HR is the belly of the Woke beast in most corporates and LinkedIn is just an extension of that hideous industry sector.
""The Confronting Racism course featuring Robin DiAngelo is no longer available in our course library, at the request of the 3rd party content provider we licensed this content from," LinkedIn vice president of corporate communications Nicole Leverich told Newsweek in an email on Monday.
"We provide a wide variety of learning content, including more than 270 courses on the topics of diversity, inclusion and belonging," Leverich said. "We will continue to add new courses to help people learn the skills they need to be more successful in their career, including the foundational skills we all need to be effective allies and help build a more equitable future.""
""The Confronting Racism course featuring Robin DiAngelo is no longer available in our course library, at the request of the 3rd party content provider we licensed this content from," LinkedIn vice president of corporate communications Nicole Leverich told Newsweek in an email on Monday.
"We provide a wide variety of learning content, including more than 270 courses on the topics of diversity, inclusion and belonging," Leverich said. "We will continue to add new courses to help people learn the skills they need to be more successful in their career, including the foundational skills we all need to be effective allies and help build a more equitable future.""
Get rid of Gordon Brown's Equality Act.
Important issue. Group-level differences between those privileged groups who have 'protected characteristics' and us are considered bias (or in the argot of Social Justice warriors things like 'racism') if they negatively affect those groups. Worse Covid health outcomes for minorities? Bias/racism. Fewer applications in an elite university? Racism/bias. Hairstyles differing from school uniform policy? Racism/bias. Fewer employees etc etc.
Utter rubbish of course, but this is how the High Court described it before: - "indirect discrimination concerns provisions, criteria or practices which have a disparate impact on those with protected characteristics".
Article from today's Guardian
Important issue. Group-level differences between those privileged groups who have 'protected characteristics' and us are considered bias (or in the argot of Social Justice warriors things like 'racism') if they negatively affect those groups. Worse Covid health outcomes for minorities? Bias/racism. Fewer applications in an elite university? Racism/bias. Hairstyles differing from school uniform policy? Racism/bias. Fewer employees etc etc.
Utter rubbish of course, but this is how the High Court described it before: - "indirect discrimination concerns provisions, criteria or practices which have a disparate impact on those with protected characteristics".
Article from today's Guardian
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
What would the Duke of Wellington, hero of Waterloo, have thought to have looked out of his Walmer Castle window this morning to see this arrive on the beaches below? Sadly the cannons on the castle surrounds are now decommissioned.
The castle was built by Henry VIII to protect against invasion from France or the Holy Roman Empire. Now we welcome them with Her Majesty's Border Force and whisk them to top flight hotels.
clip source: https://foxhole.news/2021/02/23/watch-dramatic-footage-showing-21-migrants-arrive-and-disperse-on-kent-beach/
The castle was built by Henry VIII to protect against invasion from France or the Holy Roman Empire. Now we welcome them with Her Majesty's Border Force and whisk them to top flight hotels.
clip source: https://foxhole.news/2021/02/23/watch-dramatic-footage-showing-21-migrants-arrive-and-disperse-on-kent-beach/
🤔 Durdle Door on Dorset's Lulworth Estate saw huge spike in visitors last summer. Site owners saw 'environmental degradation never been experienced' before. Lulworth Estate blamed 'the younger and more geographically and culturally diverse cohort' from urban areas for huge piles of litter that took weeks to collect. Volunteers reported at the time finding human faeces in food boxes left behind on the sand. A surge in visitors who usually go abroad and aren't used to the rules of 'leaving no trace' in the English countryside.
Today the extreme BAME activist at the head of the Extremism Commission had another go at making our country less free. At a previous House of Commons hearing she outlined how she wanted to ban everything from Tommy Robinson upwards. Previously a virtual unknown, largely non-entity, she was brought in to be the frontperson for an attempt to make 'extremism' illegal by Theresa May and seconded by the Met's Mark Rowley (see Rowleyism), a man who oversaw various counter-terror functions for the Met and has the appearance of the type of comic book villain who has children chained in his basement.
The first attempt at legislating fell flat when it became clear that 'extremism' would apply to suburban vicars who opposed homosexual marriage. So this time they're going with 'hateful extremism'. At a time when society is uneasy with hate speech restrictions and with the vast majority of 'hate incidents' (over 95%) being legal, these front people are making the case for tightening them up further still. As usual the technique is to flag scary outliers to distract you from the much larger target they are looking for. Lots of reference to Anjem Choudary etc.
People like Robinson, Generation Identity and Patriotic Alternative are also mentioned in her report. We read today's report, so you don't have to. Highlights attached below, full here: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/963156/CCE_Operating_with_Impunity_Accessible.pdf
People like Robinson, Generation Identity and Patriotic Alternative are also mentioned in her report. We read today's report, so you don't have to. Highlights attached below, full here: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/963156/CCE_Operating_with_Impunity_Accessible.pdf
Here's our summary from late last year on Sara Khan setting out her stall for the Home Affairs Committee
https://t.me/TraditionalBritainGroup/1259
https://t.me/TraditionalBritainGroup/1259
Telegram
Traditional Britain Group
Some comments and clips by the 'Extremism Commissioner' Sara Khan to the Home Affairs Committee. She wants her department to determine what you can say online and decide who is prosecuted. She thinks the law needs to be changed to make currently legal points…
Shock: "trained Marxists" do not want to spread the revolutionary tokens among their lower ranks.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-9291809/amp/Black-Lives-Matter-opens-finances.html
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-9291809/amp/Black-Lives-Matter-opens-finances.html
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Dover: They're even sending disabled people now, who have obviously heard about our International Health Service. Over 40 customers for the Priti Useless Taxi Service, including many people from Vietnam.
As usual watch Chris Johnson's page for the scoop:
https://facebook.com/profile.php?id=100035399160971
As usual watch Chris Johnson's page for the scoop:
https://facebook.com/profile.php?id=100035399160971
When 'revenge porn' goes both ways
https://courtnewsuk.co.uk/woman-takes-revenge-by-posting-video-of-her-boyfriend-giving-oral-sex-to-a-man/
https://courtnewsuk.co.uk/woman-takes-revenge-by-posting-video-of-her-boyfriend-giving-oral-sex-to-a-man/
The Mail, whose 'Defence Editor' Larisa Brown created the propaganda piece "tears, sorry, second chance" complete with a flown-in Union pillow, now tell their readers that she's "British".
But she's absolutely not. In what sense is this true now? Her citizenship has been removed and the courts have also previously agreed that she has a right to an ancestral passport in Bangladesh. She's not British in any sense whatsoever, except sharing a nation for part of her life, in which she lived in a largely foreign heritage bubble.
But she's absolutely not. In what sense is this true now? Her citizenship has been removed and the courts have also previously agreed that she has a right to an ancestral passport in Bangladesh. She's not British in any sense whatsoever, except sharing a nation for part of her life, in which she lived in a largely foreign heritage bubble.