Here is another example of the steady expansion of the legal definition of terrorism, to encompass more right of centre targets.

It's hard to see from this poor write up the basis of the terrorism charges. The now common Section 58-type offences of the Terrorism Act (having information (documents, video), likely to be of use to a terrorist) are tacked on.

But the piece appears intentionally written to suggest that views such as judicially prosecuting Harry (and euthanising his child) or sympathy for other criminal acts makes these the terrorist offences.

These are unsavoury views but making them precedents for future terrorist charges is a dangerous direction to go down.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-london-61721607

If the roles were reversed, would the MSM perhaps report more broadly?
https://www.thetelegraphandargus.co.uk/news/20194455.day-2-kian-tordoff-murder-trial-prosecution-opening-continues/

How interesting

Yachts To Be Exempt From EU's Carbon Pricing Plan | ZeroHedge

Have you had enough yet?

https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/yachts-be-exempt-eus-carbon-pricing-plan?mc_cid=03efc1ff24

Morning All,

I shall be on Red Ice at 8pm this evening being interviewed by Lana. If you don't already follow their high quality content you can find it on the links below.

https://t.me/redicetv

https://redice.tv
https://redicemembers.com
https://redice.eth.xyz
https://odysee.com/@redicetv
https://bitchute.com/redicetv
https://rumble.com/user/redicetv
https://campsite.bio/redicetv

Even this weak policy that sees us taking Rwandan refugees 1:1 is actively sabotaged by those employed to process it. The whole rotten edifice needs to be dismantled.

"civil servants' forum discuss ways of undermining the policy; mandarins create a campaign page to halt deportations"

https://order-order.com/2022/06/09/home-office-civil-servants-mutiny-over-rwanda/

Please note, there's an undesirable pretending to be something they're not on our group chat. Block > report as spam. I'll look into. Thank you.

SCIENTESE: The Language of Scientism

Avoid using scientese in normal conversation outside of scientific conferences. Avoid wasting time in discussions about definitions and existence/non existence isolation/non isolation of viruses/bacteria/etc.

All of these are red herrings designed to trap people into areas which are besides the point of what is happening: the pre-planned stripping of human rights relating to bodily autonomy.

The issue they are fighting us on is human rights, not science. They could not care less if they lose the scientific argument once they strip our rights to bodily autonomy forever.

Scientese is a Trojan Horse. Don't let the wooden horse through the city gates or allow it to dominate the narrative and focus on the real battleground: the right to bodily autonomy without discrimination or prejudice.

Scientese is just as useless as legalese to defend human rights: avoid both scientese and legalese.

Say NO to scientese.
Focus on your rights instead.

Robin

Knives are out for the excellent Michael Woodley

https://archive.ph/r3SH4

"Anti-racism" is anti-white Cultural Marxism. An ''anti-racist'' curriculum is necessarily an anti-white, Cultural Marxist curriculum.

Many schools already and soon, officially, the Welsh government will be embedding it into British children's education.

It's organised directly by the Socialist 'Workers' Party front SUTR:
https://www.eventbrite.co.uk/e/conference-for-the-black-child-tickets-338206834747

Interesting perspective on trendy globalist Israeli philosopher, Harari, by the late Sir Roger.

Recognising the fundamentals of sexual and ethnic stratification, yet calling for a global universalism under a centralised authority 🤔

https://www.city-journal.org/yuval-noah-harari

It's notable that in areas of growing dissent to the problems with liberalism, that given the most prominent voice comes from within progressive liberalism itself. A case in point is (nominally at least) right-leaning newspapers and magazines, that are only too happy to promote feminist theories, when they see it as criticising hook-up culture. Another massive example is the "transgender" aberration. Even though feminist 'gender' theory helped birth it, feminist assertions on what a woman is, is given front billing. Socially conservative voices are either too weak culturally or too morally cowardly, to be a leading combatant. So they co-opt (or are coopted by) these false friends. Any adjustments thereby to these noxious trends are marginal at best.

Example: https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-10862331/Why-sexual-revolution-disaster-women-Feminist-Louise-Perry-sparks-fierce-debate.html

𝐄 𝐍 𝐉 𝐎 𝐘 | 𝐓 𝐇 𝐄 | 𝐃 𝐄 𝐂 𝐋 𝐈 𝐍 𝐄
@EnjoyTheD

Dare we hope?

This is how the Marxists at HnH like the police to operate to prevent people politically campaigning.