'The Head'
📍Searsmont, Maine

'The Head' was discovered at Searsmont in bedrock. It is on display at the Sturbridge Museum, Massachusetts. It seems to depict someone of Scandinavian or Irish descent, as the artistic style (curving nostrils, staring eyes, chaplet of bog oak with acorn) all attest.

Most striking is the head of a man, carved in Ancient Irish style, with the curving nostrils and staring eyes that one encounters in Irish art and wearing as a chaplet a twig of bog oak leaves and acorns. it seems difficult to regard this as representing anything other than an Irish priest, or druid. It was found in Searsmont, Maine, a part of a larger work of which the torso still remains on the site, the head being now in the museum at Sturbridge, Massachusetts.

Preserve New England
@HistoricalNE

RIP ProfessorDaveExplains

𝕱𝖑𝖆𝖙 𝕰𝖆𝖗𝖙𝖍 𝕾𝖔𝖈𝖎𝖊𝖙𝖞 & 𝔄𝔱𝔥𝔢𝔬𝔦𝔡

All Categories thus far
e-Library
Picture/Diagram Index
Biblical Inerrancy
Biblical Translations
Definitions
Nature of God
Sacred Names
The Canon
Apocryphal Texts
Spiritual Authority
Creation
Giants
Archaic Humans
Biblical Cosmology
Biblical History
Israelite Identity
Paradise Found
Atlantis
False Doctrine
Cult of Saturn
Demonology
Mystery Babylon
The Jew
Esoterica

My schizo ramblings ^

“The Lord gives us His flesh to eat, and yet to understand it according to the flesh is death; while yet He says of His flesh, that therein is eternal life. Therefore we ought not to understand the flesh carnally.”

“For they supposed that He was going to deal out His body to them; but He said that He was to ascend into heaven, of course, whole: “When you shall see the Son of man ascending where He was before;” certainly then, at least, you will see that not in the manner you suppose does He dispense His body; certainly then, at least, you will understand that His grace is not consumed by tooth-biting.”

- Augustine: Tractate 27 (John 6:60-72)

Rome, as we know, believes that Christ’s body and blood are literally masticated by the mouth and teeth after His carnal body and blood are dispensed. Yet another Church divine cannot be clutched by them for support.

And as we prayed, suddenly there appeared two men standing before the Lord towards the East, on whom we were not able to look;
for there came forth from their countenance a ray as of the sun, and their raiment was shining, such as eye of man never saw; for no mouth is able to express or heart to conceive the glory with which they were endued, and the beauty of their appearance.
And as we looked upon them, we were astounded; for their bodies were whiter than any snow and ruddier than any rose;
and the red thereof was mingled with the white, and I am utterly unable to express their beauty;
for their hair was curly and bright and seemly both on their face and shoulders, as it were a wreath woven of spikenard and divers-coloured flowers, or like a rainbow in the sky, such was their seemliness.
- Apocalypse of Peter 6-10

Peter on the Transfiguration. The two men seen with Christ was Moses and Elijah.

And after six days Jesus taketh Peter, James, and John his brother, and bringeth them up into an high mountain apart,
And was transfigured before them: and his face did shine as the sun, and his raiment was white as the light.
And, behold, there appeared unto them Moses and Elias talking with him.
Then answered Peter, and said unto Jesus, Lord, it is good for us to be here: if thou wilt, let us make here three tabernacles; one for thee, and one for Moses, and one for Elias.
Matthew 17:1-4

I say this every year and usually on Christmas, but I have to stress the fact:
Christ's birthday is today, September 11th, and not December 25th.
We can read Revelation 12 and line it up exactly with the constellations from September 11th, 3bc. In fact, this is so precise that we can calculate it into an 80-minute window.
The Star of Bethlehem was the convergence of the star Regulus and Jupiter in the Leo constellation around the same time.
If anything, December 25th should be celebrated as the conception of Christ by the Holy Spirit within Mary because it's about 9 months prior.

I don't exactly know why dates were switched around, and I don't know why today was forgotten, but I do know why (((they))) would love to cover this up. Please spread this vital message.

https://youtu.be/jDJa2gKQf94?si=RkUQD0VDlr2tmGtv

Revelation 12 can be interpreted multiple ways, and all be correct. It's about racial Israel fleeing into the wilderness of Europe and the birth of our Messiah. It's about our angelic enemies and our human enemies. It's about past present and future.

RIP ProfessorDaveExplains

𝕱𝖑𝖆𝖙 𝕰𝖆𝖗𝖙𝖍 𝕾𝖔𝖈𝖎𝖊𝖙𝖞 & 𝔄𝔱𝔥𝔢𝔬𝔦𝔡

The circular reasoning of distance measurements in "space"

"Space" is fake, full of CGI, and is retarded and contradicts its own supposed space vaccum claims and distance measurements

𝕱𝖑𝖆𝖙 𝕰𝖆𝖗𝖙𝖍 𝕾𝖔𝖈𝖎𝖊𝖙𝖞 , 𝔅𝔦𝔟𝔩𝔦𝔠𝔞𝔩 𝔽𝔼 & 𝔄𝔱𝔥𝔢𝔬𝔦𝔡

Israelite Identity
Israelites or Amorites?
————
"The names of the Jewish [Israelite] towns captured by the Egyptian king Shishak in his campaign against Rehoboam, and recorded on the walls of the temple of Karnak, are each surmounted with the head and shoulders of a prisoner. Casts have been made of the heads by Mr. Flinders Petrie. and the racial type represented by them turns out to be Amorite and not Jewish. We must conclude, therefore, that even after the revolt of the Ten Tribes the bulk of the population in Southern Judah continued to be Amorite. in race, though not in name. The Jewish type was so scantily represented that the Egyptian artist passed it over when depicting the prisoners who had been brought from Judah."
~Prof. A. H. Sayce, Races of the Old Testament, 1891

Pharaoh Shisnak is recorded in 1 Kings 11:40, 14:25 and 2 Chronicles 12:2–9 as being at war with the Israelites, taking cities of Judah, which were mostly in the territory of Benjamin. According to Raymond McNair in his book Key to Northwest European Origins, Prof Sayce has the false idea of modern jews in mind when thinking on the ancient Israelites, which is why he and others say those Israelite prisoners were Amorites.

"The 'Jewish type' meaning the Ashkenazim was so scantily represented that the Egyptian artist failed to depict it at all. And remember by this expression 'Jewish type,' Professor Sayce undoubtedly means the short-statured, darkskinned, broad-headed, Ashkenazic Jew familiar to most of us today. Notice Professor Sayce says that these Jewish prisoners were not actually 'Jewish' at all, but were Amorites. He says the 'Jewish type' was so scantily represented that the Egyptian artist passed it over when depicting the prisoners who had been brought from Judah. But here is the real truth of the matter. After the Ten-Tribed Northern Kingdom of Israel rejected the rulership of the throne of David, forming a separate kingdom, only the tribes of Judah, Benjamin, and a portion of the Levites were left in the southern part of the land of Israel to form the kingdom thereafter known as the Kingdom of Judah."
~Raymond F. McNair, Key to Northwest European Origins, 1963

Professor Sayce then goes on to describe what these "Amorites" actually looked like:

"At Medinet Habu, for example, where the skin of the Amorite is a pale pink, that of the Lebu or Libyan and the Mashuash or Maxyes is red like that of the Egyptians, though we know that the Libyans belonged to a distinctively fair-complexioned race. In a tomb of the Eighteenth Dynasty, at Thebes, the Amorite chief of Kadesh has a white skin and light red-brown eyes and hair, his followers being painted alternately red and white ... It is evident, therefore, that the pale yellow and pink flesh of the Amorite is intended to denote a lighter skin than that of the Egyptian, the skin, in fact, of the blond race."
~Prof. Sayce, Races.

This corroborates with other sources:

"Egyptian illustrations of the New Kingdom show the Palestinian Amorites to have been a race much more like the northern Europeans than the Semites; long headed, with blue eyes, straight nose and thin lips."
~Encyclopedia Brit. 14th Edition Volume 1; Amorites

"Sargon I., King of Agade, and first king of the Babylonian Empire, describes Palestine on one of his monuments as the land of the Amorites (Sayce, Patriarchal Palestine), and at a later period we find portraits of Amorite prisoners on the wall sculptures of Egypt. The Egyptians depict them as a fair people, with blond or reddish hair and blue eyes."
"A study of ethnology leads to the conclusion that these people were the blond or red-haired white race, the Amurra or Amurru we hear of occasionally in the Egyptian campaigns in the direction of the Amanus mountains. That the Amorites were Caucasians in appearance and physique leaves no room for doubt, and some of their habits and forms of worship point to their being a Keltic sub-race."
~E. E. Jessel, The Unknown History Of The Jews, 1909

Why are archaeologists mistaking the ancient Israelites with Amorites? Because they have a preconceived false idea of what ancient Israelites must have looked like. Who should we trust more, modern archaeologists or eye witnesses like the Egyptians and the Bible itself? If the Egyptians say the Israelites were light skinned with blonde/red hair and blue eyes, who are we to challenge this? When modern consensus challenges eyewitness history, there is a problem.
The Israelites were white, and they still are.
YAH Bless

Biblical Definitions
Jew in the OT vs NT
--------
Yᵉhûwdîy [H3063] (pronounced yeh-hoo-dee) is the Hebrew word used for Jew in the Old Testament. This word specifically means one who stems from the tribe of Judah, ie a Judahite.

Ioudaîos [G2453] (pronounced ee-oo-dah'-yos) is the Greek word translated as Jew in the New Testament. This word is an umbrella term used to describe anyone from the Roman province of Judæa or Judahite specifically.

As you can imagine, not all Judæans are from Judah, and not everyone from Judah was a Judæan.
What people live in Judæa who aren't from the tribe of Judah? The Samaritans were Judæan because of their nationality but not Judahite.

Using the word Jew for both Judæan and Judahite can be a bit confusing, especially when comparing them to the modern day Jew (which is totally different btw). But do not fret, the word of God clears up all confusion.

God Bless

Todays "jews" take this word and run with it. They've taken advantage of a translation, betting everything on our ignorance. They think they're the true Judæans, and therefor the true Israelites because "all of the Israelites were Jews."
All someone needs to do is break out a Strong's Exhaustive Concordance to break this spell. And it doesn't take a scientist to realize if modern Jews lie to us about everything, and they do... race, religion, immigration, politics, health, history, cosmology, etc, they're probably also lying about their own origin story. Why reject all of their lies and accept their most crucial one?

Jews arent European, they arent Westerners, they arent white, they arent Israelites, they are imposters. They are foreigners. They are the Synagogue of Satan. They are the killers of Christ and enemy of His elect race. They are Edom. They live in a perpetual state of subverting their host nations. The bible warns us of these people all over. Granted, there are indeed times where the word "jew" in the Bible does have parallels with todays group. Not as definitively identifying them as Israelites, but calling them what they called themselves at the time, the "true Judæans." Paul in his book Titus warns us:

For there are many unruly and vain talkers and deceivers, specially they of the circumcision:
Whose mouths must be stopped, who subvert whole houses, teaching things which they ought not, for filthy lucre's sake.
One of themselves, even a prophet of their own, said, the Cretians are alway liars, evil beasts, slow bellies.
This witness is true. Wherefore rebuke them sharply, that they may be sound in the faith;
Not giving heed to Jewish fables, and commandments of men, that turn from the truth.
Unto the pure all things are pure: but unto them that are defiled and unbelieving is nothing pure; but even their mind and conscience is defiled.
They profess that they know God; but in works they deny him, being abominable, and disobedient, and unto every good work reprobate.
~Titus 1:10-16

To all Roman Papists:
Your "apostolic succession" doesn't matter when the "successors" are heretics.
Exalting "traditions" to the level of scripture completely invalidates scripture itself.
Pitting good works with faith as a requirement for salvation makes your faith moot, null and void.
Stop worshipping a religious government.