#TransFormatorBuzzes :
Well, we do not have any illusions, that the new Prime Minister (and Foreign Secretary, hopefully) would change their stance towards Russia or would make any significant changes in the British foreign policy at all.
However, Liz Truss has personally very poor relationships with Sergei Lavrov after her visit to Moscow, and BoJo himself has something intimate in his attempts to compete (and fail every time) with Vladimir Putin.
The most recent was his disgusting attempt to measure whose p... is bigger ('We've got to show them our pecs!") at G7 summit. Previously there was a competition, in which country the COVID19 jab would be rolled out first. I remember, in UK it was Monday, but in Moscow it officially started on Friday... (though later, due to a higher level of discipline, British population has finished it en mass much faster). That bizarre competition, probably started even long before that - there was a speech by Putin about "democracy not working" (in context of modern Western states), which was instantaneously responded by BoJo...
At least we want to believe, that to the new leadership of the UK personal attitude and previously made mistakes would not completely prevail over common sense for which the British nation is renown. We hope, that if not blinded by Russophobia and hatred, they would be able to build more constructive relationships with Russia and the whole world. May be we are still naïve...
But not only we, as in Ukrainian channels there is also fear that "a major political crisis is brewing in Britain, which could also threaten global support for Ukraine on the international arena."
#TransFormator
Well, we do not have any illusions, that the new Prime Minister (and Foreign Secretary, hopefully) would change their stance towards Russia or would make any significant changes in the British foreign policy at all.
However, Liz Truss has personally very poor relationships with Sergei Lavrov after her visit to Moscow, and BoJo himself has something intimate in his attempts to compete (and fail every time) with Vladimir Putin.
The most recent was his disgusting attempt to measure whose p... is bigger ('We've got to show them our pecs!") at G7 summit. Previously there was a competition, in which country the COVID19 jab would be rolled out first. I remember, in UK it was Monday, but in Moscow it officially started on Friday... (though later, due to a higher level of discipline, British population has finished it en mass much faster). That bizarre competition, probably started even long before that - there was a speech by Putin about "democracy not working" (in context of modern Western states), which was instantaneously responded by BoJo...
At least we want to believe, that to the new leadership of the UK personal attitude and previously made mistakes would not completely prevail over common sense for which the British nation is renown. We hope, that if not blinded by Russophobia and hatred, they would be able to build more constructive relationships with Russia and the whole world. May be we are still naïve...
But not only we, as in Ukrainian channels there is also fear that "a major political crisis is brewing in Britain, which could also threaten global support for Ukraine on the international arena."
#TransFormator
Telegram
TransFormator
However, once the cameras were turned off Mr Johnson warned that trying to settle the standoff with Russia too hastily will 'only cause enduring instability'.
No rush, Boris, until the last Ukrainian standing means exactly that ‼️
No rush, Boris, until the last Ukrainian standing means exactly that ‼️
👍2🤔2😁1
#TransFormatorBuzzes :
Well, that may be not the most burning issue in the modern world. However, it is very indicative in the demonstration of the attitude of the British (and US) officials to the international relationships and their own place and ability to cooperate. We have already written about the changes in the addresses of the British and American embassies in Moscow. Here is the continuation of the story:
MOSCOW, July 7 - RIA Novosti. The British embassy in Russia told RIA Novosti that it would not use the new address on Luhansk People's Republic Square and considered the old one on Smolenskaya Embankment to be relevant.
Recently the Capital's Department of City property reported that the embassy of the United Kingdom received a new address: Luhansk People's Republic Square, building 1. This information was entered into the address register of Moscow and the Federal Information Address System.
As follows from the commentary of the diplomatic mission, British diplomats do not intend to recognise this change.
"The current address of the British Embassy in Moscow is listed on the official website of the embassy," the press service said. There he is listed as 121099, Moscow, Smolenskaya embankment, 10.
The name "Square of the Lugansk People's Republic" was given to an unnamed territory located along the Smolenskaya embankment between Protochny Lane and the exit to Novy Arbat. Moscow Mayor Sergei Sobyanin signed the corresponding decree on July 5.
Also at the end of June, the city authorities renamed the area near the US Embassy - now it is located at the address: Donetsk People's Republic Square, Building 1. In response, the diplomatic mission removed the address from the site in the usual format - only latitude and longitude are indicated there.
You see, they think that they are entitled to "recognise" or "not recognise" changes made by the local authorities in a capital of a sovereign country (and this country is Russia).
We can only remind that the "Russian Post Service" will deliver correspondence only if a proper address is clearly stated.
#TransFormator
Well, that may be not the most burning issue in the modern world. However, it is very indicative in the demonstration of the attitude of the British (and US) officials to the international relationships and their own place and ability to cooperate. We have already written about the changes in the addresses of the British and American embassies in Moscow. Here is the continuation of the story:
MOSCOW, July 7 - RIA Novosti. The British embassy in Russia told RIA Novosti that it would not use the new address on Luhansk People's Republic Square and considered the old one on Smolenskaya Embankment to be relevant.
Recently the Capital's Department of City property reported that the embassy of the United Kingdom received a new address: Luhansk People's Republic Square, building 1. This information was entered into the address register of Moscow and the Federal Information Address System.
As follows from the commentary of the diplomatic mission, British diplomats do not intend to recognise this change.
"The current address of the British Embassy in Moscow is listed on the official website of the embassy," the press service said. There he is listed as 121099, Moscow, Smolenskaya embankment, 10.
The name "Square of the Lugansk People's Republic" was given to an unnamed territory located along the Smolenskaya embankment between Protochny Lane and the exit to Novy Arbat. Moscow Mayor Sergei Sobyanin signed the corresponding decree on July 5.
Also at the end of June, the city authorities renamed the area near the US Embassy - now it is located at the address: Donetsk People's Republic Square, Building 1. In response, the diplomatic mission removed the address from the site in the usual format - only latitude and longitude are indicated there.
You see, they think that they are entitled to "recognise" or "not recognise" changes made by the local authorities in a capital of a sovereign country (and this country is Russia).
We can only remind that the "Russian Post Service" will deliver correspondence only if a proper address is clearly stated.
#TransFormator
Telegram
TransFormator
The area near the UK embassy in Moscow was renamed «the Luhansk People's Republic Square».
Such decision was signed by the mayor of Moscow, Sergei Sobyanin, on 5th of July. The residents of Moscow have chosen such name during an online vote. 🤣😂💤
«The UK’s…
Such decision was signed by the mayor of Moscow, Sergei Sobyanin, on 5th of July. The residents of Moscow have chosen such name during an online vote. 🤣😂💤
«The UK’s…
❤2👏1
We have already written about Ukrainian flag on the Snake Island. The story has got a continuation.
As it was reported from the Office of Zelenskii, Ukrainian servicemen have actually later landed on the Island and placed a flag. The photographic proofs were provided. But that is not the end...
Read below ⬇️
#TransFormator
As it was reported from the Office of Zelenskii, Ukrainian servicemen have actually later landed on the Island and placed a flag. The photographic proofs were provided. But that is not the end...
Read below ⬇️
#TransFormator
🤮3👍1
The final point was made by Russian Ministry of Defence and Russian Air Force:
"Amid military failures and a massive retreat of Ukrainian forces in Donbass, on the night of July 7, the Kiev regime attempted to symbolically deliver the flag to Snake Island.
💥Around 5am, several Ukrainian soldiers boarded the island from a motorboat and were photographed with the flag. Russian Aerospace Forces aircraft immediately struck Snake Island with high-precision missiles, killing some of the Ukrainian troops. The survivors fled in the direction of Primorske, Odessa region."
#TransFormator
"Amid military failures and a massive retreat of Ukrainian forces in Donbass, on the night of July 7, the Kiev regime attempted to symbolically deliver the flag to Snake Island.
💥Around 5am, several Ukrainian soldiers boarded the island from a motorboat and were photographed with the flag. Russian Aerospace Forces aircraft immediately struck Snake Island with high-precision missiles, killing some of the Ukrainian troops. The survivors fled in the direction of Primorske, Odessa region."
#TransFormator
Telegram
MoD Russia
⚡️Russian Defence Ministry report on the progress of the special military operation in Ukraine (July 7, 2022) (Part 1)
▫️The Armed Forces of the Russian Federation continue the special military operation in Ukraine. The enemy suffers significant losses…
▫️The Armed Forces of the Russian Federation continue the special military operation in Ukraine. The enemy suffers significant losses…
🔥3
🇮🇳🇨🇳🇷🇺Russia has earned $24 billion since March on the sale of oil, gas and coal to China and India.
This is reported by Bloomberg with reference to its own research.
China has spent $18.9 billion on Russian hydrocarbons, which is twice as much as a year ago.
India paid $5.1 billion, which is five times more than last year.
The total revenue of the Russian Federation from hydrocarbon trade with Beijing and New Delhi increased by $13 billion.
The reorientation to India and China allowed Russia to cover the costs of Western sanctions.
This is reported by Bloomberg with reference to its own research.
China has spent $18.9 billion on Russian hydrocarbons, which is twice as much as a year ago.
India paid $5.1 billion, which is five times more than last year.
The total revenue of the Russian Federation from hydrocarbon trade with Beijing and New Delhi increased by $13 billion.
The reorientation to India and China allowed Russia to cover the costs of Western sanctions.
👍3👏3
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
When people in Europe (and not only) are preoccupied by the questions like:
-"Who is going to be a new Prime Minister in the UK?" and
-"Why India and China are ignoring Western sanctions on trade with Russia?"
somewhere in Ukraine work continues...💤
-"Who is going to be a new Prime Minister in the UK?" and
-"Why India and China are ignoring Western sanctions on trade with Russia?"
somewhere in Ukraine work continues...💤
👍4❤3
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Erdogan has put his hand on him. (At the recent NATO summit) Was it a sign of Karma?🕉
😁4👍2
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Somewhere in Ukraine. Russian helicopter in a hurry...
🤩4
There Is No ‘Magic Bullet’ That Can Turn The Tide For Ukraine
The military victory or defeat in the Russian-Ukraine War is likely to be determined by the side that has the highest quality of manpower and less on the platforms of war. For all its major missteps in the opening round, Russia began the war with a total active force of 900,000 whereas Ukraine had approximately 250,000.
Both sides have suffered egregious casualties since February – but Russia has hundreds of thousands more active troops from which to pull to replace its losses, whereas Ukraine has none. The impact on the battlefields of the Ukrainian disadvantages in weaponry and personnel is stark and unambiguous.
In a recent New York Times expose, Megan Specia wrote that a Ukrainian colonel admitted that most of the replacements being sent to his unit at the front have “never served in the army. The notion that people could simply spring to action when the war crept closer is wrong, he said. By then, it is too late.” As units like the one Specia described fall back from one city to the next, there is no military foundation upon which to base the hope that the Russian offensive will be stopped.
Moscow can replenish its personnel losses from an existing pool of relatively trained personnel. They have tens of thousands of additional tanks, armored personnel carriers, and artillery pieces to replace combat losses. Russia has a decisive advantage in air power. Putin’s military-industrial capacity to continue making missiles, rockets, and artillery shells has been diminished because of sanctions, but still functions – whereas most of Ukraine’s manufacturing capacity has been methodically destroyed.
In short, there is no valid military path through which Ukraine can hope that trading space for time will result in stopping Russia’s methodical progress through Ukraine – much less reverse it. To continue contesting every town and city is to ensure the Ukrainian casualties continue to mount and its urban areas destroyed. In the end, Russia is still likely to achieve a tactical victory.
It is necessary, in light of these physical realities, for U.S. and Western policies to change. Continuing to give verbal support to Ukraine and claiming that eventually, Kyiv’s side will win the war is not likely to change the outcome and is likely to result in a policy failure for Washington.
No one wants to negotiate from a position of weakness with an invading power, but the harsh truth is that the longer Zelensky and his Western supporters continue pursuing unrealistic objectives, the more likely Ukraine eventually suffers an outright military defeat.
The military victory or defeat in the Russian-Ukraine War is likely to be determined by the side that has the highest quality of manpower and less on the platforms of war. For all its major missteps in the opening round, Russia began the war with a total active force of 900,000 whereas Ukraine had approximately 250,000.
Both sides have suffered egregious casualties since February – but Russia has hundreds of thousands more active troops from which to pull to replace its losses, whereas Ukraine has none. The impact on the battlefields of the Ukrainian disadvantages in weaponry and personnel is stark and unambiguous.
In a recent New York Times expose, Megan Specia wrote that a Ukrainian colonel admitted that most of the replacements being sent to his unit at the front have “never served in the army. The notion that people could simply spring to action when the war crept closer is wrong, he said. By then, it is too late.” As units like the one Specia described fall back from one city to the next, there is no military foundation upon which to base the hope that the Russian offensive will be stopped.
Moscow can replenish its personnel losses from an existing pool of relatively trained personnel. They have tens of thousands of additional tanks, armored personnel carriers, and artillery pieces to replace combat losses. Russia has a decisive advantage in air power. Putin’s military-industrial capacity to continue making missiles, rockets, and artillery shells has been diminished because of sanctions, but still functions – whereas most of Ukraine’s manufacturing capacity has been methodically destroyed.
In short, there is no valid military path through which Ukraine can hope that trading space for time will result in stopping Russia’s methodical progress through Ukraine – much less reverse it. To continue contesting every town and city is to ensure the Ukrainian casualties continue to mount and its urban areas destroyed. In the end, Russia is still likely to achieve a tactical victory.
It is necessary, in light of these physical realities, for U.S. and Western policies to change. Continuing to give verbal support to Ukraine and claiming that eventually, Kyiv’s side will win the war is not likely to change the outcome and is likely to result in a policy failure for Washington.
No one wants to negotiate from a position of weakness with an invading power, but the harsh truth is that the longer Zelensky and his Western supporters continue pursuing unrealistic objectives, the more likely Ukraine eventually suffers an outright military defeat.
19FortyFive
There Is No ‘Magic Bullet’ That Can Turn the Tide for Ukraine
Last Sunday when the remaining Ukrainian soldier withdrew from Lysychansk, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky said evacuating his troops from the city “where the enemy has the greatest advantage in fire power,” was the right call, but “means only one…
👍2🤔2👏1😁1
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Putin: "We haven't started anything serious yet."...
"The longer it takes (to start negotiation) the harder it will be to get to an agreement with us."
July 7, 2022. State Duma (Parliament) of Russian Federation.
"The longer it takes (to start negotiation) the harder it will be to get to an agreement with us."
July 7, 2022. State Duma (Parliament) of Russian Federation.
🔥5👏2
Adviser to the head of Zelensky's Office, Podolyak, commented on Putin's speech today:
"Putin's mantra about war to the last Ukrainian is another proof of a deliberate Russian genocide".
What? Does he understand, what he has said?🤯
#TransFormator
"Putin's mantra about war to the last Ukrainian is another proof of a deliberate Russian genocide".
What? Does he understand, what he has said?🤯
#TransFormator
🤮3
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
❗️Exclusive❗️
Servicemen of the People's Militia of the LPR demonstrated captured weapons and equipment seized from the forces of the Kyiv regime.
Among the trophies: tanks, self-propelled and towed artillery, grenade launchers and anti-tank missiles manufactured by NATO countries, drones and even a Maxim machine gun
Servicemen of the People's Militia of the LPR demonstrated captured weapons and equipment seized from the forces of the Kyiv regime.
Among the trophies: tanks, self-propelled and towed artillery, grenade launchers and anti-tank missiles manufactured by NATO countries, drones and even a Maxim machine gun
👏5
For our Indian friends:
Mr. Alipov, Russian ambassador in India, thanked Indian Government for its assessment of the crisis in Ukraine and said, “Clearly they understand the background of the present geopolitical and geo-economic situation and the forced nature of Russia’s actions in Ukraine”. He said that India had not succumbed to western pressure regarding its links with Russia as the Delhi-Moscow relation “rests on a deep strategic foundation, drawing its strengths not only from deep historical roots, but also from a shared vision of how the world order should develop”.
Mr. Alipov conveyed Russia’s assessment that India wishes to remain free of the “paradigm of block confrontation” and said, “National interests and the need for a country to preserve its strategic autonomy guide how the Indians act, rejecting the very idea of dividing lines”.
Mr. Alipov, Russian ambassador in India, thanked Indian Government for its assessment of the crisis in Ukraine and said, “Clearly they understand the background of the present geopolitical and geo-economic situation and the forced nature of Russia’s actions in Ukraine”. He said that India had not succumbed to western pressure regarding its links with Russia as the Delhi-Moscow relation “rests on a deep strategic foundation, drawing its strengths not only from deep historical roots, but also from a shared vision of how the world order should develop”.
Mr. Alipov conveyed Russia’s assessment that India wishes to remain free of the “paradigm of block confrontation” and said, “National interests and the need for a country to preserve its strategic autonomy guide how the Indians act, rejecting the very idea of dividing lines”.
Thehindu
India, Russia share a vision of how the world should develop: Ambassador Alipov
No expansion of BRICS in haste, says Russia’s ambassador Denis Alipov
👍3👏2
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Highly Mobile Unit of Ukrainian Army.💤
😁7
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Lavrov and Blinken came to the meeting of the G20 foreign ministers. The Russian minister was the first to arrive, after him the US Secretary of State arrived at the meeting venue. He boycotted a number of protocol events with the participation of Lavrov.
🤮3
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
An unidentified person attacked former Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe during his speech in the city of Nara, the politician was injured, NHK reports. Abe is hospitalized unconscious, he shows no signs of life, media reports. A video from the scene of the attack on Abe is published on social networks, also in the frame, presumably, the detained criminal.
🤔3
Glimpse of truth among ocean of lies. Washington Post published an article about Stepan Bandera.
Stepan Bandera (1909-59) was a Ukrainian ultranationalist and quasi-Fascist. He was born in Galicia, which was part of the Austro-Hungarian Empire, turned into the short-lived West Ukrainian People’s Republic, then became part of Poland, later the Soviet Union and eventually today’s Ukraine.
In the 1930s, when the region was Polish, Bandera became a leader of the radical wing of the Organization of Ukrainian Nationalists. In effect, he was a partisan fighting for national independence and arranging things like the assassination of the Polish interior minister.
When Adolf Hitler invaded Poland, Bandera spotted an opportunity to push his cause. Collaborating with the Nazis, his OUN massacred their perceived national enemies — Jews, Poles and Russians — in a quest to ethnically cleanse Ukraine and prepare it for fascist statehood. Bandera was to lead this new nation, and Hitler was to be his ally. Bandera didn’t personally partake in the mass killings perpetrated in Ukraine by the Germans and their local helpers. But his underlings — presumably with his blessing — did.
On June 30, 1941, the partisans declared an independent Ukrainian state. But to their surprise, their putative patron, Hitler, decided that he didn’t want a separate country in what he viewed as the German people’s future Lebensraum. The Fuehrer had Bandera arrested and locked up in a concentration camp — albeit as a privileged prisoner in comfortable surroundings. In 1944, Bandera was released.
After the war, he made a home in Munich, where the Soviet Union’s KGB found and murdered him in 1959. This was the height of the Cold War, so the Ukrainian diaspora in the West built a hero cult around Bandera, painting him as a freedom fighter against, and victim of, the Soviets — which he was, but only in part.
After the Soviet Union collapsed and Ukraine became independent, the mythology around Bandera was revived, especially in western Ukraine, where Melnyk comes from. Statues and monuments went up in Bandera’s name. People marched under his banners. In recent years, however, the government has wisely distanced itself from the man and his complicated legacy.
Stepan Bandera (1909-59) was a Ukrainian ultranationalist and quasi-Fascist. He was born in Galicia, which was part of the Austro-Hungarian Empire, turned into the short-lived West Ukrainian People’s Republic, then became part of Poland, later the Soviet Union and eventually today’s Ukraine.
In the 1930s, when the region was Polish, Bandera became a leader of the radical wing of the Organization of Ukrainian Nationalists. In effect, he was a partisan fighting for national independence and arranging things like the assassination of the Polish interior minister.
When Adolf Hitler invaded Poland, Bandera spotted an opportunity to push his cause. Collaborating with the Nazis, his OUN massacred their perceived national enemies — Jews, Poles and Russians — in a quest to ethnically cleanse Ukraine and prepare it for fascist statehood. Bandera was to lead this new nation, and Hitler was to be his ally. Bandera didn’t personally partake in the mass killings perpetrated in Ukraine by the Germans and their local helpers. But his underlings — presumably with his blessing — did.
On June 30, 1941, the partisans declared an independent Ukrainian state. But to their surprise, their putative patron, Hitler, decided that he didn’t want a separate country in what he viewed as the German people’s future Lebensraum. The Fuehrer had Bandera arrested and locked up in a concentration camp — albeit as a privileged prisoner in comfortable surroundings. In 1944, Bandera was released.
After the war, he made a home in Munich, where the Soviet Union’s KGB found and murdered him in 1959. This was the height of the Cold War, so the Ukrainian diaspora in the West built a hero cult around Bandera, painting him as a freedom fighter against, and victim of, the Soviets — which he was, but only in part.
After the Soviet Union collapsed and Ukraine became independent, the mythology around Bandera was revived, especially in western Ukraine, where Melnyk comes from. Statues and monuments went up in Bandera’s name. People marched under his banners. In recent years, however, the government has wisely distanced itself from the man and his complicated legacy.
🔥3👍1