanair boiled the idea down to a blunt catchphrase: “Jab & go!”

Read more: https://cutt.ly/4jdp9YI

Yes, they at SAGE have been working hard to scare you witless; however, more people are waking up to this chaos, so now Boris and his chums are turning up the heat.

Quote: *see link below

"𝘖𝘳𝘨𝘢𝘯𝘪𝘴𝘢𝘵𝘪𝘰𝘯𝘴 𝘪𝘯𝘷𝘦𝘴𝘵𝘦𝘥 𝘪𝘯 𝘷𝘢𝘤𝘤𝘪𝘯𝘦𝘴 𝘮𝘢𝘬𝘦 𝘮𝘰𝘯𝘦𝘺 𝘧𝘳𝘰𝘮 𝘷𝘢𝘤𝘤𝘪𝘯𝘦𝘴. 𝘗𝘦𝘰𝘱𝘭𝘦 𝘸𝘩𝘰 𝘢𝘤𝘲𝘶𝘪𝘳𝘦 𝘯𝘢𝘵𝘶𝘳𝘢𝘭 𝘪𝘮𝘮𝘶𝘯𝘪𝘵𝘺 𝘩𝘢𝘷𝘦 𝘭𝘦𝘴𝘴/𝘯𝘰 𝘯𝘦𝘦𝘥 𝘧𝘰𝘳 𝘢 𝘷𝘢𝘤𝘤𝘪𝘯𝘦. 𝘐𝘧 𝘱𝘦𝘰𝘱𝘭𝘦 𝘢𝘳𝘦 𝘭𝘰𝘤𝘬𝘦𝘥 𝘪𝘯 𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘪𝘳 𝘩𝘰𝘮𝘦𝘴, 𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘺 𝘩𝘢𝘷𝘦 𝘭𝘦𝘴𝘴 𝘤𝘩𝘢𝘯𝘤𝘦 𝘰𝘧 𝘢𝘤𝘲𝘶𝘪𝘳𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘯𝘢𝘵𝘶𝘳𝘢𝘭 𝘪𝘮𝘮𝘶𝘯𝘪𝘵𝘺."

https://cutt.ly/hjpQL4u

#TheGreatResist

"𝗜𝗳" - 𝗥𝘂𝗱𝘆𝗮𝗿𝗱 𝗞𝗶𝗽𝗹𝗶𝗻𝗴