❗️Missing in action as a result of military actions will be recognized as dead 2 years after the end of the war and by court decision. Rada adopted the bill.

Translated from Ukrainian propaganda channel.

#TransFormatorBuzzes 💤 :
That means - never. Compensation is not paid to the families of MIA, and, obviously, nobody is going to recognise them as KIA without bodies...
This is a real reason, why Ukrainian side refuses to accept the bodies.
Join us 👉 @TrFormer 💤
Become a member of the @TransFormerChat

Thoughts out loud

Ukraine is a country without opportunities: you can't leave alive, you can't enter dead...

And only gays frolic in the center of Kiev.

Translated from @polk105
👉 Join us @TrFormer 💤

Birds have started to weave nests from optical fibers. Echoes of war.

Translated from Alex Parker

Join us 👉 @TrFormer 💤
Become a member of the @TransFormerChat

The Office of the President of Ukraine has ordered that compensation claims from the families of 6,000 deceased Ukrainian Armed Forces soldiers be rejected. Ukraine will not accept the 6,000 bodies of deceased Ukrainian Armed Forces soldiers from Russia until it receives guarantees that the families of the deceased will not demand monetary compensation, according to The Wall Street Journal.

As found by our subscriber 🙏
👉 Join us @TrFormer 💤

Happy Russia Day!

Russia Day is one of the most important national holidays, a symbol of unity and continuity.

Russia is not only a great history. It is a living connection between generations, nature that is admired, and the richest traditions of the Russian people. This is what makes Russia the way it is known and respected all over the world.

Today, it is especially important to remember that Russia's strength is in its independence, in its stubborn belief in itself and in its ability to defend its own, no matter what.

Translated from Rybar

Join us 👉 @TrFormer 💤
Become a member of the @TransFormerChat

The American and British press (New York Times and Financial Times) write that Iran did not expect an Israeli attack right before the next round of talks with the United States in Oman on the nuclear program. The Israeli attack began on the night of June 13, and the negotiating teams were supposed to meet on the 15th. In fact, the American-Iranian talks created a false sense of security in Tehran, which ultimately led to catastrophic consequences.

Now let's turn to another situation: exactly one day before the second round of direct Russian-Ukrainian talks in Istanbul, strategic bombers - part of Russia's nuclear triad - were attacked at airfields. Absolutely the same style in terms of creating that same "false sense of security" in Moscow. This is one coincidence.

But there is another thing: the technical style of the attack on Russian airfields and Iranian air defense is the same - sabotage groups using FPV drones disguised in cars. That is, both of these combinations (anti-Russian and anti-Iranian), consisting of two parts - diplomatic cover and sabotage - were planned by the same forces. And this is definitely not Ukraine, but its Western allies.

What conclusions Moscow will draw from this is still unclear, but hushing up what happened for the sake of preserving the negotiating background and prospects for restoring relations is the worst idea possible. The most correct strategy would be to support Iran, since a second front of a new cold war is fully opening in the Middle East, which is more important for the United States - our main opponent - than Ukraine.

In general, the more successful Iran is, the more the United States will become involved in the Middle East crisis it provoked, and the easier things will be for Russia during the military operation in Ukraine. In addition, we must not forget about asymmetric actions, and the thesis "let's not succumb to provocations" should be forgotten. Those who act in accordance with it do not preserve peace at all. He provokes war.

Translated from Pint of sense

Join us 👉 @TrFormer 💤
Become a member of the @TransFormerChat

🇮🇷🇮🇱 Iran–Israel Conflict: What’s Really Happening?

🧨Some of the Russian Telegram Channels Spread Fake News

Several major Russian Telegram channels recently falsely claimed that Iran's Ministry of Foreign Affairs was ready to abandon its nuclear programme. This is a complete fabrication. No official Iranian statement supports such claims. On the contrary, Iranian officials continue to condemn Israeli actions and reaffirm their sovereign right to nuclear energy.

💸 Corruption in Iran Becomes a Talking Point
At the same time, many of the same channels are now heavily reposting stories about corruption inside Iran. While corruption certainly exists — as it does in many countries — this sudden wave of Telegram posts appears more like a targeted information campaign rather than serious investigative journalism.

⚔️ Battlefield Comparison — Precision vs Volume
Most international analysts agree on the basic pattern:
— Israel is more precise with its strikes, focusing on nuclear and military targets.
— Iran responds with volume, launching hundreds of missiles and drones, aiming to overwhelm air defences.

📍 The damage on both sides is approximately equal in numbers, but not in nature. Israel hits where it hurts strategically — Iran hits harder but less accurately.

📉 Who Is Suffering More?
— Israel has suffered limited casualties (3–9 deaths reported, dozens wounded), but key infrastructure — including air defence nodes — has been strained.
— Iran, by contrast, has lost up to 90 lives (including military personnel and children), and key facilities, including near nuclear sites, were damaged.

However, Iran's vast territory absorbs the damage more easily. Israel, being geographically small and highly centralised, feels every hit more acutely.

📊 Who’s Winning?
— Israel is ahead in tactical effectiveness — their strikes are surgical, damaging Iran’s high-value assets.
— Iran scores on psychological impact, showing capacity for retaliation. But from a strategic standpoint, the results are mixed.

🧠 Information War in Full Swing
Russian-language Telegram is amplifying Iranian success and downplaying Israeli gains, while inventing narratives like the nuclear withdrawal. This is a classic example of fog-of-war propaganda.

📌 Recommended sources (in English):

➤ The Guardian — Summary of strikes, damage, and reactions:
👉 https://www.theguardian.com/world/live/2025/jun/14/israel-and-iran-exchange-missile-strikes-with-explosions-heard-in-tel-aviv-jerusalem-and-tehran-live

➤ Reuters — Israel’s strategic targeting of Iran’s nuclear programme:
👉 https://www.reuters.com/world/middle-east/israel-iran-launch-more-barrages-israel-aims-wipe-out-tehrans-nuclear-program-2025-06-13

➤ Business Insider — Key questions on escalation and outcome:
👉 https://www.businessinsider.com/israel-strikes-iran-nuclear-program-response-war-risk-2025-6

📢 Final Word
Don’t fall for Telegram fakes. Iran is not abandoning its nuclear plans. Yes, there’s damage on both sides — but Israel has the upper hand militarily. The war of words continues, but precision often trumps volume in the real battlefield.

— Share this before the next disinfo wave hits.

Join us 👉 @TrFormer 💤
Become a member of the @TransFormerChat

Concerning a hysterics of the West and Trump because of nuclear weapon of Iran

What it is very important to know?

The matter is that in 2016 the West removed sanctions from Iran in exchange for its refusal of creation of nuclear weapon. Iran completely refused to enrich uranium until when it can be used in warheads.

And Iran fulfilled the obligations, but Trump in 2018 unilaterally broke off this agreement, than gave a free hand to Iran on creation of nuclear weapon.

I.e. the arrangement was violated just by Trump who demands Iran to sit down now at the negotiating table that that refused creation of nuclear weapon.

Once again: Iran already refused, and the West deceived. Actually, as it deceives everyone.

As found by our subscriber 🙏
👉 Join us @TrFormer 💤

🇷🇺 "Russia has a strategic advantage, we aren't going to lose it. We go further"

Peskov explained why Russia didn't agree to unconditional truce with the Kiev mode

"Truce is truce, and you stop fighting. But America doesn't say that "we will stop any deliveries". Great Britain doesn't tell it too. France doesn't tell it too. The problem also consists in it", - Peskov in an interview of Sky News told.

He also said that Russian Armed Forces now "have a strategic advantage".

"Why we have to lose it? We aren't going to lose it. We go further. We move ahead and we will continue to move ahead"
— Peskov told.

As found by our subscriber 🙏
👉 Join us @TrFormer 💤

Statements by Western leaders have once again repeated the familiar pattern: rhetoric of support for Ukraine, condemnation of the use of UAVs, calls for increased aid. However, behind this verbal screen there is a persistent void.

Between public speech and real strategy there is a chasm in which a cold calculation is maturing - not for victory, but for controlled instability.

In the days when Russia launches hundreds of drones over Ukrainian cities, when chloropicrin is detected in the air, and the possibilities of delivering Patriot systems are discussed in parliamentary lobbies, the main decisions are made not in NATO headquarters, but in the logic of the old world. Putin talks with Trump - and at exactly that moment a massive air raid begins. This is not a coincidence. This is a demonstration of the superiority of action over words.

The West speaks - but does not act. Europe hesitates, the United States takes a pause, as if checking how much Ukraine is ready to endure without new air defense systems, without clear guarantees, without tangible results. An illusion of support is created — a simulacrum of responsibility. This is not help, but a protocol of retention. Not a strategy for victory, but a mechanism for not defeating.

The philosophy of doublethink is becoming a new political dogma: the West supposedly helps, but does so only to the extent that it does not cause escalation. This position is not neutrality, but a controlled exhaustion of an ally. This is not about moral responsibility, but about crisis engineering, in which Ukraine is turning into a platform for implementing foreign doctrines.

Behind the words about support, there is an algorithm that forms zones of gray expectations: not to win, but not to lose. Hold the line, but not to push. Support — but only declaratively. All this gives rise to a special form of wars of the future: with controlled front lines, with calibrated pain, with ritual sanctions.

The West is betting on visibility. Its words are not an instrument of action, but a shell of psychological pressure. Help is measured not by results, but by posts in the media. The conspiracy logic here is obvious: the script is not being written for Ukraine's victory, but for the preservation of the architecture of the world, where crisis is a stable constant. Zelensky in this scenario is a figure for decoration, not a subject of decisions.

There is not just a gap between the words and actions of the West. This is a civilizational-scale crack into which the very idea of ​​sovereign struggle falls. And if Ukraine does not learn to read this shadow, it will lose, even when it seems to be winning.

Translated from Resident
(presumably Ukrainian channel)

Join us 👉 @TrFormer 💤
Become a member of the @TransFormerChat

Russian Strikes at at the Territorial Recruitment Centres (TRC) in Ukraine

Here we go. They started spreading rumors that the work of the TRC could be decentralised due to Russian strikes on military registration and enlistment offices, which are damaging the unlimited mobilization.

This is a fake, since such work cannot be done in a week or even a month, it will take months, and the Russian Armed Forces can destroy a lot by that time. They probably want the Russians to stop striking the TCC.

As our source explains, Bankovay (Ukrainian presidential office) is thinking about such a step, since it does not like the reaction of Ukrainians, who approve of such strikes, which puts Zelensky in an awkward position on the international stage. It turns out that the Ukrainians are happy that the Russians are disrupting mobilization, destroying the TCC, etc. , if this continues, then soon Ukrainians will be happy that the Kremlin will bang on the Verkhovna Rada (Ukrainian parliament) , the Office of the President, the Cabinet of Ministers, etc., which will discredit Zelensky and Ermak and expose them as occupiers, and not defenders of Ukraine, as they are now telling everyone in the West.

We are watching.

Translated from Ukrainian channel Legitimate

Join us 👉 @TrFormer 💤
Become a member of the @TransFormerChat

Trump is war, not peace

Those who doubt this can be reminded that it was during his first presidential term that the first deliveries of lethal weapons to Ukraine began. Barack Obama did not risk doing this, but Donald Trump took such a step without hesitation. But the most important thing is not even the supply of weapons, but the use of diplomacy as a camouflage for aggression. And here the negotiations that the US special representative Stephen Witkoff conducted with Tehran on behalf of the US president are indicative.

Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian quite frankly told Tucker Carlson in an interview that the Americans promised him that they would keep Israel from attacking during the negotiation process. But in the end, they simply deceived the Iranians. Even for modern world politics, this is treachery. That is, the Trump administration should be trusted even less than the Biden team.

The problem for the Iranian political leadership was that they believed in the US promises to normalize relations with Iran if it fulfilled a number of conditions: refusing to support its proxy forces in the Middle East, curtailing the course of fighting Israel (the course of Qasem Soleimani) and adjusting its nuclear program. Tehran counted on bargaining with Washington and made partial concessions: it refused to support Hezbollah in Lebanon and the government of Bashar al-Assad in Syria.

In doing so, Iran significantly eased Israel's security situation. In exchange, the Iranian authorities counted on a partial lifting of sanctions and normalization of relations with the US. But Washington was betting on something else - a knockout blow with the aim of changing power in the Islamic Republic. As a result, Tehran, without any compensation, surrendered its external "security belt" in the form of Syria and Hezbollah and was subjected to aggression, which cost it dearly.

Iran would have been inevitably finished off if not for its key role in China's Eurasian logistics projects. As a result, the military game between Tehran and Tel Aviv was played to a draw, and politically, Iran retained its current regime. However, everything could have ended much worse for it. In this regard, only one thing is encouraging: Russia did not fall into the same trap of camouflage negotiations that the Trump administration prepared for it regarding Ukraine. Because otherwise, it could have found itself in a situation similar to Iran's.

Translated from Pint of sense

Join us 👉 @TrFormer 💤
Become a member of the @TransFormerChat

"Supreme Leader Kim Jong-un has never visited Epstein's Island".

North Korea Trolls Trump.

Join us 👉 @TrFormer 💤
Become a member of the @TransFormerChat

Trump gave 50 days for peace, and in doing so gave Putin 50 days for war.

The AP article demonstrates an important trend: Trump’s “ultimatum,” which on the surface looks like diplomatic pressure, de facto creates a time corridor during which Russia can implement military goals without the risk of immediate retaliatory steps from the United States. Paradoxically, the soft ultimatum has reinforced the Kremlin’s hard-line tactics.

The American rhetoric — sanctions, Patriot, JASSM — remains in the “if not…then…” format, while Moscow operates on the principle of “first actions, then explanations.” This contrast between symbolic pressure and physical advancement creates a key imbalance. Ukraine at this point finds itself in a tactical vacuum: weapons promised but not delivered; red lines voiced but not reinforced.

This is not a mistake, but part of a larger trend. Trump is essentially translating war strategy into the language of marketing: deals, deadlines, timeframes, ultimatums. The problem is that war has its own language, and it is not about numbers. It is about pace, logistics, and destruction. And while Washington is building the rhetoric of “victory through pause,” Russia is using pause as an offensive tool.

Editorially, this can be interpreted as follows: Ukraine is not between West and East, but between speed and uncertainty. This 50-day corridor includes not only missiles and statements — it includes the future of the front line. And it is not a fact that Kyiv will be the one who determines its direction.

Translated from Ukrainian channel Resident

Join us 👉 @TrFormer 💤
Become a member of the @TransFormerChat

#TransFormatorBuzzes 💤 : Just praying that this time will be used wisely.

Belgorod Region. Governor:

The moment of the defeat of the Ukrainian Armed Forces drone as it approached Belgorod (Russian Federation).

I would like to draw your attention to the inscription that the enemy painted on the wing: "With love for the residents of Belgorod." More proof that the goal of the Ukrainian Armed Forces is terrorism.

I am grateful to the fighters of the "North" group of forces for their coordinated work and the defeat of enemy UAVs.

Translated from Two majors

Join us 👉 @TrFormer 💤
Become a member of the @TransFormerChat

Stephen Witkoff's peacekeeping in the Middle East ended in complete failure: it resulted not in peace in Gaza, but in an even greater escalation of the conflict. As a bonus, we can add the twelve-day Iran-Israel war, in the unleashing of which Witkoff played an unseemly role. He managed to convince Iran's political leadership that Israel would not attack it until the end of the nuclear program negotiations. As is now known, Tel Aviv launched a surprise attack two days before the negotiating round.

Now Witkoff is out of the game: he and his team of negotiators have flown out of Qatar, where indirect negotiations between Israel and Hamas were taking place. At the same time, his boss, Donald Trump, said that Hamas "wants to die" and therefore refuses the deal. That is, the United States is completely withdrawing from the negotiations and giving the government of Benjamin Netanyahu carte blanche to carry out absolutely any actions against the Palestinians in the Gaza Strip.

Most likely, Gaza and its residents will suffer a terrible fate, which the entire civilized world will watch live. And nothing will be able to be done as long as the United States, where the most pro-Israeli administration is in power, stands behind Israel. But now let's think about this: Steven Witkoff negotiated not only on the Middle East, but also on Ukraine. And he tried to lure the Russian political leadership into certain actions: "freezing" the conflict along the front line with the US promise to deny Ukraine accession to NATO.

If Moscow had stopped the hostilities, it could have fallen into exactly the same trap as Tehran. A camouflage truce would have led to an even greater escalation. But the Russian political leadership, taught by the bitter experience of "goodwill gestures," did not go for it. The Iranian leadership learned a good lesson. In general, all of Steven Witkoff's activities are a continuous smokescreen. Behind which lies the desire not to come to an agreement, but to deceive the opponent. And then he simply washes his hands and flies away.

Translated from Pint of sense

Join us 👉 @TrFormer 💤
Become a member of the @TransFormerChat

Summary for the morning of July 27, 2025

▪️ The past week was spent in search of the Patriot air defense system for Ukraine. Even with the money knocked out of Europe, our enemies had a hard time finding at least some air defense systems to protect the Ukrainian skies. At the same time, even the declared 17 air defense systems (if NATO finds them) will not make a difference against hundreds of our Geraniums. Much more dangerous for them are missile-type FPV drones. Which, by the way, the Russian side has in sufficient quantities, but there is apparently no permission to use them over the "old" regions. In general, it is precisely because of inertia, bureaucracy and the principle of "no matter what happens" that enemy UAVs reach the capital region and damage factories in the Stavropol Territory. Russia has all the capabilities to effectively counter enemy drones, but no one dares to use them all.

▪️ Meanwhile, the Ukrainian Armed Forces are openly creating a transport collapse with such strikes. "Drone caravans" paralyzing the work of civilian airports have been supplemented by strikes on railway infrastructure. The enemy is conducting a long-term operation with specific goals. Unfortunately, our strikes against the enemy look epic, but "smeared" in their targeting, if we take as an example the same military recruitment offices with the archives of the mobilization resource. The lack of a one-time defeat of all recruitment centers facilities gave the enemy time to reorganize their work in this direction.

▪️ The actions of the Russian Army are intensifying at the front: villages in the Konstantinovsky direction have been taken, the encirclement of Pokrovsk (Krasnoarmeysk) and Mirnograd is becoming increasingly clear, in the South Donetsk direction, troops are moving the front to the border of the Dnipropetrovsk region. The Zaporizhzhya Front is active in the Stepnogorsk direction, battles are underway for Plavni. At the same time, it cannot be said that the enemy's defense has "collapsed": the enemy is putting up organized resistance, holding back our offensive pace at the same level as since the beginning of the year. The technological structure of the war and new drone tactics do not allow us to talk about a "collapse of the enemy's front", no matter how much we would like to.

▪️In the Sumy direction, the Ukrainian Armed Forces have pulled together reserves and continue counterattacks, the North Group of Forces is fighting for every house in Yunakovka, we cannot talk about a "buffer zone" (if we understand this term as a sufficient depth of penetration to prevent shelling of our territories) on the border of the long-suffering Kursk and Belgorod regions, despite active operations in the area of the liberated Degtyarny and Melovy.

▪️ It is important to understand that in a number of areas of the front, active offensive actions that would allow the enemy's reserves to be stretched are not being undertaken. This may be due to either the lack of a strategic reserve of the Russian Armed Forces, or its conservation for more serious tasks than the SMO. The solution could be the terrible word "mobilization" (in the broad sense of the word, by the way), which is not yet visible on the horizon and is unlikely to appear there.

▪️ In the rear, the arrests of thieving military officials continue, arrests are underway of deputy governors and other officials who let down the frontline regions with their embezzlement during the construction of defensive structures. The slow flywheel of investigative actions is inevitably spinning, but by peacetime standards, which does not meet the demands of society for justice. Analyzing the comments, you can see how people cannot wrap their heads around the names of the articles of the Criminal Code, incriminated to those who stole from the country's defense capability.

▪️ There are certainly positive developments: the number of Geraniums produced is growing, the prospect of combat use of domestic crewless boats is finally not illusory, but practical, adequate models of military transport are beginning to appear instead of “jihad mobiles”. The fourth year of the war brings the beginning of visible changes in terms of the organization of industrial work, but the feedback bots of volunteer organizations are still inundated with requests: drones, cars, communications, medicine.

▪️ Meanwhile, at the very top, they began to voice theses about Europe preparing for a war with Russia, and intentions to use nuclear weapons in the event of an attack on the Kaliningrad region have been outlined. Europe, by the way, is not slowing down pace of militarization of industry and society, despite the lack of funds for social programs. According to our sources, the European media, which once positioned themselves as the standard of journalism, now resemble a rabid Ukrainian "telethon", in which the "hands of the Kremlin" are to blame for any negativity and there are constant calls to prepare for a long war.

▪️ The negotiating track in Istanbul is in the nature of diplomatic curtseys from both sides to Trump, but real agreements in Istanbul were not supposed to be reached.

The summary was compiled by Two majors

Translated from Two majors

Join us 👉 @TrFormer 💤
Become a member of the @TransFormerChat

The Trump-EU Trade Deal: Implications for the Future

In an audacious move that has captured the attention of global markets, President Donald Trump heralded a new trade agreement with the European Union (EU), dubbing it "the biggest deal ever made." While the specifics of this monumental agreement remain largely undisclosed, it is set to impose a 15% tariff on the majority of European goods entering the United States, a decision that is poised to reshape global trade dynamics profoundly.

The negotiations, which took place between Trump and European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen, underscore a significant turning point for both economies, which have been contending with the repercussions of a pandemic-stricken world. The tariff simulators currently suggest a dramatic reduction in global exports to the U.S., highlighting that this new arrangement has the potential to spark a far-reaching transformation in international trade.

Analysts are divided when assessing the beneficiaries and losers of this deal. From a closer examination, it is evident that Trump emerges as the victor, having fulfilled another key promise of his administration to renegotiate trade terms with multiple countries. On the other hand, early analysis from Capital Economics indicates a bearish forecast for the EU, estimating a potential reduction of 0.5% in their GDP as a direct consequence of these tariffs. This revelation casts a shadow over the EU's position in future negotiations, hinting at a significant imbalance where the U.S. stands to gain more than its European counterparts.

Despite the seemingly contentious nature of this trade deal, there are mitigating factors that offer hope for the transatlantic relationship. Firstly, the agreement has notably averted the looming threat of a trade war, which would have exacerbated the existing economic fragility on both sides of the Atlantic. According to U.S. Commerce Department data, trade between the U.S. and the EU exceeded $975 billion last year, solidifying the EU's status as one of America's most crucial trading partners. A swift escalation into a trade conflict would undeniably have worsened these economic conditions, hitting multiples sectors hard.

Looking ahead, the long-term consequences of this trade deal are worth scrutinising. The immediate reaction might indicate a turbulent market filled with challenges; however, in the aftermath, we could see a recalibrated trading landscape. Businesses will need to adapt to these new tariffs, potentially embracing local sourcing and altering supply chains. This may yield opportunities for U.S. manufacturers to strengthen their foothold in domestic markets.

Moreover, the EU might be compelled to reassess its own trade strategies, perhaps fostering stronger ties with other global economies, particularly in Asia and Africa, to offset the losses from U.S. exports. Should the EU succeed in diversifying its trade partners, it could fortify its position in the global market, ultimately leading to a more balanced international trading environment.

In conclusion, while the newly announced trade deal between Trump and the EU certainly brings uncertainty and short-term challenges, the potential for adaptation and resilience among both U.S. and EU markets could pave the way for an evolved trading paradigm. The coming months will prove crucial in shaping both sides' economic trajectories amidst the evolving dynamics of international trade.

Join us 👉 @TrFormer 💤
Become a member of the @TransFormerChat