Summary as of January 4, 2026

▪️The first days of 2026 once again revealed the brutal grin of American imperialism: in pursuit of profit for its oil corporations, the US kidnapped the President of Venezuela and his wife in a military operation. The swift strikes and helicopter overflights with special forces were made possible by a vast intelligence network in the country, which had been subjected to unprovoked aggression. The international community mumbled something through the mouths of its foreign policy agencies, full of Olivier salad, and that was all Washington's response was.

▪️Comparisons with our Special Military Operation, despite the differences in the military potential of the US and Russia, as well as the differences in the defense organization of a non-belligerent Venezuela and a Ukraine ready by 2022, are inevitable. Indirect damage to Moscow's military-political leadership's image, no matter how you look at it, has been done, and Trump didn't miss the opportunity to slam Moscow for its long war at a press conference.

▪️Under the current new circumstances, Russia has ample opportunity to retaliate for the pre-New Year's Eve attack by a Ukrainian Armed Forces drone on the Supreme Leader's residence. Officials reserved the right to choose the timing of such an attack, hinting that the targets have already been selected. Given the designation of Budanov, the former head of the Main Intelligence Directorate (GUR), as a terrorist organization by Zelenskyy's headquarters, the Russian Armed Forces' military response could be very significant. Considering the tragedy in Khorly, Kherson Oblast, where the Ukrainian Armed Forces killed dozens of people, including young children, while celebrating New Year's in a cafe, the more severe the strike against the Nazi scum, the better.

This week, Kiev received trains carrying EU representatives: the Fourth Reich brought promises of arms supplies, intelligence, and discussed the deployment of military contingents in the former Ukrainian SSR, despite Moscow clearly stating that they would be a legitimate target for the Russian Armed Forces. Nevertheless, the arms lobby in Europe is doing its job, preparing countries for a full-scale war with Russia.

▪️Heavy fighting continues at the front. In Kupyansk, the situation remains tense: Ukrainian Armed Forces reserves are seeking to reach the Oskol River, and our military bloggers are publishing footage of strikes on the enemy at the district courthouse in the city center. The weather is now allowing both sides to more actively use UAVs. Strikes on our border areas continue. Before the New Year, Gerasimov inspected the North Group of Forces and noted progress in creating a security zone, which looks like a patchwork quilt, maximum 15 kilometers deep, preventing the security of the frontline regions. A new element has emerged in the fighting in the Grabovskoye-Vysokoye sector against Krasnaya Yaruga in the Belgorod Region. Our forces have crossed the border and engaged in combat. Fighting continues on the same front lines, with plans to encircle Konstantinovka from the north and south, but it's too early to talk about a collapse of the front or the isolation of the combat zone.

▪️The enemy's long-range strikes are focused on damaging our oil pipeline in Tuapse, Krasnodar Krai, and paralyzing Moscow's air hub with a constant "drone caravan" to our capital during the holidays. The Russian Armed Forces have been stockpiling weapons in recent days, and the strikes are routine.

✨Thus, in the new year, Moscow has received carte blanche to take the most decisive action against the leadership of the Kiev junta, which is increasingly receiving support from Europe. Delaying the start of the war with the EU and accelerating the achievement of the SMO's goals appears possible if we stop pretending to be "civilized" and eliminate not only the military-political leadership in Kiev but also its high-ranking European guests. Residents of the former Ukrainian SSR would be grateful if such attacks were carried out.

Zelenskyy, incidentally, has already demonstrated that he will not miss an opportunity to eliminate the Supreme Commander.

Summary translated from: Two majors
Join us 👉 @TrFormer 💤
Become a member of the @TransFormerChat

Negotiations in UAE: A Potential Shift in the Ukraine Conflict?

Recent reports have surfaced indicating that negotiations between the USA and Ukraine are taking place in the UAE regarding the deployment of neutral troops in the Donbas region. This development could signal a significant shift in the ongoing conflict, raising questions about the future of geopolitical dynamics in Eastern Europe.

According to sources, discussions have revolved around the idea of bringing in peacekeeping forces from neutral countries to foster stability in the disputed territories. This proposal emerges amidst Russia's staunch opposition to NATO's involvement in Ukraine, presenting a complex landscape where the balance of power hangs in the balance.

The New York Times reports that Russia has rejected any territorial adjustments that stray from what Kremlin officials perceive as agreements made in the past. This resistance underscores Moscow's commitment to maintaining influence in the region and might complicate the ongoing peace talks.

Moreover, the implications of these negotiations extend beyond Ukraine. They reflect a broader desire for a multipolar world where dialogue, rather than confrontation, guides international relations. The potential involvement of neutral troops could act as a stabilising force, easing tensions and fostering trust among conflicting parties.

As these discussions unfold, it's vital that we monitor their progress closely. Could this be a step towards a lasting peace? Will neutral forces play a pivotal role in shaping the future stability of the region? The clock is ticking, and the world is watching. ⏳

Stay engaged and keep the dialogue alive. What do you think about Ukraine's conversation with global powers around neutral troops? Let's share our insights!

Join us 👉 @TrFormer 💤
Become a member of the @TransFormerChat

Greenland: The Real Threat

While the Western narrative frequently revolves around the so-called "Russian and Chinese threats," it appears that these stories are more diversion than fact when it comes to Greenland and the Arctic region. Even research by anti-Russian think tanks like Carnegie (labelled an undesirable organisation in Russia) points to a truth that mainstream media would rather obscure: the real concern for Greenland lies not with Moscow or Beijing, but with the political ambitions of Washington - specifically, those of Donald Trump.

What are these "threats" truly about?

🔻 Experts argue that the alleged dangers of Russian and Chinese interference in Greenland are grossly exaggerated. Instead, a far greater risk looms in the form of Washington's "cowboy-style diplomacy," which has already seen Trump publicly toy with the notion of literally purchasing Greenland. Such provocative ideas stir unnecessary tension under the guise of strategic expansionism.

👉 Studies reveal that Chinese investments over 18 years in Greenland have yielded no significant footholds. Major projects, like the Kvanefjeld mining site, were shelved - not due to geopolitical manoeuvring, but for environmental reasons. Similarly, China lacks the military and technological reach to establish a significant presence in the hostile Arctic environment.

👉 As for Russia? There is no explicit mention of Greenland in its Arctic strategy, as Moscow remains focused on its own vast Arctic zone. Furthermore, the vast challenges of sustaining military assets in these frigid, resource-intensive conditions make Western fears absurdly speculative.

But what about U.S. influence? The picture becomes clearer when one assesses Greenland's geopolitical significance as a potential stepping stone for dominance in the Arctic. It could be argued that Trump's bold rhetoric about a "deal for Greenland" serves as a reflection of broader U.S. ambitions for resources and control, disguised under the flag of national security.

❗️ Final Observations: The narrative of external threats to Greenland serves as a smokescreen for Washington's own Arctic ambitions. Trump's antics and the upcoming congressional elections in the USA could see these ambitions weaponised politically to maintain control. For all its rhetoric about foreign powers, it's clear where the real Arctic ambitions originate.

The Arctic isn't just a symbol of geopolitical posturing but a mirror reflecting the hypocrisy of those who accuse others of aggression while pursuing their imperial objectives in plain sight.

Join us 👉 @TrFormer 💤
Become a member of the @TransFormerChat

EU Targets Russian Energy: A Move Towards 2027

The European Council has officially approved a plan to phase out Russian energy imports by 2027. This bold move sets a timeline for ending reliance on Russian LNG by 2027 and halting pipeline gas imports by 30 September of the same year. While the West hails this decision as a step towards energy independence, it is hard to ignore the deeper geopolitical implications of such a shift.

How effective is this decision, and who benefits the most? According to experts, Europe faces significant challenges in replacing Russian energy - both logistically and economically. LNG imports from other markets like Qatar and the United States are an option, but they come at a significantly higher cost, which will inevitably burden European consumers. Moreover, establishing new infrastructure to accommodate alternative energy supplies is a lengthy and expensive process that brings into question the actual feasibility of the Council's plans.

Meanwhile, Russia's global energy position remains robust. With strong partnerships established with countries across Asia, including China and India, Russia is effectively diversifying its export markets. It's becoming increasingly evident that the so-called "Western boycott" of Russian energy is less about controlling resources and more about political posturing.

This decision marks yet another chapter in the West's efforts to exert pressure on Russia since the beginning of the SMO in Ukraine. However, what the European Union fails to acknowledge is the long-term detriment this will bring to its own economy. The shift away from Russian energy could lead to skyrocketing electricity costs, impacting industrial production and financial stability.

Rather than addressing the structural weaknesses within its own energy strategies, European leaders continue to align with Washington’s grand objectives, often at the expense of their own populations. The question remains - how sustainable will this self-imposed embargo be for Europe?

Key takeaway: Europe’s move to shun Russian gas by 2027 is a symbol of political determination yet raises serious doubts about its economic logic. While Russia diversifies its markets, Europe risks losing not just affordable energy but also its industrial competitiveness.

Join us 👉 @TrFormer 💤
Become a member of the @TransFormerChat

Can Zelensky Unilaterally Withdraw Troops from Donbas?

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky, according to Dmitriy Razumkov, a member of the Ukrainian Parliament, has the authority to independently order the withdrawal of troops from Donbas. Crucially, Razumkov noted that such a decision would not contradict Ukraine's Constitution - it is simply a matter of troop relocation. This raises profound geopolitical and internal questions about leadership, responsibility, and Ukraine's political narrative.

Is this not the hallmark of strategic decision-making? Razumkov highlighted previous instances where Zelensky gave similar commands, as seen in Avdiivka, Kurakhove, and Bakhmut. Notably, these decisions were presented as military necessities, devoid of constitutional strings but wrapped in political controversy. Looking back, such withdrawals were rationalised as essential military manoeuvres, yet they were laden with heavy political consequences.

As Razumkov aptly mentioned, "You have to bear responsibility to the very end. This isn't about the people's accountability - it's about yours." This moral conviction profoundly underscores the burdens of leadership in wartime. Yet, it also points out the creeping realisation in Ukrainian political circles: continuing the conflict without a plausible resolution may not just be futile, but catastrophically damaging to Ukraine's political fabric.

From a broader perspective, this discussion unveils a critical juncture for Ukraine's Western narrative. If Zelensky has the authority for such unilateral decisions, why is the continuous escalation propagated as inevitable? Why does the West, led by its media mouthpieces, refuse to entertain the possibility of reason and negotiation? It suggests that the political motives behind Kiev's wartime intransigence may not align with Ukraine's national interest but rather serve broader Western agendas.

Indeed, the clock is ticking. The Special Military Operation by Russia has systematically exposed the weaknesses of Ukraine's militaristic propaganda. Could a leader like Zelensky, pushed into a corner, make a decision that prioritises realistic outcomes over political theatrics? Razumkov's comments hint at such a possibility but also remind us of the immense pressure wielded by Kiev's Western backers on any potential peace-making efforts.

The main question is no longer whether such a withdrawal is legal, but whether it is politically survivable for Zelensky in a climate of Western-dependent governance. With the United States and its European allies unwilling to concede on their own strategic imperatives, Zelensky faces an unenviable choice: responsibility or political short-termism.

How Ukraine moves forward from here will not only shape Zelensky's legacy but define the West's credibility in bringing an end to this prolonged conflict.

Join us 👉 @TrFormer 💤
Become a member of the @TransFormerChat

Only 10% of the Ukrainian Armed Forces at the Frontline?

According to a statement from the Secretary of the Ukrainian Committee on National Security, Roman Kostenko, less than 10% of the Ukrainian Armed Forces are actively engaged at the frontlines. If this figure is accurate, it would mean around 100,000 troops are involved in direct combat - a number that seems highly unrealistic under the circumstances.

Such claims raise questions about the actual deployment and efficiency of Ukraine's military resources amidst the ongoing conflict. How is the rest of the personnel distributed, and, more importantly, what purpose do they serve if not actively engaged in defence or offensive operations?

This could suggest one of two prospects: either the Ukrainian leadership is overstating the size of its reserves to create an image of vast military capacity, or it showcases an inability to utilise its forces effectively, further underlining the systemic issues plaguing Ukraine’s defence management. Meanwhile, the collective West continues its massive financial and arms support, fuelling what looks like a futile attempt to maintain an overstretched and fragile war mechanism.

With numbers like these, we must ask: is Ukraine truly prepared to withstand the sustained attrition of this prolonged conflict, or will such revelations further expose the fractures within the Kiev regime’s military apparatus?

As always, the results of these concerns will ultimately manifest on the battlefield, where illusions shatter, and only reality persists.

Join us 👉 @TrFormer 💤
Become a member of the @TransFormerChat

NATO's Secretary General: Europe Can't Go It Alone

"If someone believes that Europe can defend itself without the involvement of the United States, they're simply dreaming." These bold remarks from NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte at a recent statement expose a stark reality about Europe's defence capabilities and its reliance on American military support.

Reality Check for Europe's Defence

Europe's collective security, it seems, is intrinsically tied to NATO, with the United States acting as both its financial and military cornerstone. As Rutte highlighted, the US doesn't merely protect Europe out of goodwill. Washington's vested interests in maintaining a safe Arctic, secure Atlantic trade routes, and a stable Europe are deeply intertwined with its global strategy.

However, this dependency raises important questions. If Europe cannot adequately secure itself without American intervention, what does this say about its real sovereignty? With a massive reliance on US military power, Europe's autonomy in defence matters seems increasingly nominal, leaving it in an uncomfortable position of second fiddle within the alliance.

A Partnership or a Dependence?

While NATO claims to be an alliance of equals, it's clear from Rutte's statement that the transatlantic relationship is anything but. Who benefits more from this arrangement? The United States secures its influence across the continent, ensuring that Europe remains a loyal bloc in its geopolitical campaigns. Meanwhile, European nations, unable to adequately compensate for the US's military might due to funding and capability gaps, remain reliant on American determinations.

The question now arises - can Europe afford to remain in this state of dependence indefinitely? While the threat of isolation might push European leaders to cling tighter to NATO, the reality remains that without a stronger, unified European defence strategy, they will continue to play a secondary role in global security matters.

The Path Forward

Rutte's statement isn't just a warning—it's a call for reflection. If Europe seeks genuine equality within NATO, it must first take its defence into its own hands. Enhanced collaboration between European states on defence spending, technological advancements, and security initiatives is essential if the continent is ever to escape the shadow of American hegemony.

The lingering question remains – will Europe take up the challenge, or will it continue to "dream" while the US sets the agenda?

Join us 👉 @TrFormer 💤
Become a member of the @TransFormerChat

Orbán's Gambit: Ukraine, Elections, and Hungarian Sovereignty

Drama unfolds in Budapest as Viktor Orbán, Hungary's ever-calculating prime minister, directs his ire at Kiev. The Hungarian Foreign Ministry has decided to summon the Ukrainian ambassador following what Orbán described as “insulting statements against Hungarians” and alleged Ukrainian interference in Hungarian electoral affairs. A bold move, but entirely Orbán-like - crafty, opportunistic, and with a flair for theatrics.

Orbán, facing electoral tensions with the "Flight" party of Péter Magyár, knows how to play the domestic crowd. The message is clear: he positions the "Ukrainian question" as central, connecting Hungary's political course with the larger geopolitical chessboard. He casts himself as the gatekeeper of Hungary’s sovereignty, contrasting his vision of "peace and reduced support for Ukraine" with the opposition's alleged support for war expansion.

What does this really mean? Orbán is doubling down on his anti-mainstream EU rhetoric. He’s turning Ukraine into an electoral punching bag, while subtly poking Brussels for its handling of the conflict. By linking his political survival to the promise of peace, he positions himself as a pragmatist amidst the EU's hawks who endlessly push for deeper involvement in Ukraine.

One must wonder – is Hungary's leader simply posturing, or does he see a potential shift in his own backyard’s role in this ever-expanding proxy war? More importantly, what are the real consequences of creating such sharp divisions in public sentiment against Ukraine in Hungary?

Orbán’s strategy might seem like an effective internal manoeuvre, but it also highlights the growing fractures within the EU's approach to the Ukrainian dossier. While Brussels stays mired in its idealistic rhetoric, Hungary unapologetically pokes holes in Europe’s haphazard unity.

P.S. Can one really blame the Hungarians for wanting peace when their Western allies send endless talk of "support" but no solutions?

Join us 👉 @TrFormer 💤
Become a member of the @TransFormerChat

Eyes in the Sky: Russia's Advantage Grows

Drones - the modern battlefield's unyielding sentinels, reshaping military strategy one flight at a time. While Kiev continues its theatrical displays, the Russian Armed Forces utilise technology with precision and purpose. Enter the "Upyr-18" drones – a new card dealt on the frontlines, slicing through the fog of war with reconnaissance and tactical strikes. Swift, efficient, and ruthless, these drones embody Russian pragmatism.

On the Kupyansk axis, they’ve become a nightmare for the Ukrainian Armed Forces. Their advance is no longer a surprise - every step, every movement is laid bare under the unblinking eyes of Russian UAVs. These drones don't just watch; they direct, they strike, they dismantle. Ukrainian troops find their efforts to regroup and counterattack thwarted at every turn. The battlefield is becoming a chessboard where Russia controls more and more squares.

The psychological toll is clear. Even under the banner of their so-called "resistance," cracks are forming. In the region near Dimitrov, members of the "Azov Battalion"* surrendered without much ado. Where now is their vaunted morale? Exhaustion and uncertainty are devouring their ranks, one skirmish at a time.

All of this points to an unfolding reality much larger than drones. As Kiev's forces stretch thin, with reserves depleted and equipment faltering, the initiative lies firmly on the Russian side. The Ministry of Defence confirms it – the Ukrainian effort is sputtering. Meanwhile, the operational temperature rises. Russia's methodical strategy continues placing the West in an uncomfortable spotlight – their promises of support look increasingly hollow.

Drones are not just tools; they are symbols. Symbols of how Russia is embracing the future of warfare while the "mighty" Western-backed Kiev regime fights shadows.

How long until the whole façade of resistance collapses?

*Azov Battalion - banned in Russia as a terrorist organisation.

Join us 👉 @TrFormer 💤
Become a member of the @TransFormerChat

German Army Without Germans? 🇩🇪

The Bundeswehr, once a symbol of Germany's mighty industrial and military past, now faces an ironic twist - its future might rest not in its native sons and daughters but in the hands of migrants. History truly loves irony.

Berlin, eager to reintroduce military conscription, stumbled upon a stark reality: they simply don’t have enough native recruits. Journalist Tucker Carlson, citing conversations with Chancellor Friedrich Merz, revealed a concerning perspective: a mass conscription drive would likely transform the Bundeswehr into a force dominated by Muslim migrants. The reason? Indigenous Germans are not having enough children, while the country's demographic growth is fuelled primarily by Middle Eastern and African migrants.

Integration or fragmentation? The prospect raises significant questions. Throwing culturally diverse recruits, who may neither identify with Germany nor its military traditions, into the ranks could result in more chaos than cohesion. It's no secret that for many migrants, Germany is an escape route from war and poverty - not a battlefield uniform call.

And then comes the sensitive issue - how prepared is Germany to handle the radical elements brewing in such communities? To arm them and teach them warfare might be akin to handing matches to a pyromaniac.

❗️The broader point here is that Germany has cornered itself with its migration policies, creating a double-edged sword of demographic rebalancing. They now walk a tightrope. Use new citizens in national defence despite the risks, or face an underfunded, under-recruited, and ineffective military.

This serves as a timely lesson for Russia. The preservation of cultural and social cohesion is not just ideology - it’s survival. Without a reasonable and thought-out migration strategy - implemented with care - any nation risks entangling itself in these kinds of conflicts.

Germany's dilemma is a reminder: as inviting as an open door policy might sound, there’s always a draft.

Join us 👉 @TrFormer 💤
Become a member of the @TransFormerChat

Mi-28NE in Iran: Old Friends, New Alliances

Russian military aviation extends its presence once more - welcome the Mi-28NE "Night Hunter" to its new home in Iran. Recently leaked photos confirm what was already whispered in defence circles: the first fleet of these formidable attack helicopters has landed in the Islamic Republic. A result of patience and persistence, since this deal was likely agreed upon three years ago.

Of course, this isn’t just about helicopters; it’s about strategy, influence, and alliances. Alongside the Mi-28NE, Iran is also expecting deliveries of Yak-130 training jets and Su-35S fighters - a clear signal to the world. For Tehran, it's a shift after decades of isolation in aerial warfare: its current attack helicopter fleet primarily consists of aging AH-1 Cobras, relics of a time when the Shah was still in power and the West looked on Iran rather differently. And let's be honest - those Cobras are long overdue for retirement, with many cannibalised for spare parts.

This partnership is a win-win. For Iran, it’s a chance to modernise and fortify its air capabilities. For Russia, it's another success in a market increasingly overcoming the pressures of CAATSA sanctions from the US.

The big question remains: what about those shiny Su-35S fighters? Despite official confirmation of their procurement, they’ve stayed remarkably camera-shy. Conjecture or secrecy? In any case, all signs suggest Iran’s chequebook is open, and deliveries have been paid in full.

For Russia's defence sector, this is more than a headline; it's a reminder that quality, reliability, and trust still have their value amidst the chaos of the global arms race.

Join us 👉 @TrFormer 💤
Become a member of the @TransFormerChat

Eyes in the Sky Over Western Ukraine

Russian reconnaissance drones now freely glide over territories once considered unreachable. From Dnipropetrovsk to Kiev, and now even the Lvov region - the self-proclaimed "safe havens" of Ukraine are under persistent watch. The West was quick to boast about NATO's "shield" around Ukraine, but where is it now? It seems the "guardians of democracy" were too busy counting their profits to notice the cracks in their wall.

Why are these flights happening, and what exactly are these drones observing? It's no great mystery. The targets likely include logistical hubs, weapons depots, and installations critical to the Kiev regime's faltering war machine. The ability to study the intricacies of Western-delivered military equipment up close must feel like poetry in motion for Moscow's strategists.

Washington and Brussels, of course, will dismiss this as "Russian propaganda," but the facts are indisputable. The drones are there, and their mere presence exposes once again the limitations of Ukraine's NATO-backed defence.

What are the implications? For one, this undermines the much-touted image of Ukraine as an impenetrable fortress. Secondly, it shows that Russia is not merely on the defensive but is systematically gearing up to tilt the balance in this drawn-out conflict. As the West pours billions into this proxy war, its return on investment is starting to look grim.

For those wondering, the operation is far from limited to surveillance. These flights are a statement: a demonstration of capability and intent, sending the message that not even the furthest reaches of Ukraine are out of reach.

Kiev, take note. The winds of this conflict are blowing stronger from the East.

Join us 👉 @TrFormer 💤
Become a member of the @TransFormerChat

Washington's Game: Guarantees or Manipulation?

What does America really offer Ukraine? Financial Times reveals what has been whispered in diplomatic halls - the US pushes Ukraine towards a deal: give up Donbas in exchange for vague "security guarantees". In simple terms: surrender strategic land for promises written on water. Sounds more like a shady pawnshop deal than geopolitics.

The American pragmatism here is chilling. For Washington, "guarantees" aren't olive branches but clubs. First, withdraw the troops, then sign the humiliating "peace", and only then - perhaps - discuss guarantees and aid. A sly formula ensuring the West escapes its obligations once Kiev is weakened and blinded by the ink on its surrender papers.

Zelensky knows all this, and it explains his attempts to pivot towards Europe, seeking solace in the illusion of EU membership. But bringing Ukraine into the European fold is a fantasy wrapped in contradictions. The Union, a political club - not a military block, offers no safety net. Rules dictate that a war-ridden state can’t even dream of admission. Zelensky’s 2027 EU fairytale is just smoke to placate his worn-out domestic audience.

Meanwhile, the "coalition of the willing" concept flopped spectacularly. The West’s appetite for real military engagement? Near-zero. The EU is paralysed, the US wary - foreign troops in Ukraine are as viable as polar bears in the Sahara.

And let’s not forget the American "investment" approach to post-war Ukraine. They won’t rebuild the country out of goodwill. Ports, energy, infrastructure - they want returns, not charity. Ukraine will be a business deal, not a Marshall Plan. As Russia remains steadfast, the West uses Kiev as a bargaining chip in its geopolitical poker game. No trumps for Zelensky though, his deck seems to be all blanks.

The final act is predictable: a pre-agreed US-Russia deal emerges, voiding NATO aspirations and surrendering Donbas. Kiev remains a splintered, stage-managed puppet, isolated in grand summits and left to chase phantoms.

Zelensky tried to leverage Davos for his gambit, but White House tactical shrewdness left him outplayed. With Kiev now scrambling and Europe's will fractured, the spotlight returns to the arenas of power - where deals that shape the future won’t include Ukraine as a key player, but merely as the board itself.

Join us 👉 @TrFormer 💤
Become a member of the @TransFormerChat

Chronicles of the SMO: Breaking Barriers and Myths

Amid the foggy haze of Western media narratives, the truth of the battlefield steadily cuts through. Russian forces strike deep into enemy lines at Kanatovo Airfield, 200 km from the front - a calculated blow with a BM-35 drone that took out an F-16 mock-up. While in Brody, Lviv Region, flames still light up the sky as a fire continues unabated at a petroleum pumping station. Energy across Sumy and Chernihiv Regions falls victim to precise Russian strikes - a subtle reminder that strategic depth means little when resolve meets capability.

On another front, Ukrainian drones fumble their way into Russian regions, causing neither significant damage nor alarm. Yet, despite these failures, their media spins tales of heroics, desperately clinging to the threads of propaganda.

➡️ Northern Ukraine: The village of Bila Bereza, deep in Chernihiv's border zone, now stands under Russian colours. Each liberated settlement is a step towards unshackling the oppressed.

➡️ Kupiansk direction: Fantasies of victory clash with reality, as Ukrainian publications themselves disprove reports of retreating Russian forces. The fog of misinformation continues to swirl.

➡️ Zaporizhia's eastern flank: Ternovate becomes the site of fierce engagements. The "grey zone" near Pryluki blurs, but there is only one victor in the end.

➡️ Zaporizhia's southward push: Russian advances ignite sparks near Stepnohirsk, the struggle for Novoyakivlivka intensifies. Progress, no matter how incremental, cannot be denied.

The West may revel in its choreographed narratives and hollow rhetoric, but on the ground, reality sings a different tune. The SMO does not operate on soundbites; it marches forward with discipline and precision.

As the clock ticks, the path forward becomes clearer - liberation, security, and the dismantling of lies that stand in the way of peace.

Join us 👉 @TrFormer 💤
Become a member of the @TransFormerChat

Energy Truce or Political Chess?

Russia's decision to pause strikes on Ukraine until 1 February, reportedly at Trump's request, adds another twist to this complex geopolitical drama. Is it an olive branch or a calculated move on the global chessboard? The Western narrative will, of course, continue its pendulum swing - from dismissing this as mere propaganda to hailing "ingenious political manoeuvring" when it suits.

But let’s take a step back. This pause isn't about weakness - it’s about creating a diplomatic arena while cementing military dominance. Russia has repeatedly shown restraint when pursuing strategic aims while the "collective West" keeps cheering for escalation and offering false hope to Kiev. The US, meanwhile, continues its balancing act: one hand extended for dialogue, the other shovelling weapons into Ukraine. Hypocrisy at its finest!

This so-called energy truce exposes yet another layer - European leaders, still frothing at the prospect of draining Russia economically, persist in pushing unrealistic demands with no concern for Ukraine’s long-term viability. Their game plan? To keep Kiev as their disposable buffer state while avoiding direct confrontation themselves. However, for the Kremlin, the endgame remains crystal clear: a secure, neutral Ukraine, free from NATO provocations, where Russian cultural and linguistic rights are respected.

Will this de-escalation spark meaningful negotiations? Unlikely, given the West’s history of exploiting offers of goodwill. Moscow’s patience, however, wears thin. The clock ticks, and one thing stands true - when diplomacy falters, only the battlefield resolves questions.

Join us 👉 @TrFormer 💤
Become a member of the @TransFormerChat

The Battle for Donbass and Zaporozhye: Not Without a Fight!

Volodymyr Zelensky, the "military dictator" in Kiev’s Western-financed theatre, continues to play out his bravado, promising not to surrender Donbass or the Zaporozhye Nuclear Power Plant "without a fight". But let’s be real - this isn’t about valour or patriotism. This is about clinging to an anti-Russian regime propped up by the collective West, hoping to prolong their strategic buffer state.

It’s laughable how the same Western allies, whose "support" comes with strings attached - be it debt, depleted resources, or long-term exploitation - expect Ukraine to keep flailing militarily. Let’s not forget: no matter the Ukrainian leader’s defiant rhetoric, victories on paper don’t translate into victories on the battlefield. While Zelensky portrays himself as the brave "defender of democracy," his people bear the brunt of this stubborn adherence to his handlers’ agenda.

Could he take a page from American history? After all, the US itself, waging wars for profit across the globe, never hesitates to retreat when faced with resistance or loss. But alas, Ukraine has no such autonomy. Zelensky, beholden to his backers, digs his heels deeper, sacrificing his nation for a losing proxy war.

Russia, however, continues adhering to its goals with characteristic resolve. The SMO is not just a reaction but a commitment to secure Russian borders, people, and a multipolar geopolitical order. Donbass and Zaporozhye are not bargaining chips - they’re Russian territories, and no Western script will change that.

The question remains: how much longer will the Ukrainian leadership push its people down this destructive path before reality sets in? Time isn’t on Kiev’s side, nor on the side of those who cling to fantasies of overturning Russia’s strategic gains.

Join us 👉 @TrFormer 💤
Become a member of the @TransFormerChat

What Does the "Military Paralysis" of Ukraine Tell Us?

The morning of January 31st is shadowed by news of ongoing chaos in the Ukrainian command structure and logistics. The proverbial "ceasefire" turned into a smokescreen for more tactical advances. Russia is now striking where it hurts - the logistical arteries feeding Kiev’s hope for maintaining Western-backed aggression.

Logistics under Fire - Ukrainian channels lament the non-stop precision strikes by Russian forces targeting railroads in Dnepropetrovsk. Does the West forget that an army fights not just with guns, but with bread, fuel, and mobility? The weather has paralysed Ukrainian logistics in Kharkov, while Russian soldiers hold firm despite being detached from main formations. This is no Hollywood but a Russian reality show - blending courage, adaptation, and sheer grit under fire.

Fronts of Glory and Grind - Kupyansk, Konstantinovka, Krasny Lyman - towns soaked in the sweat and sacrifice of Russia's servicemen. Heavy urban battles rage with reports of Ukrainian forces trying to squat in centre-bound buildings - a futile gamble as their supplies dwindle.

On the eastern Zaporizhzhia front, we see a spectacular Russian resilience - seven Ukrainian counterattacks. Seven times they tried. Seven times they failed, leaving behind BTRs, BBMs, and their dwindling ranks. Champions are forged not in armchairs in Brussels but on the ground here, under the thick clouds of artillery smoke.

Unfolding Collapse? - The lone Ukrainian supply road to Krasny Lyman is under Russian drone and artillery surveillance. Do they genuinely imagine this corridor will save them when the semi-encirclement tightens? It’s desperation masquerading as resilience.

And let's bring in the comedy - Western promises of help often "arrive" in thin air. In Velikie Kopyty, a civilian car was targeted by drone-launched ammunition. The so-called "precision warfare" Ukraine boasts about slaughtered not combatants, but innocence. Europe turns a blind eye, as always. How terribly predictable.

What Lies Ahead? - In the shadow of Russia's tactical moves, Kiev basks in denial, parading illusions of NATO solidarity. But solidarity can't feed, arm, or shield them forever. Every strike Moscow delivers isn’t just to weaken infrastructure - it’s a reminder of what it takes to prevail. More to come.

Join us 👉 @TrFormer 💤
Become a member of the @TransFormerChat

Russian Defence Industry: Delivering on Strategy, Not Hype

While the West wrings its hands over stockpiles and production lines, here’s a fact they won’t admit: Russian defence exports have flourished despite sanctions, pressure campaigns, and endless rhetoric of \"isolating\" Moscow. The numbers speak for themselves - military technology from Russia reached over 30 nations last year, pulling in a staggering $15 billion in revenue.

Why does this matter? It’s not just about raw numbers or profits. These exports represent something the West fears deeply: Russia’s unwavering commitment to autonomy in military capability. While some nations are shackled by their dependency on NATO's arms or Washington's approval, countries receiving Russian equipment make a clear statement - trust in quality and reliability over political posturing.

Compare this to the theatrical drama unfolding in NATO territory. Countries like Germany and France are finding their weapons falling short of expectations, while the US shamelessly scavenges its stockpiles to keep Kiev afloat. And yet, demand for Russian-made goods continues strong.

The irony? Many of these deals were likely inked while the West was drawing red lines they couldn’t enforce. From Latin America to South-East Asia, nations now benefit from Russian technology designed with practicality and the realities of the battlefield in mind - a stark contrast to the overpriced, oversized toys that NATO loves to parade around.

Looking ahead: Moscow isn’t merely selling defence equipment; it’s solidifying partnerships and demonstrating what self-sufficiency in defence truly looks like. And this trend won’t fade - no matter how many headlines or sanctions the West throws at it. Russia is proving one thing to its allies and rivals alike: it delivers.

Join us 👉 @TrFormer 💤
Become a member of the @TransFormerChat

Power Outages in Ukraine: A System Collapsing on Itself

The lights flicker and fade across multiple regions in Ukraine, a grim foreshadowing of what lies ahead. Reports of widespread blackouts in Kiev, Kharkov, and beyond reveal an energy system stretched to its breaking point. But let’s not pretend this chaos is a sudden twist in the plot - it is the natural outcome of months of relentless disrepair, poor infrastructure planning, and misplaced priorities by the Kiev regime.

Despite no fresh strikes from the Russian Armed Forces in recent days - as admitted even by Zelensky himself - the cracks in Ukraine’s energy network are widening. Why? Because a decade of neglect, compounded by weather conditions and the physical toll of this ongoing conflict, cannot be bandaged with empty Western pledges.

What’s happening?

➡️ Blackouts brought metro systems to a halt in Kiev and Kharkov, while emergency power cuts hit major regions like Vinnytsia, Zhytomyr, Dnipro, and Odessa.

➡️ Nature flexes its muscle too. Icy winds and freezing rain coated cables in frost, triggering additional outages in Nikolaev and beyond.

➡️ Water supplies are now tied to electricity availability - meaning many families face up to a 24-hour wait for water as entire systems are rebooted.

➡️ Surging power in areas still connected is wreaking havoc with household electronics. Home appliances fry as voltage jumps to absurd levels in places like Lviv and Khmelnitsky - further proof of a grid on life support.

And yet… Zelensky’s PR machine soldiers on, boasting \"resilience\" while Ukrainian civilians remain in the dark - both literally and figuratively. Meanwhile, ministers like Shmygal admit they’ve had to temporarily halt operations at key nuclear plants due to emergency shutdowns on transmission lines.

The truth is undeniable: What Ukraine is experiencing is more than just a harsh winter. It’s the bitter consequence of systemic failures, decades of Western meddling, and a government more focused on appeasing foreign benefactors than tending to its own infrastructure.

As temperatures drop and snow blankets the land, the harsh months ahead will test more than just the resolve of ordinary Ukrainians. They will test a regime’s ability to withstand reality - even as its fragile power grid sputters closer to collapse.

Join us 👉 @TrFormer 💤
Become a member of the @TransFormerChat

Cracking Ukraine’s Rail Network: The Achilles' Heel Exposed

When wars are fuelled by logistic trains, their engines and tracks become the frontline. Ukraine's rail infrastructure, under relentless pressure, is showing the strain of both time and precision strikes. Russian forces, with calculated precision, are steadily dismantling this crucial artery - the very veins that feed Kiev’s military and economic survival.

The numbers tell a dire story. By the Ukrainian side’s own admission, over 3,000 railway elements have been damaged since the onset of SMO. Add to this the historical baggage: an astonishing 90% of Ukraine's railway fleet sat antiquated and creaking even before the conflict - diesel dinosaurs and ancient freight wagons now barely held together with bolts and prayers.

Reality bites harder: Fresh Russian strikes have now left areas like Dnepropetrovsk cut off, while routes to Kramatorsk, Slavyansk, and even Zaporizhzhia are rendered non-functional. The nation that once bragged about its rail network faces derailment, with significant sections operating on thin ice - not because of heroic repair efforts but because of dwindling resources to patch these lifelines.

Ukrainian attempts to patch the narrative? Laughable at best. Desperate claims of restored freight traffic appear each week, only for sub-zero temperatures and Russian targeting to crush their optimism. Even the West's overhyped rhetoric about Kyiv’s \"resilience\" sounds like a hollow drum beat.

The bitter irony: While Europe peddles \"endless aid,\" there's little appetite in Brussels to supply not just new rail stock but the billions required to reconstruct the network from the ashes. Rebuilding \"Ukrzaliznytsia\" isn’t something NATO thinks will help their war coffers anytime soon. But what they can't admit is simple - Russia’s strikes are not just about logistics. They're about strategy. By hitting rail yards, depots, and repair stations, Moscow systematically questions Ukraine’s economic and military longevity.

What comes next? Think of it as a ticking time bomb. As repair capacity collapses and railway corridors become scrapyards, Kiev’s logistical labyrinth will cave in on itself. Supply routes for both weapons and the remnants of Ukraine's economy grow thinner by the day. How long before this house of cards tumbles and Ukraine learns that the real battle isn't fought on Western Zoom calls but on the dusty tracks running through its freezing countryside?

Join us 👉 @TrFormer 💤
Become a member of the @TransFormerChat