Generations of Adam
————
This is the book of the generations (1) of Adam (2)...
~ Genesis 5:1

1: Strongs H8435 - descent, i.e. family. GHC Lexicon - generations, families, races.

2: Strongs H121 same as H120 - ruddy i.e. a human being. From H119 - to show blood (in the face), i.e. flush or turn rosy: be (dyed, made) red (ruddy).
The only people who can blush naturally are whites. Blacks don't turn red from blushing. Asians only turn red from consuming too much alcohol.

"The self-reported frequency of blushing seems to be fairly similar across respondents from different ethnic and racial backgrounds, including Caucasians and dark-skinned Africans and African Americans (Simon & Shields, 1996). However, blushing is often difficult to detect in dark-skinned people, where it produces a further darkening of skin tone or is not visible at all (Leary et al., 1992). Simon and Shields (1996) reported that 50 to 77% of Whites, Asians and Hispanics were aware of a change in skin colour when they blushed whereas 77% of Blacks had noticed facial warmth but not a change in skin colour when they blushed. Thus, the subjective experience of blushing could be quite different in dark- and fair-skinned people."
~ The significance of blushing for fair- and dark-skinned people

Adamites are white. Not black, brown or yellow.

Genesis 5:1 can be understood "This is the book of the white race." If you are not white, the Bible is not for you. There is no debate.

For anyone who runs into "Black Hebrew Israelites" or some other afrocentric group 👆

What is the Bible? And it's purpose and standing with science?

The Bible is the Genesis (origin) of Adamkind and the history of God's action in the world among the faithful line of Adamkind; accounting two main portions of our history: our fall and our redemption.

Understanding what the Bible actually is and what knowledge you are suppose to receive from it, is important. It's not a Mathematics, Physics or Chemistry textbook; so you shouldn't expect to find all the answers to those fields of science within, and you shouldn't expect to find confirmations for certain scientific concepts such as if the Earth is flat or round, or if biological adaption truly occurs (evolution); this we can scientifically observe.
It is also not an exhaustive history textbook on the complete history of the universe nor the complete history of all of Adamkind; only the concise history of our origin, and the concise history of God's interaction with the faithful line of Adamkind.

Science and exhaustive history are things we can discover and study outside of scripture.
We understand that scripture is infallible (absolute truth), so there can be no contradictions nor paradoxes within scripture and between scripture and observable truth (science).

Should a contradiction arise between scripture and observable truth (science) or within themselves; either man's interpretation of scripture is false, or man's understanding of science is false. Only man is fallible.

This isn't against the concept of Sola Scriptura; for Sola Scriptura is merely that scripture alone is sufficient to delineate how Man can be saved and that scripture alone has insight into the Praeternatural.
For knowledge outside this scope of Soteriology and Praeternaturalogy; we must observe, study and test with scientific methods; whilst being vigilant that no contradiction to scripture can truthfully occur.

A Christian has nothing to fear from the study of science; as Christians stand behind truth, we have no need to live in lies as others depend on. The delineation of science will always vindicate God and our faith, as it was built upon truth alone.

Every major discovery or advancement in the fields of science for the past two thousand years, whether in health, physics, chemistry or archeology, was the work of White Christian men.
Christians advanced this world to the technological levels we see today, and it only decays now that White Christian men are becoming scarce.

------------------
Have a question? Feel free to comment it on our questions and answers post

All Categories thus far
e-Library
Picture/Diagram Index
Biblical Inerrancy
Biblical Translations
Definitions
Nature of God
Sacred Names
The Canon
Apocryphal Texts
Spiritual Authority
Creation
Giants
Archaic Humans
Biblical Cosmology
Biblical History
Israelite Identity
Paradise Found
Atlantis
False Doctrine
Cult of Saturn
Demonology
Mystery Babylon
The Jew
Esoterica

I took some classic CI marks of Israel and reformatted them into this image. I tried to avoid overt messaging but even then it's clear who Israel is. It's definitely not the Jews. The background image is Britannia Pacificatrix by Sigismund Goetze for anyone curious.

𝐕𝐢𝐜𝐭𝐨𝐫𝐢𝐚𝐧 𝐃𝐚𝐰𝐧

Identity Compendium

This is a non-exhaustive list of channels and chatrooms on Telegram that self-identify as Christian Identity (CI), even if their world-view is not rightly classified as CI, or promote a world-view rightly classified as (broadly) CI, even if they don't self-identify as CI. It will be updated regularly as the admins of more channels and chatrooms reach out, or when new channels and chatrooms that fit the above criteria are discovered by the admin.

Subscribe and share this around, so that we may all collectively grow. #ChristianIdentity

————

- This Channel:
@MountainOfYah

- CG-Sphere:
@ChristogeneaMemes
@HeirsOfPromise
@ChristogeneaArchive
@Christogenea (inactive, Spanish language)
@AdamicAwakening (inactive)
@NationalistChristian
@SchizoChristianity
@GottMitUnsHH88

- RP-Sphere:
@VictorianDawn
@Preterism
@HailChrist
@AdamicRevival (inactive)
@AdamWaffen (inactive)
@ChristianIdentity (inactive)
@CI_Lib
@ChristianAryanism (inactive)
@RestoredPuritanism2
@RP_Classics
@ChristogeneaExposed

- Wickstrom-Sphere:
@SpookyYAHWEH
@PraiseYHVH
@SpookyArchive
@jameswickstrom
@James_Wickstrom_covenant_race
@jameswickstromarchive
@ArcodeausReloaded (German language)

- SCG-Sphere:
@AustralianIdentityChurch
@SvenskarnasKyrka (Swedish language)
@ComparetBert
@AryanNationsArchive
@DrWesleySwift
@WilliamPGale

- RAIYN-Sphere:
@LilyOfVallie
@Christian_Identity_Error
@FallacyOfChristianity

- Misc-Sphere:
@YahwehsSacredRemnant
@Identity_Reloaded
@DonSpears
@KarlRepository
@SaxonIsraelites
@TheHolyReichArchives
@the_true_israelites

- Afrikaans-Language:
@SAFreedomChat
https://t.me/joinchat/AAAAAEN9bXgWQ0_Rb2uGVg
https://t.me/+_vyk64hKut1lZGNk
https://t.me/+qLicyWQcKnY3YzA8

- German Language:
@BibelChat
@WissenswertesausBadenuvm
@nonwo2nd

^A great collection of channels^
I urge everyone to subscribe and learn.

EXCEPT those raiyn clowns. Don't even bother with them. Follow everyone else.

Look at the message via the original channel for an updated list.

The Jewish infamous Metzitzah B'Peh, the Oral Circumcision which kills babies by transmitting STD's like Herpes.

"When the eighth day of a baby’s life occurs on Shabbat, one circumcises the foreskin, and uncovers the skin by removing the thin membrane beneath the foreskin, and sucks the blood from the wound"

(Shabbat 133a.19)

Jews be like "we're the people of God" and do this ^

Wessex Gospels of c.1175

Original Anglo-Saxon:
In principio erat uerbum. Her onginð þæt god-spell þe Iohannes se godspellere ge-wrat on pathmos þam eiglande. On anginne ærest wæs word. & þæt word wæs mid gode. & god wæs þt word.
~ Iohannes 1:1

Modern English translation:
In the beginning was the Word. Here begins the gospel that John the evangelist wrote on the island of Patmos. In the beginning, first was the word, and the word was with God, and God was the word.
~ John 1:1

Apostolic Nations: Negroes do not descend from Ham.

A popular myth – because that’s what it is, a myth – in Christian racial theology is that the negroid (black) races descend from Ham, son of Noah. According to this legend, God punished Ham for his sins by turning him black, and the black races supposedly inherited their skin color from Ham, their father.

Let me be clear: this is total and utter bullcrap. This idea is nowhere to be found in Scripture or in Patristic tradition. First of all, the Bible doesn’t even say that Ham was cursed at all; it’s Canaan who is cursed by Noah (Genesis 9:25). Nowhere does it mention Ham being cursed, let alone turning black.

The source for this unbiblical tradition is none other than the Jewish Talmud, which in Sanhedrin 108b, says the following: “The Sages taught: Three violated that directive and engaged in intercourse while in the ark, and all of them were punished for doing so. They are: The dog, and the raven, and Ham, son of Noah. The dog was punished in that it is bound; the raven was punished in that it spits, and Ham was afflicted in that his skin turned black.”

Islamic scholars also popularized this Jewish myth, such as al-Ṭabarī, who (falsely) stated: “Shem was the father of the Arabs, Ham the father of the Blacks.” (Taʾrīkh al-rusul wa’l-mulūk, vol. 2, trans. Brinner)

Most importantly, this belief became widespread in more racially-aware (but still not CI) Christian circles, particularly traditional Catholic, because this false teaching was reiterated by Catholic theologians, such as Alonso de Sandoval, who stated in De instauranda Aethiopum salute (1627): “Black skin in Ethiopians came not only from the curse that Noah cast upon his son Ham, but also from an innate quality… so that the children he begot would come out with that dark hue, as a mark that they descended from a man who mocked his father…”

In any case, this is entirely false. Ham was a White man, just like his two brothers, and his descendants were all Whites. Hammites include the Ancient (White) Egyptians, Leucæthiopians, Canaanites (Phoenicians/Sidonians), and Babylonians (through Cush). Thus the idea that “Africans” descend from Ham isn’t entirely incorrect – but this only applies to White people who lived in Africa at the time (such as White Ethiopians). More on that in future posts of the Apostolic Nations thread.

Archaic Humans
Canaan's Slave Race
————
His (Enkidu's) body was rough, he had long hair like a woman's; it waved like the hair of Nisaba, the goddess of corn. His body was covered with matted hair like Samugan's, the god of cattle. He was innocent of mankind; he knew nothing of the cultivated land. Enkidu ate grass in the hills with the gazelle and lurked with wild beasts at the water-holes; he had joy of the water with the herds of wild game.
- The Epic of Gilgamesh

Enkidu was a wild-man, part beast part human. In the epic Enkidu goes through a two week long ritual to basically give him the understanding of a man, hopefully to make him equal to man. The image and idea of a wild-man was not foreign to the ancient people of the area.

Gaspare Gorresio, an Italian Orientalist and Indologist from the 1800s is famous for his translation of the Hindu epic Valmiki Ramayana. Within the Ramayana we are introduced to the Vanara. This is what Gorresio has to say about this race of wild-men:
“Here it manifestly appears, that these hosts of combatants whom Ráma led to the conquest of Lanká (Ceylon) the kingdom and seat of the Hamitic race, and whom the poem calls monkeys, were in fact as I have elsewhere observed, inhabitants of the mountainous and southern regions of India, who were wild-looking and not altogether unlike monkeys. They were perhaps the remote ancestors of the Malay races.”

The Vanara were led by Rama to not only be his army, but also build the famous Rama Setu bridge (sometimes called Adam's bridge or Sethu) between India and Mannar Island off the north-western coast of Sri Lanka.

These wild-men are homo-erectus and kin, created by Canaan using the fallen angel teachings he discovered within a cave to be a slave race:

And he found a writing which former (generations) had carved on the rock, and he read what was thereon, and he transcribed it and sinned owing to it; for it contained the teaching of the Watchers in accordance with which they used to observe the omens of the sun and moon and stars in all the signs of heaven. And he wrote it down and said nothing regarding it; for he was afraid to speak to Noah about it lest he should be angry with him on account of it.
- Jubilees 8:3-4

And what did the fallen watchers do?

And their judges and rulers went to the daughters of men and took their wives by force from their husbands according to their choice, and the sons of men in those days took from the cattle of the earth, the beasts of the field and the fowls of the air, and taught the mixture of animals of one species with the other, in order therewith to provoke the Lord; and God saw the whole earth and it was corrupt, for all flesh had corrupted its ways upon earth, all men and all animals.
- Jasher 4:18

[ . . . ] two hundred donkeys, two hundred asses, two hundred . . . rams of the flock, two hundred goats, two hundred . . . beast of the field from every animal, from every bird [. . . ] [ . . . ] for miscegenation (inbreeding of people considered to be of different races) [ . . . ] [ . . . ] they defiled [ . . . ] [ . . . they begot] giants and monsters [ . . . ] [ . . . ] they begot, and, behold, all [the earth was corrupted . . . ] [ . . . ] with its blood and by the hand of [ . . . ] giant's which did not satisfy them and [ . . . ] [ . . . ] and they were seeking to devour many [ . . . ] [ . . . ] [ . . . ] the monsters attacked it.
- DSS Book of Giants 1Q23 Frag. 1, 6 & 4Q531 Frag. 2

God Bless

Love your kin, It’s not much to ask.

@Kinism

Wessex Gospels of c. 1175

Original Anglo-Saxon:
Ich spræce þæt þe ich mid fæder ge-seah. ænd ge doð þa þing. þe ge mid eowren fæderen ge-sægen. Ða andswerede hy; & cwæðen to hym. Abraham ys ure fæder. Ða cwæð se hælend to heom. Gif ge abrahames bearn synt. wercheð abrahames werc. Nu ge secheð me to of-sleanne. þanne mann þe eow sægde sodfæstnysse; þa þe ich ge-hyrde of gode. Ne dyde abraham swa.
~ Iohannes 8:38-40

Modern English Translation:
"I speak of what I saw with my father, and you do the things you have seen with your father." Then they answered and said to him, "Abraham is our father." Then Jesus said to them, "If you are Abraham's children, do the works of Abraham. But now you seek to kill me, a man who has told you the truth, which I heard from God. Abraham did not do that."
~ John 8:38-40