Continuation from above ⬆️⬆️⬆️
Western sanctions do not bother him either: foreign microcircuits are needed only to assemble the iPhone, and they are not suitable for conquering space. There are no critical difficulties in other areas either. Ukraine delivers certain troubles, continued Moscow's main ally. According to him, the Belarusian-Ukrainian border is tightly closed, but the same cannot be said about the Russian-Ukrainian one. True, the FSB and the KGB are effectively combating emerging threats through joint efforts.
In turn, Putin thanked Lukashenka for his readiness to include assistance to students in the DPR and LPR in the humanitarian agenda of the Union State. "If these are not humanitarian issues, then what can be attributed to them? Education, assistance to children, young people — this, probably, should always be in the focus of our attention," Putin said.

Results
Political scientist Andrei Suzdaltsev noted that every time Lukashenko comes to meet with Putin, he seeks to strengthen economic ties with Moscow.
“As for the deployment of nuclear weapons, this is also mutually beneficial. Russia will strengthen its security, and Lukashenko will position himself as the main guarantor of Russian missiles on his territory. That is, Moscow will have to protect him,” the expert argues.
Vladimir Zharikhin, deputy head of the Institute of CIS Countries, stressed that economic and security issues are the most important for both sides today. Moreover, there are no contradictions between them, since everyone understands that there is no time.
“With hard work, we managed to agree on 28 road maps. The countries continue their rapprochement in order to cope with Western pressure, but, apparently, they are not going to create supranational bodies. On the other hand, the current opportunities are quite enough to deepen cooperation in other areas ", — Zharikhin believes.
It is obvious that Lukashenka's visit to Russia is far from the last one. At the same time, contacts will develop not only along the lines of the Union State — Moscow and Minsk also bring the EAEU and the CSTO closer.

Ministry of Defense: AFU destroyed their own soldiers who surrendered, firing 300 shells at them

MOSCOW, April 6 — RIA Novosti. The Kiev regime deliberately destroys its military personnel in order to prevent attempts to retreat from their positions, the Ministry of Defence said.
So, on April 5, near Avdiivka, units of the Southern Group of Russian troops were active in capturing the enemy's stronghold.
“During the battle, the commander of the unit of the 53rd mechanized brigade of the Armed Forces of Ukraine, who was at the strong point, turned to the Russian command via an open radio channel, declaring that his unit of 14 people had voluntarily laid down their weapons and the desire to surrender,” the military department said.
In order for the Ukrainian fighters to be able to safely leave, the Russian military suspended hostilities. Until the morning, Ukrainian servicemen were placed in a dugout.

"At night, Ukrainian artillery purposefully opened heavy fire on the dugout where the surrendered Ukrainian servicemen were located," the Defence Ministry added.
In total, the Armed Forces of Ukraine fired about 300 large-caliber shells. All 14 fighters who laid down their arms were killed.
President Vladimir Putin spoke about this incident today at a meeting with the acting head of the DPR, Denis Pushilin. According to him, the Kiev regime is behaving in the highest degree cynical and cruel in relation not only to the Russians, but also to its citizens.

Join us 👉 @TrFormer 💤
Become a member of the @TransFormerChat

Good night 😴
from @TrFormer💤

As soon as Finland joined NATO, a mobile strategic missile system Yars was spotted in the border town of Vyborg.

Will the reaction from the Finns follow tomorrow, or according to tradition in a couple of months?
👉Join us @TrFormer💤

Good morning and happy Friday ☀️

👉Join us @TrFormer💤

Censorship: The Metaphaysics of Sovereign Culture

The topic of censorship is not only highly topical for our society (especially in the context of the SMO), but also philosophically fundamental. Contemporary Western culture increasingly resorts to censorship, despite trying to present liberalism as the abolition of all censorship criteria. In reality, what is censorship if not the most radical form of censoring any idea, image, doctrine, work or thought that does not fit into the narrow and increasingly exclusivist dogma of the 'open society'? Even today, at the Cannes Film Festival and other prestigious venues controlled by the West, it is impossible to pass by without the bare minimum: non-traditional forms of sexual identity, racial diversity, anti-colonial (and in fact neo-colonial liberal) discourse and so on. What else but a totalitarian and pandemic censorship is wokeism, i.e. an appeal to all citizens to be 'awake' and to report immediately to the relevant authorities as soon as they notice a hint of deviation from liberal values - racism (Russophobia is an exception), racism (racism is an exception here, as Russia is not politically correct), 'sexism', 'patriotism' (again, Ukrainian Nazism is an exception, which is welcome as it is a fight against 'Russians'), gender inequality (e.g. protection of the normal traditional family)? And isn't the infamous 'political correctness', which insistently and under threat of total ostracism forces us to avoid certain terms, expressions, quotations, formulations that might offend the sensibilities of liberal society, censorship? In today's West, we are faced with a veritable flowering of censorship and this is an undeniable fact, regardless of the synonyms that can be invented for it.

By Alexander Dugin

👉Join us @TrFormer💤

🇷🇺🇹🇷 Sergey Lavrov is on an official visit to Ankara, meets with Turkish Foreign Minister M. Cavusoglu.

👉Join us @TrFormer💤

⬆️⬆️⬆️
Due to the fact that the dollar turnover was so large outside the United States, money inside the country was very cheap. Thanks to this, middle–class Americans could afford to own their own house, and the government could maintain astronomical debt without obvious consequences. Sometimes there was a debate in Congress about the debt ceiling, but it was all abstract. It didn't seem important to most of them. It wasn't then. The Fed printed dollars, the US controlled the world's reserve currency, and this meant that we had cheap money – a privilege that no other country had.

But what happens when it's all over? No one wants to think about it, because the consequences will be really terrible. We thought about this about a year ago, when the special operation in Ukraine began. But it was the reaction of the West that promised real troubles. The US leadership has gone crazy. It seems that Joe Biden, with the help of allies from among Republican senators, did not want to shake the regime in Russia, but to undermine the economic system that was so generous to the United States. It's not about the millions that the US sent Zelensky, it wouldn't have killed us. It's about sanctions. They were supposed to hit Russia, but in March last year it became clear that the only ones who would suffer would be the United States.

These sanctions would never have worked, because, unlike the United States, Russia does not have a financial economy. Russia is getting richer from the sale of real products – oil, gas, coal, iron, grain, fertilizers. If they need it, they will just exchange it. A year later, despite the sanctions, the Russian ruble remains the same against the dollar as it was before the conflict in Ukraine.

Tucker Carlson, Fox News anchor
👉Join us @TrFormer💤

Xi Jinping and Macron hold informal talks in Guangzhou.

👉Join us @TrFormer💤

🧿Техас Донбасс (aka Russell Bentley) is back for the most controversial Talk with the WB yet.

Other than chemical weapons and depleted uranium shells, we discuss the drone wars, the protests in France, Epstein and Trump, as well as the expectations of offensives on Donetsk.

➡️ https://youtu.be/tKLBvCDkQZY ⬅️

Likewise, we reflect on the passing of Maxim Fomiin in the terrorist attack in SPB

@WorkingBrother 😎

"I had a telephone conversation with President Zelensky before my visit to China." Ukraine will be an important topic in my meetings with President Xi and Premier Li. The EU wants a just world that respects the sovereignty and territorial integrity of Ukraine".
Usrula von der Leyen flew to Beijing to help Macron "put pressure together on Xi Jinping".

And respect for the sovereignty and territorial integrity of Serbia?