Oh here we go ... timed just before the Election this week. DM clearly following orders. as this is the paper the voters there are most likely to read .... https://www.dailymail.com/news/article-15897789/Restore-activists-white-supremacy-summit-neo-Nazis-Evidence-emerges-eve-vital-election-vote-Rupert-Lowes-divisive-party-grave-mistake.html

I'm not sure how accurate this is, but it's plausible...

https://www.facebook.com/share/p/1FaXefruYb/

Security at Asda telling a woman she stinks of alcohol, and then at the end snatches at her phone...

https://vm.tiktok.com/ZNRcg87LG/

He's only considering leaving the city, not the country.

He's not long arrived in Spain, and he seems very keen on honing certain skills...

https://vm.tiktok.com/ZNRcpEDrs/

Even the DM is talking about the NUDGE Unit now: REVEALED: How shadowy unit of government 'thought police' set up by ex-MI6 agent is trying to keep a lid on Britain's simmering racial tensions https://www.dailymail.com/news/article-15897997/unit-government-police-MI6-agent-racial-tensions.html

Choosing not to close a border is one decision. Branding concern about that choice as extremism is another. The second protects the first. Hungary Stopped It In Six Months. Britain's Government Chose Not To.

In May 2025, Keir Starmer stood in Downing Street and told the country, "The experiment is over." Six months earlier, he had already explained what it was. Of his predecessors, he said, "Policies were reformed deliberately to liberalise immigration. This happened by design, not accident." Both statements are true. The experiment was deliberate. But it is not over.

In the first six months of 2025, the same period Starmer declared it over, 47 people were permitted to lodge an asylum claim in Hungary, a country of 9.5 million. In the same period, Britain received roughly 50,000. Both countries answer to the same conventions and hold the same tools. The difference between 47 and 50,000 is not capacity. It is choice.

The United States made the same choice this year. Border Patrol apprehensions fell to their lowest level since 1970, down from 1.6 million in 2021 to under 240,000. Net migration to the United States turned negative for the first time in half a century. This was achieved within months of a government deciding to act. Britain's government has not made that decision.

This is not new. In 2013, Peter Mandelson admitted that in 2004, under a Labour government, "we were not only welcoming people to come into this country to work, we were sending out search parties for people." Andrew Neather, who wrote the 2000 speech opening Britain's borders, later said the policy was intended to "rub the Right's nose in diversity and render their arguments out of date." Six of eight references to that policy's social objectives were removed before publication.

More recently, Professor Alan Manning, former head of the government's own Migration Advisory Committee, admitted that mass migration was used to paper over economic failure. A substitute for reform. The trade-off was understood. The warnings were issued. The decision was taken anyway, by both parties, across three decades.

What is new is the second half of the choice. Having decided, repeatedly, to expand migration rather than confront the harder political work, the same state has built the machinery to manage the response.

The government's own project delivery guidance states that British equality, diversity and inclusion policy is governed by the UN's 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. Prevent's training classifies "cultural nationalism," the belief that mass migration threatens Western culture, alongside extremist ideology, broad enough to capture the Prime Minister's own warning that Britain risks becoming "an island of strangers." A new definition of Islamophobia was opposed jointly by Christian, Muslim, Hindu and Sikh leaders, by the Equality and Human Rights Commission, and by the government's own former anti-extremism adviser, who warned extremists would use it to deflect scrutiny. It was announced regardless.

The pattern repeats in how dissent is handled. After the 2024 riots, people were jailed for social media posts within days, sentences in the same range as those who set buildings alight. This year, the Technology Secretary Liz Kendall announced new powers to remove "incendiary" content during "times of crisis," definitions set by ministers, the same day the government's own terror reviewer revealed his questions about migration's national security implications had gone unanswered. One question produced legislation within forty-eight hours. The other, silence.

None of this is incompetence. Incompetence does not produce a 47 person asylum total in Hungary and a fifty-year low in US border crossings within months of two governments deciding to act, while Britain, holding the same tools, produces neither.

Choosing not to close a border is one decision. Branding concern about that choice as extremism is another. The two are not separate. The second protects the first. ........ https://x.com/JChimirie66677/status/2066137678416953761

When you read CONNOR TOMLINSON's article you begin to understand where this whole 2 TIER SYSTEM in Britain comes from: :" ..... Essentially, RICU is the nerve centre of two-tier policing..... " As I suspected on the day of Vickrum Digwa’s sentencing, the tropes recycled by RICU in every grieving family’s impact statement were present in the speech that Henry Nowak’s father gave to the press outside Southampton Court. Lines such as “Henry was one of the most inclusive individuals...”, and “This is not a case about Sikhism. This is not a case about racism...”, and “This doesn’t mean going to extremes…” would have been fed to the Nowak family by RICU, via the community liaison officers — who Mark Nowak referenced in his remarks — to reduce “community tensions”, discourage social disorder, and with the threat that civil unrest might jeopardise court proceedings....................The state is obliged to do this, under the various iterations of the Race Relations Act, consolidated in the Equality Act 2010 ....... Pursuant to fostering “good relations” between the host population and minority, often violent, communities with “protected characteristics”, the state will instruct politicians, police officers, and media outlets to call for calm, denounce division, and extol the virtues of multiracial pluralism, all while unilaterally policing the negative opinions held of minorities by majorities with Public Order offences, non-crime hate incidents, and prison sentences for imprudent social media posts........ Every government department is commanded to “advance equality of opportunity between persons who share a relevant protected characteristic and persons who do not share it” — mandating discrimination against heterosexuals, men, whites, and Christians, on behalf of racial, religious, and sexual-preference minorities. It also makes it almost impossible to fire them, when they can log discrimination complaints as members of groups with “protected characteristics”....................... This leads to the consolidation of activist networks within the civil service, who then use bodies like RICU to pursue their own goals — such as the 700 member Islamic Network ......The presence of a member of the Charity Commission on the recommended Counter Extremism Ministerial Board also demonstrates an intent to double down on DEI policies. ...... .... continued ... https://connortomlinson.substack.com/p/the-dont-look-back-in-anger-department

Denmark

NEW: Bluesky will not be included in the under-16s social media ban...... This is essentially a two tier political social media ban.

Blue sky is left wing and much more pro government so Labour will let kids on it.

Naturally with no other choice children will flood onto Bluesky.

This is a disgrace. https://x.com/BenGrahamUK/status/2066167370624745476

Sussex police push over the elderly mother of Rhiannon Whyte.

Been away for a few days, catching up now. This is why, if I've personally shared their content on channels, I've tended to archive it first so they don't benefit from the ad or cookie revenue.

Perverts

Yesterday in London

https://x.com/i/status/2066415406093340691

As yet unconfirmed

Active Patriot:

A teenager has been charged and is due in court after a boy was strangled off his motorbike at a park on Drapers Lane in Hedon at around 8.30pm on Friday.

A 16-year-old boy, who cannot be named for legal reasons due to his age, has been charged with non-fatal strangulation, robbery, and possession of an offensive weapon in a public place, and has been remanded into custody.

It is believed a teenage boy approached another teenage boy, thought to be known to him, before assaulting him and attempting to steal his motorbike.

He can't be named due to his age, but the low quality video shows you just enough...

https://www.facebook.com/share/r/1Ex3r7ysJt/