𝗛𝗲𝗮𝗿𝘁𝗯𝗿𝗲𝗮𝗸𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝘁𝗼 𝗹𝗶𝘀𝘁𝗲𝗻 𝘁𝗼 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗰𝗿𝗶𝗲𝘀 𝗳𝗼𝗿 𝗵𝗲𝗹𝗽 𝗶𝗻 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗯𝗮𝗰𝗸𝗴𝗿𝗼𝘂𝗻𝗱

https://youtu.be/AzL979SQ4Nw

#SharingTheKnowledge

🔗𝗙𝗼𝗹𝗹𝗼𝘄, 𝗦𝘂𝗯𝘀𝗰𝗿𝗶𝗯𝗲👇👇 𝗦𝗵𝗮𝗿𝗲 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝘂𝗻𝗶𝘁𝗲:
@Truth_Awakening_Channel
𝙒𝙝𝙚𝙧𝙚 𝙥𝙚𝙤𝙥𝙡𝙚 𝙘𝙤𝙢𝙚 𝙩𝙤𝙜𝙚𝙩𝙝𝙚𝙧 𝙩𝙤 𝙙𝙚𝙗𝙖𝙩𝙚 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙧𝙚𝙖𝙡 𝙩𝙧𝙪𝙩𝙝.🤝🥰✌💏

𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗗𝗶𝘀𝗰𝗹𝗼𝘀𝘂𝗿𝗲! 𝗛𝗗
𝟮𝗻𝗱 𝗗𝗲𝗰 𝟮𝟬𝟭𝟬

◙ Problem - Create a pandemic
◙ Reaction - Scare everyone with continual Propaganda
◙ Solution - Vaccine

#SharingTheKnowledge

🔗𝗙𝗼𝗹𝗹𝗼𝘄, 𝗦𝘂𝗯𝘀𝗰𝗿𝗶𝗯𝗲👇👇 𝗦𝗵𝗮𝗿𝗲 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝘂𝗻𝗶𝘁𝗲:
@Truth_Awakening_Channel
𝙒𝙝𝙚𝙧𝙚 𝙥𝙚𝙤𝙥𝙡𝙚 𝙘𝙤𝙢𝙚 𝙩𝙤𝙜𝙚𝙩𝙝𝙚𝙧 𝙩𝙤 𝙙𝙚𝙗𝙖𝙩𝙚 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙧𝙚𝙖𝙡 𝙩𝙧𝙪𝙩𝙝.🤝🥰✌💏

𝗚𝗔𝗕𝗕𝗜𝗘 𝗕𝗨𝗥𝗡𝗘𝗧𝗧 𝘁𝗲𝗹𝗹𝘀 𝗵𝗼𝘄 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗽𝗼𝗹𝗶𝗰𝗲 𝗰𝗮𝘂𝘀𝗲𝗱 𝗿𝗮𝘂𝗰𝗼𝘂𝘀 𝘄𝗵𝗲𝗻 𝘁𝗵𝗲𝘆 𝗶𝗻𝘃𝗮𝗱𝗲𝗱 𝗵𝗲𝗿 𝗽𝗿𝗶𝘃𝗮𝗰𝘆 𝗯𝗲𝗰𝗮𝘂𝘀𝗲 𝗮 𝗻𝗲𝗶𝗴𝗵𝗯𝗼𝘂𝗿 𝗺𝗮𝗱𝗲 𝗮𝗹𝗹𝗲𝗴𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻𝘀 𝘁𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝘀𝗵𝗲 𝗵𝗮𝗱 𝗺𝗼𝗿𝗲 𝗽𝗲𝗿𝘀𝗼𝗻𝘀 𝘁𝗵𝗮𝗻 𝗮𝗹𝗹𝗼𝘄𝗲𝗱 𝗶𝗻 𝗵𝗲𝗿 𝗵𝗼𝗺𝗲 𝗱𝘂𝗲 𝘁𝗼 𝗰𝗼𝘃𝗶𝗱 𝗿𝘂𝗹𝗲𝘀:-

𝗛𝗲𝗿 𝘀𝘁𝗼𝗿𝘆 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝘃𝗶𝗱𝗲𝗼 𝗮𝗯𝗼𝘂𝘁 𝗵𝗼𝘄 𝗶𝘁 𝘂𝗻𝗳𝗼𝗹𝗱𝗲𝗱 𝟬𝟲/𝟬𝟭/𝟮𝟬𝟮𝟭

I’ve had the worst week of my life, I tried to kill myself, I’m really really not in a good place right now.

I went to my bed with my little brother (age 9) to try sleep as it’s so hard for me to sleep right now because all I think about is the world ending and dying I’ve been given anxiety tablets and sleeping tablets.

I just got into bed had my head down for 10 mins. I heard a loud bang at the door, the police had apparently had a complaint that there are people in my mums house; the video shows the proof that there was no one in my house that shouldn’t be and also my family and I have done absolutely nothing wrong but stand up for our selves and used out human rights.

This video shows what happens it’s absolutely awful. I am so disappointed in police Scotland,

𝗪𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝘀𝗲𝗻𝘀𝗶𝗯𝗹𝗲 𝗽𝗲𝗼𝗽𝗹𝗲 𝘁𝗵𝗶𝗻𝗸 𝗮𝗯𝗼𝘂𝘁 𝗕𝗢𝗥𝗜𝗦. 🤣🤣🤣

He's a dickhead!

𝗢𝗽𝗲𝗿𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻 𝗖𝗼𝘃𝗶𝗱𝟭𝟵 𝗶𝘀 𝗷𝘂𝘀𝘁 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗲𝘅𝗰𝘂𝘀𝗲 𝘁𝗼 𝗜𝗺𝗽𝗹𝗲𝗺𝗲𝗻𝘁 "𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗡𝗲𝘄 𝗪𝗼𝗿𝗹𝗱 𝗢𝗿𝗱𝗲𝗿"

- The Great Reset.

- The 4th Industrial Revolution.

- Immunisation Agenda 2030.

- Reset The Table.

- UNs Sustainable Development Goals.

- Agenda 21/30.

The 'New Normal', Agenda 21, Agenda 30, sure they are only conspiracy theories and this definitely wasn't planned.

#Anonymous

#SharingTheKnowledge

🔗𝗙𝗼𝗹𝗹𝗼𝘄, 𝗦𝘂𝗯𝘀𝗰𝗿𝗶𝗯𝗲👇👇 𝗦𝗵𝗮𝗿𝗲 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝘂𝗻𝗶𝘁𝗲:
@Truth_Awakening_Channel
𝙒𝙝𝙚𝙧𝙚 𝙥𝙚𝙤𝙥𝙡𝙚 𝙘𝙤𝙢𝙚 𝙩𝙤𝙜𝙚𝙩𝙝𝙚𝙧 𝙩𝙤 𝙙𝙚𝙗𝙖𝙩𝙚 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙧𝙚𝙖𝙡 𝙩𝙧𝙪𝙩𝙝.🤝🥰✌💏

🔻 Is this Doctored? 🤣
🔗 Derek Utley
#Fun

✔Credit: @TheTrumpist
via Twitter

🔗𝗠𝗨𝗦𝗧 𝗕𝗘 𝗪𝗔𝗧𝗖𝗛𝗘𝗗: 𝗗𝗿 𝗕𝗼𝗱𝗼 𝗦𝗰𝗵𝗶𝗳𝗳𝗺𝗮𝗻𝗻: “𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗽𝗮𝗻𝗱𝗲𝗺𝗶𝗰, 𝘁𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝘄𝗮𝘀𝗻’𝘁 𝗼𝗻𝗲”🔗
#BodoShiffman

Full context below.

🔗𝗠𝗨𝗦𝗧 𝗕𝗘 𝗪𝗔𝗧𝗖𝗛𝗘𝗗: 𝗗𝗿 𝗕𝗼𝗱𝗼 𝗦𝗰𝗵𝗶𝗳𝗳𝗺𝗮𝗻𝗻: “𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗽𝗮𝗻𝗱𝗲𝗺𝗶𝗰, 𝘁𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝘄𝗮𝘀𝗻’𝘁 𝗼𝗻𝗲”🔗

This is my first video in English, if You want me to make more videos like this, give me a like and follow my channel. Thanks for Your support.

Another Failure Of The COVID Diagnostic Test
In previous articles, I’ve detailed several key reasons why the PCR test is worthless and deceptive https://cutt.ly/zfn2Kjd.

Here I discuss yet another reason: the uniformity of the test has never been properly validated. Different labs come up with different results.

Let’s start here — the reference is the NY Times, January 22, 2007, “Faith in Quick Tests Leads to Epidemic That Wasn’t.”

“Dr. Brooke Herndon, an internist at Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, could not stop coughing…By late April, other health care workers at the hospital were coughing…”

“For months, nearly everyone involved thought the medical center had had a huge whooping cough outbreak, with extensive ramifications. Nearly 1,000 health care workers at the hospital in Lebanon, N.H., were given a preliminary test and furloughed from work until their results were in; 142 people, including Dr. Herndon, were told they appeared to have the disease; and thousands were given antibiotics and a vaccine for protection. Hospital beds were taken out of commission, including some in intensive care.”

“Then, about eight months later, health care workers were dumbfounded to receive an e-mail message from the hospital administration informing them that the whole thing was a false alarm.”

“Now, as they look back on the episode, epidemiologists and infectious disease specialists say the problem was that they placed too much faith in a quick and highly sensitive molecular test [PCR] that led them astray.”

“There is no national data on pseudo-epidemics caused by an overreliance on such molecular tests, said Dr. Trish M. Perl, an epidemiologist at Johns Hopkins and past president of the Society of Health Care Epidemiologists of America. But, she said, pseudo-epidemics happen all the time. The Dartmouth case may have been one the largest, but it was by no means an exception, she said.”

“Many of the new molecular [PCR] tests are quick but technically demanding, and each laboratory may do them in its own way. These tests, called ‘home brews,’ are not commercially available, and there are no good estimates of their error rates. But their very sensitivity makes false positives likely, and when hundreds or thousands of people are tested, as occurred at Dartmouth, false positives can make it seem like there is an epidemic.”

“’You’re in a little bit of no man’s land,’ with the new molecular [PCR] tests, said Dr. Mark Perkins, an infectious disease specialist and chief scientific officer at the Foundation for Innovative New Diagnostics, a nonprofit foundation supported by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. ‘All bets are off on exact performance’.”

“With pertussis, she [Dr. Kretsinger, CDC] said, ‘there are probably 100 different P.C.R. protocols and methods being used throughout the country,’ and it is unclear how often any of them are accurate. ‘We have had a number of outbreaks where we believe that despite the presence of P.C.R.-positive results, the disease was not pertussis,’ Dr. Kretsinger added.”

“Dr. Cathy A. Petti, an infectious disease specialist at the University of Utah, said the story had one clear lesson.”

“’The big message is that every lab is vulnerable to having false positives,’ Dr. Petti said. ‘No single test result is absolute and that is even more important with a test result based on P.C.R’.”

—Sobering, to say the least. Of course, some people will claim that since the date of the Times’ article (2007), vast improvements have been made in the PCR test.

Really? The truth is, something much worse is lurking in the weeds. It has been lurking ever since the PCR was approved for use in diagnostics:

No large study validating the uniformity of PCR results, from lab to lab, has ever been done.

You would think at least a dozen very large studies had checked for uniform results, before unleashing the PCR on the public; but no, this was not the case. It is still not the case.

Here is what should have been done decades ago:

Take a thousand volunteers. Remove tissue samples from each person. Send those samples to 30 different labs. Have the labs run PCR and announce their findings for each volunteer.

“We found the following virus in sample 1…” Something simple like that.

Now compare the findings, in each of the 1000 cases, from all 30 labs. Are the findings the same? Are the outcomes uniform all the way across the board?

My money would be against it. Strongly against.

But this is not the end of the process. SEVERAL of these large-scale studies should be done. In EACH study, there are 1000 volunteers and 30 labs.

Why? Because, as you can readily see, the whole story about a current pandemic is riding on those tests. The story, the containment measures, the lockdowns, the economic devastation, the human destruction—it’s all built on the presumption that the PCR is a valid test.

It’s unthinkable that these validation studies of the PCR weren’t done decades ago. But they weren’t. And there is only one reason why: to avoid the truth. The results of the PCR aren’t uniform. They vary from lab to lab.

One lab says positive for virus B. Another lab says negative for virus B. Both labs are looking at the same sample.

No? Couldn’t be? Then prove it with the several large-scale studies I’m proposing.

I’ll give you a rough fictional analogy for the current testing situation:

In an old-growth forest of immense trees, a government agency tests white spots found on some trunks. The verdict? A highly destructive and novel fungus, for which there is no remedy. Without immediate and drastic action, the fungus will spread to the whole forest and destroy all the trees.

So a government contract is signed with a logging company, and workers move in and start cutting down many trees.

Meanwhile, another lab tests those white spots and reports they’re harmless bird droppings. Yet another lab claims they’re a mild traditional fungus of no great concern.

The reports of these two labs are suppressed and censored. The labs are put on a quiet blacklist, and their business dries up.

The tree cutting continues.

An analyst at the US Forestry Service sends a memo to his boss. It details the fact that the test which found deadly fungus is unreliable. Different labs doing the test come up with different and conflicting results.

Worse yet, that test was never properly validated as a uniform process before being approved for use.

In other words, no one did a large study in which multiple labs used the test to determine the composition of spots found on trees. No one made sure that all labs came to the same conclusions using the test.

The Forestry analyst writes: “The test has inherent flaws. Different labs examining the same sample will always come up with different results. This has disastrous consequences in the real world. You can see that now; we are cutting down half a forest to prevent the spread of a fungus which has been noticed for centuries, and never caused serious harm…”

The analyst is fired from his job and firmly reminded that he signed a non-disclosure agreement, and he better keep his mouth shut.

The tree-cutting goes on. A developer buys up the cleared land at a very low price…

In essence, the pipeline of information from actually reliable sources, to the government, and then to the public, is narrowed, and guarded against unwelcome intrusions of TRUTH.

In the case of the PCR test, that’s what is happening.

By Jon Rappoport, Guest writer / Reference: NYtimes.com

https://cutt.ly/qhyjPrA

#SharingTheKnowledge

🔗𝗙𝗼𝗹𝗹𝗼𝘄, 𝗦𝘂𝗯𝘀𝗰𝗿𝗶𝗯𝗲👇👇 𝗦𝗵𝗮𝗿𝗲 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝘂𝗻𝗶𝘁𝗲:
@Truth_Awakening_Channel
𝙒𝙝𝙚𝙧𝙚 𝙥𝙚𝙤𝙥𝙡𝙚 𝙘𝙤𝙢𝙚 𝙩𝙤𝙜𝙚𝙩𝙝𝙚𝙧 𝙩𝙤 𝙙𝙚𝙗𝙖𝙩𝙚 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙧𝙚𝙖𝙡 𝙩𝙧𝙪𝙩𝙝.🤝🥰✌💏

𝗕𝗜𝗟𝗟 𝗚𝗔𝗧𝗘𝗦 𝗗𝗘𝗟𝗘𝗧𝗘𝗗 𝗗𝗢𝗖𝗨𝗠𝗘𝗡𝗧𝗔𝗥𝗬 "𝗪𝗛𝗬 𝗛𝗘 𝗦𝗪𝗜𝗧𝗖𝗛𝗘𝗗 𝗙𝗥𝗢𝗠 𝗠𝗜𝗖𝗥𝗢𝗦𝗢𝗙𝗧 𝗧𝗢 𝗩𝗔𝗖𝗖𝗜𝗡𝗘𝗦"

Bill Gates stepped down from his position on Microsoft’s board in 2020 to focus on his philanthropic work. He had already left his full-time role with the company in 2008, to focus on his endeavours with the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.

𝗣𝗹𝗮𝗻𝗲𝘁 𝗟𝗼𝗰𝗸𝗱𝗼𝘄𝗻 – 𝗖𝗮𝘁𝗵𝗲𝗿𝗶𝗻𝗲 𝗔𝘂𝘀𝘁𝗶𝗻 𝗙𝗶𝘁𝘁𝘀
𝗝𝗮𝗻𝘂𝗮𝗿𝘆 𝟮, 𝟮𝟬𝟮𝟭 𝗯𝘆 𝗦𝗵𝗮𝗿𝗶𝗯𝗶𝘁𝘀𝗶𝘀.
#PlanetLockdown

This sit down interview with Catherine covers the spectrum of the current situation we find ourselves in. It was conducted as a part of the full length documentary.
We are releasing the full interview for the betterment of public understanding of the situation.
Catherine’s analysis can be found at: https://home.solari.com
The full film, when released, will be available at https://www.PlanetLockdownFilm.com
Sign up to receive notification of the release of the feature length documentary film and full interviews by clicking here: https://cutt.ly/6jgMNkQ