Finds from the recently discovered Anglo Saxon woman burial in Northamptonshire. The Guardian did an entire write up without once using the word Anglo-Saxon.

This woman was once of the early Christians from around 650 AD. There was plenty of paganism about at the time too.

The myth still prevails that “97% of scientists" agree about man made climate change.

Basic statical literacy debunks this rather easily. The non peer reviewed paper relied upon by the media to present a one-sided narrative on climate change, published by Cook et al., shows clearly that 66.4% (a majority) of the published climate literature took no position on the cause of climate change.

Further 86% of scientists that the authors of the study reached out to for an opinion on global warming failed to engage.

Understanding these simple facts is all that’s required to utterly dismantle the zero-carbon agenda.

🔗Quantifying the consensus on anthropogenic global warming in the scientific literature

Look at these three WHG skulls (2 male, 1 female). They have quite prominent cheek bones of the sort you see in some Baltic and Nordic people. They have wide faces and strong square jaws but with weak chins (not pointy).

The eye sockets are angles downwards as in modern Europeans (asians and native Americans generally more level) and they are rectangular like Europeans and Australoids (Africans have round sockets)
We are looking at European skulls, but not typical of any modern Europeans today.

Therefore these people would have looked European but not the same as modern Europeans