You won’t see this on the evening news.
New South Wales Australia: rates of covid infection based on how vaxxed you are.
Basically, the data says the more “vaccines” you’ve had, the sicker you’ll be, with “double boosted” people being infected at an alarmingly higher rate than others. Unvaccinated people remain the least affected group by far.
New South Wales Australia: rates of covid infection based on how vaxxed you are.
Basically, the data says the more “vaccines” you’ve had, the sicker you’ll be, with “double boosted” people being infected at an alarmingly higher rate than others. Unvaccinated people remain the least affected group by far.
https://andreaskalcker.com/en/coronavirus/clinical-study-with-chlorine-dioxide/Chlorine-Dioxide-AS-An-Alternative-Treatment-for-Covid-19.html
"Patients treated only with Chlorine Dioxide had fewer days with symptoms compared to those treated with several drugs. 99.07% of the treated patients were discharged without any health problems."
"Patients treated only with Chlorine Dioxide had fewer days with symptoms compared to those treated with several drugs. 99.07% of the treated patients were discharged without any health problems."
Andreas Kalcker
Chlorine Dioxide as an Alternative Treatment for COVID-19
{pdf = https: //andreaskalcker.com/images/COVID_Tratamiento.pdf | 100% | 800 | native}
In October 2020, I tasked Dr Andrew Hill with reporting to the World Health Organisation on the dozens of new studies from around the world, suggesting that Ivermectin could be a remarkably safe and effective treatment for COVID-19.
But on January 18th, 2021, Dr Hill published his findings on a pre-print server. His methods lacked rigour, the review was inferior quality and the extremely positive findings on ivermectin were contradicted by the conclusion. In the end, Dr Hill advised that “Ivermectin should be validated in larger appropriately controlled randomized trials before the results suffice for review by regulatory authorities.”
https://rumble.com/vwfia3-a-letter-to-andrew-hill-dr-tess-lawrie-oracle-films.html?mref=6zof&mrefc=3
But on January 18th, 2021, Dr Hill published his findings on a pre-print server. His methods lacked rigour, the review was inferior quality and the extremely positive findings on ivermectin were contradicted by the conclusion. In the end, Dr Hill advised that “Ivermectin should be validated in larger appropriately controlled randomized trials before the results suffice for review by regulatory authorities.”
https://rumble.com/vwfia3-a-letter-to-andrew-hill-dr-tess-lawrie-oracle-films.html?mref=6zof&mrefc=3
Rumble
A Letter to Dr Andrew Hill | Dr Tess Lawrie | Oracle Films
In October 2020 Dr Andrew Hill was tasked to report to the World Health Organisation on the dozens of new studies from around the world suggesting that Ivermectin could be a remarkably safe and effect