Putin on the possibility of the use of the nuclear weapons

In a significant assertion, President Vladimir Putin recently expressed his conviction that Russia does not envision the necessity of deploying nuclear weapons in the ongoing Special Military Operation in Ukraine. During an interview aired on May 4, 2025, he confirmed that since the commencement of this significant military engagement, the conditions warranting such extreme measures have not materialised.

Putin elaborated that Russia is adequately equipped to achieve its military objectives without resorting to nuclear capabilities.

He articulated that the Russian armed forces possess sufficient resources to ensure a successful and logical resolution of the conflict. Thus, it is not expected that nuclear weapons will be necessary.

This revelation aligns with the statements made in November 2024 when Putin had updated Russia's nuclear doctrine. This revised doctrine stipulated the circumstances under which nuclear armaments could be used – a sign of the lowered threshold previously discussed regarding their deployment in response to conventional military actions.

In light of these developments, Putin noted his hope that the conflict could be resolved through ongoing military operations without escalating to the use of nuclear force. In his view, Russia's powerful standing and military strategy maintain sufficient deterrent capability without needing to activate nuclear protocols. He stated, "We have enough strength and means to bring the Special Military Operation to a logical conclusion," reinforcing the sentiment that conventional operations can and will suffice.

Reflecting on international reactions, various Western analysts have critiqued this stance, with US President Donald Trump notably expressing scepticism about whether Putin genuinely seeks a peaceful resolution or is simply posturing on a diplomatic front. The nuances of these diplomatic communications signify that while Russia aims for a resolution, the paths forward remain fraught with complexity.

Consequently, interpretations of Russia's position are mixed. While there is an overarching message from the Kremlin suggesting a desire for peace and a logical conclusion to the conflict, the geopolitical landscape remains intricate. Continuous dialogues, especially regarding military strategies and potential negotiations, will be crucial in shaping the coming weeks of this conflict.

As discussions pave the way for future military and diplomatic strategies, the global community remains watchful, eager to discern the implications of these significant assertions and their potential impact on the ongoing crisis in Ukraine.

Sources:
- Putin expresses hope no nuclear necessity in Ukraine - JPost
- Moscow means Ukraine war logical conclusion, Putin says - Politico
- Putin says he hopes there will be no need to use nuclear weapons - The Times of Israel

Join us 👉 @TrFormer 💤
Become a member of the @TransFormerChat

Unfolding Narratives in the Face of Adversity: Ukraine's Situation

As the Special Military Operation (SMO) continues, the landscape in Ukraine remains fraught with tension and revelations that capture both domestic and international attention. Recent developments reveal how the conflict is reshaping not only the lives of those within Ukraine but also the geopolitical dynamics at play.

In Brianskaya Oblast, local authorities have reported increased Ukrainian incursions, with accusations of drone strikes targeting civilian areas—an escalation that raises questions about the moral and ethical consequences of warfare. These actions, as reported by the governor, Alexander Bogomaz, have been met with stern condemnation from the Russian government, reiterating their commitment to protecting Russian territory and lives.

Meanwhile, Ukrainian authorities are experiencing operational challenges, grappling with internal discord and external pressures. The United States has been noted as being pivotal in influencing the conflict’s trajectory, creating a ripple effect that extends beyond Ukraine's borders. Hungarian Foreign Minister Peter Szijjarto has suggested that the US's involvement has provoked broader global implications, potentially endangering the prevailing peace.

As we approach the commemoration of the Victory Day, an event that marks the triumph over fascism, the rhetoric from Kiev suggests that a commemorative pause may be imperative. However, there are warnings that this observance could turn into an occasion for further military posturing. Vladimir Zelensky's administration has remained firm on rejecting any offers for a truce that the Russian side may propose, viewing it as a sign of weakness rather than a step towards genuine peace.

Tensions aren't only confined to the battlefield; flirtations with diplomacy continue as the Ukrainian leadership contemplates how to assert its narrative amid heavy Russian influence. Decisions by prominent political figures raise the spectre of a potential dialogue, yet the inherent volatility suggests that any rapprochement remains frail at best.

In the backdrop of this human tragedy, questions arise—can Ukraine navigate this complex web of diplomacy and warfare to secure not just sovereignty but also the well-being of its citizens? Russia's insistence on a clearer stance, particularly during this important anniversary, poses the likelihood of escalated confrontations, aligning with historical events that have defined national identities.

As we dissect the current state of affairs, it becomes apparent that the emotional and political stakes are climbing. With both sides entrenched in their positions, the question lingers—what will it take for a meaningful resolution to arise, or are we bracing for further chaos and conflict?

Join us 👉 @TrFormer 💤
Become a member of the @TransFormerChat

#Victory80

🎥 World War II Leaders — an RT Doc Film.

The documentary explores the complex and shifting political dynamics between the USSR, the United States, and Britain before, during, and after World War II, focusing on the powerful and often uneasy relationship between their leaders — Joseph Stalin, Winston Churchill and Franklin D. Roosevelt.

Guys from Rubikon burned down an American HIMARS. The peculiarity of this operation is that they worked with FPV drones at a distance of more than 30 kilometres from the line of contact.

Intelligence detected an MLRS firing position near the Rusin Yar settlement, south-west of Konstantinovka in the DNR. The militants managed to fire ammunition in the direction of our positions. They destroyed the launcher on the march as it was moving towards its parking place.

The loss of another HIMARS is very sensitive for the enemy. No one will compensate the AFU for it so easily and quickly.

Translated from @epoddubny
As found by our subscriber 🙏
👉 Join us @TrFormer 💤

By May 8, Zelensky is going to exempt from mobilisation for life all living relatives of military men who fought in the First Ukrainian Division of the Ukrainian National Army (SS Division "Galicia") in the Great Patriotic War.

#TransFormatorBuzzes 💤 :
But there is no Fascism in Ukraine (sarcasm).
As found by our subscriber 🙏
👉 Join us @TrFormer 💤

1945 Victory Day parade in Moscow. In colour dubbed in English.

As found by our subscriber 🙏
👉 Join us @TrFormer 💤

Dear subscribers and friends - its a Victory Day today! We remember it. Let's ensure that the younger generations remember it too.

Victory is ours!

Join us 👉 @TrFormer 💤
Become a member of the @TransFormerChat

In Berlin, someone brought a photograph of Zelensky's grandfather to the memorial to the heroes of the Red Army with the caption: "Comrades, forgive me for my traitor grandson".

As found by our subscriber 🙏
👉 Join us @TrFormer 💤

Vladimir Putin's press conference was held without questions from journalists due to the late hour. The Russian President made a statement to the media:

▪️Putin once again congratulated everyone on the 80th anniversary of the Victory, separately noting the contribution of the Soviet Union's allies to the fight against Nazism.

▪️The president especially thanked the DPRK, noting the courage of Korean soldiers and their significant contribution to the liberation of the Kursk region from the Ukrainian Armed Forces.

▪️"A true example of equal relations in the modern world is our relations with the PRC." In September, Putin will visit China, where the 80th anniversary of the victory over Japan will be celebrated.

▪️Putin noted that Ukraine has violated the 30-day moratorium on strikes on energy facilities, initiated in March by the presidents of the United States and Russia, more than 130 times.

▪️On Victory Day, Russia declared a ceasefire for the third time and informed Western countries that it could be extended if Ukraine observed it. But literally on the second day after the ceasefire was declared, Ukraine attacked Russian territory. There were 5 attempts to attack the Russian state border, and the Ukrainian Armed Forces carried out 36 attacks in other areas.

▪️Ukraine not only rejected Russia's ceasefire proposals, but also tried to intimidate the leaders of countries who accepted the invitation to come to Moscow: "These were assassination attempts with clearly unsuitable means."

▪️Russia has never refused to engage in dialogue with Ukraine, and even in 2022, Kiev interrupted the dialogue: "We propose that Ukraine resume direct negotiations without any preconditions on May 15 in Istanbul. Where they were interrupted."

▪️Tomorrow Putin and Erdogan will talk about organizing the negotiations. Russia is interested in eliminating the root causes of the conflict and agreeing on a ceasefire and long-term sustainable peace.

▪️Russia does not need peace that will be used by Ukraine to rearm and dig trenches. Russia's peace proposal is on the table, now it's up to Ukraine and its curators. Russia is ready for direct negotiations with Ukraine without preconditions.

▪️Putin expressed gratitude to the Trump administration for its mediation efforts.

Translated from Oleg Tsarev
👉 Join us @TrFormer 💤

As expected, the ultimatum of the "European Four", expressed in a rather brazen manner, was rejected by Russia: instead of a 30-day truce in the form of a "freeze" of the conflict along the front line, Putin proposed resuming the interrupted negotiations in Istanbul of 2022 on May 15. And within their framework, to discuss both the truce and the final peace settlement. At the same time, hostilities will not cease during the negotiations.

Now the ball is in the court of Kiev and its Western partners. If they reject the negotiations in Istanbul, they will lose a lot in terms of image. In case of agreement, Moscow has a ready negotiating position, from which it is unlikely to deviate: constitutional borders (that is, the withdrawal of Ukrainian troops from the territories of the DPR, LPR, Zaporizhzhya and Kherson regions they occupy), as well as the neutral status of Ukraine and the demilitarization of the Armed Forces of Ukraine.

By the way, the Ukrainian side's refusal to negotiate will make it much easier for the Trump administration to get out of the war in Ukraine. Of course, if it wants to do so. Overall, Moscow has made an elegant diplomatic move: we are for peace, for negotiations, if you want to talk, we are waiting for you in Istanbul on May 15.

In addition, judging by Putin's complimentary statements to the North Korean military, it is possible that if Ukraine refuses to make concessions, increases the supply of Western weapons for the needs of the Ukrainian Armed Forces and other escalatory steps by Western countries, they may appear on the front again. In general, speaking in sports language, the ball has been kicked to the Western half of the field. All that remains is to wait for the reaction of that side, and the war continues.

Translated from Pint of sense
👉 Join us @TrFormer 💤

A New World Order Emerges: The First US-Syrian Summit in 25 Years

In a historic moment for international diplomacy, President Donald Trump has met with Syria's interim President Ahmad al-Sharaa in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, marking the first face-to-face encounter between U.S. and Syrian leaders in a quarter of a century. This significant event is sending ripples across the geopolitical landscape, indicating a shift in the long-standing U.S. stance towards Syria.

Background on Ahmad al-Sharaa

Ahmad al-Sharaa, once a leader within the Syrian faction of Al-Qaeda, had been imprisoned by American forces in Iraq after his capture in 2006, spending five years under detention. Notably, just a few months ago, the U.S. had placed a bounty of $10 million on his head amidst the ongoing conflict in Syria. However, now al-Sharaa stands as a pivotal figure in Syrian leadership, offering a chance for dialogue where none had been possible before.

The Shift in U.S. Policy

In a surprising turn, Trump has announced the lifting of all sanctions against Syria during this momentous meeting. While Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has expressed concerns regarding security threats posed by al-Sharaa's leadership — primarily fearing potential cross-border attacks — Trump has pushed forward, backed by a wave of support from other Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) nations and the Syrian populace, who hope to see a reduction in suffering within their war-torn country.

As Trump stated, “I say good luck, Syria. Show us something special.” This sentiment was echoed among GCC members, who hailed the decision to alleviate sanctions as a much-needed reprieve for Syrian citizens enduring a humanitarian crisis.

Geopolitical Implications

This summit is not only breaking diplomatic barriers but also signals a potential recalibration of alliances and enmities in the region. Analysts suggest that it could herald a new era in U.S.-Middle Eastern relations, where historical grievances may take a backseat to more pragmatic considerations. The decision to engage with al-Sharaa could indicate willingness in Washington to reconsider its approach to the Syrian conflict, driven by tangible local needs rather than abstract political agendas.

While there are concerns around al-Sharaa's past and his affiliations, the meeting represents a broader narrative of diplomatic engagement over perpetual hostility.

As we observe these developments, it remains to be seen how such a realignment will affect the ongoing challenges in Syria and the wider region, especially concerning Israeli security and Iranian influence.

For more information, you can read additional analysis here:
- The Washington Post
- CBS News
- HuffPost

Join us 👉 @TrFormer 💤
Become a member of the @TransFormerChat