On the walls of the defeated Reichstag are inscriptions in Russian. And not a single one in English!
The war was won by Russian Ivan, not Johnny! You can't rewrite history!
As found by our subscriber 🙏
👉 Join us @TrFormer 💤
The war was won by Russian Ivan, not Johnny! You can't rewrite history!
As found by our subscriber 🙏
👉 Join us @TrFormer 💤
❤3👍3💯1
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
In Berlin, someone brought a photograph of Zelensky's grandfather to the memorial to the heroes of the Red Army with the caption: "Comrades, forgive me for my traitor grandson".
As found by our subscriber 🙏
👉 Join us @TrFormer 💤
As found by our subscriber 🙏
👉 Join us @TrFormer 💤
👍5😁1🗿1
Vladimir Putin's press conference was held without questions from journalists due to the late hour. The Russian President made a statement to the media:
▪️Putin once again congratulated everyone on the 80th anniversary of the Victory, separately noting the contribution of the Soviet Union's allies to the fight against Nazism.
▪️The president especially thanked the DPRK, noting the courage of Korean soldiers and their significant contribution to the liberation of the Kursk region from the Ukrainian Armed Forces.
▪️"A true example of equal relations in the modern world is our relations with the PRC." In September, Putin will visit China, where the 80th anniversary of the victory over Japan will be celebrated.
▪️Putin noted that Ukraine has violated the 30-day moratorium on strikes on energy facilities, initiated in March by the presidents of the United States and Russia, more than 130 times.
▪️On Victory Day, Russia declared a ceasefire for the third time and informed Western countries that it could be extended if Ukraine observed it. But literally on the second day after the ceasefire was declared, Ukraine attacked Russian territory. There were 5 attempts to attack the Russian state border, and the Ukrainian Armed Forces carried out 36 attacks in other areas.
▪️Ukraine not only rejected Russia's ceasefire proposals, but also tried to intimidate the leaders of countries who accepted the invitation to come to Moscow: "These were assassination attempts with clearly unsuitable means."
▪️Russia has never refused to engage in dialogue with Ukraine, and even in 2022, Kiev interrupted the dialogue: "We propose that Ukraine resume direct negotiations without any preconditions on May 15 in Istanbul. Where they were interrupted."
▪️Tomorrow Putin and Erdogan will talk about organizing the negotiations. Russia is interested in eliminating the root causes of the conflict and agreeing on a ceasefire and long-term sustainable peace.
▪️Russia does not need peace that will be used by Ukraine to rearm and dig trenches. Russia's peace proposal is on the table, now it's up to Ukraine and its curators. Russia is ready for direct negotiations with Ukraine without preconditions.
▪️Putin expressed gratitude to the Trump administration for its mediation efforts.
Translated from Oleg Tsarev
👉 Join us @TrFormer 💤
▪️Putin once again congratulated everyone on the 80th anniversary of the Victory, separately noting the contribution of the Soviet Union's allies to the fight against Nazism.
▪️The president especially thanked the DPRK, noting the courage of Korean soldiers and their significant contribution to the liberation of the Kursk region from the Ukrainian Armed Forces.
▪️"A true example of equal relations in the modern world is our relations with the PRC." In September, Putin will visit China, where the 80th anniversary of the victory over Japan will be celebrated.
▪️Putin noted that Ukraine has violated the 30-day moratorium on strikes on energy facilities, initiated in March by the presidents of the United States and Russia, more than 130 times.
▪️On Victory Day, Russia declared a ceasefire for the third time and informed Western countries that it could be extended if Ukraine observed it. But literally on the second day after the ceasefire was declared, Ukraine attacked Russian territory. There were 5 attempts to attack the Russian state border, and the Ukrainian Armed Forces carried out 36 attacks in other areas.
▪️Ukraine not only rejected Russia's ceasefire proposals, but also tried to intimidate the leaders of countries who accepted the invitation to come to Moscow: "These were assassination attempts with clearly unsuitable means."
▪️Russia has never refused to engage in dialogue with Ukraine, and even in 2022, Kiev interrupted the dialogue: "We propose that Ukraine resume direct negotiations without any preconditions on May 15 in Istanbul. Where they were interrupted."
▪️Tomorrow Putin and Erdogan will talk about organizing the negotiations. Russia is interested in eliminating the root causes of the conflict and agreeing on a ceasefire and long-term sustainable peace.
▪️Russia does not need peace that will be used by Ukraine to rearm and dig trenches. Russia's peace proposal is on the table, now it's up to Ukraine and its curators. Russia is ready for direct negotiations with Ukraine without preconditions.
▪️Putin expressed gratitude to the Trump administration for its mediation efforts.
Translated from Oleg Tsarev
👉 Join us @TrFormer 💤
👍4👌1
As expected, the ultimatum of the "European Four", expressed in a rather brazen manner, was rejected by Russia: instead of a 30-day truce in the form of a "freeze" of the conflict along the front line, Putin proposed resuming the interrupted negotiations in Istanbul of 2022 on May 15. And within their framework, to discuss both the truce and the final peace settlement. At the same time, hostilities will not cease during the negotiations.
Now the ball is in the court of Kiev and its Western partners. If they reject the negotiations in Istanbul, they will lose a lot in terms of image. In case of agreement, Moscow has a ready negotiating position, from which it is unlikely to deviate: constitutional borders (that is, the withdrawal of Ukrainian troops from the territories of the DPR, LPR, Zaporizhzhya and Kherson regions they occupy), as well as the neutral status of Ukraine and the demilitarization of the Armed Forces of Ukraine.
By the way, the Ukrainian side's refusal to negotiate will make it much easier for the Trump administration to get out of the war in Ukraine. Of course, if it wants to do so. Overall, Moscow has made an elegant diplomatic move: we are for peace, for negotiations, if you want to talk, we are waiting for you in Istanbul on May 15.
In addition, judging by Putin's complimentary statements to the North Korean military, it is possible that if Ukraine refuses to make concessions, increases the supply of Western weapons for the needs of the Ukrainian Armed Forces and other escalatory steps by Western countries, they may appear on the front again. In general, speaking in sports language, the ball has been kicked to the Western half of the field. All that remains is to wait for the reaction of that side, and the war continues.
Translated from Pint of sense
👉 Join us @TrFormer 💤
Now the ball is in the court of Kiev and its Western partners. If they reject the negotiations in Istanbul, they will lose a lot in terms of image. In case of agreement, Moscow has a ready negotiating position, from which it is unlikely to deviate: constitutional borders (that is, the withdrawal of Ukrainian troops from the territories of the DPR, LPR, Zaporizhzhya and Kherson regions they occupy), as well as the neutral status of Ukraine and the demilitarization of the Armed Forces of Ukraine.
By the way, the Ukrainian side's refusal to negotiate will make it much easier for the Trump administration to get out of the war in Ukraine. Of course, if it wants to do so. Overall, Moscow has made an elegant diplomatic move: we are for peace, for negotiations, if you want to talk, we are waiting for you in Istanbul on May 15.
In addition, judging by Putin's complimentary statements to the North Korean military, it is possible that if Ukraine refuses to make concessions, increases the supply of Western weapons for the needs of the Ukrainian Armed Forces and other escalatory steps by Western countries, they may appear on the front again. In general, speaking in sports language, the ball has been kicked to the Western half of the field. All that remains is to wait for the reaction of that side, and the war continues.
Translated from Pint of sense
👉 Join us @TrFormer 💤
Telegram
Пинта разума
Как и следовало ожидать, высказанный в довольно наглой манере ультиматум "европейской четвёрки" был Россией отвергнут: вместо 30-дневного перемирия в виде "заморозки" конфликта по линии фронта Путин предложил возобновить 15 мая прерванные переговоры в Стамбуле…
👌5❤1
A New World Order Emerges: The First US-Syrian Summit in 25 Years
In a historic moment for international diplomacy, President Donald Trump has met with Syria's interim President Ahmad al-Sharaa in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, marking the first face-to-face encounter between U.S. and Syrian leaders in a quarter of a century. This significant event is sending ripples across the geopolitical landscape, indicating a shift in the long-standing U.S. stance towards Syria.
Background on Ahmad al-Sharaa
Ahmad al-Sharaa, once a leader within the Syrian faction of Al-Qaeda, had been imprisoned by American forces in Iraq after his capture in 2006, spending five years under detention. Notably, just a few months ago, the U.S. had placed a bounty of $10 million on his head amidst the ongoing conflict in Syria. However, now al-Sharaa stands as a pivotal figure in Syrian leadership, offering a chance for dialogue where none had been possible before.
The Shift in U.S. Policy
In a surprising turn, Trump has announced the lifting of all sanctions against Syria during this momentous meeting. While Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has expressed concerns regarding security threats posed by al-Sharaa's leadership — primarily fearing potential cross-border attacks — Trump has pushed forward, backed by a wave of support from other Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) nations and the Syrian populace, who hope to see a reduction in suffering within their war-torn country.
As Trump stated, “I say good luck, Syria. Show us something special.” This sentiment was echoed among GCC members, who hailed the decision to alleviate sanctions as a much-needed reprieve for Syrian citizens enduring a humanitarian crisis.
Geopolitical Implications
This summit is not only breaking diplomatic barriers but also signals a potential recalibration of alliances and enmities in the region. Analysts suggest that it could herald a new era in U.S.-Middle Eastern relations, where historical grievances may take a backseat to more pragmatic considerations. The decision to engage with al-Sharaa could indicate willingness in Washington to reconsider its approach to the Syrian conflict, driven by tangible local needs rather than abstract political agendas.
While there are concerns around al-Sharaa's past and his affiliations, the meeting represents a broader narrative of diplomatic engagement over perpetual hostility.
As we observe these developments, it remains to be seen how such a realignment will affect the ongoing challenges in Syria and the wider region, especially concerning Israeli security and Iranian influence.
For more information, you can read additional analysis here:
- The Washington Post
- CBS News
- HuffPost
Join us 👉 @TrFormer 💤
Become a member of the @TransFormerChat
In a historic moment for international diplomacy, President Donald Trump has met with Syria's interim President Ahmad al-Sharaa in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, marking the first face-to-face encounter between U.S. and Syrian leaders in a quarter of a century. This significant event is sending ripples across the geopolitical landscape, indicating a shift in the long-standing U.S. stance towards Syria.
Background on Ahmad al-Sharaa
Ahmad al-Sharaa, once a leader within the Syrian faction of Al-Qaeda, had been imprisoned by American forces in Iraq after his capture in 2006, spending five years under detention. Notably, just a few months ago, the U.S. had placed a bounty of $10 million on his head amidst the ongoing conflict in Syria. However, now al-Sharaa stands as a pivotal figure in Syrian leadership, offering a chance for dialogue where none had been possible before.
The Shift in U.S. Policy
In a surprising turn, Trump has announced the lifting of all sanctions against Syria during this momentous meeting. While Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has expressed concerns regarding security threats posed by al-Sharaa's leadership — primarily fearing potential cross-border attacks — Trump has pushed forward, backed by a wave of support from other Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) nations and the Syrian populace, who hope to see a reduction in suffering within their war-torn country.
As Trump stated, “I say good luck, Syria. Show us something special.” This sentiment was echoed among GCC members, who hailed the decision to alleviate sanctions as a much-needed reprieve for Syrian citizens enduring a humanitarian crisis.
Geopolitical Implications
This summit is not only breaking diplomatic barriers but also signals a potential recalibration of alliances and enmities in the region. Analysts suggest that it could herald a new era in U.S.-Middle Eastern relations, where historical grievances may take a backseat to more pragmatic considerations. The decision to engage with al-Sharaa could indicate willingness in Washington to reconsider its approach to the Syrian conflict, driven by tangible local needs rather than abstract political agendas.
While there are concerns around al-Sharaa's past and his affiliations, the meeting represents a broader narrative of diplomatic engagement over perpetual hostility.
As we observe these developments, it remains to be seen how such a realignment will affect the ongoing challenges in Syria and the wider region, especially concerning Israeli security and Iranian influence.
For more information, you can read additional analysis here:
- The Washington Post
- CBS News
- HuffPost
Join us 👉 @TrFormer 💤
Become a member of the @TransFormerChat
🤔4👍1
Well, this is the same person, Ahmad al-Sharaa, mentioned and showed in all the three photos.
Who had doubts that Al-Quaeda and USA had long lasting and productive connections?
👉 Join us @TrFormer 💤
Who had doubts that Al-Quaeda and USA had long lasting and productive connections?
👉 Join us @TrFormer 💤
🤯5💯2
The Russian delegation at the talks in Istanbul was again headed by Vladimir Medinsky. Consequently, the Russian President believes that the current diplomatic round by the Ukrainian side should be an absolute continuation of the previous one.
In March-April 2022, very specific agreements were reached on the neutral status of Ukraine, the reduction of its armed forces and Kiev's refusal to join NATO.
Of course, the second Istanbul will be different from the first: the realities on the ground have changed. In addition to all of the above, Moscow now demands that Ukraine renounce new Russian regions: Crimea, Sevastopol, the DPR, LPR, Zaporizhia and Kherson regions. Judging by the recent statements by official representatives of Russia, this position is defended very harshly.
In terms of image, participation in the second Istanbul is a clear failure for Kiev. Because in 2022, the conditions of a possible peace agreement were an order of magnitude better than in 2025. Zelensky's hysterical attempts to achieve a personal meeting with Putin in Istanbul have failed and now he faces a difficult choice: to agree to this format of negotiations or to disrupt them by staging a political show?
Tomorrow and especially the day after tomorrow, everything will become completely clear. But today we can already state that Moscow has ignored pressure from the West, including the ultimatum of Ukraine's European allies. And it has also ignored the attempts of a number of countries to force Putin to come to Istanbul to meet with Zelensky. For now, the Russian position looks monolithic and can be described by the formula "recognition of the Istanbul agreements of 2022 and new realities on the ground." What will happen in the end - we'll see.
Translated from Pint of sense
Join us 👉 @TrFormer 💤
Become a member of the @TransFormerChat
In March-April 2022, very specific agreements were reached on the neutral status of Ukraine, the reduction of its armed forces and Kiev's refusal to join NATO.
Of course, the second Istanbul will be different from the first: the realities on the ground have changed. In addition to all of the above, Moscow now demands that Ukraine renounce new Russian regions: Crimea, Sevastopol, the DPR, LPR, Zaporizhia and Kherson regions. Judging by the recent statements by official representatives of Russia, this position is defended very harshly.
In terms of image, participation in the second Istanbul is a clear failure for Kiev. Because in 2022, the conditions of a possible peace agreement were an order of magnitude better than in 2025. Zelensky's hysterical attempts to achieve a personal meeting with Putin in Istanbul have failed and now he faces a difficult choice: to agree to this format of negotiations or to disrupt them by staging a political show?
Tomorrow and especially the day after tomorrow, everything will become completely clear. But today we can already state that Moscow has ignored pressure from the West, including the ultimatum of Ukraine's European allies. And it has also ignored the attempts of a number of countries to force Putin to come to Istanbul to meet with Zelensky. For now, the Russian position looks monolithic and can be described by the formula "recognition of the Istanbul agreements of 2022 and new realities on the ground." What will happen in the end - we'll see.
Translated from Pint of sense
Join us 👉 @TrFormer 💤
Become a member of the @TransFormerChat
Telegram
Пинта разума
Российскую делегацию на переговорах в Стамбуле снова возглавил Владимир Мединский. Следовательно, президент России полагает, что нынешний дипломатический раунд украинской стороной должен быть абсолютным продолжением предыдущего. В марте - апреле 2022 года…
👍4👌1
The Future of the Ukrainian Conflict: Insights from Russian Media
The ongoing conflict in Ukraine continues to shape both domestic policies in Russia and international relations. Recent analyses provide a substantial view of the changing dynamics and prospective forecasts about the conflict's future.
Prognosis and Political Shifts
Recent reports, particularly from the centre for geopolitics at JPMorgan Chase, suggest that the war may be approaching its final stages, with analysts predicting a potential cessation of hostilities by the end of 2025. They argue that the most likely scenario involves Ukraine adapting to a state akin to "North Korea," maintaining limited interaction with the West while reliant on Russian impositions and frameworks for stability (see more on this intriguing perspective here: Meduza).
According to Sergey Lavrov, Russia's Minister of Foreign Affairs, the Kremlin is preparing to engage in further negotiations, perhaps in the Vatican, highlighting the importance of a unified stance in these discussions (more details available at Gazeta). This suggests a desire for a diplomatic path, even if the prospects of any quick resolutions remain slim.
Moreover, Dmitry Peskov, the Kremlin spokesperson, emphasises the significance of nuanced negotiations, insisting on the importance of altering the composition of the Ukrainian negotiators to include those who are more amenable to Russian perspectives (details provided by RBC).
Military Posture and Strategic Expectations
The military landscape also reflects a shift in strategy, with reports from MK indicating that military operations and negotiations are no longer mutually exclusive; they exist in tandem, thus redefining how both sides approach the conflict (see further here MK).
Also of note is the indication that the Kremlin is not particularly optimistic about a swift military resolution, which hints at a prolonged engagement in the region, especially with Ukraine's military capabilities being continuously bolstered by Western arms (as emphasised in an article discussing the shifts in military dynamics). The need for a solid military strategy to safeguard Russian interests remains paramount.
Conclusion and Forward-Looking Statements
In conclusion, while the clock ticks towards mid-2025, the Russian stance seems firmly planted on maintaining its geopolitical foothold while engaging in strategic negotiations. The assessment by financial analysts and political commentators suggests a complex interplay between military developments and diplomatic negotiations, underscoring an arduous road ahead.
With these insights, one may reflect on the resilience of Russian policy amidst a backdrop of Western pressure and internal challenges. The potential for a shift towards a lasting peace could hinge on diplomatic dexterity as much as on military effectiveness.
Join us 👉 @TrFormer 💤
Become a member of the @TransFormerChat
The ongoing conflict in Ukraine continues to shape both domestic policies in Russia and international relations. Recent analyses provide a substantial view of the changing dynamics and prospective forecasts about the conflict's future.
Prognosis and Political Shifts
Recent reports, particularly from the centre for geopolitics at JPMorgan Chase, suggest that the war may be approaching its final stages, with analysts predicting a potential cessation of hostilities by the end of 2025. They argue that the most likely scenario involves Ukraine adapting to a state akin to "North Korea," maintaining limited interaction with the West while reliant on Russian impositions and frameworks for stability (see more on this intriguing perspective here: Meduza).
According to Sergey Lavrov, Russia's Minister of Foreign Affairs, the Kremlin is preparing to engage in further negotiations, perhaps in the Vatican, highlighting the importance of a unified stance in these discussions (more details available at Gazeta). This suggests a desire for a diplomatic path, even if the prospects of any quick resolutions remain slim.
Moreover, Dmitry Peskov, the Kremlin spokesperson, emphasises the significance of nuanced negotiations, insisting on the importance of altering the composition of the Ukrainian negotiators to include those who are more amenable to Russian perspectives (details provided by RBC).
Military Posture and Strategic Expectations
The military landscape also reflects a shift in strategy, with reports from MK indicating that military operations and negotiations are no longer mutually exclusive; they exist in tandem, thus redefining how both sides approach the conflict (see further here MK).
Also of note is the indication that the Kremlin is not particularly optimistic about a swift military resolution, which hints at a prolonged engagement in the region, especially with Ukraine's military capabilities being continuously bolstered by Western arms (as emphasised in an article discussing the shifts in military dynamics). The need for a solid military strategy to safeguard Russian interests remains paramount.
Conclusion and Forward-Looking Statements
In conclusion, while the clock ticks towards mid-2025, the Russian stance seems firmly planted on maintaining its geopolitical foothold while engaging in strategic negotiations. The assessment by financial analysts and political commentators suggests a complex interplay between military developments and diplomatic negotiations, underscoring an arduous road ahead.
With these insights, one may reflect on the resilience of Russian policy amidst a backdrop of Western pressure and internal challenges. The potential for a shift towards a lasting peace could hinge on diplomatic dexterity as much as on military effectiveness.
Join us 👉 @TrFormer 💤
Become a member of the @TransFormerChat
🤔2❤1👌1
The Western Perspective on the Ukraine Conflict: Tensions and Predictions
As the Ukraine conflict continues to unfold, various Western sources provide insights into its complexities and anticipated developments, painting a more cautionary picture compared to their Russian counterparts. The situation remains fraught with military engagements and geopolitical manoeuvres, and any return to peace seems distant.
Stalemate and Stretched Resources
Recent analyses suggest that peace talks are facing significant challenges. The Kremlin has denied reports of any upcoming discussions at the Vatican, and Ukrainian intelligence has highlighted ongoing military actions, including a drone strike on a Russian early-warning radar system in Orenburg (The Moscow Times). General Oleksandr Syrsky of Ukraine warns that Russia is well-equipped for further offensives, suggesting a persistence in hostilities that undermines diplomatic efforts (The Guardian).
Furthermore, the recent G7 meeting indicated a potential escalation in economic pressure against Russia, with finance chiefs threatening more sanctions (The Guardian). This renewed pressure reflects a larger strategy to support Ukraine militarily and financially, which may prolong the conflict without a concrete resolution in sight.
Military Preparations and Prolonged Conflict
The involvement of Western allies has not waned; the EU is poised to roll out an €800 billion plan aimed at strengthening its military capabilities, indicating a collective commitment to aid Ukraine (American Conservative). Additionally, Ukraine is set to benefit from increased military equipment shipments from the United States, showcasing a proactive stance on the part of Western nations (CNN).
In terms of military engagements, Russian forces are reportedly establishing a "buffer zone" along the border, suggesting preparations for a prolonged conflict with ongoing territorial disputes (CNN). This tactic may imply that Russia is not only bracing for an extended military campaign but also aiming to fortify its positions against Ukrainian advances.
A Complex Path Forward
In conclusion, the outlook for the Ukraine conflict remains unclear, with military strategies dominating discussions and diplomatic efforts proving inadequate. The prospect of lasting peace appears further away, with involved parties reaffirming their readiness for continued confrontations. General Zaluzhnyi's assertions about the resources available to Russia underscore a dangerous reality where both sides maintain a posture geared toward long-term commitments.
Given the array of military resources and international sanctions in play, it seems the resolution of this crisis awaits a significant shift in attitudes or strategies, which presently feels improbable. As we move forward, vigilance and continued analysis of both military and political developments will be crucial.
Join us 👉 @TrFormer 💤
Become a member of the @TransFormerChat
As the Ukraine conflict continues to unfold, various Western sources provide insights into its complexities and anticipated developments, painting a more cautionary picture compared to their Russian counterparts. The situation remains fraught with military engagements and geopolitical manoeuvres, and any return to peace seems distant.
Stalemate and Stretched Resources
Recent analyses suggest that peace talks are facing significant challenges. The Kremlin has denied reports of any upcoming discussions at the Vatican, and Ukrainian intelligence has highlighted ongoing military actions, including a drone strike on a Russian early-warning radar system in Orenburg (The Moscow Times). General Oleksandr Syrsky of Ukraine warns that Russia is well-equipped for further offensives, suggesting a persistence in hostilities that undermines diplomatic efforts (The Guardian).
Furthermore, the recent G7 meeting indicated a potential escalation in economic pressure against Russia, with finance chiefs threatening more sanctions (The Guardian). This renewed pressure reflects a larger strategy to support Ukraine militarily and financially, which may prolong the conflict without a concrete resolution in sight.
Military Preparations and Prolonged Conflict
The involvement of Western allies has not waned; the EU is poised to roll out an €800 billion plan aimed at strengthening its military capabilities, indicating a collective commitment to aid Ukraine (American Conservative). Additionally, Ukraine is set to benefit from increased military equipment shipments from the United States, showcasing a proactive stance on the part of Western nations (CNN).
In terms of military engagements, Russian forces are reportedly establishing a "buffer zone" along the border, suggesting preparations for a prolonged conflict with ongoing territorial disputes (CNN). This tactic may imply that Russia is not only bracing for an extended military campaign but also aiming to fortify its positions against Ukrainian advances.
A Complex Path Forward
In conclusion, the outlook for the Ukraine conflict remains unclear, with military strategies dominating discussions and diplomatic efforts proving inadequate. The prospect of lasting peace appears further away, with involved parties reaffirming their readiness for continued confrontations. General Zaluzhnyi's assertions about the resources available to Russia underscore a dangerous reality where both sides maintain a posture geared toward long-term commitments.
Given the array of military resources and international sanctions in play, it seems the resolution of this crisis awaits a significant shift in attitudes or strategies, which presently feels improbable. As we move forward, vigilance and continued analysis of both military and political developments will be crucial.
Join us 👉 @TrFormer 💤
Become a member of the @TransFormerChat
✍1👌1
🇷🇺 The first photo from the 1000 for 1000 exchange is going on right now at the border of Belarus and Ukraine.
We are bringing home almost all the servicemen who were captured during the three years of the SMO!
As found by our subscriber 🙏
👉 Join us @TrFormer 💤
We are bringing home almost all the servicemen who were captured during the three years of the SMO!
As found by our subscriber 🙏
👉 Join us @TrFormer 💤
👍5🫡2💩1
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Olukemi Olufunto Badenoke, born Adegoke, who is now the leader of the British Conservatives, while defending Netanyahu on Sky News, got into the excitement of blabbing:
"Israel is waging a proxy war in Britain's interests. Just as, incidentally, Ukraine is waging a proxy war in the interests of Western Europe against Russia".
#TransFormatorBuzzes 💤 :
To comment that — only to spoil.
As found by our subscriber 🙏
👉 Join us @TrFormer 💤
"Israel is waging a proxy war in Britain's interests. Just as, incidentally, Ukraine is waging a proxy war in the interests of Western Europe against Russia".
#TransFormatorBuzzes 💤 :
To comment that — only to spoil.
As found by our subscriber 🙏
👉 Join us @TrFormer 💤
🤡4💯1🤣1
British opposition leader claims Israel fighting ‘proxy war on behalf of the UK’ in Gaza
Anadolu Europe
Anadolu Europe
Anadolu Agency
British opposition leader claims Israel fighting ‘proxy war on behalf of the UK’ in Gaza
Conservative leader Kemi Badenoch equates Israel's genocidal attacks on Gaza with Ukraine’s defense against Russia
🐳5
Long-Range Missiles: Prelude to Escalation?
The discussions surrounding the supply of long-range missiles to Ukraine by European powers have escalated over recent days, largely supported by Germany, the United Kingdom, and France. With such movements, the potential for increased conflict intensity looms ever closer, raising critical questions about their implications.
A Shift in Military Support
German Chancellor Friedrich Merz announced that Berlin, following the lead of its European allies, would lift restrictions on the range of military support provided to Ukraine. This means that Ukraine can now launch strikes not just on the frontlines but potentially deep within Russian territory, targeting military infrastructure. Merz affirmed during an interview with WDR that Germany has removed any distance limitations, heralding a new chapter in Germany’s military support strategy for Ukraine RT.
The proposal includes the provision of 100 to 150 Taurus cruise missiles. These munitions, renowned for their precision and extended range, could drastically alter the operational landscape—enabling Ukraine to conduct strikes far beyond the immediate conflict zone. As reported by various sources, including Gazeta, some reports suggest that Ukrainian forces could be supported in deploying missiles capable of reaching strategic sites in Russia itself.
Justifying the Escalation
But can this transformation in military supply be justified? Supporters might argue that empowering Ukraine with such weaponry is a legitimate response to Russian aggression. However, from a Russian perspective, this escalatory dynamic is inherently provocative. It is viewed not merely as military support but as an invitation to intensify hostilities, potentially drawing NATO further into an active role in the conflict, thus jeopardising regional stability.
Moreover, these developments may compel Russia to adapt its military strategy, likely responding with heightened strikes on Ukrainian positions, including infrastructure and supply chains critical to the war effort. An article from NTV underlines that Russia is prepared to intensify its offensive operations in retaliation for such provocations.
Predicting the Future
Looking forward, the injection of long-range missiles into the Ukrainian arsenal will likely escalate tensions significantly. As the West endorses Ukraine's ability to strike deeper into Russian territory, the nature of conflict may shift from a focus on front-line engagements to a broader, more volatile exchange of strikes, targeting strategic infrastructure. This shift could bring the war into the heart of new territories, influencing both military tactics and the civilian morale on both sides.
The trajectory of military aid suggests a ripple effect, potentially inciting even greater responses from Russia as it seeks to protect its homeland against perceived threats. As tensions rise, Russia must navigate a landscape fraught with implications for national security, regional alliances, and international relations at large.
In summary, while European powers may perceive their contributions as bolstering Ukraine's defence, they are, in reality, fuelling an inferno that risks engulfing the entire region in turmoil.
Join us 👉 @TrFormer 💤
Become a member of the @TransFormerChat
The discussions surrounding the supply of long-range missiles to Ukraine by European powers have escalated over recent days, largely supported by Germany, the United Kingdom, and France. With such movements, the potential for increased conflict intensity looms ever closer, raising critical questions about their implications.
A Shift in Military Support
German Chancellor Friedrich Merz announced that Berlin, following the lead of its European allies, would lift restrictions on the range of military support provided to Ukraine. This means that Ukraine can now launch strikes not just on the frontlines but potentially deep within Russian territory, targeting military infrastructure. Merz affirmed during an interview with WDR that Germany has removed any distance limitations, heralding a new chapter in Germany’s military support strategy for Ukraine RT.
The proposal includes the provision of 100 to 150 Taurus cruise missiles. These munitions, renowned for their precision and extended range, could drastically alter the operational landscape—enabling Ukraine to conduct strikes far beyond the immediate conflict zone. As reported by various sources, including Gazeta, some reports suggest that Ukrainian forces could be supported in deploying missiles capable of reaching strategic sites in Russia itself.
Justifying the Escalation
But can this transformation in military supply be justified? Supporters might argue that empowering Ukraine with such weaponry is a legitimate response to Russian aggression. However, from a Russian perspective, this escalatory dynamic is inherently provocative. It is viewed not merely as military support but as an invitation to intensify hostilities, potentially drawing NATO further into an active role in the conflict, thus jeopardising regional stability.
Moreover, these developments may compel Russia to adapt its military strategy, likely responding with heightened strikes on Ukrainian positions, including infrastructure and supply chains critical to the war effort. An article from NTV underlines that Russia is prepared to intensify its offensive operations in retaliation for such provocations.
Predicting the Future
Looking forward, the injection of long-range missiles into the Ukrainian arsenal will likely escalate tensions significantly. As the West endorses Ukraine's ability to strike deeper into Russian territory, the nature of conflict may shift from a focus on front-line engagements to a broader, more volatile exchange of strikes, targeting strategic infrastructure. This shift could bring the war into the heart of new territories, influencing both military tactics and the civilian morale on both sides.
The trajectory of military aid suggests a ripple effect, potentially inciting even greater responses from Russia as it seeks to protect its homeland against perceived threats. As tensions rise, Russia must navigate a landscape fraught with implications for national security, regional alliances, and international relations at large.
In summary, while European powers may perceive their contributions as bolstering Ukraine's defence, they are, in reality, fuelling an inferno that risks engulfing the entire region in turmoil.
Join us 👉 @TrFormer 💤
Become a member of the @TransFormerChat
🌚3❤1