A great discussion about the Textus Receptus and the KJV. Common ground between an Anglican and an Independent Baptist.

https://www.youtube.com/live/5p05X5ntGSs

6000 YEAR OLD ARYAN MUMMY UNCOVERED IN SOUTH AMERICA

For the first time officially, a recognized genetic study has detected European genes on South American mummies over 6000 years old, specifically Chinchorro from northern Chile.

“One of them, from a Chinchorro mummy in northern Chile dating from 3972 to 3806 BC, contains 30 to 40% European ancestry... The first ancient genetic evidence of pre-Viking transatlantic contact.”

This is a huge revelation. It is a fact: the white man was present in South America several millennia ago, supporting Native American legends about the presence of white civilizing gods and pre-Columbian founding myths.

We are incredibly fortunate to witness this in our time; more than one anthropologist would have dreamed of seeing these results one day.


Since a portion of the Chinchorro population really did have substantial ancestry that clusters with Western Eurasian populations, it could mean:

1. Ancient Gene Flow: There was some form of gene flow, migration, or contact between Old World (or groups related to Old World) populations and the ancestors of the Chinchorro people — much earlier than historically documented contacts.


2. Rethinking Pre-Columbian History: It could force archaeologists and geneticists to more deeply re-evaluate models of early population movements into the Americas, potentially adding complexity (e.g., multiple waves, more diverse ancestries).

Read the study yourself below.

https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/132555v1.full

A great biblical and theological discussion on polygyny, and a defense of polygynous pastor Rich Tidwell. A great fruitful discussion.

https://www.youtube.com/live/SW04fGDibw0

Israelite Identity
Pilgrims 3
————
Johnson's Wonder-Working Providence, 1628-1651 originally by Edward Johnson, edited by Franklin Jameson in 1910 is a first hand colonial history of America. Within the book it is clear they believed themselves to be of the lost tribes of Israel.

"(Behold) and all you that hopefully long for Christs appearing to confound Antichrist (Consider) and rejoyce all yee his Churches the World through-out, for the Lambe is preparing for his Bride, and oh! yee the ancient Beloved of Christ, whom he of old led by the hand from Egypt to Canaan, through that great and terrible Wildernesse..." p59
"... and you the Seed of Israel both lesse and more, the ratling of your dead bones together is at hand, Sinewes, Flesh and Life: at the Word of Christ it comes." p60
"Then oh! you People of Israel gather together as one Man, and grow together as one Tree. Ezek. 37. and 23." p60

There is much, much more available in the book. All of these quotes refer to the Christians of New England.
YAH bless

Happy Thanksgiving!

I will praise the name of God with a song, and will magnify him with thanksgiving.
This also shall please the LORD better than an ox or bullock that hath horns and hoofs.
~Psalm 69:30-31

Celebrate your Israelite heritage: the conquering of North America, the New Canaan, from heathens for the physical regathering place of Gods Elect.
Give thanks to God for what you have.
Pray for the return of our national sovereignty, true freedom from Satan's grip, the safety and conversion of our people, and the return of a righteous and united American Empire.

God Bless

Vibe check

The Israelite Population in the Roman Province of Judaea during the 1st Century AD, by Johan Bauke Oosthuizen.
https://www.academia.edu/145245296/The_Israelite_Population_in_the_Roman_Province_of_Judaea_during_the_1st_Century_AD

For the South African subscribers to this channel, Johan is a South African linked to Stellenbosch University. Here is the link to his channel on Telegram
https://t.me/J_Oosthuizen

Here is the link to him on Academia (dot) eu
Johan Bauke Oosthuizen - Independent Researcher
https://independent.academia.edu/JohanOosthuizen13

Check the link out. He has published other researched topics. AI bashes him for publishing articles that go against the established Jewish narrative.

"The Israelite Population in the Roman Province of Judaea during the 1st Century AD," by Johan Bauke Oosthuizen, published in December 2025.

The PDF is only 12 pages long. If my understanding of it is correct, pure Israelites among a total population of 552,000, was as low as 3.5% to 13.4%. By far the majority were of Edomite descent. This is valuable information when reading the New Testament. Jesus was forever clashing with the Pharisees. Both Jacob (James), the brother of Jesus, and Paul, became Pharisees. In Galatians 2:14-16, properly translated, Paul says that all ethnic Israelites are Judaised from birth. It emphasizes Revelation 2:9 and Revelation 3:9 (properly translated), "those who say that they are of the tribe of Judah, but are not, but are of the synagogue of Satan."

The closer we get to the second coming of Jesus, the more evidence is surfacing that the Jews are utter frauds, that what the Bible says about the final fate of the Edomites is about to become a reality for them.

REJECT THE FALSE DICHOTOMY

❌ Race or Religion?
✅ RACE = RELIGION

Matthew 22:35-40

Teacher, what is the great commandment in the law?” And He said to him: “Love YAHWEH your God with all your [heart, soul and mind]. This is the great and first commandment. The second is THE SAME AS (ὁμοία) IT: You shall love YOUR NEIGHBOUR (πλησίον) as yourself. By these two commandments hang all the law and the prophets.”

Leviticus 19:18

You shall not...bear any grudge against THE CHILDREN OF YOUR PEOPLE, but you shall love YOUR NEIGHBOUR (πλησίον) as yourself: I am YAHWEH.

● (πλησίον) = neighbour (i.e. Countryman) cf. Strongs, the children of your people cf. Lev 19:18.
● (ὁμοία) = the same as, cf. NAS.

@MountainOfGod

I say this every year and usually on Christmas, but I have to stress the fact:
Christ's birthday is today, September 11th, and not December 25th.
We can read Revelation 12 and line it up exactly with the constellations from September 11th, 3bc. In fact, this is so precise that we can calculate it into an 80-minute window.
The Star of Bethlehem was the convergence of the star Regulus and Jupiter in the Leo constellation around the same time.
If anything, December 25th should be celebrated as the conception of Christ by the Holy Spirit within Mary because it's about 9 months prior.

I don't exactly know why dates were switched around, and I don't know why today was forgotten, but I do know why (((they))) would love to cover this up. Please spread this vital message.

https://youtu.be/jDJa2gKQf94?si=RkUQD0VDlr2tmGtv

https://www.youtube.com/live/cPVjr8rM-Lk

Iron Sharpens Iron Ep1 ~
Responding to Pastor Rich Tidwell: Adding Law, Forbidding Marriage, and False Witness.

A fruitful discussion on hermeneutics, divine law, biblical marriage and divorce, and refutation of Rich Tidwells recent Xitter crashout.

Make sure to sub to the channel index for easy sourcing and discover topics already talked about

https://t.me/TruthInYeshuaIndex

https://youtu.be/6xtFiaIeU00

Do Christians have to believe in the virgin birth?

Pastor Gavin Ortlund (PHD) explains three reasons why denying the virgin birth compromises the entire faith:

1. Disagreement on the virgin birth concerns the truth of Scripture, not its interpretation.

2. Rejection of the virgin birth typically results from an anti-supernatural world view.

3. The virgin birth is organically connected to the broader person and work of Christ.

Israelite Identity

"After this, sometimes our countrymen, sometimes the enemy, won the field, to the end that our Lord might in this land try after his accustomed manner these his Israelites, whether they loved him or not, until the year of the siege of Mount Badon."
- Saint Gildas the Wise (500-570 AD), On the Ruin & Conquest of Britain, touching on the pagan Anglo-Saxons battling with the Christians.

"...these his Israelites, whether they loved him or not" refers to the pagan Anglo-Saxon invaders and the various Christians of Britain.

The white Anglo, Saxon, Scandinavian, Germanic and kindred people are the Israelites of the Old Testament. This is not a new idea.
God Bless

Israelite Identity
Israelites or Amorites?
————
"The names of the Jewish [Israelite] towns captured by the Egyptian king Shishak in his campaign against Rehoboam, and recorded on the walls of the temple of Karnak, are each surmounted with the head and shoulders of a prisoner. Casts have been made of the heads by Mr. Flinders Petrie. and the racial type represented by them turns out to be Amorite and not Jewish. We must conclude, therefore, that even after the revolt of the Ten Tribes the bulk of the population in Southern Judah continued to be Amorite. in race, though not in name. The Jewish type was so scantily represented that the Egyptian artist passed it over when depicting the prisoners who had been brought from Judah."
~Prof. A. H. Sayce, Races of the Old Testament, 1891

Pharaoh Shisnak is recorded in 1 Kings 11:40, 14:25 and 2 Chronicles 12:2–9 as being at war with the Israelites, taking cities of Judah, which were mostly in the territory of Benjamin. According to Raymond McNair in his book Key to Northwest European Origins, Prof Sayce has the false idea of modern jews in mind when thinking on the ancient Israelites, which is why he and others say those Israelite prisoners were Amorites.

"The 'Jewish type' meaning the Ashkenazim was so scantily represented that the Egyptian artist failed to depict it at all. And remember by this expression 'Jewish type,' Professor Sayce undoubtedly means the short-statured, darkskinned, broad-headed, Ashkenazic Jew familiar to most of us today. Notice Professor Sayce says that these Jewish prisoners were not actually 'Jewish' at all, but were Amorites. He says the 'Jewish type' was so scantily represented that the Egyptian artist passed it over when depicting the prisoners who had been brought from Judah. But here is the real truth of the matter. After the Ten-Tribed Northern Kingdom of Israel rejected the rulership of the throne of David, forming a separate kingdom, only the tribes of Judah, Benjamin, and a portion of the Levites were left in the southern part of the land of Israel to form the kingdom thereafter known as the Kingdom of Judah."
~Raymond F. McNair, Key to Northwest European Origins, 1963

Professor Sayce then goes on to describe what these "Amorites" actually looked like:

"At Medinet Habu, for example, where the skin of the Amorite is a pale pink, that of the Lebu or Libyan and the Mashuash or Maxyes is red like that of the Egyptians, though we know that the Libyans belonged to a distinctively fair-complexioned race. In a tomb of the Eighteenth Dynasty, at Thebes, the Amorite chief of Kadesh has a white skin and light red-brown eyes and hair, his followers being painted alternately red and white ... It is evident, therefore, that the pale yellow and pink flesh of the Amorite is intended to denote a lighter skin than that of the Egyptian, the skin, in fact, of the blond race."
~Prof. Sayce, Races.

This corroborates with other sources:

"Egyptian illustrations of the New Kingdom show the Palestinian Amorites to have been a race much more like the northern Europeans than the Semites; long headed, with blue eyes, straight nose and thin lips."
~Encyclopedia Brit. 14th Edition Volume 1; Amorites

"Sargon I., King of Agade, and first king of the Babylonian Empire, describes Palestine on one of his monuments as the land of the Amorites (Sayce, Patriarchal Palestine), and at a later period we find portraits of Amorite prisoners on the wall sculptures of Egypt. The Egyptians depict them as a fair people, with blond or reddish hair and blue eyes."
"A study of ethnology leads to the conclusion that these people were the blond or red-haired white race, the Amurra or Amurru we hear of occasionally in the Egyptian campaigns in the direction of the Amanus mountains. That the Amorites were Caucasians in appearance and physique leaves no room for doubt, and some of their habits and forms of worship point to their being a Keltic sub-race."
~E. E. Jessel, The Unknown History Of The Jews, 1909

Why are archaeologists mistaking the ancient Israelites with Amorites? Because they have a preconceived false idea of what ancient Israelites must have looked like. Who should we trust more, modern archaeologists or eye witnesses like the Egyptians and the Bible itself? If the Egyptians say the Israelites were light skinned with blonde/red hair and blue eyes, who are we to challenge this? When modern consensus challenges eyewitness history, there is a problem.
The Israelites were white, and they still are.
YAH Bless