Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
๐ฌ๐ง ๐ข๐๐ฟ ๐ฅ๐ถ๐ด๐ต๐ ๐๐ผ ๐ฃ๐ฟ๐ผ๐๐ฒ๐๐ ๐บ๐๐๐ ๐ฟ๐ฒ๐บ๐ฎ๐ถ๐ป ๐ผ๐๐ฟ ๐ฅ๐๐๐๐ง..
๐ฆ๐๐ง๐จ๐ฅ๐๐๐ฌ ๐ฎ๐ฌ๐ง๐ ๐ ๐๐ฅ๐๐ ๐ฎ๐ฌ๐ฎ๐ญ, ๐ง๐ข๐๐๐ง๐๐๐ฅ ๐ช๐ ๐ ๐จ๐ฆ๐ง ๐ ๐๐๐ ๐ข๐จ๐ฅ ๐ ๐๐ฅ๐!
๐ฆ๐๐ง๐จ๐ฅ๐๐๐ฌ ๐ฎ๐ฌ๐ง๐ ๐ ๐๐ฅ๐๐ ๐ฎ๐ฌ๐ฎ๐ญ, ๐ง๐ข๐๐๐ง๐๐๐ฅ ๐ช๐ ๐ ๐จ๐ฆ๐ง ๐ ๐๐๐ ๐ข๐จ๐ฅ ๐ ๐๐ฅ๐!
๐ฌ๐ง ๐ช๐ต๐ฒ๐๐ต๐ฒ๐ฟ ๐๐ผ๐ ๐น๐ถ๐ธ๐ฒ ๐ต๐ถ๐บ ๐ผ๐ฟ ๐ป๐ผ๐, ๐๐ผ๐ ๐ต๐ฎ๐๐ฒ ๐๐ผ ๐ต๐ฎ๐ป๐ฑ ๐ถ๐ ๐๐ผ ๐ต๐ถ๐บ. ๐๐ฎ๐บ๐บ๐, ๐ต๐ฒ ๐๐ป๐ฑ๐ฒ๐ฟ๐๐๐ฎ๐ป๐ฑ๐ ๐๐ต๐ฒ ๐ฟ๐ถ๐ด๐ต๐ ๐๐ผ ๐ฝ๐ฟ๐ผ๐๐ฒ๐๐.
๐๐๐ผ๐น๐น๐ผ๐, ๐ฆ๐๐ฏ๐๐ฐ๐ฟ๐ถ๐ฏ๐ฒ๐๐ ๐ฎ๐ป๐ฑ ๐๐ป๐ถ๐๐ฒ:
https://t.me/Truth_Awakening_Channel
๐๐๐๐ง๐ ๐ฅ๐๐ค๐ฅ๐ก๐ ๐๐ค๐ข๐ ๐ฉ๐ค๐๐๐ฉ๐๐๐ง ๐ฉ๐ค ๐๐๐๐๐ฉ๐ ๐ฉ๐๐ ๐ง๐๐๐ก ๐ฉ๐ง๐ช๐ฉ๐.๐ค
๐๐๐ผ๐น๐น๐ผ๐, ๐ฆ๐๐ฏ๐๐ฐ๐ฟ๐ถ๐ฏ๐ฒ๐๐ ๐ฎ๐ป๐ฑ ๐๐ป๐ถ๐๐ฒ:
https://t.me/Truth_Awakening_Channel
๐๐๐๐ง๐ ๐ฅ๐๐ค๐ฅ๐ก๐ ๐๐ค๐ข๐ ๐ฉ๐ค๐๐๐ฉ๐๐๐ง ๐ฉ๐ค ๐๐๐๐๐ฉ๐ ๐ฉ๐๐ ๐ง๐๐๐ก ๐ฉ๐ง๐ช๐ฉ๐.๐ค
๐จ๐ฆ๐ ๐ก๐๐ช๐ฆ - ๐ฉ๐๐๐ช๐ฃ๐ข๐๐ก๐ง๐ฆ
๐ง๐ต๐ฒ ๐๐ผ๐๐ป๐ฑ๐ฒ๐ฟ๐ ๐ช๐ฎ๐ฟ๐ป๐ฒ๐ฑ ๐จ๐ ๐๐ฏ๐ผ๐๐ ๐๐ฏ๐๐๐ฒ๐ ๐๐ถ๐ธ๐ฒ ๐.๐ฅ. ๐ญ
Rob Natelson - March 11, 2021
Commentary
H.R. 1, the bill that would seize control of federal elections from the states, comes with an unusual twist. It supposedly promotes โaccess.โ But it says anyone challenging its constitutionality is barred from every court in the nation but a single federal trial court in Washington, D.C.!
Under H.R. 1, some citizens get more access than others.
Mark Twain is said to have quipped that history doesnโt repeat itself, but often rhymes. And hereโs one of those rhymes: Limiting challengers to one court in the nation sounds a lot like Founding-Era warnings that if Congress could regulate its own elections it might limit voters to one polling place per state. More on that shortly.
As my last essay noted, H.R. 1 claims to rely on three sections of the Constitution, two of which probably are irrelevant. The third is the Elections Clause (Article I, Section 4, Clause 1)โmore appropriately called the Times, Places, and Manner Clause. It reads as follows:
โ๐ป๐๐ ๐ป๐๐๐๐, ๐ท๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐ ๐ด๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐ ๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐ ๐ฌ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐ ๐บ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐ ๐น๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐, ๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐ ๐๐๐๐ ๐บ๐๐๐๐ ๐๐ ๐๐๐ ๐ณ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐; ๐๐๐ ๐๐๐ ๐ช๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐ ๐๐ ๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐ ๐๐ ๐ณ๐๐ ๐๐๐๐ ๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐ ๐น๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ โฆ.โ
H.R. 1 quotes some out-of-context Supreme Court language to the effect that the italicized language gives Congress broad authority to overrule state election law.
But the text of the Elections Clause tells a very different story, as does its history.
The text tells us that Congressโs power applies only to congressional elections. It doesnโt apply to presidential contests, as the drafters of H.R. 1 pretend.
In addition, the text focuses principally on the power of state legislatures. It adds Congressโs authority only in a subordinate clause. This subordinate clause is what lawyers and judgesโboth in the Founding Era and in modern timesโcall a โproviso.โ Provisos traditionally are interpreted narrowly, leaving the earlier language (the state legislaturesโ power) to be interpreted broadly. In this case, narrow interpretation means that if thereโs reasonable doubt about whether Congress has authority, the issue is decided against Congress.
Now letโs look at the history:
When the Constitution was publicly debated, the proviso giving Congress power to revise state election laws was highly controversial. Even many of the Constitutionโs supporters wanted it taken out. Dr. James McClurg of Virginia, who had served at the Constitutional Convention, was one of these. Another was Noah Webster, later famous for his American dictionary. Webster wrote an influential pamphlet strongly supporting the Constitutionโbut demanding that the proviso be removed.
Why the concern? They understood the danger of allowing incumbent politicians to dictate the laws governing their own re-election. Experience shows that if incumbents write the rules, they write the rules to suit themselves. A glaring example is how the Democrat sponsors of H.R. 1 seek to alter state voter registration systems to their own advantage.
Skeptical Founding-Era writers explained in detail how the proviso could be abused. They pointed out, for instance, that if Congress could fix a โPlaceโ for election, it might severely limit the number of polling places and locate them to benefit incumbents. Thus, a congressman from Philadelphia might induce his colleagues to locate only one polling place in Pennsylvaniaโin the congressmanโs own neighborhood in Philadelphia.
Sound familiar? Itโs a lot like Democrat partisans providing that the one court where H.R. 1 can be challenged is in heavily Democrat Washington, D.C.
During the constitutional debates, there was so much public resistance to the proviso that advocates became very concerned. What if these few words led the public to reject the entire Constitution?
Page 1 of 2
๐ง๐ต๐ฒ ๐๐ผ๐๐ป๐ฑ๐ฒ๐ฟ๐ ๐ช๐ฎ๐ฟ๐ป๐ฒ๐ฑ ๐จ๐ ๐๐ฏ๐ผ๐๐ ๐๐ฏ๐๐๐ฒ๐ ๐๐ถ๐ธ๐ฒ ๐.๐ฅ. ๐ญ
Rob Natelson - March 11, 2021
Commentary
H.R. 1, the bill that would seize control of federal elections from the states, comes with an unusual twist. It supposedly promotes โaccess.โ But it says anyone challenging its constitutionality is barred from every court in the nation but a single federal trial court in Washington, D.C.!
Under H.R. 1, some citizens get more access than others.
Mark Twain is said to have quipped that history doesnโt repeat itself, but often rhymes. And hereโs one of those rhymes: Limiting challengers to one court in the nation sounds a lot like Founding-Era warnings that if Congress could regulate its own elections it might limit voters to one polling place per state. More on that shortly.
As my last essay noted, H.R. 1 claims to rely on three sections of the Constitution, two of which probably are irrelevant. The third is the Elections Clause (Article I, Section 4, Clause 1)โmore appropriately called the Times, Places, and Manner Clause. It reads as follows:
โ๐ป๐๐ ๐ป๐๐๐๐, ๐ท๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐ ๐ด๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐ ๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐ ๐ฌ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐ ๐บ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐ ๐น๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐, ๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐ ๐๐๐๐ ๐บ๐๐๐๐ ๐๐ ๐๐๐ ๐ณ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐; ๐๐๐ ๐๐๐ ๐ช๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐ ๐๐ ๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐ ๐๐ ๐ณ๐๐ ๐๐๐๐ ๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐ ๐น๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ โฆ.โ
H.R. 1 quotes some out-of-context Supreme Court language to the effect that the italicized language gives Congress broad authority to overrule state election law.
But the text of the Elections Clause tells a very different story, as does its history.
The text tells us that Congressโs power applies only to congressional elections. It doesnโt apply to presidential contests, as the drafters of H.R. 1 pretend.
In addition, the text focuses principally on the power of state legislatures. It adds Congressโs authority only in a subordinate clause. This subordinate clause is what lawyers and judgesโboth in the Founding Era and in modern timesโcall a โproviso.โ Provisos traditionally are interpreted narrowly, leaving the earlier language (the state legislaturesโ power) to be interpreted broadly. In this case, narrow interpretation means that if thereโs reasonable doubt about whether Congress has authority, the issue is decided against Congress.
Now letโs look at the history:
When the Constitution was publicly debated, the proviso giving Congress power to revise state election laws was highly controversial. Even many of the Constitutionโs supporters wanted it taken out. Dr. James McClurg of Virginia, who had served at the Constitutional Convention, was one of these. Another was Noah Webster, later famous for his American dictionary. Webster wrote an influential pamphlet strongly supporting the Constitutionโbut demanding that the proviso be removed.
Why the concern? They understood the danger of allowing incumbent politicians to dictate the laws governing their own re-election. Experience shows that if incumbents write the rules, they write the rules to suit themselves. A glaring example is how the Democrat sponsors of H.R. 1 seek to alter state voter registration systems to their own advantage.
Skeptical Founding-Era writers explained in detail how the proviso could be abused. They pointed out, for instance, that if Congress could fix a โPlaceโ for election, it might severely limit the number of polling places and locate them to benefit incumbents. Thus, a congressman from Philadelphia might induce his colleagues to locate only one polling place in Pennsylvaniaโin the congressmanโs own neighborhood in Philadelphia.
Sound familiar? Itโs a lot like Democrat partisans providing that the one court where H.R. 1 can be challenged is in heavily Democrat Washington, D.C.
During the constitutional debates, there was so much public resistance to the proviso that advocates became very concerned. What if these few words led the public to reject the entire Constitution?
Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2
So advocates assured the public that Congressโs power over congressional elections would be extremely limited. They said the proviso was designed only for emergencies. As I reported in my 2010 study of the Elections Clause:
โ[๐ป]๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐โ ๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ โฆ ๐๐๐ ๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐ ๐๐๐ ๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐: ๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐ ๐ป๐๐๐๐, ๐ท๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐ ๐ด๐๐๐๐๐ ๐ช๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐ ๐๐ ๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐ช๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐ ๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐. ๐ฐ๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐ ๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐, ๐ ๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐ ๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐ ๐ฏ๐๐๐๐ ๐๐ ๐น๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐ ๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐ ๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐. ๐จ๐ ๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐, ๐๐๐ ๐ญ๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐ ๐น๐๐๐ ๐ ๐ฐ๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐ ๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐ ๐๐๐ ๐ช๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐ช๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐ ๐๐๐๐ ๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐ ๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐ ๐. ๐ป๐๐ ๐ญ๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐ ๐ ๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐, ๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐ ๐๐ ๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐.โ
Moreover:
โ๐ฐ๐ ๐ด๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ , ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐ฑ๐๐๐๐ ๐ด๐๐ฏ๐๐๐๐ ๐๐ ๐ ๐๐ ๐๐๐๐ โฆ ๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐ ๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐ ๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐. ๐จ๐ ๐ฑ๐๐๐๐ ๐ฐ๐๐๐ ๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐ ๐ต๐๐๐๐ ๐ช๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐, โ[๐]๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐ ๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐ ๐ช๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐ ๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ โฆ ๐๐ ๐ ๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐ ๐๐๐, ๐๐๐ ๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐, (๐๐ ๐๐๐ ๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐ ๐๐ ๐บ๐๐๐๐ ๐ช๐๐๐๐๐๐๐, ๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐ ๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐, ๐ ๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐).โโ
Marylandโs famous jurist, Alexander Contee Hanson, added that Congress would exercise its โtimes, places, and mannerโ authority only in cases of invasion, legislative neglect, or obstinate refusal to pass election laws, or if a state crafted its election laws with a โsinister purposeโ or to injure the general government. โIt was never meant,โ he wrote, โthat congress should at any time interfere, unless on the failure of a state legislature, or to alter such regulations as may be obviously improper.โ
Based on these assurances, the public accepted the proviso and ratified the Constitution.
Of course, the Constitution doesnโt actually say the proviso is limited to emergencies. But courts routinely consider the history behind a documentโs words when deciding how broadly to interpret them. I explained above that the text tells us to construe the proviso narrowly. History backs this up.
Hereโs an illustration of how the courts should apply Congressโs Election Clause authority. Suppose the question arises of whether โthe manner of holding Electionsโ extends only to mechanics such as the form of the ballot, or also includes regulating campaigns. Narrow construction would give force to the Founding-Era evidence that โmanner of holdingโ does not include campaigns.
Bottom line: The drafters of H.R. 1 were wrong to proclaim unlimited power to regulate federal elections and campaigns. On the contrary, the Elections Clause grants Congress only limited authority. A runaway Congress should never be permitted to seize more power than the Constitution gives it.
Robert G. Natelson, a former constitutional law professor, is a leading originalist scholar and senior fellow in constitutional jurisprudence at the Independence Institute in Denver. The Texas attorney general twice relied on his 2010 study of the Elections Clause in Supreme Court litigation earlier this year, and Chief Justice John Roberts used it in a 2015 Supreme Court case.
๐ ๐ฅ๐ฒ๐ฎ๐ฑ ๐บ๐ผ๐ฟ๐ฒ: ๐ง๐ต๐ฒ ๐๐ฝ๐ผ๐ฐ๐ต ๐ง๐ถ๐บ๐ฒ๐
๐๐๐ผ๐น๐น๐ผ๐, ๐ฆ๐๐ฏ๐๐ฐ๐ฟ๐ถ๐ฏ๐ฒ๐๐ ๐ฎ๐ป๐ฑ ๐๐ป๐ถ๐๐ฒ:
https://t.me/Truth_Awakening_Channel
๐๐๐๐ง๐ ๐ฅ๐๐ค๐ฅ๐ก๐ ๐๐ค๐ข๐ ๐ฉ๐ค๐๐๐ฉ๐๐๐ง ๐ฉ๐ค ๐๐๐๐๐ฉ๐ ๐ฉ๐๐ ๐ง๐๐๐ก ๐ฉ๐ง๐ช๐ฉ๐.๐ค
So advocates assured the public that Congressโs power over congressional elections would be extremely limited. They said the proviso was designed only for emergencies. As I reported in my 2010 study of the Elections Clause:
โ[๐ป]๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐โ ๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ โฆ ๐๐๐ ๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐ ๐๐๐ ๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐: ๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐ ๐ป๐๐๐๐, ๐ท๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐ ๐ด๐๐๐๐๐ ๐ช๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐ ๐๐ ๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐ช๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐ ๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐. ๐ฐ๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐ ๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐, ๐ ๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐ ๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐ ๐ฏ๐๐๐๐ ๐๐ ๐น๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐ ๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐ ๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐. ๐จ๐ ๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐, ๐๐๐ ๐ญ๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐ ๐น๐๐๐ ๐ ๐ฐ๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐ ๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐ ๐๐๐ ๐ช๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐ช๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐ ๐๐๐๐ ๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐ ๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐ ๐. ๐ป๐๐ ๐ญ๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐ ๐ ๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐, ๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐ ๐๐ ๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐.โ
Moreover:
โ๐ฐ๐ ๐ด๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ , ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐ฑ๐๐๐๐ ๐ด๐๐ฏ๐๐๐๐ ๐๐ ๐ ๐๐ ๐๐๐๐ โฆ ๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐ ๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐ ๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐. ๐จ๐ ๐ฑ๐๐๐๐ ๐ฐ๐๐๐ ๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐ ๐ต๐๐๐๐ ๐ช๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐, โ[๐]๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐ ๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐ ๐ช๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐ ๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ โฆ ๐๐ ๐ ๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐ ๐๐๐, ๐๐๐ ๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐, (๐๐ ๐๐๐ ๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐ ๐๐ ๐บ๐๐๐๐ ๐ช๐๐๐๐๐๐๐, ๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐ ๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐, ๐ ๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐).โโ
Marylandโs famous jurist, Alexander Contee Hanson, added that Congress would exercise its โtimes, places, and mannerโ authority only in cases of invasion, legislative neglect, or obstinate refusal to pass election laws, or if a state crafted its election laws with a โsinister purposeโ or to injure the general government. โIt was never meant,โ he wrote, โthat congress should at any time interfere, unless on the failure of a state legislature, or to alter such regulations as may be obviously improper.โ
Based on these assurances, the public accepted the proviso and ratified the Constitution.
Of course, the Constitution doesnโt actually say the proviso is limited to emergencies. But courts routinely consider the history behind a documentโs words when deciding how broadly to interpret them. I explained above that the text tells us to construe the proviso narrowly. History backs this up.
Hereโs an illustration of how the courts should apply Congressโs Election Clause authority. Suppose the question arises of whether โthe manner of holding Electionsโ extends only to mechanics such as the form of the ballot, or also includes regulating campaigns. Narrow construction would give force to the Founding-Era evidence that โmanner of holdingโ does not include campaigns.
Bottom line: The drafters of H.R. 1 were wrong to proclaim unlimited power to regulate federal elections and campaigns. On the contrary, the Elections Clause grants Congress only limited authority. A runaway Congress should never be permitted to seize more power than the Constitution gives it.
Robert G. Natelson, a former constitutional law professor, is a leading originalist scholar and senior fellow in constitutional jurisprudence at the Independence Institute in Denver. The Texas attorney general twice relied on his 2010 study of the Elections Clause in Supreme Court litigation earlier this year, and Chief Justice John Roberts used it in a 2015 Supreme Court case.
๐ ๐ฅ๐ฒ๐ฎ๐ฑ ๐บ๐ผ๐ฟ๐ฒ: ๐ง๐ต๐ฒ ๐๐ฝ๐ผ๐ฐ๐ต ๐ง๐ถ๐บ๐ฒ๐
๐๐๐ผ๐น๐น๐ผ๐, ๐ฆ๐๐ฏ๐๐ฐ๐ฟ๐ถ๐ฏ๐ฒ๐๐ ๐ฎ๐ป๐ฑ ๐๐ป๐ถ๐๐ฒ:
https://t.me/Truth_Awakening_Channel
๐๐๐๐ง๐ ๐ฅ๐๐ค๐ฅ๐ก๐ ๐๐ค๐ข๐ ๐ฉ๐ค๐๐๐ฉ๐๐๐ง ๐ฉ๐ค ๐๐๐๐๐ฉ๐ ๐ฉ๐๐ ๐ง๐๐๐ก ๐ฉ๐ง๐ช๐ฉ๐.๐ค
The Epoch Times
The Founders Warned Us About Abuses Like H.R. 1
Commentary H.R. 1, the bill that would seize control of federal elections from the states, comes with an ...
๐จ๐ฆ๐ ๐ก๐๐ช๐ฆ - ๐๐ข๐ก๐๐ฅ๐๐ฆ๐ฆ
๐๐ข๐ฃ ๐๐ผ๐๐๐ฒ ๐ ๐ฒ๐บ๐ฏ๐ฒ๐ฟ๐ ๐๐ป๐๐ฟ๐ผ๐ฑ๐๐ฐ๐ฒ ๐๐ถ๐น๐น ๐๐ผ ๐ฅ๐ฒ๐ถ๐ป ๐ถ๐ป ๐๐ถ๐ฑ๐ฒ๐ปโ๐ ๐ฅ๐ฒ๐ด๐๐น๐ฎ๐๐ผ๐ฟ๐ ๐ฃ๐น๐ฎ๐ป๐
๐๐ฌ ๐๐๐ก๐๐ง๐ ๐๐๐ก ๐ ๐ฎ๐ฟ๐ฐ๐ต ๐ญ๐ฎ, ๐ฎ๐ฌ๐ฎ๐ญ
A group of Republican House members this week introduced a bill aimed at preventing overreach by the executive branch in substituting Congress-passed laws with its own rulemaking. This comes about two months after the Senate introduced an identical bill.
The bill, known as the Regulations from the Executive In Need of Scrutiny (REINS) Act of 2021, seeks to affirm Congressโs legislative power by requiring every new โmajor ruleโ proposed by federal agencies be approved by both the House and Senate before they can be enforced.
The proposed law defines โmajor ruleโ as any federal rule or regulation that may result in an annual effect on the economy of $100 million or more; a major increase in costs or prices for consumers, individual industries, government agencies, or geographic regions; or cause significant adverse effects on competition, employment, investment, productivity, innovation, or the ability of U.S.-based enterprises to compete with foreign-based enterprises.
The bill was introduced by Rep. Kat Cammack (R-Fla.) and co-sponsored by more than two dozen House lawmakers, including Judiciary Committee Ranking Member Jim Jordan (R-Ohio) and Rep. Matt Gaetz (R-Fla.).
โThe REINS Act is a measure that ensures Congress is the only lawmaker in the United States. This bill reasserts Article I authority that vests all legislative power in Congress and provides necessary oversight of the executive rulemaking process,โ Cammack said in a statement on Wednesday.
โItโs about making sure the executive branch does not unduly overstep its vested authority through a necessary system of checks and balances.โ
Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) introduced an identical Senate version of the bill in January. His office explained at the time that under the REINS Act, once a major rule is drafted, it would trigger a process that would require both chambers of Congress to approve and then be signed by the president. This requirement, he said, would satisfy the โbicameralism and presentment requirements of the Constitution.โ
โFor too long, an ever-growing federal bureaucracy has piled regulations and red tape on the backs of the American people without any approval by Americansโ elected representatives,โ Paul said in the statement.
The White House did not immediately respond to a request for comment from The Epoch Times.
In an interview with The Epoch Timesโ American Thought Leaders last year, Sen. Mike Lee (R-Utah) said Congress has itself to blame for overreach by the judicial and executive branches.
Congress has in many instances surrendered its legislating authority to the executive branch of government, he said. This has led to the executive, the judiciary, and administrative agencies expanding their reach in order to fill the void left by lawmakers.
โThe far more common type involves a delegation to the executive branch. We pass a law that says, in effect, we shall have good law in area X and we hereby delegate to commission or department or division Y the power to make and interpret and enforce rules carrying the force of generally applicable federal law in that area,โ Lee said. โAnd from that moment forward, that division or department, or commission, is the lawmaker, and is also the law enforcer.โ
Meanwhile, states have also cautioned Biden and his administration from engaging in federal overreach that could contravene the stateโs authority to enact laws or violate various constitutional rights.
Six attorneys general wrote a letter to Biden in January to put his administration on notice that any actions that might exceed their statutory authority, are inconsistent with constitutional tenets, or place civil liberties at risk could trigger legal action by the states.
Page 1 of 2
๐๐ข๐ฃ ๐๐ผ๐๐๐ฒ ๐ ๐ฒ๐บ๐ฏ๐ฒ๐ฟ๐ ๐๐ป๐๐ฟ๐ผ๐ฑ๐๐ฐ๐ฒ ๐๐ถ๐น๐น ๐๐ผ ๐ฅ๐ฒ๐ถ๐ป ๐ถ๐ป ๐๐ถ๐ฑ๐ฒ๐ปโ๐ ๐ฅ๐ฒ๐ด๐๐น๐ฎ๐๐ผ๐ฟ๐ ๐ฃ๐น๐ฎ๐ป๐
๐๐ฌ ๐๐๐ก๐๐ง๐ ๐๐๐ก ๐ ๐ฎ๐ฟ๐ฐ๐ต ๐ญ๐ฎ, ๐ฎ๐ฌ๐ฎ๐ญ
A group of Republican House members this week introduced a bill aimed at preventing overreach by the executive branch in substituting Congress-passed laws with its own rulemaking. This comes about two months after the Senate introduced an identical bill.
The bill, known as the Regulations from the Executive In Need of Scrutiny (REINS) Act of 2021, seeks to affirm Congressโs legislative power by requiring every new โmajor ruleโ proposed by federal agencies be approved by both the House and Senate before they can be enforced.
The proposed law defines โmajor ruleโ as any federal rule or regulation that may result in an annual effect on the economy of $100 million or more; a major increase in costs or prices for consumers, individual industries, government agencies, or geographic regions; or cause significant adverse effects on competition, employment, investment, productivity, innovation, or the ability of U.S.-based enterprises to compete with foreign-based enterprises.
The bill was introduced by Rep. Kat Cammack (R-Fla.) and co-sponsored by more than two dozen House lawmakers, including Judiciary Committee Ranking Member Jim Jordan (R-Ohio) and Rep. Matt Gaetz (R-Fla.).
โThe REINS Act is a measure that ensures Congress is the only lawmaker in the United States. This bill reasserts Article I authority that vests all legislative power in Congress and provides necessary oversight of the executive rulemaking process,โ Cammack said in a statement on Wednesday.
โItโs about making sure the executive branch does not unduly overstep its vested authority through a necessary system of checks and balances.โ
Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) introduced an identical Senate version of the bill in January. His office explained at the time that under the REINS Act, once a major rule is drafted, it would trigger a process that would require both chambers of Congress to approve and then be signed by the president. This requirement, he said, would satisfy the โbicameralism and presentment requirements of the Constitution.โ
โFor too long, an ever-growing federal bureaucracy has piled regulations and red tape on the backs of the American people without any approval by Americansโ elected representatives,โ Paul said in the statement.
The White House did not immediately respond to a request for comment from The Epoch Times.
In an interview with The Epoch Timesโ American Thought Leaders last year, Sen. Mike Lee (R-Utah) said Congress has itself to blame for overreach by the judicial and executive branches.
Congress has in many instances surrendered its legislating authority to the executive branch of government, he said. This has led to the executive, the judiciary, and administrative agencies expanding their reach in order to fill the void left by lawmakers.
โThe far more common type involves a delegation to the executive branch. We pass a law that says, in effect, we shall have good law in area X and we hereby delegate to commission or department or division Y the power to make and interpret and enforce rules carrying the force of generally applicable federal law in that area,โ Lee said. โAnd from that moment forward, that division or department, or commission, is the lawmaker, and is also the law enforcer.โ
Meanwhile, states have also cautioned Biden and his administration from engaging in federal overreach that could contravene the stateโs authority to enact laws or violate various constitutional rights.
Six attorneys general wrote a letter to Biden in January to put his administration on notice that any actions that might exceed their statutory authority, are inconsistent with constitutional tenets, or place civil liberties at risk could trigger legal action by the states.
Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2
โWe stand ready to meet with your administration to discuss more how the issues below affect our States; litigation is never first option, and we would like to help your team in its important job on behalf of all Americans, consistent with the Constitution and the rule of law,โ West Virginia Attorney General Patrick Morrisey, who is leading the group, wrote in the letter addressed to the White House (pdf).
โYet, if you sign unconstitutional laws passed by Congress, it will be our responsibility and duty to challenge those laws in court. If cabinet officials, executive officers, and agencies go beyond the bounds of their statutory authority, fail to follow legally required procedures, or fall short of the bedrock Administrative Procedure Act obligation of reasoned decision making, it will likewise be our responsibility to take action.โ
The Administrative Procedure Act is a federal law that governs the process for agency rulemaking and has been frequently invoked to challenge executive branch rules and regulations.
Follow Janita on Twitter: @janitakan
๐ ๐ฅ๐ฒ๐ฎ๐ฑ ๐บ๐ผ๐ฟ๐ฒ: ๐ง๐ต๐ฒ ๐๐ฝ๐ผ๐ฐ๐ต ๐ง๐ถ๐บ๐ฒ๐
๐๐๐ผ๐น๐น๐ผ๐, ๐ฆ๐๐ฏ๐๐ฐ๐ฟ๐ถ๐ฏ๐ฒ๐๐ ๐ฎ๐ป๐ฑ ๐๐ป๐ถ๐๐ฒ:
https://t.me/Truth_Awakening_Channel
๐๐๐๐ง๐ ๐ฅ๐๐ค๐ฅ๐ก๐ ๐๐ค๐ข๐ ๐ฉ๐ค๐๐๐ฉ๐๐๐ง ๐ฉ๐ค ๐๐๐๐๐ฉ๐ ๐ฉ๐๐ ๐ง๐๐๐ก ๐ฉ๐ง๐ช๐ฉ๐.๐ค
โWe stand ready to meet with your administration to discuss more how the issues below affect our States; litigation is never first option, and we would like to help your team in its important job on behalf of all Americans, consistent with the Constitution and the rule of law,โ West Virginia Attorney General Patrick Morrisey, who is leading the group, wrote in the letter addressed to the White House (pdf).
โYet, if you sign unconstitutional laws passed by Congress, it will be our responsibility and duty to challenge those laws in court. If cabinet officials, executive officers, and agencies go beyond the bounds of their statutory authority, fail to follow legally required procedures, or fall short of the bedrock Administrative Procedure Act obligation of reasoned decision making, it will likewise be our responsibility to take action.โ
The Administrative Procedure Act is a federal law that governs the process for agency rulemaking and has been frequently invoked to challenge executive branch rules and regulations.
Follow Janita on Twitter: @janitakan
๐ ๐ฅ๐ฒ๐ฎ๐ฑ ๐บ๐ผ๐ฟ๐ฒ: ๐ง๐ต๐ฒ ๐๐ฝ๐ผ๐ฐ๐ต ๐ง๐ถ๐บ๐ฒ๐
๐๐๐ผ๐น๐น๐ผ๐, ๐ฆ๐๐ฏ๐๐ฐ๐ฟ๐ถ๐ฏ๐ฒ๐๐ ๐ฎ๐ป๐ฑ ๐๐ป๐ถ๐๐ฒ:
https://t.me/Truth_Awakening_Channel
๐๐๐๐ง๐ ๐ฅ๐๐ค๐ฅ๐ก๐ ๐๐ค๐ข๐ ๐ฉ๐ค๐๐๐ฉ๐๐๐ง ๐ฉ๐ค ๐๐๐๐๐ฉ๐ ๐ฉ๐๐ ๐ง๐๐๐ก ๐ฉ๐ง๐ช๐ฉ๐.๐ค
The Epoch Times
GOP House Members Introduce Bill to Rein in Bidenโs Regulatory Plans
A group of Republican House members this week introduced a bill aimed at preventing overreach by the executive branch in substituting Congress-passed laws with its rulemaking.
๐ ๐๐ผ๐น๐น๐ฒ๐ฐ๐๐ถ๐ผ๐ป ๐ผ๐ณ ๐๐๐ถ๐ฑ๐ฒ๐ป๐ฐ๐ฒ ๐ข๐ณ ๐๐ผ๐๐ถ๐ฑ-๐ญ๐ต ๐ฉ๐ฎ๐ฐ๐ฐ๐ถ๐ป๐ฒ ๐๐ฑ๐๐ฒ๐ฟ๐๐ฒ ๐ฅ๐ฒ๐ฎ๐ฐ๐๐ถ๐ผ๐ป๐ ๐๐ป๐ฑ ๐๐ฒ๐ฎ๐๐ต๐:
(Official Data)
COVID-19 vaccine AstraZeneca analysis print (as of 31/01/21) -
https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/960151/COVID-19_AstraZeneca_Vaccine_Analysis_Print.pdf
(Official Data)
COVID-19 mRNA Pfizer- BioNTech vaccine analysis print (as of 31/01/21) -
https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/962405/COVID-19_mRNA_Pfizer-_BioNTech_Vaccine_Analysis_Print.pdf
(Official Data)
UK Yellowcard Reporting Scheme -
https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/coronavirus-covid-19-vaccine-adverse-reactions/coronavirus-vaccine-summary-of-yellow-card-reporting
(Official Data)
VAERS US Reporting System (as of 12/02/21) -
https://cutt.ly/JzKyx3T
(Official Data)
CDC Covid-19 vaccine reactions and adverse events -
https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/covid-19/info-by-product/moderna/reactogenicity.html
(Peer-Reviewed Study)
(Informed consent disclosure to vaccine trial subjects of risk of COVID-19 vaccines worsening clinical disease) -
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33113270/
(Peer-Reviewed Study)
(Pathogenic priming likely contributes to serious and critical illness and mortality in COVID-19 via autoimmunity) -
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7142689/
(Video)
India 580 adverse reactions, 7 hospitalised and 2 deaths on day 3 of Covid-19 vaccine roll-out -
https://www.bitchute.com/video/F6A68ffcTWom/
(Video)
Doctors and health experts advising against having the Covid-19 vaccines -
https://www.bitchute.com/video/21d5Z6GIxeAj/
(Video)
Panel of doctors with the backing of 87,000+ doctors and nurses exposing the pandemic hoax -
https://www.bitchute.com/video/GrAmcLjZymKa/
(Video)
Doctors in Germany warning not to get the vaccine -
https://brandnewtube.com/watch/doctors-in-germany-warning-do-not-get-vaccinated_QaXxH1yZmmWe8wt.html
(Video)
Doctor Carrie Madej warning about the potential horrors of the experimental Covid-19 vaccines -
https://ourtube.co.uk/watch/NrdNL9ri9van4sS
(Video)
Molecular Biologist/Immunologist Professor Dolores Cahill warning of why people will potentially start dying enmasse due to having the Covid-19 vaccines -
https://ourtube.co.uk/watch/hh3xX37bWh5NFdT
(Video)
Woman suffering serious adverse reaction from Moderna Covid-19 Vaccine -
https://ourtube.co.uk/watch/BE4ZzloPXNKtb4J
(Video)
Woman suffering serious adverse reaction from Pfizer Covid-19 vaccine -
https://ourtube.co.uk/watch/TBlW18XZo6YU3sC
(Video)
Woman injured in the Covid-19 vaccine trials -
https://ourtube.co.uk/watch/BbftE8ZG6HGtIwZ
(Video)
Multiple people having adverse reactions to the Covid-19 vaccines -
https://ourtube.co.uk/watch/Budd
(News Article)
46 Residents in Spanish nursing home die after receiving Covid-19 vaccine -
https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/46-residents-in-spanish-nursing-home-die-after-receiving-covid-19-vaccine
(News Article)
23 Covid-19 vaccine deaths elderly residents of Norwegian care home -
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-9151341/Norway-adjusts-advice-vaccine-deaths-isnt-alarmed.html
(News Article)
"Pfizer Covid-19 vaccine is causing more allergic reactions than expected" - Top scientist with Operation Warp Speed -
https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/13572052/pfizer-covid-vaccine-allergic-reactions-study-more-expected/
(News Article)
CDC: Moderna's Covid-19 vaccine can cause allergic reaction in some people -
https://www.marketwatch.com/story/cdc-modernas-covid-19-vaccine-can-cause-allergic-reaction-in-some-people-2021-01-25?utm_source=zergnet.com&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=zergnet_6197094
(News Article)
Gibraltar 53 dead in 10 days after having Pfizer Covid-19 vaccine -
https://healthimpactnews.com/2021/53-dead-in-gibraltar-in-10-days-after-experimental-pfizer-mrna-covid-injections-started/print/
Page 1 of 2
(Official Data)
COVID-19 vaccine AstraZeneca analysis print (as of 31/01/21) -
https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/960151/COVID-19_AstraZeneca_Vaccine_Analysis_Print.pdf
(Official Data)
COVID-19 mRNA Pfizer- BioNTech vaccine analysis print (as of 31/01/21) -
https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/962405/COVID-19_mRNA_Pfizer-_BioNTech_Vaccine_Analysis_Print.pdf
(Official Data)
UK Yellowcard Reporting Scheme -
https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/coronavirus-covid-19-vaccine-adverse-reactions/coronavirus-vaccine-summary-of-yellow-card-reporting
(Official Data)
VAERS US Reporting System (as of 12/02/21) -
https://cutt.ly/JzKyx3T
(Official Data)
CDC Covid-19 vaccine reactions and adverse events -
https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/covid-19/info-by-product/moderna/reactogenicity.html
(Peer-Reviewed Study)
(Informed consent disclosure to vaccine trial subjects of risk of COVID-19 vaccines worsening clinical disease) -
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33113270/
(Peer-Reviewed Study)
(Pathogenic priming likely contributes to serious and critical illness and mortality in COVID-19 via autoimmunity) -
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7142689/
(Video)
India 580 adverse reactions, 7 hospitalised and 2 deaths on day 3 of Covid-19 vaccine roll-out -
https://www.bitchute.com/video/F6A68ffcTWom/
(Video)
Doctors and health experts advising against having the Covid-19 vaccines -
https://www.bitchute.com/video/21d5Z6GIxeAj/
(Video)
Panel of doctors with the backing of 87,000+ doctors and nurses exposing the pandemic hoax -
https://www.bitchute.com/video/GrAmcLjZymKa/
(Video)
Doctors in Germany warning not to get the vaccine -
https://brandnewtube.com/watch/doctors-in-germany-warning-do-not-get-vaccinated_QaXxH1yZmmWe8wt.html
(Video)
Doctor Carrie Madej warning about the potential horrors of the experimental Covid-19 vaccines -
https://ourtube.co.uk/watch/NrdNL9ri9van4sS
(Video)
Molecular Biologist/Immunologist Professor Dolores Cahill warning of why people will potentially start dying enmasse due to having the Covid-19 vaccines -
https://ourtube.co.uk/watch/hh3xX37bWh5NFdT
(Video)
Woman suffering serious adverse reaction from Moderna Covid-19 Vaccine -
https://ourtube.co.uk/watch/BE4ZzloPXNKtb4J
(Video)
Woman suffering serious adverse reaction from Pfizer Covid-19 vaccine -
https://ourtube.co.uk/watch/TBlW18XZo6YU3sC
(Video)
Woman injured in the Covid-19 vaccine trials -
https://ourtube.co.uk/watch/BbftE8ZG6HGtIwZ
(Video)
Multiple people having adverse reactions to the Covid-19 vaccines -
https://ourtube.co.uk/watch/Budd
(News Article)
46 Residents in Spanish nursing home die after receiving Covid-19 vaccine -
https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/46-residents-in-spanish-nursing-home-die-after-receiving-covid-19-vaccine
(News Article)
23 Covid-19 vaccine deaths elderly residents of Norwegian care home -
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-9151341/Norway-adjusts-advice-vaccine-deaths-isnt-alarmed.html
(News Article)
"Pfizer Covid-19 vaccine is causing more allergic reactions than expected" - Top scientist with Operation Warp Speed -
https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/13572052/pfizer-covid-vaccine-allergic-reactions-study-more-expected/
(News Article)
CDC: Moderna's Covid-19 vaccine can cause allergic reaction in some people -
https://www.marketwatch.com/story/cdc-modernas-covid-19-vaccine-can-cause-allergic-reaction-in-some-people-2021-01-25?utm_source=zergnet.com&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=zergnet_6197094
(News Article)
Gibraltar 53 dead in 10 days after having Pfizer Covid-19 vaccine -
https://healthimpactnews.com/2021/53-dead-in-gibraltar-in-10-days-after-experimental-pfizer-mrna-covid-injections-started/print/
Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2
(News Article)
Doctor in Florida dies after getting Pfizer Covid-19 vaccine - https://www.nytimes.com/2021/01/12/health/covid-vaccine-death.html
(News Article)
Healthcare worker dies after 2nd dose of Covid-19 Vaccine -
https://www.ocregister.com/2021/01/26/health-care-worker-dies-after-second-dose-of-covid-vaccine-investigations-underway/
(News Article)
Elderly man in Michigan dies after getting Moderna Covid-19 vaccine -
https://www.msn.com/en-us/health/medical/macomb-county-man-90-dies-after-covid-19-vaccine-e2-80-94-but-doctors-say-shots-are-safe/ar-BB1dNBfi
(News Article)
Elderly man collapses and dies shortly after getting Covid-19 vaccine at Javits Center NY -
https://nypost.com/2021/02/07/elderly-man-collapses-dies-shortly-after-getting-covid-19-vaccine-at-javits-center/
๐๐๐ผ๐น๐น๐ผ๐, ๐ฆ๐๐ฏ๐๐ฐ๐ฟ๐ถ๐ฏ๐ฒ๐๐ ๐ฎ๐ป๐ฑ ๐๐ป๐ถ๐๐ฒ:
https://t.me/Truth_Awakening_Channel
๐๐๐๐ง๐ ๐ฅ๐๐ค๐ฅ๐ก๐ ๐๐ค๐ข๐ ๐ฉ๐ค๐๐๐ฉ๐๐๐ง ๐ฉ๐ค ๐๐๐๐๐ฉ๐ ๐ฉ๐๐ ๐ง๐๐๐ก ๐ฉ๐ง๐ช๐ฉ๐.๐ค
(News Article)
Doctor in Florida dies after getting Pfizer Covid-19 vaccine - https://www.nytimes.com/2021/01/12/health/covid-vaccine-death.html
(News Article)
Healthcare worker dies after 2nd dose of Covid-19 Vaccine -
https://www.ocregister.com/2021/01/26/health-care-worker-dies-after-second-dose-of-covid-vaccine-investigations-underway/
(News Article)
Elderly man in Michigan dies after getting Moderna Covid-19 vaccine -
https://www.msn.com/en-us/health/medical/macomb-county-man-90-dies-after-covid-19-vaccine-e2-80-94-but-doctors-say-shots-are-safe/ar-BB1dNBfi
(News Article)
Elderly man collapses and dies shortly after getting Covid-19 vaccine at Javits Center NY -
https://nypost.com/2021/02/07/elderly-man-collapses-dies-shortly-after-getting-covid-19-vaccine-at-javits-center/
๐๐๐ผ๐น๐น๐ผ๐, ๐ฆ๐๐ฏ๐๐ฐ๐ฟ๐ถ๐ฏ๐ฒ๐๐ ๐ฎ๐ป๐ฑ ๐๐ป๐ถ๐๐ฒ:
https://t.me/Truth_Awakening_Channel
๐๐๐๐ง๐ ๐ฅ๐๐ค๐ฅ๐ก๐ ๐๐ค๐ข๐ ๐ฉ๐ค๐๐๐ฉ๐๐๐ง ๐ฉ๐ค ๐๐๐๐๐ฉ๐ ๐ฉ๐๐ ๐ง๐๐๐ก ๐ฉ๐ง๐ช๐ฉ๐.๐ค
NY Times
Doctorโs Death After Covid Vaccine Is Being Investigated (Published 2021)
A Florida physician developed an unusual blood disorder shortly after he received the Pfizer vaccine. It is not yet known if the shot is linked to the illness.
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
๐ง๐ต๐ฒ ๐๐๐ถ๐น ๐ผ๐ณ ๐๐ฎ๐๐ฒ๐ ๐ฎ๐ป๐ฑ ๐๐ฝ๐๐๐ฒ๐ถ๐ป...
๐๐๐ผ๐น๐น๐ผ๐, ๐ฆ๐๐ฏ๐๐ฐ๐ฟ๐ถ๐ฏ๐ฒ๐๐ ๐ฎ๐ป๐ฑ ๐๐ป๐ถ๐๐ฒ:
https://t.me/Truth_Awakening_Channel
๐๐๐๐ง๐ ๐ฅ๐๐ค๐ฅ๐ก๐ ๐๐ค๐ข๐ ๐ฉ๐ค๐๐๐ฉ๐๐๐ง ๐ฉ๐ค ๐๐๐๐๐ฉ๐ ๐ฉ๐๐ ๐ง๐๐๐ก ๐ฉ๐ง๐ช๐ฉ๐.๐ค
๐๐๐ผ๐น๐น๐ผ๐, ๐ฆ๐๐ฏ๐๐ฐ๐ฟ๐ถ๐ฏ๐ฒ๐๐ ๐ฎ๐ป๐ฑ ๐๐ป๐ถ๐๐ฒ:
https://t.me/Truth_Awakening_Channel
๐๐๐๐ง๐ ๐ฅ๐๐ค๐ฅ๐ก๐ ๐๐ค๐ข๐ ๐ฉ๐ค๐๐๐ฉ๐๐๐ง ๐ฉ๐ค ๐๐๐๐๐ฉ๐ ๐ฉ๐๐ ๐ง๐๐๐ก ๐ฉ๐ง๐ช๐ฉ๐.๐ค
๐จ๐ฆ๐ ๐ก๐๐ช๐ฆ - ๐ฃ๐ฟ๐ฒ๐๐ถ๐ฑ๐ฒ๐ป๐ ๐๐ผ๐ป๐ฎ๐น๐ฑ ๐ง๐ฟ๐๐บ๐ฝโ๐ ๐ฑ๐ฒ๐ฝ๐ฎ๐ฟ๐๐๐ฟ๐ฒ ๐ณ๐ฟ๐ผ๐บ ๐๐ต๐ฒ ๐ช๐ต๐ถ๐๐ฒ ๐๐ผ๐๐๐ฒ ๐ต๐ฎ๐ ๐ฐ๐ผ๐ถ๐ป๐ฐ๐ถ๐ฑ๐ฒ๐ฑ ๐๐ถ๐๐ต ๐ฎ ๐๐ต๐ฎ๐ฟ๐ฝ ๐ฑ๐ฒ๐ฐ๐น๐ถ๐ป๐ฒ ๐ถ๐ป ๐๐ถ๐ฒ๐๐ฒ๐ฟ๐๐ต๐ถ๐ฝ ๐ณ๐ผ๐ฟ ๐ป๐๐บ๐ฒ๐ฟ๐ผ๐๐ ๐ฝ๐ฟ๐ถ๐บ๐ฒ๐๐ถ๐บ๐ฒ ๐ฐ๐ฎ๐ฏ๐น๐ฒ ๐ป๐ฒ๐๐ ๐๐ต๐ผ๐๐, ๐ฎ ๐ฉ๐๐ฃ ๐ฎ๐ป๐ฎ๐น๐๐๐ถ๐ ๐๐ต๐ผ๐๐ฒ๐ฑ.
The size of the audience watching โCNN Tonight With Don Lemonโ between March 1-5 was down by -32.5% compared to the average audience between Nov. 30-Dec. 4, 2020, before President Joe Bidenโs inauguration and Trumpโs impeachment trial, VIP showed in its analysis.
๐ ๐ฅ๐๐๐ ๐ ๐ข๐ฅ๐: ๐๐ฎ๐ถ๐น๐ ๐๐ฎ๐น๐น๐ฒ๐ฟ
๐๐๐ผ๐น๐น๐ผ๐, ๐ฆ๐๐ฏ๐๐ฐ๐ฟ๐ถ๐ฏ๐ฒ๐๐ ๐ฎ๐ป๐ฑ ๐๐ป๐ถ๐๐ฒ:
@Truth_Awakening_Channel
๐๐๐๐ง๐ ๐ฅ๐๐ค๐ฅ๐ก๐ ๐๐ค๐ข๐ ๐ฉ๐ค๐๐๐ฉ๐๐๐ง ๐ฉ๐ค ๐๐๐๐๐ฉ๐ ๐ฉ๐๐ ๐ง๐๐๐ก ๐ฉ๐ง๐ช๐ฉ๐.๐ค
The size of the audience watching โCNN Tonight With Don Lemonโ between March 1-5 was down by -32.5% compared to the average audience between Nov. 30-Dec. 4, 2020, before President Joe Bidenโs inauguration and Trumpโs impeachment trial, VIP showed in its analysis.
๐ ๐ฅ๐๐๐ ๐ ๐ข๐ฅ๐: ๐๐ฎ๐ถ๐น๐ ๐๐ฎ๐น๐น๐ฒ๐ฟ
๐๐๐ผ๐น๐น๐ผ๐, ๐ฆ๐๐ฏ๐๐ฐ๐ฟ๐ถ๐ฏ๐ฒ๐๐ ๐ฎ๐ป๐ฑ ๐๐ป๐ถ๐๐ฒ:
@Truth_Awakening_Channel
๐๐๐๐ง๐ ๐ฅ๐๐ค๐ฅ๐ก๐ ๐๐ค๐ข๐ ๐ฉ๐ค๐๐๐ฉ๐๐๐ง ๐ฉ๐ค ๐๐๐๐๐ฉ๐ ๐ฉ๐๐ ๐ง๐๐๐ก ๐ฉ๐ง๐ช๐ฉ๐.๐ค
The Daily Caller
The Numbers Are In: Trumpโs Exit From The World Stage Led To A Network Ratings Bloodletting
Former President Donald Trumpโs departure from the White House has coincided with sharp audience decreases for numerous prime time cable news shows.
๐๐ข๐ ๐๐ฐ๐ฐ๐ฒ๐ฝ๐๐ ๐๐๐ฃโ๐ ๐ข๐ณ๐ณ๐ฒ๐ฟ ๐ผ๐ณ ๐๐ต๐ถ๐ป๐ฎ-๐ ๐ฎ๐ฑ๐ฒ ๐ฉ๐ฎ๐ฐ๐ฐ๐ถ๐ป๐ฒ๐, ๐ง๐ฒ๐ฎ๐บ ๐๐ฎ๐ฝ๐ฎ๐ป ๐ช๐ผ๐ปโ๐ ๐ง๐ฎ๐ธ๐ฒ ๐ง๐ต๐ฒ๐บ
๐๐ฌ ๐๐๐๐ซ ๐ช๐จ
๐ ๐ฎ๐ฟ๐ฐ๐ต ๐ญ๐ฐ, ๐ฎ๐ฌ๐ฎ๐ญ
President of the International Olympic Committee (IOC) Thomas Bach announced on March 11 that the IOC has agreed to purchase Chinaโs COVID-19 vaccine to administer to willing participants of the Tokyo Olympics this summer and the Beijing Winter Olympics in 2022.
The Japanese Olympic Committee said Japan was not consulted regarding the decision by the IOC and later announced that Team Japan will not be taking the China-made vaccines. The vaccine is not approved for use in Japan.
Two Olympic events will be held in the next eight monthsโthe postponed Tokyo Games and the 2022 Beijing Winter Games. The IOC has said it will pay for Chinese vaccines for the teams participating in the Olympic games but didnโt give any information regarding the cost or quantity. Bach also said that distribution of China vaccine will be through international agencies or existing vaccine agreements that countries have with China, according to The Associated Press.
There are about 11,000 athletes participating in the Summer Olympics not counting their coaches, media, volunteers, and officials. Bach said that the Chinese Olympic Committee had promised it would provide as many vaccines as needed.
The Chinese regime made the vaccine offer to the IOC amidst internationals call for boycotting the Beijing Winter Olympics in light of its genocidal campaign against Uyghurs and other minorities in Chinaโs Xinjiang. Alongside the United States designating the persecution of Uyghurs as genocide by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), more than 100 international human rights organizations and many politicians in the Western countries have called on countries around the world to boycott the Beijing Winter Olympics.
China has been actively pushing efforts of vaccine diplomacy using doses made by Chinese companies Sinovac and Sinopharm. A government spokesman said early this month during the regimeโs annual โtwo sessionsโ national government meetings that China has already provided COVID-19 vaccines to more than 60 countries.
๐๐ฅ๐๐๐ ๐ ๐ข๐ฅ๐: ๐๐ฝ๐ผ๐ฐ๐ต ๐ง๐ถ๐บ๐ฒ๐
๐๐๐ผ๐น๐น๐ผ๐, ๐ฆ๐๐ฏ๐๐ฐ๐ฟ๐ถ๐ฏ๐ฒ๐๐ ๐ฎ๐ป๐ฑ ๐๐ป๐ถ๐๐ฒ:
@Truth_Awakening_Channel
๐๐๐๐ง๐ ๐ฅ๐๐ค๐ฅ๐ก๐ ๐๐ค๐ข๐ ๐ฉ๐ค๐๐๐ฉ๐๐๐ง ๐ฉ๐ค ๐๐๐๐๐ฉ๐ ๐ฉ๐๐ ๐ง๐๐๐ก ๐ฉ๐ง๐ช๐ฉ๐.๐ค
๐๐ฌ ๐๐๐๐ซ ๐ช๐จ
๐ ๐ฎ๐ฟ๐ฐ๐ต ๐ญ๐ฐ, ๐ฎ๐ฌ๐ฎ๐ญ
President of the International Olympic Committee (IOC) Thomas Bach announced on March 11 that the IOC has agreed to purchase Chinaโs COVID-19 vaccine to administer to willing participants of the Tokyo Olympics this summer and the Beijing Winter Olympics in 2022.
The Japanese Olympic Committee said Japan was not consulted regarding the decision by the IOC and later announced that Team Japan will not be taking the China-made vaccines. The vaccine is not approved for use in Japan.
Two Olympic events will be held in the next eight monthsโthe postponed Tokyo Games and the 2022 Beijing Winter Games. The IOC has said it will pay for Chinese vaccines for the teams participating in the Olympic games but didnโt give any information regarding the cost or quantity. Bach also said that distribution of China vaccine will be through international agencies or existing vaccine agreements that countries have with China, according to The Associated Press.
There are about 11,000 athletes participating in the Summer Olympics not counting their coaches, media, volunteers, and officials. Bach said that the Chinese Olympic Committee had promised it would provide as many vaccines as needed.
The Chinese regime made the vaccine offer to the IOC amidst internationals call for boycotting the Beijing Winter Olympics in light of its genocidal campaign against Uyghurs and other minorities in Chinaโs Xinjiang. Alongside the United States designating the persecution of Uyghurs as genocide by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), more than 100 international human rights organizations and many politicians in the Western countries have called on countries around the world to boycott the Beijing Winter Olympics.
China has been actively pushing efforts of vaccine diplomacy using doses made by Chinese companies Sinovac and Sinopharm. A government spokesman said early this month during the regimeโs annual โtwo sessionsโ national government meetings that China has already provided COVID-19 vaccines to more than 60 countries.
๐๐ฅ๐๐๐ ๐ ๐ข๐ฅ๐: ๐๐ฝ๐ผ๐ฐ๐ต ๐ง๐ถ๐บ๐ฒ๐
๐๐๐ผ๐น๐น๐ผ๐, ๐ฆ๐๐ฏ๐๐ฐ๐ฟ๐ถ๐ฏ๐ฒ๐๐ ๐ฎ๐ป๐ฑ ๐๐ป๐ถ๐๐ฒ:
@Truth_Awakening_Channel
๐๐๐๐ง๐ ๐ฅ๐๐ค๐ฅ๐ก๐ ๐๐ค๐ข๐ ๐ฉ๐ค๐๐๐ฉ๐๐๐ง ๐ฉ๐ค ๐๐๐๐๐ฉ๐ ๐ฉ๐๐ ๐ง๐๐๐ก ๐ฉ๐ง๐ช๐ฉ๐.๐ค
The Epoch Times
IOC Accepts CCPโs Offer of China-Made Vaccines, Team Japan Wonโt Take Them
President of the International Olympic Committee (IOC) Thomas Bach announced on March 11 that the IOC has agreed ...
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
๐ฌ๐ง ๐ญ๐ฐ/๐ฌ๐ฏ/๐ฎ๐ฌ๐ฎ๐ญ - ๐๐ฟ๐ฟ๐ฒ๐๐๐ ๐๐ผ๐ฑ๐ฎ๐ ๐ถ๐ป ๐๐ป๐ด๐น๐ฎ๐ป๐ฑ'๐ ๐๐ฒ๐ฐ๐ผ๐ป๐ฑ ๐น๐ฎ๐ฟ๐ด๐ฒ๐๐ ๐ฐ๐ถ๐๐ ๐๐ถ๐ฟ๐บ๐ถ๐ป๐ด๐ต๐ฎ๐บ ๐ฎ๐ ๐น๐ผ๐ฐ๐ฎ๐น๐ ๐ฝ๐ฟ๐ผ๐๐ฒ๐๐๐ฒ๐ฑ ๐ฎ๐ด๐ฎ๐ถ๐ป๐๐ ๐๐ต๐ฒ ๐ฑ๐ฟ๐ฎ๐ฐ๐ผ๐ป๐ถ๐ฎ๐ป ๐๐ผ๐ฟ๐ผ๐ป๐ฎ๐๐ถ๐ฟ๐๐ ๐น๐ผ๐ฐ๐ธ๐ฑ๐ผ๐๐ป ๐บ๐ฒ๐ฎ๐๐๐ฟ๐ฒ๐ ๐ฏ๐ฒ๐ถ๐ป๐ด ๐ถ๐บ๐ฝ๐น๐ฒ๐บ๐ฒ๐ป๐๐ฒ๐ฑ ๐ฏ๐ ๐๐ต๐ฒ ๐ช๐ผ๐ฟ๐น๐ฑ ๐๐ฐ๐ผ๐ป๐ผ๐บ๐ถ๐ฐ ๐๐ผ๐ฟ๐๐บ (๐ผ๐ฝ๐ฝ๐!! ๐๐ถ๐ฑ ๐ ๐๐ฎ๐ ๐๐ต๐ฎ๐ ๐ผ๐๐ ๐น๐ผ๐๐ฑ?
March 20TH, many countries are uniting in protest against these murderous authoritarianism enforcing governments.
๐๐๐ผ๐น๐น๐ผ๐, ๐ฆ๐๐ฏ๐๐ฐ๐ฟ๐ถ๐ฏ๐ฒ๐๐ ๐ฎ๐ป๐ฑ ๐๐ป๐ถ๐๐ฒ:
https://t.me/Truth_Awakening_Channel
๐๐๐๐ง๐ ๐ฅ๐๐ค๐ฅ๐ก๐ ๐๐ค๐ข๐ ๐ฉ๐ค๐๐๐ฉ๐๐๐ง ๐ฉ๐ค ๐๐๐๐๐ฉ๐ ๐ฉ๐๐ ๐ง๐๐๐ก ๐ฉ๐ง๐ช๐ฉ๐.๐ค
March 20TH, many countries are uniting in protest against these murderous authoritarianism enforcing governments.
๐๐๐ผ๐น๐น๐ผ๐, ๐ฆ๐๐ฏ๐๐ฐ๐ฟ๐ถ๐ฏ๐ฒ๐๐ ๐ฎ๐ป๐ฑ ๐๐ป๐ถ๐๐ฒ:
https://t.me/Truth_Awakening_Channel
๐๐๐๐ง๐ ๐ฅ๐๐ค๐ฅ๐ก๐ ๐๐ค๐ข๐ ๐ฉ๐ค๐๐๐ฉ๐๐๐ง ๐ฉ๐ค ๐๐๐๐๐ฉ๐ ๐ฉ๐๐ ๐ง๐๐๐ก ๐ฉ๐ง๐ช๐ฉ๐.๐ค
๐ ๐จ๐ฝ๐ฑ๐ฎ๐๐ฒ ๐ผ๐ป ๐๐ต๐ฒ ๐ฐ๐ผ๐๐ป๐๐ฟ๐ถ๐ฒ๐ ๐๐ต๐ฎ๐ ๐ต๐ฎ๐๐ฒ ๐ฏ๐ฎ๐ป๐ป๐ฒ๐ฑ ๐ซ ๐๐ฆ๐ง๐ฅ๐๐ญ๐๐ก๐๐๐ ๐ ! ๐๐ฟ๐ฒ๐น๐ฎ๐ป๐ฑ ๐ต๐ฎ๐ ๐ฎ๐น๐๐ผ ๐ฏ๐ฒ๐ฒ๐ป ๐ฎ๐ฑ๐ฑ๐ฒ๐ฑ ๐๐ผ ๐๐ต๐ฒ ๐น๐ถ๐๐:
๐๐๐ผ๐น๐น๐ผ๐, ๐ฆ๐๐ฏ๐๐ฐ๐ฟ๐ถ๐ฏ๐ฒ๐๐ ๐ฎ๐ป๐ฑ ๐๐ป๐ถ๐๐ฒ:
https://t.me/Truth_Awakening_Channel
๐๐๐๐ง๐ ๐ฅ๐๐ค๐ฅ๐ก๐ ๐๐ค๐ข๐ ๐ฉ๐ค๐๐๐ฉ๐๐๐ง ๐ฉ๐ค ๐๐๐๐๐ฉ๐ ๐ฉ๐๐ ๐ง๐๐๐ก ๐ฉ๐ง๐ช๐ฉ๐.๐ค
๐๐๐ผ๐น๐น๐ผ๐, ๐ฆ๐๐ฏ๐๐ฐ๐ฟ๐ถ๐ฏ๐ฒ๐๐ ๐ฎ๐ป๐ฑ ๐๐ป๐ถ๐๐ฒ:
https://t.me/Truth_Awakening_Channel
๐๐๐๐ง๐ ๐ฅ๐๐ค๐ฅ๐ก๐ ๐๐ค๐ข๐ ๐ฉ๐ค๐๐๐ฉ๐๐๐ง ๐ฉ๐ค ๐๐๐๐๐ฉ๐ ๐ฉ๐๐ ๐ง๐๐๐ก ๐ฉ๐ง๐ช๐ฉ๐.๐ค
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
๐บ๐ฒ ๐ ๐ฎ๐ฟ๐ถ๐ฎ๐ป๐ป๐ฒ ๐ช๐ฒ๐ฏ๐๐๐ฒ๐ฟ ๐๐ถ๐ฐ๐๐ถ๐ผ๐ป๐ฎ๐ฟ๐ ๐ถ๐ ๐ฐ๐ต๐ฎ๐ป๐ด๐ถ๐ป๐ด ๐ฑ๐ฒ๐ณ๐ถ๐ป๐ถ๐๐ถ๐ผ๐ป๐ ๐๐ผ ๐ณ๐ถ๐ ๐๐ต๐ฒ ๐น๐ฒ๐ณ๐ ๐ป๐ฎ๐ฟ๐ฟ๐ฎ๐๐ถ๐๐ฒ... ๐ฒ๐ฟ๐ฟ ๐ฒ๐ฟ๐ฟ?
๐ฆ๐๐ฅ๐๐ ๐๐ข๐ฅ๐ฅ๐๐๐๐ฅ (๐ญ๐ฐ ๐ ๐๐ฅ ๐ฎ๐ฌ๐ฎ๐ญ) "๐๐ถ๐ฐ๐๐ถ๐ผ๐ป๐ฎ๐ฟ๐ ๐ฅ๐ฒ-๐ฑ๐ฒ๐ณ๐ถ๐ป๐ฒ๐
๐๐๐ผ๐น๐น๐ผ๐, ๐ฆ๐๐ฏ๐๐ฐ๐ฟ๐ถ๐ฏ๐ฒ๐๐ ๐ฎ๐ป๐ฑ ๐๐ป๐ถ๐๐ฒ:
https://t.me/Truth_Awakening_Channel
๐๐๐๐ง๐ ๐ฅ๐๐ค๐ฅ๐ก๐ ๐๐ค๐ข๐ ๐ฉ๐ค๐๐๐ฉ๐๐๐ง ๐ฉ๐ค ๐๐๐๐๐ฉ๐ ๐ฉ๐๐ ๐ง๐๐๐ก ๐ฉ๐ง๐ช๐ฉ๐.๐ค ๐ฉ๐ฎ๐ฐ๐ฐ๐ถ๐ป๐ฒ ๐ช๐ฟ๐ผ๐ป๐ด-๐๐ต๐ถ๐ป๐ธ"
๐ฆ๐๐ฅ๐๐ ๐๐ข๐ฅ๐ฅ๐๐๐๐ฅ (๐ญ๐ฐ ๐ ๐๐ฅ ๐ฎ๐ฌ๐ฎ๐ญ) "๐๐ถ๐ฐ๐๐ถ๐ผ๐ป๐ฎ๐ฟ๐ ๐ฅ๐ฒ-๐ฑ๐ฒ๐ณ๐ถ๐ป๐ฒ๐
๐๐๐ผ๐น๐น๐ผ๐, ๐ฆ๐๐ฏ๐๐ฐ๐ฟ๐ถ๐ฏ๐ฒ๐๐ ๐ฎ๐ป๐ฑ ๐๐ป๐ถ๐๐ฒ:
https://t.me/Truth_Awakening_Channel
๐๐๐๐ง๐ ๐ฅ๐๐ค๐ฅ๐ก๐ ๐๐ค๐ข๐ ๐ฉ๐ค๐๐๐ฉ๐๐๐ง ๐ฉ๐ค ๐๐๐๐๐ฉ๐ ๐ฉ๐๐ ๐ง๐๐๐ก ๐ฉ๐ง๐ช๐ฉ๐.๐ค ๐ฉ๐ฎ๐ฐ๐ฐ๐ถ๐ป๐ฒ ๐ช๐ฟ๐ผ๐ป๐ด-๐๐ต๐ถ๐ป๐ธ"
๐ท๐บ ๐ฃ๐๐๐ถ๐ป ๐ฎ๐ป๐ป๐ผ๐๐ป๐ฐ๐ฒ๐:
๐ถ๐'๐ ๐ผ๐๐ฒ๐ฟ!
๐ ๐ง๐ต๐ฒ ๐ฏ๐ฟ๐ถ๐ฐ๐ธ๐น๐ฎ๐๐ฒ๐ฟ๐ ๐ณ๐ฎ๐ถ๐น๐ฒ๐ฑ!
๐ง๐ต๐ฒ ๐ป๐ฒ๐ ๐๐ผ๐ฟ๐น๐ฑ ๐ผ๐ฟ๐ฑ๐ฒ๐ฟ ๐ต๐ฎ๐ ๐ณ๐ฎ๐ถ๐น๐ฒ๐ฑ!
๐ฅ๐๐๐๐ถ๐ฎ๐ป ๐ฃ๐ฟ๐ฒ๐๐ถ๐ฑ๐ฒ๐ป๐ ๐ฉ๐น๐ฎ๐ฑ๐ถ๐บ๐ถ๐ฟ ๐ฃ๐๐๐ถ๐ป announced on Russian television that the New World Order had collapsed, arguing that the world was now the final contraction after the death of the elite regime. Putin told the Russian broadcaster NTV that the new global world order had failed because people around the world had awakened who had realized the insidious truth about the plans of the elite.
๐๐๐ผ๐น๐น๐ผ๐, ๐ฆ๐๐ฏ๐๐ฐ๐ฟ๐ถ๐ฏ๐ฒ๐๐ ๐ฎ๐ป๐ฑ ๐๐ป๐ถ๐๐ฒ:
https://t.me/Truth_Awakening_Channel
๐๐๐๐ง๐ ๐ฅ๐๐ค๐ฅ๐ก๐ ๐๐ค๐ข๐ ๐ฉ๐ค๐๐๐ฉ๐๐๐ง ๐ฉ๐ค ๐๐๐๐๐ฉ๐ ๐ฉ๐๐ ๐ง๐๐๐ก ๐ฉ๐ง๐ช๐ฉ๐.๐ค
๐ถ๐'๐ ๐ผ๐๐ฒ๐ฟ!
๐ ๐ง๐ต๐ฒ ๐ฏ๐ฟ๐ถ๐ฐ๐ธ๐น๐ฎ๐๐ฒ๐ฟ๐ ๐ณ๐ฎ๐ถ๐น๐ฒ๐ฑ!
๐ง๐ต๐ฒ ๐ป๐ฒ๐ ๐๐ผ๐ฟ๐น๐ฑ ๐ผ๐ฟ๐ฑ๐ฒ๐ฟ ๐ต๐ฎ๐ ๐ณ๐ฎ๐ถ๐น๐ฒ๐ฑ!
๐ฅ๐๐๐๐ถ๐ฎ๐ป ๐ฃ๐ฟ๐ฒ๐๐ถ๐ฑ๐ฒ๐ป๐ ๐ฉ๐น๐ฎ๐ฑ๐ถ๐บ๐ถ๐ฟ ๐ฃ๐๐๐ถ๐ป announced on Russian television that the New World Order had collapsed, arguing that the world was now the final contraction after the death of the elite regime. Putin told the Russian broadcaster NTV that the new global world order had failed because people around the world had awakened who had realized the insidious truth about the plans of the elite.
๐๐๐ผ๐น๐น๐ผ๐, ๐ฆ๐๐ฏ๐๐ฐ๐ฟ๐ถ๐ฏ๐ฒ๐๐ ๐ฎ๐ป๐ฑ ๐๐ป๐ถ๐๐ฒ:
https://t.me/Truth_Awakening_Channel
๐๐๐๐ง๐ ๐ฅ๐๐ค๐ฅ๐ก๐ ๐๐ค๐ข๐ ๐ฉ๐ค๐๐๐ฉ๐๐๐ง ๐ฉ๐ค ๐๐๐๐๐ฉ๐ ๐ฉ๐๐ ๐ง๐๐๐ก ๐ฉ๐ง๐ช๐ฉ๐.๐ค
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
โญ๐๐ถ๐๐๐ฒ๐ป ๐๐ผ ๐๐ต๐ถ๐ ๐๐ต๐ฎ๐ฟ๐ฝ ๐น๐ฎ๐ฑ๐:
๐๐ฟ ๐๐ป๐ป๐ฒ ๐ ๐ฐ๐๐น๐ผ๐๐ธ๐ฒ๐โญ
๐๐๐ฏ๐ผ๐๐: ๐๐ฟ ๐๐ป๐ป๐ฒ ๐ ๐ฐ๐๐น๐ผ๐๐ธ๐ฒ๐
๐๐๐ผ๐น๐น๐ผ๐, ๐ฆ๐๐ฏ๐๐ฐ๐ฟ๐ถ๐ฏ๐ฒ๐๐ ๐ฎ๐ป๐ฑ ๐๐ป๐ถ๐๐ฒ:
https://t.me/Truth_Awakening_Channel
๐๐๐๐ง๐ ๐ฅ๐๐ค๐ฅ๐ก๐ ๐๐ค๐ข๐ ๐ฉ๐ค๐๐๐ฉ๐๐๐ง ๐ฉ๐ค ๐๐๐๐๐ฉ๐ ๐ฉ๐๐ ๐ง๐๐๐ก ๐ฉ๐ง๐ช๐ฉ๐.๐ค
๐๐ฟ ๐๐ป๐ป๐ฒ ๐ ๐ฐ๐๐น๐ผ๐๐ธ๐ฒ๐โญ
๐๐๐ฏ๐ผ๐๐: ๐๐ฟ ๐๐ป๐ป๐ฒ ๐ ๐ฐ๐๐น๐ผ๐๐ธ๐ฒ๐
๐๐๐ผ๐น๐น๐ผ๐, ๐ฆ๐๐ฏ๐๐ฐ๐ฟ๐ถ๐ฏ๐ฒ๐๐ ๐ฎ๐ป๐ฑ ๐๐ป๐ถ๐๐ฒ:
https://t.me/Truth_Awakening_Channel
๐๐๐๐ง๐ ๐ฅ๐๐ค๐ฅ๐ก๐ ๐๐ค๐ข๐ ๐ฉ๐ค๐๐๐ฉ๐๐๐ง ๐ฉ๐ค ๐๐๐๐๐ฉ๐ ๐ฉ๐๐ ๐ง๐๐๐ก ๐ฉ๐ง๐ช๐ฉ๐.๐ค
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
๐ง๐ต๐ฒ ๐ง๐ฟ๐๐๐ต ๐๐ฏ๐ผ๐๐ ๐ฉ๐ฎ๐ฐ๐ฐ๐ถ๐ป๐ฒ๐ ๐๐ผ๐ฐ๐-๐๐ฒ๐ฟ๐ถ๐ฒ๐ - ๐๐ฝ๐ถ๐๐ผ๐ฑ๐ฒ ๐ฎ - ๐ช๐ต๐ฎ๐โ๐ ๐ถ๐ป ๐ฎ ๐ฉ๐ฎ๐ฐ๐ฐ๐ถ๐ป๐ฒ? ๐๐ฟ๐ฒ ๐ฉ๐ฎ๐ฐ๐ฐ๐ถ๐ป๐ฒ๐ ๐ฒ๐ณ๐ณ๐ฒ๐ฐ๐๐ถ๐๐ฒ; ๐ช๐ต๐ฎ๐ ๐ฎ๐ฏ๐ผ๐๐ ๐ฃ๐ผ๐น๐ถ๐ผ?
๐๐ฉ๐ถ๐ฒ๐ ๐บ๐ผ๐ฟ๐ฒ: ๐ถ๐ฏ๐ฟ๐ ๐ง๐ฉ
๐๐๐ผ๐น๐น๐ผ๐, ๐ฆ๐๐ฏ๐๐ฐ๐ฟ๐ถ๐ฏ๐ฒ๐๐ ๐ฎ๐ป๐ฑ ๐๐ป๐ถ๐๐ฒ:
https://t.me/Truth_Awakening_Channel
๐๐๐๐ง๐ ๐ฅ๐๐ค๐ฅ๐ก๐ ๐๐ค๐ข๐ ๐ฉ๐ค๐๐๐ฉ๐๐๐ง ๐ฉ๐ค ๐๐๐๐๐ฉ๐ ๐ฉ๐๐ ๐ง๐๐๐ก ๐ฉ๐ง๐ช๐ฉ๐.๐ค
๐๐ฉ๐ถ๐ฒ๐ ๐บ๐ผ๐ฟ๐ฒ: ๐ถ๐ฏ๐ฟ๐ ๐ง๐ฉ
๐๐๐ผ๐น๐น๐ผ๐, ๐ฆ๐๐ฏ๐๐ฐ๐ฟ๐ถ๐ฏ๐ฒ๐๐ ๐ฎ๐ป๐ฑ ๐๐ป๐ถ๐๐ฒ:
https://t.me/Truth_Awakening_Channel
๐๐๐๐ง๐ ๐ฅ๐๐ค๐ฅ๐ก๐ ๐๐ค๐ข๐ ๐ฉ๐ค๐๐๐ฉ๐๐๐ง ๐ฉ๐ค ๐๐๐๐๐ฉ๐ ๐ฉ๐๐ ๐ง๐๐๐ก ๐ฉ๐ง๐ช๐ฉ๐.๐ค
๐๐๐ผ๐น๐น๐ผ๐, ๐ฆ๐๐ฏ๐๐ฐ๐ฟ๐ถ๐ฏ๐ฒ๐๐ ๐๐ป๐ถ๐๐ฒ ๐ฎ๐ป๐ฑ ๐ฑ๐ผ๐ป'๐ ๐ณ๐ผ๐ฟ๐ด๐ฒ๐ ๐๐ผ ๐๐ต๐ฎ๐ฟ๐ฒ ๐๐ต๐ฒ ๐ธ๐ป๐ผ๐๐น๐ฒ๐ฑ๐ด๐ฒ ๐ฅฐ๐
https://t.me/Truth_Awakening_Channel
๐๐๐๐ง๐ ๐ฅ๐๐ค๐ฅ๐ก๐ ๐๐ค๐ข๐ ๐ฉ๐ค๐๐๐ฉ๐๐๐ง ๐ฉ๐ค ๐๐๐๐๐ฉ๐ ๐ฉ๐๐ ๐ง๐๐๐ก ๐ฉ๐ง๐ช๐ฉ๐.๐ค
https://t.me/Truth_Awakening_Channel
๐๐๐๐ง๐ ๐ฅ๐๐ค๐ฅ๐ก๐ ๐๐ค๐ข๐ ๐ฉ๐ค๐๐๐ฉ๐๐๐ง ๐ฉ๐ค ๐๐๐๐๐ฉ๐ ๐ฉ๐๐ ๐ง๐๐๐ก ๐ฉ๐ง๐ช๐ฉ๐.๐ค
Telegram
๐๐ก๐ ๐๐ซ๐๐๐ซ ๐๐ ๐๐ก๐ ๐๐ง๐ซ๐ฎ๐ฅ๐๐
The order Of The Unruled/Ascendents is a collective of living souls driven by conscience who believe in our inherent rights.
Rights that supersede all other jurisdictions.
Y A S H U A Wins.
Bho Stoc Math
Rights that supersede all other jurisdictions.
Y A S H U A Wins.
Bho Stoc Math
๐ง๐ต๐ฒ ๐๐ข๐ ๐ ๐๐ง๐ง๐๐ ๐ข๐ ๐ฏ๐ฌ๐ฌ โ ๐ช๐ต๐ผ ๐ฎ๐ฟ๐ฒ ๐๐ต๐ฒ๐?
๐๐ฅ๐๐๐ ๐ ๐ข๐ฅ๐:
The Committee of 300 is a product of the British East India Companyโs Council of 300. The East India Company was chartered by the British royal family in 1600. It made vast fortunes in the opium drug trade with China and became the largest company on earth in its time.
Today, through many powerful alliances, the Committee of 300 rules the world and is the driving force behind the criminal agenda to create a โNew World Orderโ, under a โTotalitarian Global Governmentโ.
There is no need to use โtheyโ or โthe enemyโ except as shorthand. We know who โtheyโ, the enemy, is. The Committee of 300 with its โaristocracyโ, its ownership of the U.S. Federal Reserve banking system, insurance companies, giant corporations, foundations, communications networks, presided over by a hierarchy of conspirators ~ this is the enemy.
Secret societies exist by deception.
Each is a hierarchy with an inner circle at the top,..
Page 1 of 16
๐๐ฅ๐๐๐ ๐ ๐ข๐ฅ๐:
The Committee of 300 is a product of the British East India Companyโs Council of 300. The East India Company was chartered by the British royal family in 1600. It made vast fortunes in the opium drug trade with China and became the largest company on earth in its time.
Today, through many powerful alliances, the Committee of 300 rules the world and is the driving force behind the criminal agenda to create a โNew World Orderโ, under a โTotalitarian Global Governmentโ.
There is no need to use โtheyโ or โthe enemyโ except as shorthand. We know who โtheyโ, the enemy, is. The Committee of 300 with its โaristocracyโ, its ownership of the U.S. Federal Reserve banking system, insurance companies, giant corporations, foundations, communications networks, presided over by a hierarchy of conspirators ~ this is the enemy.
Secret societies exist by deception.
Each is a hierarchy with an inner circle at the top,..
Page 1 of 16