Forwarded from PatriotAU️️️
Colorado Appeals Court Denies Tina Peters Bond — 70-Year-Old Gold Star Mother to Remain in Prison
Read
Read
The Gateway Pundit
Colorado Appeals Court Denies Tina Peters Bond — 70-Year-Old Gold Star Mother to Remain in Prison | The Gateway Pundit | by Brian…
Last month, the Colorado Court of Appeals heard the appeal of 70-year-old former Mesa County Clerk Tina Peters. Peters is serving over 9 years following her August 2024 conviction at La Vista Correctional Facility in Pueblo, Colorado. Peters…
🤬12
Forwarded from Disclose.tv
NEW - Carl Grillmair, Caltech astrophysicist and research scientist (NASA principal investigator on Hubble and Spitzer Space Telescopes), shot and killed at his home in California. At the time of his death, he was researching comets and asteroids hazardous to Earth.
Read here: https://www.disclose.tv/id/86o4fdrqa3/
@disclosetv
Read here: https://www.disclose.tv/id/86o4fdrqa3/
@disclosetv
🤔8⚡1
Forwarded from ARMYGIRL ✨✨✨ (Army Girl)
The Supreme Court's 6-3 ruling on February 20, 2026, invalidated most of President Trump's sweeping tariffs imposed under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA), finding they exceeded presidential authority. This directly impacts the revenue collected from those tariffs.
Tariff duties collected by U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) are deposited into the U.S. Treasury's general fund. This is the main pool of federal revenue (alongside income taxes, etc.) used for government spending as authorized by Congress through appropriations—no special earmarking for tariffs exists, despite some political claims about funding specific programs.
### What Happens to the Money Already Collected?
Estimates vary slightly across sources, but the invalidated IEEPA-based tariffs generated roughly $130–175 billion (with figures around $133–175 billion commonly cited through late 2025/early 2026, and total customs duties hitting ~$195–287 billion in FY 2025 including pre-existing tariffs).
- The government will no longer collect new revenue from these invalidated tariffs going forward.
- Importers (businesses that paid the duties) are generally entitled to seek refunds for duties paid under now-invalid authority. This could involve:
- Filing protests or claims with CBP (U.S. Customs and Border Protection).
- Potential litigation in courts like the Court of International Trade if needed.
- The refund process is expected to be complex and messy (as noted by justices during arguments and in coverage), involving millions of import entries from hundreds of thousands of companies. Some deadlines may be waived, but not all payments will automatically qualify—especially if entries were already "liquidated" (finalized) without timely protests.
- Refunds go back to the importers (typically large companies or retailers), not directly to consumers. While some higher prices from tariffs passed to buyers, there's no broad mechanism for individual consumers to claim rebates.
- The federal government would need to pay these refunds from the Treasury (potentially increasing borrowing or cutting elsewhere short-term), reversing much of the revenue previously counted toward the budget.
### Broader Implications
- The ruling doesn't eliminate all tariffs—some (e.g., on steel/aluminum under other laws like Section 232) remain in place.
- The administration may try to reimpose similar measures using different legal authorities, though that could face new challenges.
- Net effect: Much of the "money received from tariffs" (the IEEPA portion) effectively gets returned to businesses via refunds, reducing the federal windfall that had boosted collections dramatically in 2025.
In short, the collected funds aren't "gone" but largely face reversal through refunds to importers, shrinking the government's net revenue gain from this policy. The exact refund timeline and total could take months or years to fully resolve through administrative and legal processes.
Tariff duties collected by U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) are deposited into the U.S. Treasury's general fund. This is the main pool of federal revenue (alongside income taxes, etc.) used for government spending as authorized by Congress through appropriations—no special earmarking for tariffs exists, despite some political claims about funding specific programs.
### What Happens to the Money Already Collected?
Estimates vary slightly across sources, but the invalidated IEEPA-based tariffs generated roughly $130–175 billion (with figures around $133–175 billion commonly cited through late 2025/early 2026, and total customs duties hitting ~$195–287 billion in FY 2025 including pre-existing tariffs).
- The government will no longer collect new revenue from these invalidated tariffs going forward.
- Importers (businesses that paid the duties) are generally entitled to seek refunds for duties paid under now-invalid authority. This could involve:
- Filing protests or claims with CBP (U.S. Customs and Border Protection).
- Potential litigation in courts like the Court of International Trade if needed.
- The refund process is expected to be complex and messy (as noted by justices during arguments and in coverage), involving millions of import entries from hundreds of thousands of companies. Some deadlines may be waived, but not all payments will automatically qualify—especially if entries were already "liquidated" (finalized) without timely protests.
- Refunds go back to the importers (typically large companies or retailers), not directly to consumers. While some higher prices from tariffs passed to buyers, there's no broad mechanism for individual consumers to claim rebates.
- The federal government would need to pay these refunds from the Treasury (potentially increasing borrowing or cutting elsewhere short-term), reversing much of the revenue previously counted toward the budget.
### Broader Implications
- The ruling doesn't eliminate all tariffs—some (e.g., on steel/aluminum under other laws like Section 232) remain in place.
- The administration may try to reimpose similar measures using different legal authorities, though that could face new challenges.
- Net effect: Much of the "money received from tariffs" (the IEEPA portion) effectively gets returned to businesses via refunds, reducing the federal windfall that had boosted collections dramatically in 2025.
In short, the collected funds aren't "gone" but largely face reversal through refunds to importers, shrinking the government's net revenue gain from this policy. The exact refund timeline and total could take months or years to fully resolve through administrative and legal processes.
❤2
Look at this on a broader scale. What SCOTUS just did was show that globalist motives are what’s running things in America.
Not our Constitution.
That’s going to open a lot more eyes. Especially in conjunction with the Epstein revelations.
Not our Constitution.
That’s going to open a lot more eyes. Especially in conjunction with the Epstein revelations.
👏11❤4
Remember that we are in a season of Revelation, of Energy shifts and changes to the fundamentals of our world. This has been happening for decades.
It’s a process. And I’m as annoyed at saying it as you probably are to hear it. But here we are.
It’s easy to get caught up in the details and forget the much larger picture. 😉
It’s a process. And I’m as annoyed at saying it as you probably are to hear it. But here we are.
It’s easy to get caught up in the details and forget the much larger picture. 😉
🔥12👍2
Forwarded from TR HQ (TruthRascal)
Find.
Your.
Center.
You’re going to need it.
Incidentally, the symbol of a circle with a point at the center is the alchemical symbol for Gold.
It also represents the Sun.
It corresponds to the Heart, the Center of YOU.
Your Heart is the touchpoint between worlds. It is the balance point, the Stargate, the wormhole at the center of your toroidal field.
When you can take the Energies from the higher realms and merge them with the Energies from the lower…Aether and Earth,
Spiritual and Physical,
On Earth as it is in Heaven,
you will see that everything comes together within you at your Heart.
You are the lock AND the key.
@TruthRascalHQ
✨💕✨
—1 Feb 2023—
Your.
Center.
You’re going to need it.
Incidentally, the symbol of a circle with a point at the center is the alchemical symbol for Gold.
It also represents the Sun.
It corresponds to the Heart, the Center of YOU.
Your Heart is the touchpoint between worlds. It is the balance point, the Stargate, the wormhole at the center of your toroidal field.
When you can take the Energies from the higher realms and merge them with the Energies from the lower…Aether and Earth,
Spiritual and Physical,
On Earth as it is in Heaven,
you will see that everything comes together within you at your Heart.
You are the lock AND the key.
@TruthRascalHQ
✨💕✨
—1 Feb 2023—
🔥13❤9💯1
Eric Daugherty on X…
“🚨 BREAKING: SCOTUS Justice Clarence Thomas dropped straight TRUTH BOMBS in his dissent on the tariffs
He nailed it.
"NEITHER the statutory text nor the Constitution provide a basis for ruling against the President." 🔥
"Congress authorized the President to “regulate . . . importation.” Throughout American history, the authority to “regulate importation” has been understood to include the authority to impose duties on imports."
"The meaning of that phrase was beyond doubt by the time that Congress enacted this statute, shortly after President Nixon’s highly publicized duties on imports were UPHELD based on identical language."
"The statute that the President relied on therefore authorized him to impose the duties on imports at issue in these cases."
"Because the Constitution assigns Congress many powers that do not implicate the nondelegation doctrine, Congress may delegate the exercise of many powers to the President."
"Congress has done so repeatedly since the founding, WITH THIS COURT'S BLESSING."
🫳🎤
THE GOAT!”
https://x.com/ericldaugh/status/2024871850556133698
“🚨 BREAKING: SCOTUS Justice Clarence Thomas dropped straight TRUTH BOMBS in his dissent on the tariffs
He nailed it.
"NEITHER the statutory text nor the Constitution provide a basis for ruling against the President." 🔥
"Congress authorized the President to “regulate . . . importation.” Throughout American history, the authority to “regulate importation” has been understood to include the authority to impose duties on imports."
"The meaning of that phrase was beyond doubt by the time that Congress enacted this statute, shortly after President Nixon’s highly publicized duties on imports were UPHELD based on identical language."
"The statute that the President relied on therefore authorized him to impose the duties on imports at issue in these cases."
"Because the Constitution assigns Congress many powers that do not implicate the nondelegation doctrine, Congress may delegate the exercise of many powers to the President."
"Congress has done so repeatedly since the founding, WITH THIS COURT'S BLESSING."
🫳🎤
THE GOAT!”
https://x.com/ericldaugh/status/2024871850556133698
🔥16😁1
😆😆😆 PDJT just said the tariffs REMAIN IN PLACE
AND he added an additional 10% global tax!!!!!
😆😆🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
AND he added an additional 10% global tax!!!!!
😆😆🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
🔥22❤3😁1