Forwarded from dark_universe_09 (@dark_universe_09)
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
This is a bio chemical war against humanity. This is not just happening as a coincidence, it is happening on purpose. They are killing nature with deadly toxic chemicalsโฆ they will use this as an excuse to bring in more climate control โclean air zonesโ lockdowns, curfews and more restrictions.
This is a war against good and evil.
๐ซ For raw truth, knowledge guidance & wisdom follow our telegram messenger group.
https://t.me/darkuniverse09
This is a war against good and evil.
๐ซ For raw truth, knowledge guidance & wisdom follow our telegram messenger group.
https://t.me/darkuniverse09
๐9๐5๐ฅ1
Forwarded from iSTiNA
https://rumble.com/v29oksg-live-8-uncensored-maria-zeee-rages-uninjected-have-same-nanotech-clots-grap.html
Mark Steele was right about everything he said here, and this is confirmed by the evidence of Dr. Anna Mihalcea!
(Mark Steele je bio u pravu u vezi svega ลกto je rekao ovde, a to potvrฤuje dokazima dr Ana Mihalcea! Izvinjavam se ลกto nema prevoda, jer nisam mogao da skratim video poลกto je sve vaลพno tako da mi je bilo ลพao da ga skraฤujem, a ฤitavih sat vremena je zaista preobimno za prevod)
Mark Steele was right about everything he said here, and this is confirmed by the evidence of Dr. Anna Mihalcea!
(Mark Steele je bio u pravu u vezi svega ลกto je rekao ovde, a to potvrฤuje dokazima dr Ana Mihalcea! Izvinjavam se ลกto nema prevoda, jer nisam mogao da skratim video poลกto je sve vaลพno tako da mi je bilo ลพao da ga skraฤujem, a ฤitavih sat vremena je zaista preobimno za prevod)
Rumble
Uncensored: Maria Zeee RAGES!!! Uninjected Have Same Nanotech, Clots, Graphene as Injected with Dr. Ana
Maria Zeee RAGES as Dr. Ana Mihalcea from https://anamihalceamdphd.substack.com/ joins her to show evidence that the uninjected are showing the SAME nanotech, graphene, clots and more as the injected
Forwarded from LG Equine Centre
Join me on my journey of growing my own food, producing my own food, daily keep of useful animals and so much more
Channel
@allotmentlife
Chat
@allotmentlifechat
Channel
@allotmentlife
Chat
@allotmentlifechat
๐11
Forwarded from Iamleegarrett (Lee Garrett)
LIVE IN 10 MINUTES
wakeupuk.net/live
NET NEWS WITH LEE GARRETT
100th SHOW ON WAKE UP
A LITTLE TRIP DOWN MEMORY LANE
wakeupuk.net/live
NET NEWS WITH LEE GARRETT
100th SHOW ON WAKE UP
A LITTLE TRIP DOWN MEMORY LANE
๐ญ2
Forwarded from NewsOnChain
๐3
Forwarded from NewsOnChain
๐1
Forwarded from ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐ท๐๐๐๐
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
3 months ago East Palestine, OH was at the center of pilot program to respond to EMERGENCY situations. They gave digital IDโs FOR FREE to residents to track long term health problems like โdifficulty breathingโ
The plot thickens...
TWEET
The plot thickens...
TWEET
๐10๐คฏ1
Forwarded from NewsOnChain
Ed Snowden reveals HAARP's global assassination agenda ๐
https://twitter.com/Michael24481767/status/1627379158463414272?t=
https://twitter.com/Michael24481767/status/1627379158463414272?t=
Twitter
HAARP
๐1
Forwarded from Anna de Buisseret (UK Lawyer)
This is an urgent request for UK residents!
PLEASE TAKE ACTION, THEN SHARE WITH YOUR NETWORKS ASAP ... 1st March is the Deadline
We all need to respond to the governmentโs public consultation on digital Identity before the first of March 2023.
This is, as Neil Oliver puts it, โThe End Gameโ. We collectively must reject it or it will be passed into law. Once that has happened our new rulers will be able to totally control our every move.
Please share the document with as many people as you can & ask them to respond via the government website before 1st March 2023.
If we, the people, can inundate the gov website with objections it will help to derail it.
https://www.gov.uk/government/consultations/draft-legislation-to-help-more-people-prove-their-identity-online/consultation-on-draft-legislation-to-support-identity-verification
GOV.UK (https://www.gov.uk/government/consultations/draft-legislation-to-help-more-people-prove-their-identity-online/consultation-on-draft-legislation-to-support-identity-verification)
Consultation on draft legislation to support identity verification
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
HOW TO SAY โNOโ: โCONSULATION ON DRAFT LEGISLATION TO SUPPORT IDENTITY VERIFICATIONโ
1. GO TO: โGOV.UKโ WEBSITE
2. SEARCH ON: โIDENTITY VERIFICATIONโ
3. CLICK ON HEADING: โCONSULATION ON DRAFT LEGISLATION TO SUPPORT IDENTITY VERIFICATIONโ
4. GO TO: PARAGRAPH WITH HEADING โHOW TO RESPONDโ
5. CLICK ON: โRESPOND ONLINE THROUGH OUR SURVEYโ.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The questions are designed to bamboozle you, stick to the responses below :
1. Neither agree nor disagree
2. Neither agree nor disagree
3. Neither agree nor disagree
4. Disagree
5. Disagree
6. No โฆ
Response : "I do not think that the data should be shared amongst all parts of government because, in my opinion, if one department has to deal with my needs it should be irrelevant to other departments."
7. Strongly disagree
8. Agree
9. Strongly disagree
10. Yes โฆ
Response : "In the light of this survey; the fact that it has not been advertised, the fact that we have not had a year long consultation where we could discuss in village halls and civic centres with councillors, the fact that this is being slipped in online where nobody really know about it makes me very suspicious of the governmentโs motives."
"This is a democratic country and the government is acting like a communist dictatorship."
PLEASE TAKE ACTION, THEN SHARE WITH YOUR NETWORKS ASAP ... 1st March is the Deadline
We all need to respond to the governmentโs public consultation on digital Identity before the first of March 2023.
This is, as Neil Oliver puts it, โThe End Gameโ. We collectively must reject it or it will be passed into law. Once that has happened our new rulers will be able to totally control our every move.
Please share the document with as many people as you can & ask them to respond via the government website before 1st March 2023.
If we, the people, can inundate the gov website with objections it will help to derail it.
https://www.gov.uk/government/consultations/draft-legislation-to-help-more-people-prove-their-identity-online/consultation-on-draft-legislation-to-support-identity-verification
GOV.UK (https://www.gov.uk/government/consultations/draft-legislation-to-help-more-people-prove-their-identity-online/consultation-on-draft-legislation-to-support-identity-verification)
Consultation on draft legislation to support identity verification
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
HOW TO SAY โNOโ: โCONSULATION ON DRAFT LEGISLATION TO SUPPORT IDENTITY VERIFICATIONโ
1. GO TO: โGOV.UKโ WEBSITE
2. SEARCH ON: โIDENTITY VERIFICATIONโ
3. CLICK ON HEADING: โCONSULATION ON DRAFT LEGISLATION TO SUPPORT IDENTITY VERIFICATIONโ
4. GO TO: PARAGRAPH WITH HEADING โHOW TO RESPONDโ
5. CLICK ON: โRESPOND ONLINE THROUGH OUR SURVEYโ.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The questions are designed to bamboozle you, stick to the responses below :
1. Neither agree nor disagree
2. Neither agree nor disagree
3. Neither agree nor disagree
4. Disagree
5. Disagree
6. No โฆ
Response : "I do not think that the data should be shared amongst all parts of government because, in my opinion, if one department has to deal with my needs it should be irrelevant to other departments."
7. Strongly disagree
8. Agree
9. Strongly disagree
10. Yes โฆ
Response : "In the light of this survey; the fact that it has not been advertised, the fact that we have not had a year long consultation where we could discuss in village halls and civic centres with councillors, the fact that this is being slipped in online where nobody really know about it makes me very suspicious of the governmentโs motives."
"This is a democratic country and the government is acting like a communist dictatorship."
๐9๐3
Forwarded from Lawyers of Light
Important 5g case update
On 6 and 7 February 2023 the Administrative Court heard the judicial review of the Secretary of Stateโs alleged failure to address the evidence of risks to human health posed by 5G technology.
Barrister Philip Rule is acting for the claimants, led by Michael Mansfield KC, and instructed by Hackett & Dabbs LLP.
The case is essentially about the dangers of 5g and the Govt's failure to consider these and inform the public of the alleged ill effects of 5g, in particular 3 substantiated effects caused by exposure to radiofrequency EMFs: (i) nerve stimulation, (ii) changes in the permeability of cell membranes, and (iii) effects due to temperature elevation.
The claimants also argued that there are existing vulnerable groups who ought to be considered by the Govt, and who deserve to be given information to assist them (but have not been), including:
โ๏ธThose with disabilities that require medical implants with electrical currents or conductivity, including pace-makers in the heart for example.
โ๏ธThose with disability/injury that require the implant of metal to their body;
โ๏ธChildrenโfor instance, childrenโs brains absorb greater quantity of RFR, and bone marrow exposure is greater; as well as their lifespan exposure being of longer duration;
โ๏ธThose who presently suffer disability arising from exisiting cancer;
โ๏ธThose presently suffering pre-cancerous conditions;
โ๏ธThose exposed habitually to radiation in the workplace, of particular levels or longevity;
โ๏ธThose with immunosuppressant conditions;
โ๏ธThose suffering from ME;
โ๏ธThose suffering from EHS.
The Court was shown that the International Agency for Research on Cancer has classified both ELF magnetic fields and RF EMFs as possibly carcinogenic to humans. Exposure to non-ionising radiation including radiofrequency is notably a recorded disease or illness recognised by the WHO, since 2005, in the International Classification of Diseases, ICD-10.
Some of the grounds advance a breach of the Human Rights Act 1998 by omissions and failings in violation of the positive obligations to protect human life, health and dignity, required to be met by Articles 2, 3 and/or 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights.
Judgment is now awaited from the Administrative Court.
More here โฌ๏ธโฌ๏ธ
https://actionagainst5g.org/case-updates/judicial-review-heard/
On 6 and 7 February 2023 the Administrative Court heard the judicial review of the Secretary of Stateโs alleged failure to address the evidence of risks to human health posed by 5G technology.
Barrister Philip Rule is acting for the claimants, led by Michael Mansfield KC, and instructed by Hackett & Dabbs LLP.
The case is essentially about the dangers of 5g and the Govt's failure to consider these and inform the public of the alleged ill effects of 5g, in particular 3 substantiated effects caused by exposure to radiofrequency EMFs: (i) nerve stimulation, (ii) changes in the permeability of cell membranes, and (iii) effects due to temperature elevation.
The claimants also argued that there are existing vulnerable groups who ought to be considered by the Govt, and who deserve to be given information to assist them (but have not been), including:
โ๏ธThose with disabilities that require medical implants with electrical currents or conductivity, including pace-makers in the heart for example.
โ๏ธThose with disability/injury that require the implant of metal to their body;
โ๏ธChildrenโfor instance, childrenโs brains absorb greater quantity of RFR, and bone marrow exposure is greater; as well as their lifespan exposure being of longer duration;
โ๏ธThose who presently suffer disability arising from exisiting cancer;
โ๏ธThose presently suffering pre-cancerous conditions;
โ๏ธThose exposed habitually to radiation in the workplace, of particular levels or longevity;
โ๏ธThose with immunosuppressant conditions;
โ๏ธThose suffering from ME;
โ๏ธThose suffering from EHS.
The Court was shown that the International Agency for Research on Cancer has classified both ELF magnetic fields and RF EMFs as possibly carcinogenic to humans. Exposure to non-ionising radiation including radiofrequency is notably a recorded disease or illness recognised by the WHO, since 2005, in the International Classification of Diseases, ICD-10.
Some of the grounds advance a breach of the Human Rights Act 1998 by omissions and failings in violation of the positive obligations to protect human life, health and dignity, required to be met by Articles 2, 3 and/or 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights.
Judgment is now awaited from the Administrative Court.
More here โฌ๏ธโฌ๏ธ
https://actionagainst5g.org/case-updates/judicial-review-heard/
๐2
Forwarded from STRANGER THAN FICTION NEWS
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
The people of East Palestine are being told their bedding, clothing, furniture have been permeated with these chemicals and need to be thrown out. They are being told to stay out of their basements and the local hospitals are overwhelmed with body rashes and other side effects... it's becoming like chernobyl in Ohio....
๐6
Forwarded from JON ๐ด๓ ง๓ ข๓ ฅ๓ ฎ๓ ง๓ ฟ M
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
This is the complete detailed zionist list of trumps entire team ,all are zionists every one
Forwarded from NewsOnChain
No psyop here!!! ๐คฎ
https://twitter.com/CubanMofo_/status/1627442844867723270?s=20
https://twitter.com/CubanMofo_/status/1627442844867723270?s=20
Forwarded from Mimram
This is an urgent request! We all need to respond to the governmentโs public consultation on digital Identity before the first of March 2023.
This is, as Neil Oliver puts it, โThe End Gameโ. We collectively must reject it or it will be passed into law. Once that has happened our new rulers will be able to totally control our every move.
Please share the document with as many people as you can & ask them to respond via the government website before 1st March 2023.
If we, the people, can inundate the gov website with objections it will help to derail it.
https://www.gov.uk/government/consultations/draft-legislation-to-help-more-people-prove-their-identity-online/consultation-on-draft-legislation-to-support-identity-verification
GOV.UK (https://www.gov.uk/government/consultations/draft-legislation-to-help-more-people-prove-their-identity-online/consultation-on-draft-legislation-to-support-identity-verification)
Consultation on draft legislation to support identity verification
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
HOW TO SAY โNOโ: โCONSULATION ON DRAFT LEGISLATION TO SUPPORT IDENTITY VERIFICATIONโ
1. GO TO: โGOV.UKโ WEBSITE
2. SEARCH ON: โIDENTITY VERIFICATIONโ
3. CLICK ON HEADING: โCONSULATION ON DRAFT LEGISLATION TO SUPPORT IDENTITY VERIFICATIONโ
4. GO TO: PARAGRAPH WITH HEADING โHOW TO RESPONDโ
5. CLICK ON: โRESPOND ONLINE THROUGH OUR SURVEYโ.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The questions are designed to bamboozle you, stick to the responses below :
1. Neither agree nor disagree
2. Neither agree nor disagree
3. Neither agree nor disagree
4. Disagree
5. Disagree
6. No โฆ
Response : "I do not think that the data should be shared amongst all parts of government because, in my opinion, if one department has to deal with my needs it should be irrelevant to other departments."
7. Strongly disagree
8. Agree
9. Strongly disagree
10. Yes โฆ
Response : "In the light of this survey; the fact that it has not been advertised, the fact that we have not had a year long consultation where we could discuss in village halls and civic centres with councillors, the fact that this is being slipped in online where nobody really know about it makes me very suspicious of the governmentโs motives."
"This is a democratic country and the government is acting like a communist dictatorship."
This is, as Neil Oliver puts it, โThe End Gameโ. We collectively must reject it or it will be passed into law. Once that has happened our new rulers will be able to totally control our every move.
Please share the document with as many people as you can & ask them to respond via the government website before 1st March 2023.
If we, the people, can inundate the gov website with objections it will help to derail it.
https://www.gov.uk/government/consultations/draft-legislation-to-help-more-people-prove-their-identity-online/consultation-on-draft-legislation-to-support-identity-verification
GOV.UK (https://www.gov.uk/government/consultations/draft-legislation-to-help-more-people-prove-their-identity-online/consultation-on-draft-legislation-to-support-identity-verification)
Consultation on draft legislation to support identity verification
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
HOW TO SAY โNOโ: โCONSULATION ON DRAFT LEGISLATION TO SUPPORT IDENTITY VERIFICATIONโ
1. GO TO: โGOV.UKโ WEBSITE
2. SEARCH ON: โIDENTITY VERIFICATIONโ
3. CLICK ON HEADING: โCONSULATION ON DRAFT LEGISLATION TO SUPPORT IDENTITY VERIFICATIONโ
4. GO TO: PARAGRAPH WITH HEADING โHOW TO RESPONDโ
5. CLICK ON: โRESPOND ONLINE THROUGH OUR SURVEYโ.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The questions are designed to bamboozle you, stick to the responses below :
1. Neither agree nor disagree
2. Neither agree nor disagree
3. Neither agree nor disagree
4. Disagree
5. Disagree
6. No โฆ
Response : "I do not think that the data should be shared amongst all parts of government because, in my opinion, if one department has to deal with my needs it should be irrelevant to other departments."
7. Strongly disagree
8. Agree
9. Strongly disagree
10. Yes โฆ
Response : "In the light of this survey; the fact that it has not been advertised, the fact that we have not had a year long consultation where we could discuss in village halls and civic centres with councillors, the fact that this is being slipped in online where nobody really know about it makes me very suspicious of the governmentโs motives."
"This is a democratic country and the government is acting like a communist dictatorship."
๐9
Forwarded from dark_universe_09 (@dark_universe_09)
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
๐จ Another one in the Netherlands, Groningen. Thick clouds of carcinogenic smoke fill the air from a fire in the polystyrene warehouse. Well, it's going global...
I guess there covid death jabs didnโt work, now they have a new plan. Smoke them out with bio chemical warfare.
Donโt be a victim of ignorance, Think while itโs still legal. ๐ง
๐ซ For raw truth, knowledge guidance & wisdom follow our telegram messenger group.
https://t.me/darkuniverse09
I guess there covid death jabs didnโt work, now they have a new plan. Smoke them out with bio chemical warfare.
Donโt be a victim of ignorance, Think while itโs still legal. ๐ง
๐ซ For raw truth, knowledge guidance & wisdom follow our telegram messenger group.
https://t.me/darkuniverse09
๐7๐คฌ3